DRAGONS IS OVERRATED
Breakfast for Eurofighters or F-22s
Literally can only carry long range cruise missiles. It's a one trick poney.
BLACK DRAGON TO FAST AND HES ROCKETS FLY TO FAR
IT IS ENOUGHT TO KILL EVEREBODY
Wrong, it has many more weapons avalible. However in a strategic stand off between Russia and the Us both sides would likley only use their strategic bombers with nuclear cruise missiles. Even the B-2 would only try to penetrante outher radar net layers since the russians are able to dedect them from 80-150 miles away depending on the source you look at and the weather conditions and terrain topography.
Like I said a one trick poney.
the aircarier killer
fast and in any point of earth
Brah a war ever happening between the U.S and Russia is practially 0%.
If the Tu 160 only role is nuclear attack and destroying U.S carrier groups then it's a pointless one.
The B1B Lancee has been used frequently to bomb the fuck out of sandniggers, what has the Tu 160 dobe? Launce a few long ass expensive cruise missiles. Kek, worthless.
Tu 160 role to get rights to bomb the fuck out of sandniggers while USA suck outside
bump
Russia has other bomber for that. Tu-160 still is best strategic bomber there.
Only they actually cant even catch it.
I don't get it. USSR and America were allies during WWII. When/Why did it go to shit?
not realy
to low range
>black dragon
>is actually white
they were allies of convenience though. both the americans and brits wanted the germans and soviets to drain each other out in all-out-war (harry truman made an explicit statement to that effect when he was senator, the NYT wrote about it.). ww2 wasnt a simple war of sides just fighting it out with all they had, you had the allies scheming against each other throughout the war. america (like the british empire before it) and russia were always going to clash due to conflicting geopolitics, look up the mackinder doctrine. you had the same thing going on during ww1. f.e. the british and french were supposedly on russia's side and yet u see them pulling off the kind of shit that belonged to the "great game era" strategy like hurrying to occupy the bosphorus to deny russia one of its most important geostrategic objectives.
>look up the mackinder doctrine
Thanks for the tip
>my Mach1.5 meme plane which can stand in the air for max 4 hours will catch your Mach2.05 long-range bomber that can fly for 20 hours at an altitude that my plane can't even reach
This post is so stupid that it is making me mad.
en.wikipedia.org
"no one feels safe! Because no one can feel that international law is like a stone wall that will protect them. Of course such a policy stimulates an arms race"
Damn. Post drink recipe please.
I'll trade for recipe
Thanks!
en.wikipedia.org
"NO ONE FEELS SAFE! BECAUSE NO ONE CAN FEEL THAT INTERNATIONAL LAW IS LIKE A STONE WALL THAT WILL PROTECT THEM. OF COURSE SUCH A POLICY STIMULATES AN ARMS RACE"
bump
>Eurofighters
>He depends on external fuel tanks
bump
The Tu-160 is an aesthetic aircraft.