Any evidence for culture not being genetic?

Im interested in any examples, research or evidence suggesting culture is not emergent from genes: cases when races wholesale change practices or we see some epigenetic changes. Im convinced its genetic but want to see the best evidence against it.

Attached: download.jpg (212x238, 11K)

Realise my image was too low res to warrant replies.

Attached: vMo4mIE.png (500x561, 333K)

A rapid change in environment can also change a culture. Environmental phenomena such as famine, drought, war, and other mass casualty incidents can temporarily change a people's culture.

Also since you mentioned epigenetics, there is a famous example I can give you. Polish women who were pregnant during WWII and thus malnourished, gave birth to underweight babies. These babies, when grown, were found to have higher rates of diabetes and weight gain issues. The malnourished mother's uterus affected these fetuses at an epigenetic level and they had behavioral changes thereof for the rest of their lives.

Ukraine and proximities, has always been the antithesis of western europe even tho it's the aproximated place of aryan origin

But of course there's a range, but can it derange it permanently such that it doesnt drift back or derange it to within other races' levels for any notable duration? Obviously an individual can temporarily be enraged but if he is genetically mild mannered it won't last long.

As far as im aware the best example would be east asia's stagnation for years.

Attached: 2377cfac023354c9b5149d858b7ee639--marina-and-the-diamonds-the-marina.jpg (600x901, 66K)

Kerala has for a century been the best place to live in india
,
Dradivian and commie

Attached: 2006_Human_Development_Index_for_India_map_by_states,_HDI_data_by_GoI_and_UNDP_India.svg.png (436x480, 134K)

Direct causes arent so interesting to me, obviously if you drink during pregnancy your child will be lower in IQ. But to what extent does your lifetime affect the kids you will later have.

Well we know europeans have gone through huge changes since then, being the original isn't very significant. We all came from african proto humans yet we dont expect africans to be as good.

Attached: 8099528960_1322697f79_c.jpg (450x801, 39K)

I know india has great genetic variation. Could it be that region represents a more advanced group than the rest?

culture changes ...very often....genetics don't change often

Any developed enough culture could be sued to prove you wrong, as they:

>Evolved ethnically independent
>Reached similar conclusions

That way Andeans, while genetically distinct from europeans developed almost everything they did.

Who is this?

Marina Diamandis, some welsh singer.

Obviously superficial traditions, but is there much evidence for more fundamental dispositions changing too fast to be genetic change e.g. crime rates in celts plummeting after roman takeover. Again best i can think of would be the east asians appearing dim and uncreative until suddenly exploding.

Can you expand on that a bit?

Attached: Marina-Diamandis.jpg (2693x2693, 196K)

>is there much evidence for more fundamental dispositions changing too fast to be genetic change
Germans becoming pacifists after ww2

Culture is absolutely genetic to some extent. There was even a few actual studies concluding this not very long ago. Although they were politically correct to get through the kosher approval peer review process. To what extent is it genetic, we won’t know until it’s acceptable to start asking these sorts of questions

God fucking damn I love titties.

How are things in Iraq right now, Ahmad?

fine fine

I dont imagine the crime rates were wildly different within nazi germany nor before it. There's some range of course but i would be surprised and interested if say weimar germany ever had congo levels of homicide. Going to war is a different thing than internal peace.

Attached: tumblr_msm0i71RZr1s8y0gvo1_1280.jpg (733x1100, 130K)

i'm not talking about crime
i'm talking about culture taking a 180 degree turn

>can we prove a negative
sages

Of course.

Agriculture, architecture, government, feudalism, roads, bureaucracy writing mathematics and a very long etc...

Even if the fringe tehorists are correct and there existed a cultural exchange, that still don't disproves the simple fact that ethnically diverse people like the andeans developed just like the europeans did.

Attached: pinturas-de-la-cultura-inca-15.jpg (480x592, 95K)

But to talk of pacifism would entail violent crime rates changing. A state of either being in war or not isnt cultural.

>what is cultural anthropology
i know it's the weekend, but come on.

ok disregard that example
let's talk sexuality
minimum age of marriage in England was 10 years for centuries
it changed in 19th century
currently it's considered an abomination to marry a 10 year old
no major change of genetics happened during that time

You can easily rephrase my question as a positive.

I know nothing about the Andeans, assuming they developed a similar culture i would be very interested if they had greatly differing genes, because you can still have convergent evolution wherein two separate genetic sources end up being similar. If biopsies show they have wildly different neuroanatomy then its very interesting.

Attached: Marina-3-marina-and-the-diamonds-31212093-1280-720.jpg (1280x720, 131K)

Its hard to know if people found 10 year olds attractive though. I would imagine it was pragmatic more than sexual and it was still 14 or so before people found them sexually appealing. I know that might seem highly sceptical as its something that's hard to prove, but im trying to find conclusive proof or near on.

Attached: tumblr_mgclbilvly1rhgruko1_500.gif (500x246, 893K)

Just anecdotal here, but think of groups of kids you've seen on the first day of middle school; at first, there's a lot of interaction between myriad individuals, then they start realizing who they like more and, as a result, begin spending more time and developing more complex and in-group behaviors.

I, and I'm not claiming this to be true but, think that humanity as a whole isn't too different.

ok...
jews in Europe were largely into financial sector and trading jobs, no hard labor
come nationalist socialism (Zionism) and they worked all kind of jobs in israel from farmer to factory worker to soldier
no major change of genetics

Of course it's genetic. Why would island blacks live like continental African blacks?
Because they are genetically at a level where they live that way.

A,B,D haplogroups, D it's found on native asians like Ainus and part of siberia and Mongolia.

They had no reason to develop the arch or two story buildings.

That could be anologous for the differences between different european nations but the fundamental inclinations and actions are very similar. Kids might have in jokes but they tend to find the same categories enjoyable and have similar abilities. Im not arguing there is no environmental variation, that's patently false. But that culture is primarily environmental. If france behaved like Somalia it would be good evidence of it.

Thats why I listen to berber blues?

In the first instance they were compelled. I can make a bear act placidly with a large amount of restraint but it's not sustainable. Without the artificial pressure they will stop and revert to their genetic inclination. If the culture were environmental they would not begin to immediately revert when free of the pressure.

Ok, im going to go read into them, cheers.

fair enough