Blend S(exual harrassment)

>"You can get the job, but only if you have sex with me."

Fascinating anime, gents.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chekhov's_gun
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>gets a job and a handsome boyfriend
Good deal

Men in CGDCT was a mistake, yes. So was giving this to the worst studio.

Is Dino the Weinstein of Japanese maid cafes?

This is bombing in preorder rankings anyways so it's a lost cause

>Gets a job like she wanted.
>Gets a gaijin boyfriend like she wanted.

The only downside for her is that he doesn't have a bushy white beard.

You said it, not me.

So, if
>going out with
means
>having sex with
Then does that mean that that bitch from that hajimete no gyaru did cheated in her boyfriend with that chad?

>watching hajimete no gal all the way to the end
Impressive commitment or masochism?

Deserved. I'm not even /u/ but the only men that should be acceptable on CGDCT SoL are irrelevant ones, like Flying Witch.

>going out with automatically means sex
This is why you faggots will stay virgins for the rest of your lives.

This.

Is this all Sup Forums can do?

Post Maika's dumb dork face?

I mean.... voluntarily celibate married couples do exist. There's like a dozen of them in the entire world population of 7.5 billion people and each one has a news story written about them. But when you grow up and become an adult yourself, you'll realize that sex is the logical conclusion "going out"

> Going out with girls but not a prelude to sex
Okay chad, that's enough of your lies.

Hey average looking lonely woman without means
I am a handsome fit horsehung nice man who has a great job a nice home and a clean bill of health.
If you consent to being my loving pampered girfriend and sex toy that I will ravage mercilessly and maybe one day give me multiple children I will give you this high paying life fulfilling dream job.

What do you say?

You are trying a bit too hard, shitposter-kun.

>paraphrasing dialogue from an anime is "shitposting"
Fuck off.

Isn't that how it usually works?

In Hollywood, not the cafe industry.

Sex just the start of the endgame. Before that you actually have to, you know, go out. Like, on dates. And form a healthy relationship.
>BlendS thread
>expecting anything else
Are you, by chance, an idiot?

>the director deliberately put testicles into the first five minutes of the story
>"sex is totally unrelated to this story, tho"
Right..........

The cat balls are there just to show it was a stray cat that wasn't neutered you retard.

I thought it never happened to me because I am ugly

Going out with someone isn't the same as marrying or spending the rest of your life with them.

You're such a naive child.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chekhov's_gun

Are you saying that short term relationships "for fun" never involve sex? How many girls have you ever dated?

Going out isn't the same as a sexual relationship either

If you are going out with a girl, but you don't intend to either get her in bed, and/or you don't intend to marry her (eventually), then what the fuck are you doing with your life?

Cuter with glasses.

You're just hanging out, if you dont like her after a while then just move on. Sex and marriage are a future potetential but they are never mandatory. You're just dating to test the water. Unless you're motivated enough with the partners agreement then sex is welcome.

Potential*

>take a dumb dork
>give her megane

why do this?

The author is a woman, what did you expect.

That's called being friend-zoned, you fucking beta.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chekhov's_gun
That's a principle that doesn't have to be followed 100% of the time, retard.
They exist, you should try it.
Trying to maybe forge non-romantic relationships? Or get to know other people outside of my first impressions of them

Did you never heard of platonic love? Sex is completely optional for a couple and while relationships based on sex exists, they can also be based on emotional support or both at the same time.
Human interactions aren't as black and white as you're saying.

>sometimes people don't use the principle
>that means an obvious example of it is not real because there are exceptions
Great critical thinking skills. Is that how you arrive at the conclusion that a relationship with a female that doesn't involve the possibility for either sex or marriage makes any kind of sense? Fucking idiot.

I feel that we're getting raided right now.

Man her hair isn't even that black

This board is 18+.

>someone is disagreeing with me online
>it can't possibly mean that I'm actually terribly confused or there's anything inconsistent in what I think
>it must mean that people are pranking me

Too early to judge.

I didn't say anything about intentions. Obviously if you want to go out with them you're interested. But being interested isn't the same as being commited. You go out with someone primarily to get to know them better. It can obviously lead to sex, or it could lead to breaking up with them before that.

You don't have to commit to a long-term relationship to date a girl, but there is no reason to date if the man gets nothing out of the relationship, since females are incredibly expensive and time-consuming. All you're doing is torturing yourself while probably her full time boyfriend is satisfying her sexually.

Why is she such a dork?

Not as dorky as her workmates

Cute dork

Hey buddy, I think you got the wrong door. The tumblr club is two blocks down.

Sexy dork.

I want to protect her dumb dork smile

Daily Blend Shitpost thread?

Uh, it does.

If you're not having sex then it's no different than a friendship

Being friend-zoned indefinitely is the real dating redpill.

Go and be a faggot somewhere else.

SO what you're implying is someone's gonna fuck that cat?

Say that to my face, not online, and see what happens.

>dorks
>ever sexy at all

Literally only you think this, homo.

They don't just cut their ballsacks off, you know.

Because she's like Machi but with a sadistic side

But Machi was shit too.

kys

Yes, because the all female ones are doing a lot better right?

But Machi is cute though.

Its actually a faggot check. You aren't supposed to notice the balls, you're supposed to be preoccupied with trying to see her panties.

So in the end she'll be scared into being submissive and quit working?

You're trying too hard.

>"Won't you work here as a precursor to going out with me?"
>"You can get the job, but only if you have sex with me."
damn user, you cant even translate english to english
you'll never get that crunchy position

>the cat balls are in frame because of check'ems gun
lmfao
has this been followed by even 1% of writers?
even shakespeare made fun of tvtropes-types in his own works.

dork is the new cute