Why is the left still pushing this?

why is the left still pushing this?

Attached: stormymydaniels.jpg (594x399, 30K)

>(((overseas owned))) tabloids

Could she be... /ourpornstar/ ?

The are on the ropes and swinging wildly. The dahnald is a wrecking machine.

Because the NDA with "DD" sounds like Trump was blackmailed.

Because not admitting to an affair sounds like obstruction of justice.

NPR's State of Wonder did an interview with the journalist (NYT I think) that wrote the puff piece about how Steele is a stand up British spy guy who wanted to save America from le Drumpf and she outright said this. That is the desired media narrative. #Resist y'all. That's what journalism is for. #Resist.

Attached: 1496891915713.jpg (991x942, 202K)

Shes on a tour and is just trying to cash in

They will not stop the attack against our President. They are gonna continue to be just as ruthless all the way through 2024

Quadrupled her business, too. But that's her motive, not the left's and not the press'.

/ourslag/

Attached: 1516172446289.webm (480x600, 1.51M)

I actually think it makes him more popular.

>even though trumps lawyer paid her 150k of his own money to shut her up

in 2014
she denied many times even earlier

>reverse image search image
>this is the first result
Why is the left so obsessed with Trump?

Attached: SMARMY STORMY.png (1201x231, 29K)

If she's denying it, then aren't the articles quoting her directly libel?

>How Hillary might still win

Libel has really high standards. There have to be actual damages, it has to be done maliciously, and the author has to lack any plausible reason to believe the false statements.

JC Baby

Attached: let-he.png (500x904, 213K)

>20011

>Libel has really high standards. There have to be actual damages, it has to be done maliciously, and the author has to lack any plausible reason to believe the false statements.
The standards aren't that high, and the lying jew media is guilty of three-of-four of your suggested point already. She absolutely has a case if she wants it.

Are you suggesting the porn star sue for libel? She doesn't have damages. She's bragging to CNN about her career improving because of the hyped up scandal.

Trump/Cohen are the ones with an argument for libel. Cohen has a decent case against her on the actual damages. Trump doesn't, no one really cares except people who already think he's scum.

She's a pornstar. What do you expect?

Has there ever been a more blatent and shameless attempt at a smear campeighn?
purposely misconstruing the pussy grabbing comments to make it seem like it was something he did to women didn't work, the Russian prostitute peepepe story turned out to be false, now they're going for morally righteous shame ... These people don't fucking even believe in the sanctity of marriage, but we're suppose to be on their side because of possible marital infidelity that happened 12 years ago?

This is just petty, vindictive and distasteful.

>why is the left still pushing this?
Fake and gay. Stephanie Gregory Clifford would have to use her legal name on legal documents, not her "doing business as" dba.

If the leftist deep state kikes wanted to create this "LE DRUMPFT CHEAT ON MELANOMA WITH A PORN STAR" rumor they should have gone ALL the way in and said it was a tranny porn star or something, it's not like the leftist kike media wouldn't have run the story. Stormy Daniels is literally the most vanilla shit they pulled, she doesn't even fucks niggers.

They denied it in 20011? Wow, The God Emperor is so rich he has a time machine.