Your take?

Your take?

Attached: 3chan.png (960x720, 226K)

B.

A, because B is the socialist argument and C is a brainlet tier

B, obviously. I create something for myself, I keep it.

B.

Attached: 2012-04-20-cake.jpg (750x1056, 161K)

B. It’s her fucking flute.

the one that pays the most for it

B

C because #gingerpride #irishpride #saintpattiesday #yawutm8

Take it and snap the bitch in half so none of them get the flute

whos bigger bunda?

A is the socialist argument you brainlet, it's literally redistribution of B's wealth.

>Child B made the flute
>Taking away something and then giving it to someone else without B's consent

B can make the decision to sell it instead of having a kike steal it from her

If B provided the materials and labor then B owns the flute. Now if the materials were provided by person X and they paid B a wage then X owns the flute.
If A wants the flute A can buy a flute, C needs to get a job.

First of all, fuck C. Forget about him.

The Flute belongs to B, as it made it. A doesn't get a flute just because it can play the instrument.

B because A can pay for the fucker if she wants it so bad.

Child A obviously.

Give to to B and tell them to sell it to A and spit on C

because you may have the means to keep it for yourself, or because the gov makes sure that happens?

A & C are more socialist arguments tha n B

Ignore "A" and "C". The Flute belongs to "B". If "B" wishes to trade his product for some other value to "A" he can. He must never give it to "C" for free.

Also, gas "C".

Are there really people on Sup Forums that don't advocate for B?

Child B.
Child A should seek to purchase the flute from Child B.
Child C should seek employment from Child B to make flutes in exchange for currency.

These "white people" don't understand Asian culture why bother?

A is meritocratic, B is capitalist, C is socialist

Who the hell wouldnt say B?

Let B keep it at first and tell her to sell it to A for some crayons or some shit.

Tell C to fuck off

Inform A and B that the two of them just formed a mutual relationship, where by A plays beautiful music through the fruits of B labor. And now the two can expand upon this.

If A or B refuses they shall need to fight for it.

C should make his own damn flute or get a job and buy one.

Go tell that to your employer you socialist nigger.

Terrible analogy. C doesn't deserve shit, fuck C. B should consider selling the flute to A. While A has a point of what good is a flute to those who can't utilise it, this does not warrant a free flute. I sure as shit didn't get my instruments for free even though I put them to good use.

None of them, they all sound like entitled brats

Who the fuck owns the flute in the first place? seems like b. ergo the other 2 cunts are trying to steal and should get a beating.

simple.

Attached: 1520433449295.jpg (370x500, 39K)

actually you're right, now that i though about it

Cut the flute into three equal pieces and distribute it fairly

Yes.

B. If A can play a flute then she should make her own. C should be killed.

>flutes don't exist outside of asia

B.

She can then charge kid A for its usage and then they can both make fun of the poor kid C.

B because she made her flute and doesn't want to give it away. Taking it from her would be a violation of NAP.

Obviously B. He undertook the risk of making it, invested her time and skill, and she's entitled to the fruit of her own enterprise.

A can teach to B in exchange to be able to use the flute as well.

C can go be useful somewhere else, once in his life.

I give it to the one who sucked my dick the best.

>Investor and Producer

B.

Attached: 1500894833735.jpg (928x696, 95K)

Most people will struggle with A and C because the argument could extend to almost all of your possessions.

Fat people would eat all my food because they're hungry and computer nerds would compulsorily acquire my computer because they know how to code.

It's a bad example of redistribution, because we already do this quite regularly in most western countries in a fair less obvious and confronting manner.

B made the flute. The flute belongs to B.
A and C should be publicity flogged for thievery.

B
its was her to begin with
the other 2 are trying to steal it

A. B is clearly bullshitting about making the flute, she's a fucking child. Clearly kids saying they made a flute is the new "my dad works at Nintendo". C can fuck right off, poorfag.

I'm having the flute, and if any of them wants it they can fight me for it. The weak should fear the strong.

It's funny how child C is saying that he should get it because he's poor.

Me but only in an ideal world. Would give it to A to make most utilitarian choice.

But the world is not ideal so to hell with such ideas. Reals > feels.

Flutes are already in three pieces, head body and foot.

>Also Gas “C”.

Kek

Attached: A5BB2848-2791-437F-B9F3-2C74D40A80F9.jpg (188x371, 19K)

lol'd

If A is white and B is white then B should give A the flute because the white race would be glorified by having more brilliant muscians
The last thing the white race needs is more rich fucks with shit poor white people could put to better use

B, this isn't even a real question

None of them get the flute regardless of what they say. You could replace A, B and C with just them saying ''NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER'' and it wouldn't change a thing.
The flute belongs to someone. Whoever owns the flute gets to decide what happens with the flute.
Since the image says ''Who would YOU give it to?'' it implies that the flute belongs to me. It sounds like B made the flute, but I have the flute, so I must have bought it from her.

This looks like the typical communist ''argument'' of ''hurr durr I made a thing so I get it,'' but that's not how it works. If you make a flute and then you sell it to me, it's my flute, regardless of whether or not you made it.

If A wants the flute so bad, then she should pay for it. B made it, B either keeps it or gets back its worth in money. C should be gassed.

Obviously you pay Child B to manufacture more flutes

B
but she can make A another flute and A 'pays' by giving B flute lessons while C can use the time to go learn a skill.

Give it to child B and suggest that Child B should sell it to Child A so Child A can setup a show and sell tickets to Child B & C.

The question is wrong, if Child B made it then it's theirs, why is someone else deciding what to do with it? Literally wtf

turns out it was a skinflute

Attached: 1496740016103.jpg (468x586, 136K)

Not child C. I don't trust men who want to put phallic items in their mouth.

Sterf svp een gewelddadige dood en ga weg van m'n tafel, vuile kutsos

>children lie
>but A is telling the truth
Fucking explain yourself.

All the better, no need to destroy the flute then, and if they want any music they'll have to co-operate

This is the white Christian nationalist answer
Anything else is (((globalism)))

Wow it took a leaf to figure it out.

Frankly, there is nothing wrong with A. B isn't necessarily the "redpilled answer". In fact, I would argue A is the more fascist answer while B Is the more lolbergtarian answer. I actually support A, the best people should be given the best tools to make the nation strong. At least we can all agree C is for cancer

Then give it to the child who protests and says she prefers that the flute stays whole in the possession of someone else than to destroy it.

What is an accurate breakdown of A, B and C politically. The flute belongs to B, no question, yes? B would then eventually give it to A, and C would get a job.

Your flag says otherwise, faggot.

B has the only right to it, but if they were smart they'd sell it to A for profit. C doesnt matter.

If b intends to use it then b
If b just wasted their time and is now hoarding it for no reason other than greed then a obviously

Indeed

B is the only logical choice. If you own something, you own it. You can't be forced to give up your property just because someone can use it better. It falls upon A to set up some sort of arrangement with B so she can either borrow or purchase the flute. C can go get fucked.

>make a product
>sell the product
>''oy vey, that product actually belongs to me, you stole the fruits of my labor!''

Neither. Its mine because I can take it away.
>checks flag

You fools!

kill yourself asap

>provided the materials
Lrn2read faggot

Stick the flute up my ass and then see which one of them still wants it.

Attached: 1520857434188m.jpg (638x1024, 53K)

It's between A and B. I'd give it to child A because she could play it for the other two to enjoy.

You break the flute into three pieces and give each child a piece

that will shut them up for a while

Attached: 53.jpg (750x420, 18K)

>see kid fighting over flute
>take it from them
>spank them all
>unzip dick.jpg
the one that plays this flute the best wins

A because she has the means (knowledge) to produce music which is the intention of the object in the first place.

I don't understand C's position. He says that getting the flute would improve his life. How does having a flute improve your life if you can't play the flute?

Child B made the damn flute, by every measure it is her flute. Why the fuck did I even take it from her? If child A or C want it they can go ask the person who produces flutes ffs.

How the fuck did a child manufacture a flute get this shit out of my face.

>A
Fascist choice
>B
Libertarian choice
>C
Leftist choice

A obviously, it is the Fascist model.

>If b just wasted their time and is now hoarding it for no reason other than greed then a obviously
That's commie talk, faggot. The flute belongs to B and they can horde it all they'd like. Sounds like A is refusing to pay what it's worth and then relies on useful idiot like C (or yourself) to gang up on them, ultimately using the argument "I'm the only one who can play" to end up with the flute themselves.

The flute belongs to B, but that answer clearly represents commie ideals and is worded poorly. The flute would only go to A if A and B can come to some sort of trade agreement

If I am a private entity -- then none of these entitled pricks, and I'm retaining ownership of it.

If I am the state, it is not mine to take or give in the first place.

Attached: flute.png (960x720, 148K)

One continues to improve society the other doesn't.
To argue otherwise is literal degeneracy

this thread took 15 min to escalate

B. Then B should sell it to A. C should stop complaining and try to learn something or do something useful instead of waiting for A and B to make his life better.

Go home Etna you're drunk

Not C. Definitely not C.

C is the means by which A dispossess B. It's commie 101

Make child A compensate child B and tell child C to fuck off.
Child B can also make another flute if it wants to.