Why is love between two consenting individuals illegal?

Why is love between two consenting individuals illegal?

Attached: 1482477579580.jpg (1080x1349, 225K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0uw9NWF7Z6w
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

because children can't consent by definition, you trash.

No, just no. Not acceptable. There is no rationale whatsoever.

So children have no agency? Parents can do whatever they wish with them?

In order to give consent you need to have the ability to make a rational decision. This does not occur until people are in their early twenties. Women in my view develop slower mentality than men as well.

Within the bounds of the law, yes, yes they can and in many cases should.

Honestly, though, I think there should be an exception for anyone younger than 19 to have relations with someone older than 17.

So they can't consent to sex at an early age, but they can consent to see a sex change?

I think the question is what the law should be an not whether the law should be followed.

Because it isn't love you sick fuck. If it was, there would be intent to marry, but all pedos care about is the diddling part.

A female's "consent" doesn't matter. You don't ask a piece of property for permission. A girl's father decides when to have her married, he owns her. All sex outside marriage is rape, unless its her father doing her when he still owns her.
And get out of her with that overrated five-headed bitch. Post cute lolis.

>Flag
Keep your grooming in Gothenburg, Mohammed

Attached: Mario-die.jpg (300x300, 10K)

Are you thinking about hurting a child you sick fuck ? Reported

Just genuinly curious what the argument against OP is beyond "muh feels".

Attached: 3e1396f63883071d9099fbae7057df02--fit-girls-beautiful-women.jpg (720x1080, 114K)

die, pedo scum

It isn't. OP's pic related can't concent

The Elite is sick with hate over white people breeding. Many religions used to make 13 the age of marriage, with the father's approval. I bet a lot of us have Great Grandmothers who were married and had children in their teens. They also had large families when they started having children that young. Now that all governments of the world are Anti White, they want to restrict white breeding as much as they can without being too obvious. (The white people are suckers for indirect attacks on their societies.)

Letting your daughter go out and get pregnant by the first man she gets hot for is still a stupid idea because YOU will be paying for that mistake for 18 or more years. Take on any burden you wish but don't be too surprised when men with a few shreds of dignity left protect their daughters with violence.

>there would be intent to marry, bu
Thats the whole point, to marry girls young so they will be good wives. Do you want girls to be sluts?
>sex is harmful
No, it isn't. Little girls like sex.
There is none. Just "I was told it's bad so it is" and "good strong families are bad, girls should all be sluts". Just disgusting feminist nonsense.

Fuck off, pedo

Not an argument

back to Sup Forums with you

Yes!

To a degree which decreases as they grow up and can accept agency.

This is why mental defectives can have legal guardians, even if they are above the age of majority.

The idea of an age of majority is just a short hand of demarcation between people who are assumes to be capable of agency and those who are not.

sex is not love

this. finally the true redpill has been posted. Women should be designated as property. They do not have the option to consent.

Aside from the obvious moral problem,
children aren't "individuals" psychologically speaking. Their perceptions aren't developed enough to provide or even adequately comprehend consent. Check out some of the psychological research around childhood development for yourself.

So it's not only morally abhorrent, its also objectively wrong.

imagine her with a BBC

Attached: 1510381141874.gif (250x250, 106K)

>strawman

They cannot consent to either

Honestly this whole idea that "consent" is the arbiter of all good is really silly. People can consent to do all sort of things that we know are wrong. In our society this shit is wrong, just like homosexuality was and should be. This whole deconstruction of moral institutions is just another Jewish trick ruin our society,
Fuck off kike

she has quite a large forehead

It's wrong. If you morally justify it where does it stop? Murder? Murder for who? Certainly not paedophiles because they are morally justified right? When you have the state enforcing this kind of madness you can kiss goodbye to civilised society.

Morality derived from where?

As for not individuals, does this mean if the parent consents to his 14 year old daughter marrying a 25 year old man it is ok?

They cant consent to either of those. Unfortunately society is working itself in a fucked up downward spiral, and the biggest victims are children

women NEVER make rational decisions, so that is WRONG.

You're move faggot

UN FUCKING REAL.
Pedo post stays current on thread
Earlier Jimmy Carter (POLITICAL) thread gets archived after 35 mins
AND
The post I made was RE WORDED by someone.
Political on pol/= BAD
Pedo on pol/ = OK
WTF

The same perverted mind that wants to have sex with children is the same type of perverted mind that allows a child to pick their gender.

Children are ignorant and can be groomed. They are impressionable and before the age of 14, really don't have the ability to question what the adults in their lives have taught them. As a society, we must protect the innocence of ignorance, otherwise dumbshits like you will have kids and train them that their entire purpose is to serve your perversions.

Its a fee fee issue, it is not morally right to create a situation where someone can be taken advantage of unfairly, especially in a sexual way.

>women aren't irrational
Immanuel Kant's no1 student was a women and they pretty much cowrote the Critique of Pure Reason

I want to fuck dat so it shouldnt be

Attached: 1519752447578.jpg (352x353, 21K)

Children are not moral agents

(Not who you were talking to buy I will jump in)

Possibly yes, possibly no. Just as any choice it depends on specifics. All he was saying was that the 14yr old lacks the ability to make an informed correct choice.
The parent is assumed to have the ability.


Just presuming that the adult will make a bad choice and then asking why they did, as a way if demonstrating that the parent can't be trusted is assuming your conclusion. It's logically invalid.

But I will field it anyways.


It may be wrong to set up such a marriage. But we can be assured fewer parents would make such errors as kids on their own.

pol is only interested in what triggers their autism
>u mad white boi

precisely

Its called stockholm Syndrom.

By law, the consent of a person less than (insert age of consent of your country) is not valid. If you really want to fuck kids go to japan (12) or Philippines (13). But please, gas yourself first.

Large forehead because CHILD.
Bone plates in skull still expanding.
Still growing into adult

Love isn't. Sex is. Sex and love are two different things, idiot.

Because society needs someone for their minute of hate, and you kind of deserve it.

But you bumped it too.

we've told you
you're too idiot or too stubborn to understand

>It's wrong
Oh, okay, now that you've said that healthy families are bad that explains that it's true.
>and train them that their entire purpose is to serve your perversions.
That is a daughter's purpose, to please her father. They're hardly good for much else.
>Its a fee fee issue
You admit to not having any real reasoning for your position?
>a situation where someone can be taken advantage of unfairly
Using a gurl for what girls are for is not "unfairly taking advantage of her".

Interesting coming from an anarcho-capitalist

So basically what is morally right is to let who knows best make the decisions, whether its the child, parent or state, so long as they make a decision that is "right".

>Large forehead because CHILD.

Nah, she's legit weird looking for a kid too.

it's not
children are parent's responsibility, not their property

He is speaking in general terms.


MOST WOMEN are not capable of emotionless ratiocination

All sex outside of marriage should be criminalized. But there’s nothing wrong with having intercourse with your wife if she isn’t under 18, but has already gone through puberty

Because of Jews. Pedophilia is a thought crime. There is literally nothing wrong with having consensual sex with children. And yes, children CAN consent - that's what 'playing doctor' is all about. Don't fall for kike lies.

How do we stop pedophiles? By not making sexy kids.

Attached: girl.jpg (685x645, 103K)

is* under 18, but has already gone through puberty

To be fair most adult women have same mental capabilities of children.

>It may be wrong to set up such a marriage
Why? It's wrong for a girl to have a husband who can take care of her and be making baby instead of wasting time in school and slutting around and getting a "career"? Yeah, youre right, strong families sure are bad, a mistake that shouldn't be made.

Because your grown up consenting individuals are too stupid to know what they doing and destroying countries.

Attached: 2684j1.jpg (500x437, 43K)

>Women in my view develop slower mentality than men as well.
That's a generous way of putting it. Pretty sure they never actually develop.

>children are parent's responsibility, not their property
Well, yes, daughters are property, sons of course aren't because they're people.

Let her grow up you faggit and while she’s maturing just be there to educate and guide her in this shitstorm of a life and then, when she’s at least 16, you can make her a proposal

you need to draw the line somewhere in order to balance the rights and responsibilities of parents and children against the society represented by the state

Why should someone who can't even be held liable for reasonable terms on a contract they sign be allowed to give sexual consent?

> hurr durr look at me, women property, like in islam, amirite goys?

There's LITERALLY nothing wrong with being a pedo.

Spoken like a true sand nigger. Has /pol been overrun with Allah Akbars?

Its not. Children cannot consent though so fuck off.

There is literally nothing wrong with killing a pedo in cold blood. Fuck them, not human.

>none of these loveless virgin faggots fell in love when they were young

Attached: moon.jpg (480x360, 8K)

Consent isnt all its cracked up to be. Its not an absolute validator nor the only validator of legitimacy.

FUCK OFF PEDO!

Nu-pol screams out in pain: "but think of the children! Oh laws, please someone save the chillluns!"

>pol/
Lurk for 10 more years before posting, maybe you will get it by then

>yes shlomo, definitely

>none of these loveless virgin faggots fell in love when they were young

maybe the last time a pretty girl was nice to them was when they weren't fat, hairy and smelly. They are chasing something that doesn't exist.

Stop wanking off to photos of Kristina, scumbag. She's 12 years old.

who's that?
>inb4 it's jailbait

SLIPPERY SLOPE;
The Thread.
This is why The Patriarchy has traditionally eradicated faggots, queers, gays, traps, liberals, leftist, communist, globalist, et al, ad infinum ad nauseam.
Baby Raper is their Final Form.
The Storm is Coming.
DOC will fix all.
Day
Of
Castration
DBB
Day
Of
Butch - ery.

Attached: 20171011_164114.png (1210x1958, 1.03M)

Shut the fuck up you degenerate monkey brain and go back to your cave

its unbelievable how 90% of this thread is too stupid to find proper arguments
youtube.com/watch?v=0uw9NWF7Z6w here if you want to watch a legit discussion on why sex with children is wrong in every case

MODS

you are one twisted person

The true reason is that it has a net negative effect on the individual's development.

Only a pedo would come to this conclusion.

That seems highly subjective

They lack experience that comes with age and aren’t mentally and emotionally developed yet, and thus, are incapable of giving consent with an adult.

Little girls do not like sex you imbecile. You're too perverted to understand that.

>t. Muzzie

Your reasoning is flawed beyond comprehension. You have no understanding of a woman, much less a girl. Clearly by your statements, they are objects to be used. You are probably a serial killer with this type of mentality.

I'm going to eat out my consenting 9 year old wife's pussy and there's nothing you can do about it!

but it has been proven kids can give consent.

if you give kids a choice between ice cream and broccoli. That's consent right?
They are consenting either ice cream or broccoli

Now what if that 11 yo like sex like icecream

hmmmmm.

Her blowjob video is epic.

Friendly reminder that courting of pre-pubescent girls is and was totally normal from Rome until the 1900s!

Marriage is acceptible starting from around 15-17.
See pic related.

You are literally a male feminist if you fall for the "marry the 35yo roastie" meme.

Attached: THOTs jealous @ 13yo girl.png (991x558, 620K)

Also: innie vs. outer vagina is REAL!

You can tell how much dick a girl had by the size of external labia!
Thats why women have surgery to reduce labia size: women literally cut their lips off to hide the dick they got.

Attached: only NAWALTs.jpg (611x608, 168K)

Children will do whatever you tell them to do even if they don't want to do it.
There are children that later in life aren't harmed by it but that's not the majority. Sometimes people are robbed and they stole something they didn't care about and aren't harmed by it. The robber should still go to prison because they did something fundamentally wrong. The only thing we should be arguing is the punishment. And I think the punishment is too harsh but that's it.

Attached: 89765890zuii90876tuzio98786t8z97jih89gz8io876i.png (1606x904, 688K)

you wish