Why do you think liberals have higher IQs than conservatives?
Why do you think liberals have higher IQs than conservatives?
because people take iq tests seriously
because (((liberals))) are the ones taking and giving the tests.
>Racism in the title of the course
Biased study.
Present a peer-reviewed source please.
Liberals have more wealth due to their higher intelligence, this allows them to segregate more effectively from niggers as they have more freedom of movement because of that wealth.
> People with lower cognitive abilities also had less contact with people of other races.
"This finding is consistent with recent research demonstrating that intergroup contact is mentally challenging and cognitively draining, and consistent with findings that contact reduces prejudice"
They're literally making the case that living in a multicultural society makes you more intelligent. I've never seen such a bastardization of correlation vs causation in my life.
It's well documented that cities that vote democrat tend to be the MOST racially segregated. NY city has the highest amount of school segregation of any American city.
If they don't, they're just stupid.
If they do, they make so many stupid decisions that it doesn't even matter, thus making them just stupid.
Obviously this is true
National Socialists though...
High IQ people tend go to college(though of course these days shit loads of dummies do too) which means they go through more indoctrination than those who don't go to college. They generally lack street smarts though.
>A related point, central in Ellul's thesis, is that modem propaganda cannot work without "education"; he thus reverses the widespread notion that education is the best prophylactic against propaganda. On the contrary. he says, education, or what usually goes by that word in the modem world, is the absolute prerequisite for propaganda. In fact, education is largely identical with what Ellul calls "pre-propaganda ”the conditioning of minds with vast amounts of incoherent information, already dispensed for ulterior purposes and posing as "facts" and as "education." Ellul follows through by designating intellectuals as virtually the most vulnerable of all to modem propaganda, for three reasons: (1) they absorb the largest amount of secondhand, unverifiable information; they feel a compelling need to have an opinion on every important question of our time, and thus easily succumb to opinions offered to them by propaganda on all such indigestible pieces of information; (3) they consider themselves capable of "judging for themselves." They literally need propaganda.