>YouTube will now begin displaying links to fact-based content alongside conspiracy theory videos.
>Wojcicki announced the new feature, which she called "information cues," during a talk with WIRED editor-in-chief Nicholas Thompson at the South by Southwest conference in Austin, Texas. Here’s how it will work: If you search and click on a conspiracy theory video about, say, chemtrails, YouTube will now link to a Wikipedia page that debunks the hoax alongside the video.
>"Our goal is to start with a list of internet conspiracies listed on the internet where there is a lot of active discussion on YouTube," Wojcicki said at SXSW.
>The problem with the recommendation algorithm is that it feeds users ever-more extreme content, sometimes straying from what they searched for in the first place. For example, if you search for a video about the Holocaust, YouTube might recommend that you then watch one about how the tragedy was a hoax.
The kikes can't let anything go without injecting their two cents into it. They're going after all conspiracy videos just so they can appear to be neutral when they hit the ones they REALLY WANT to 'debunk'. Nobody gives a shit about the Earth being flat - we all know the truth. Nobody gives a shit about whether the Titanic was sunk on purpose. But they give a shit about the fact that the Holohoax is slowly being debunked in the mind of the public. They're picking up on the fact that people are learning about the international jew. And that's what they have to try and intercept.
Matthew Carter
I am not surprised on how they could create a smear campaign with their connections in """""tech news sites"""". I just saw this article right after the article about AMD flaws which was discovered by Israel-based security group.
wow jews must be really spooked with all this (((shut it down))) happening
Julian Miller
I was about to say this. When I was going through school, I WANTED to use Wikipedia as a legitimate source, but every course I went through completely discouraged it.
Now? It's the only true source of information, Goyim!
Justin Russell
If they didn't have literally thousands of people shilling every way imaginable 24/7 on the internet + the mainstream media the world would be a completely different place. Zionism = Noiz
even if you believe in this shit you should've at least read the wiki article first. how is this bad?
Logan Robinson
Wikipedia can be good but controversial or political nature stuff always link to BuzzFeed, Huffington Post, CNN, etc.
Christopher Walker
>he doesnt know wiki editors are controlled
Jason Perez
This is all to hide pizzagate
In the first line of the Wikipedia article for pizzagate, it calls it a "debunked conspiracy theory."
I assume Google has inserted itself j to wikipedias editorial staff and moderation team by majority and makes conclusive decisions on articles when disputes come up.
Thomas Evans
Yeah, that was why I wanted to use it back then. It WAS good info, long as you checked the source. It's what made me so critical of media nowadays, honestly. Sources are always bullshit anymore.
Noah Peterson
>WTF THIS ISN'T FAIR, WHY CAN'T I PEDDLE MY ALT-RIGHT CONSPIRACY THEORIES AS THE TRUTH, (((FACTS))) ARE JEWISH FUCKING JEWTUBE the absolute state of Sup Forumslacks
Jayden Diaz
What a fucking coincidence. This thread just popped up.
Benjamin Anderson
The funny thing is, you can just use the sources it lists for yourself.
Christian Sanchez
kek, the more they fight it, the more people will dig
Thomas Moore
This. The brainwashing needs constant maintenance and updating with new propaganda or else people forget it or it just wares off as other things take relevance in people's lives.
The heavy censorship shows that the controllers are threatened badly, or else they wouldn't be this heavy handed.
We are winning.
Justin Barnes
Wikipedia entries are so tremendously left-biased it's almost comical.
>we will now put a sticker label on cigarettes and then people will know they're bad and stop smoking. Their plans are just bad. No one will click these links, no one will give a fuck. All that will happen is the """"problem""""" will persist normally, but now they're going to be all exasperated. They reconcile disagreement with ignorance. Because their positions are so self evident and morally correct that you must either be missing information or be evil to disagree with them. This is just a step in a not-so-long process that eventually gets to some kind of ban.
On a brighter note, this is going to pave the way for some great new maymays.
Benjamin Young
Q predicted this
Jose Hill
I'm excited to hear every conspiracy theorist on this god's flat earth postulate as to why their conspiracy theory is the REAL theory that YouTube is afraid of.
They have all sorts of bans lined up they know are going to piss people off.
It's why they pushed so fucking hard for any kind of gun control they could after Parkland.
Gabriel Gomez
>Wikipedia
Lol
Ryan Price
>Richard Bertrand Spencer (born May 11, 1978)[1] is an American white supremacist.[2]
Jayden Richardson
>predicts we'll get a wave of jewtoob content directly debunking wikipedia articles
Jeremiah Wright
This can only back fire. How could you provide true information on racial crime statistics? The algorithm would only be able to promote "institutionalized racism" That kind of stuff pisses normies off quick. They hate being treated like the dummies they are
Jace Price
Absolutely kiked.
Nathaniel Carter
Because people who are new will fall for the mainstream wiki narrative, dismiss the entire topic as nonsense and think they got to the bottom of things when what really happened is they got caught in the mainstream media web of lies yet again.
It's not even a theory, for example, that geoengineering is occurring. Heck, it was promoted by all the big names on 90s mainstream media. Fucking George Bush did interviews all about it....
Sebastian Diaz
They directly referenced chemtrails / the holohoax in the article. It's a wide net.
James Roberts
if you believe that lefties have no hierarchies, you may as well believe in a flat earth
Robert Gonzalez
It's time for the education system to inculcate kids to be skeptical of "fake news", and for all "real news" to be indicated as "true" whilst making false claims about the truth, as a prerequisite for using websites that contain information about possible facts. So let's keep going down the road to 1984.
Juan Hughes
If that's what Wikipedia is to your eyes, then you are deeply brainwashed.
Charles Russell
it kind of seems like they're trying too hard. Most people a more annoyed by talk about this than are interested enough to have an opinion.
Dylan Reed
That's why 'racism' is becoming literal poison all of sudden. They'll have to remove those vids entirely or people will surely die.
Elijah Nguyen
you dont know how wikipedia is already coopted by a team of feminists that insert feminist talking points in unrelated topics.
Ayden Howard
>youtube will link directly to a extremely falsifiable source of information which by itself isn't a source per se, but a collective work by individual who make up an article and cite the source down the page, with little to no editorial value
It's like they don't even check the source themselves, last time I've read a wiki page about politics over 70% of the sources were actually university news articles (aka articles with no editorial work done upon them), so technically they coudln't even be used as proper source.
Christian Watson
A little bit TOO specific with the mentioning of the Holocaust being a hoax.
I find it almost exhilarating to imagine FBI statistics being "debunked" by a philosophical concept like suggests. I don't really care if stuff like chemtrails get debunked, I want to see actual facts get shat on by a big megacorporation. That would be a redpill.
Aiden Smith
its the obvious ones. chemtrails and rainbow sprinklers were on youtube for years then all of a sudden the 2016 election happens and its suddenly a big issue.
Robert Hill
Riiiiiiight. One guy tried to shoot up a pizza place and this is why you're doing this. Nice one, Jewgle.
the man on the left believes hierarchies exist and that it is a problem, the man on the right believes hierarchies exist and should exist.
Anthony Wilson
This. I swear, this 2000's mindset of wikipedia...
Landon Allen
Have you looked at anything even remotely political on wikipedia?
Hudson Morgan
How about this guys, lets join Wikipedia
Chase Collins
it's harder than you imagine. they have people literally paid to review every single modification made.
John Ortiz
It's the only play they have, which is evidence that people are waking up to the system and its propaganda. This type of heavy handedness comes at the end if all dying empires: they lash out brutally, trying to keep the lid on it all by forcing people down. It never works. Eventually, the damn breaks. Always has, always will.
This is actually great news. It shows desperation to lack subtleties when propaganda is involved.
Hudson Bennett
>when YouTube algorithms catch on to the kikes and they can't stop it so they implement a controlled "fact check" feature but that too backfires on you because people start looking things up as a long term consequence instead of just sitting there waiting for Google to fact check them again. >implying this feature won't make people go fact check
At the time of writing this I realized that people are dumb enough to use YouTube as an easy fact check hub.
Isaac Wilson
the man on the left represents communist/socialist ideologies, doesn't he?
Why is it impossible for Youtube to just have a platform and not give a shit about content posted? Nobody in their right mind would assume Youtube endorsed this view or that if they didn't meddle like this.
Joshua Stewart
It's interesting how they had no interest whatsoever in the content of the net or what is or isn't journalism before. Until Trump won. Now every website needs fact checkers, every website needs ADL moderation, every website needs to censor content, every website needs disclaimers and warnings and flashing-red Semitic cornea melters to blast Jewish-liberal viewpoints into your soul like the beams from Raiders of the Lost Ark.
he is a generic SJW. it is more a categorization of his social beliefs than his political beliefs, beyond wealth-distribution. If you're trying to convince me that there are inconsistencies in Marxist thinking, you're barking up the wrong tree.
Jordan Garcia
How else will competition arise? Besides you making unique memes on other video sites of course.
Luke Harris
this dude looks like he stores all that data in his massive brain
That's why colleges ban students from using Wikipedia for research papers?
Asher Jenkins
Anyone can edit it but you need to provide sources. If a conspiracy is real and has good evidence the article will reflect that, mkultra or the snowden leaks are good examples.
You'll notice neither youtube or wikipedia are censoring those things either.
Ever since the parkland shooting they've been shilling anti-conspiracy material. Snopes is jewish owned, as is another anti-conspiracy website owned and ran by a rothschild .
Cooper Clark
>but you need to provide sources.
This isn't even true if you follow the correct politics
Josiah Bennett
If you're finding content that isn't sourced you should be flagging it
So the Ashkenazi genius is nothing more than Room 641A?
Carson Phillips
seems like JIDF is back again. any hitjobs again against AMD?
Matthew Butler
Just know that any time you see a link to snopes, there's probably something to that story
Caleb Cox
I'm surprised it took them this long to do this.
I've been saying they should mix and match liberal and conservative videos on the same topic in the recommended videos section for years. Instead it just recommends you more crazy and extreme stuff.
Henry Adams
this is good, all of this shit helps to wake people up, nobody's going to change their mind about something because yt linked a wiki page; it will help them to realize that the narrative is completely controlled, 100%. They were better of a few years ago when they were just dismissive about this shit, it's human nature to seek out that which is forbidden
Carter Gonzalez
So much this, snopes is a huge red flag
Robert Hernandez
I've been enlightened thanks Sup Forums =)
Gabriel Lewis
Lmao, another Polish jew runs the shit. It's like Israel all over again.
So they are the dictators of facts now? They can state those are false facts and showcase (((facts))) that can further their own narrative now?
Donald, Peter Thiel, someone please regulate these retards already as this is a public space, the infrastructure to build a competitor is overwhelming and no one wants to attempt to build something when the massive frontrunner is fine with operating on mass loss.
Words to live by: With jews, you lose.
Brandon Johnson
she needs to be gassed, also 611 Folsom Street, San Francisco
Landon Miller
the real issue here will be when it links you from a molymeme video to one that says that all humans are exactly equal and sources some article from vice.
Daniel Hernandez
Snopes is the biggest bullshit factory I've ever seen. It was started by a husband and wife to call bs on fwd emails that everyone would send back in the day. Then I guess the guy got a tranny hooker addiction or something and split with his wife. Snopes then became a (((fact checker))) and is the shitpile you see today.
Nicholas Mitchell
Beautiful post user, with the links and green text. Bravo
The thing is, many people do that in academia, myself included, but nobody verifies or questions the sources' sources', until something becomes common knowledge despite never being tested. Granted, this has been happening ever since people have been able to make assumptions, but it certainly isn't going away any time soon.
