There is no blue wav-

There is no blue wav-

Attached: Screenshot (59).png (697x582, 112K)

Other urls found in this thread:

cityandstatepa.com/content/gops-bad-worse-scenario-pa-18-special-election
nbcnews.com/card/pa-18-democrat-district-nope-n855901
triblive.com/opinion/georgewill/13368742-74/george-f-will-18th-congressional-district-race-could-set-template-for-democrats
newrepublic.com/minutes/139307/mitt-romney-got-played
twitter.com/CNNTonight/status/973779450277122048
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>never leading by more than 1000 votes
>still haven't counted a predominantly red area
>implying this is a "wave"

Pretty sure these counties are a majority democrat.. Trump only won them by +20 because of how awful Hillary was

>Midterm election year
>Special election
>Democrat wins

>no democratic congressman since 2003
>trump +20%
>romney +17%
>mccain +11%

GOP GOES FROM WINNING 100% - 0% TO FUCKING LOSING

Attached: obama laughing.jpg (270x187, 6K)

Obama won disctrict in 2012

No, because of how great he was

Trump won district by 20 points 1 and a half years ago

Westmoreland still blank

Source, user?

cityandstatepa.com/content/gops-bad-worse-scenario-pa-18-special-election
nbcnews.com/card/pa-18-democrat-district-nope-n855901
triblive.com/opinion/georgewill/13368742-74/george-f-will-18th-congressional-district-race-could-set-template-for-democrats
newrepublic.com/minutes/139307/mitt-romney-got-played

This is considered an R+11 district and has had a Republican representative since the 2002 midterms, this should have been a walk like the other special elections last year, not a repeat of Alabama.

But Pennsylvania will be redistricted before November and the Democrat will run in a different, more Democratic district, so none of this really matters.

>Trump won this district by 20 points
>Ricky Raccoon is losing by ~800 points

W E W
E
W

>Dems win something that people will forget about within a week or two

Why the fuck do you people shill so hard over the smallest happenings, if it was major midterm election then maybe you have a right to shill if you won but this is just some literally who election that people will forget about, just like in Alabama.

Because its an indicator of the swing against Trump.

they don't give district data till later

>>Ricky Raccoon

Attached: ac360.jpg (640x360, 28K)

Because Trump won this district by 20 and it's overwhelmingly white working-class, a Republican shouldn't lose or even struggle there, by rights it should be 10% for the (((R))).

But again, redistricting means none of this matters.

it does matter because it shows the swing towards Democrats

also trump will be triggered and will fire more of his cabinet

this just shows that a lot of dems secretly voted for Trump

Who cares? isn't that the oppositions job to take seats of the ruling party? i was reading somewhere the Democrats managed to lose a thousand seats by the end of Obamas presidency, thats fucking crazy, you all chimp out over winning a single seat back nearly two years in.

No because she had bad ideas. This guy was a great candidate who didn’t run muh white privileged.

You dont get it.. why do you think the GOP poured millions into this seat, which will not exist in a few months, and is only valid until next November?

Because they know that if a Democrat wins in a district Trump win by 20 points, it'll spell trouble for Republicans that only won within 20 points in 2016. They will get discouraged and might not want to run. Not good for the party. So theyre trying to hold it to keep morale up.

Not just a seat. It's a referendum on the president and the two major parties.

Trump is still up over obama at this point.

It's because anybody with sense would not spending the time of day to vote in an election that does not matter

>Have to run for re-election in November anyway under new districts
>Dems only vote in mass to try and prove a point
>Still had to run a democrat that's more conservative than half of congressional GOP

So far Dems have taken back 1 Senate seat in Alabama, 1 governorship, 1 Congressional seat and about 35 state seats and that's before 1 midterm so i'd say they're doing well

>
this

Good that means you actually have an opposition doing its job and appealing to voters with their platform.

No it’s not. That’s not his elections work. If the democrats keep the muh white privileged which they will the republicans will still win.

Lamb is a Republican running as a Democrat. If Democrats want to stop being retarded and run more people like Lamb they will win. You and I both know that's not happening.

I’d vote for the democrat. Excluding his anti immigration policy he is not that bad.

Democrats are totally not doing that, user, you're absolutely right. Wait...

Attached: moulton.png (845x490, 250K)

Sup Forums would love Lamb if he had an R next to his name

38 seats .... dude.
Run more appealing candidates on platforms that matter i don't care if they are Democrats so long as they kick shitskins out.

Attached: Mum with a Dork.jpg (715x685, 109K)

They do know this will split the party more right?

So now they have to name the neoliberal, blue dogs and sjws happy. That won’t end bad.....

As long as Trump is in office, people will hold their nose and vote Dem.

The Alabama seat will go republican In
2020. Also those local wins was due to bad candidates and scandals not ideas.

Na, once trump signs a deal with Kim, gets a photo op with him, and muller ends the Russian investigation the trump hate will die down.

How the hell did he get into office in the first place? Dems couldn’t unite around Hillary or win in the senate

Voter suppression in WI, MI
Third-party votes in WI, MI, PA
Comey memo on Clinton email
Russian interference

>fuck liberty, MUH SHITSKINS

Alt-right and trumptard Republicucks in a nutshell.

>and muller ends the Russian investigation the trump hate will die down.

Not even then. Trump loves to poke liberals and rile them up. All he's doing is swatting a beehive. It will not end well for Repubs if he keeps doing it.

Mueller isn't ending the investigation any time soon. And Trump signing a deal with Kim won't mean anything, but you probably were too young to know about the Leap Day agreement.

The democrats should focus on blue dogs. If democrats go back to the party of blue dogs with trump light immigration they would destroy the republicans.

If Jim Webb was the candidate he would have destroyed trump. He could have won some southern states.

Thready reminder that special elections historically mean nothing in the general scope of midterm elections.

Are democrats going to shift right and run with a bunch of pro gun anti abortion candidates? This fucking timeline is fucked.

trump is the GOAT, we know

sexy jacinda

u guys are lucky to have her

Chloe Swarbrick too

and i like based Winston Peters as well. He made the right choice going with Labour

fuck the Nats

boi o boi. the midterms, honestly, are going to be a semen bath. We are literally going to be bathing in the semen of democrats from their constant cumming once they pick up both chambers. Picture how we were in 2014 when we won the senate, but like times 5. semen everywhere.

in all cerealness, we're toast. Cinnamon Toast Crunch.

No, the Russian investigation is going to end soon.

Not going to war is kinda a big deal.

The fact that this is even close in such a deeply red district is indicative of a blue wave, buddy.

>opens op.png
>completely ignores the point
wew, you rural and suburban retards really are something. why are you rural and suburban retards even allowed to vote?

No they aren’t. But if this guy starts voting like a fag liberal he will be out in 6 months.

A lot of bug votes are coming up.

2017: Trump will never wi-

Can we trust any pro-dem stats ever again?

This is actually a really red district.

It’s not even a red area. Trump won that place because of his economic stance on trade.

The republican candidate was anti union and did not even represent trump economics.

It's a red area.

>voter suppression
Aka dems couldnt bus in enough niggers
>third party votes
This right here. This fucking arrogence, believing you're entitled to someone's fucking vote.
>clinton emails
KEK so its unfair for people to judge candidates based on what they do?
>Russian interference
Nobody changed their vote due to shitposts of facebook, faggot.

The asterisk to that thousand seats stat is the Democrats massively over-performed in 2008 due to an unpopular war, declining economy and charismatic presidential candidate, so they were overextended and won a lot of state legislative seats they were never going to hold; a thousand losses is still really bad, but not the whole story.

38 seats in irregular special elections, and so far their margin of gain is 17%, by comparison their margin of gains back in 2006, their last good midterm (lol), was 15%.

The asterisk to that thousand seats stat is the Democrats massively over-performed in 2008 due to an unpopular war, declining economy and charismatic presidential candidate, so they were overextended and won a lot of state and federal legislative seats they were never going to hold; a thousand losses is still really bad, but not the whole story.

38 seats in irregular special elections, and so far their margin of gain is 17%, by comparison their margin of gains back in 2006, their last good midterm (lol), was 15%.

What the fuck are we doing if we're not infiltrating politics, even small and local positions. We have to network and build ourselves up. Do you ever take a look at Democrat/SocDem/Lefty groups in your area? They are canvassing and training young people to run. They have PACs, billionaire backers, and more networking and training events than anyone on the right. Seriously, look up (((Indivisible))) and local progressive chapters near you. Look at their events. They have professionals coming in teaching people how to run for anything from school board to congress. And what are WE doing to reach new voters?

WE ARE GOING TO FUCKING LOSE THE MIDTERMS AT THIS RATE

Attached: p-nervs.png (646x595, 304K)

Democracy is such a joke. Why do you still believe in this retarded sham? We've been at it for over two-hundred years and all we've got is more socialism and ever-increasing government, no matter what party is in control.

If the State isn't destroyed completely, we'll be living in an Orwellian dystopia within the next fifty years. Voting for Republicucks who are nearly as pro-regulation, pro-taxation, and pro gun-control as Democrats will not change that. It'll just ensure it happens at a slower pace.

The choice is essentially death by cyanide or asphyxiation. Instead of screeching at and assaulting your countrymen over which is better, why not choose NOT to die? Why not choose, definitively, NOT to live in an authoritarian dystopia by denying the parasites in power the authority to violate your rights in the first place?

We need a society wherein people are free to determine with whom and how they will live. Democracy is simply everyone attempting to impose their vision of utopia on everyone else, with the ultimate result being more power and control in the hands of the parasites they elect to do it.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: DYOKKqfX4AEDB84.jpg (1536x2048, 244K)

Republicans going to get ass raped in November. Nice knowing you faggots.

Attached: 93_GORILLION_MRW2.gif (377x372, 3.46M)

Attached: AW YISS.gif (234x249, 269K)

lol

Rick Saccone won 53.3% in Washington County and and 57.8% in Green County. There are 1,398 ballots left from those two counties. With the current vote count, if Saccone won 70% of the ballots, WAY overperforming his current numbers, he would still lose by 19 votes. Saccone lost. Lamb won.
twitter.com/CNNTonight/status/973779450277122048

>i have idea how politics works. I’m pretty sure it’s just like football. As long as Trump keeps celebrating in the inzone my team must be winning.

>if we open the borders, surely the non-whites will support limited government

HE CAN STILL WIN

BERNI--SACCONE WOULD HAVE WON

Yeah I wish Jim Web was the Democratic candidate, fucking hate Clinton so much.

Attached: ex0rqf4.jpg (620x335, 36K)

>There are 1,398 ballots left from those two counties.
what about the absentees?

those are the absentees

Those are the absentees.

Westmoreland Absentees haven't been counted despite CNN claiming they have been.

Saccone needs less than 60% of the 3,206 outstanding absentee ballots from West+Wash+Greene to overtake Lamb.

They're referring to absentee ballots, but there's actually 3,206.

anyone got a jeb! meme for this?

White male won clearly it was the Russians.

I've already told you once Bruce.

D+20.

Drongo cunt.

So did he win or lose?

He's won, but nobody is calling it yet.

Attached: DYORqWLV4AA2Uf7.jpg (1200x558, 18K)

No one knows.

Westmoreland's missing 2 precincts finally reported, and CNN et al are claiming that means the absentee ballots are counted (which isn't the case).

We've still got 3,206 Absentee ballots to count, in addition to military and, perhaps, provisional ballots. Absentee ballots remaining are all in GOP areas.

Saccone needs 58-59% of them to overtake Lamb; he's averaged 56.6% amongst these 3 areas tonight.

>properly map districts
>GOP loses 20 points

cant explain that

Attached: 1430775192503.jpg (867x848, 337K)

>districts haven't been changed yet
>dem challenger is a good looking Marine vet with views that closely align with Trump's
>gop challenger is a guido academic who backpedaled his support for Trump's agenda in the last month

Shocker

It was an ex marine, pro gun, pro trump trade democrat. If they would've ran a run of the mill democrat, he/she would've been fucked.

What views of his closely align with Trump. And why didn't Trump endorse him instead of endorsing Saccone and literally fucking campaigning for him in the past week?

>desperately try to swing penn election with steel tariff
>still lose

trumplestiltskins in shambles

this is still the gerrymandered district and they lost

The issue isn't that he's "pro-Trump," you fucking retards. The issue is that the people who voted for Obama twice and then Trump in 2016 (blue collar, Rust Belt workers) have seen that Trump is not who they thought he would be. They're going back to roost with the Democratic Party.

this,
trump just brought a CIAnigger in as his secretary of state, and promoted a torturer and evidence destroyer to the head of the CIA
he sold america out to the jews it was all a jewish trick and Sup Forums fell for it

The republicans put no money into this race

>supports Trump's stance on the Opioid epidemic
>supports cracking down on those bringing drugs into the US
>supports an infrastructure package with the same economic and natl' sec. priorities Trump has
>Relatively similar stance on ACA
>Against the Fed profiting off of student loans and from like Trump
>Pro-Union = Pro-blue collar = Pro-Tariff
>Pro-energy exploitation like Trump

>pro-blue collar
>pro-infrastructure
o i am laffin

LALALALALALALALAL!!
I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!
LALALALALALALALAL!!
I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!
LALALALALALALALAL!!
I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!
LALALALALALALALAL!!
I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!

DONALD TRUMP IS AN INCREDIBLY SUCCESSFUL BUSINESSMAN THAT IS THE BEST PRESIDENT AND EVERYBODY LOVES HIM!!!

LALALALALALALALAL!!
I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!
LALALALALALALALAL!!
I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!
LALALALALALALALAL!!
I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!
LALALALALALALALAL!!
I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!

MAGA
MAGA
MAGA
FAGGA
FAGGA
TRUMPC#CKS ARE FAGGAS

>tariffs a year in the making were released prior to the latest rounds of NAFTA negotiations and after China announced intentions to expand production in 2018
>this means tariffs are clearly there to swing elections

lol

>The issue isn't that he's "pro-Trump," you fucking retards. The issue is that the people who voted for Obama twice and then Trump in 2016 (blue collar, Rust Belt workers) have seen that Trump is not who they thought he would be. They're going back to roost with the Democratic Party.

This isn't even true. This a special election, not a midterm or presidential election. GOP votes are at 40% of 2016 (because who the fuck cares about voting for someone that will be in office for 7 months) while blue collar democrats that DIDN'T VOTE in 2016 are voting in support of a pro-union, pro-blue collar, pro-tariff, pro-infrastructure candidate.

>a CIAnigger

He's run the CIA for slightly over a year and had no experience with it beforehand you halfwit.

literally listed on his website and he has extensively campaigned on it.

absolutely the case

Attached: 2093840289348.png (591x535, 335K)

>anecdote from NYTimes

Your gf's son told me you like being cucked on the reg. I guess this is indisputably true now