Why why why Pennsylvania?

Without Trump you wouldn't have got your taxes cut and your jobs wouldn't come back. Why didn't you vote for Trump again, he did exactly what he said he would do

Attached: 1520997430944.png (656x755, 39K)

Other urls found in this thread:

hrdive.com/news/in-most-important-labor-decision-in-decades-scotus-appears-ready-to-weak/518821/
m.youtube.com/watch?v=c_JGRpqln8E
twitter.com/AnonBabble

GOP ran a right-to-work fag in union country. He's also flabby and unmasculine.

Attached: pennsylvania_sacconerick_lambconor_021618getty[1].jpg (640x360, 28K)

Bullshit.

Attached: 9865432.jpg (1000x964, 52K)

YES. this is great news. First that rapist country hick Roy Moore got defeated, now things are looking good in Penn. Maybe the midterms will get enough democrats in congress to impeach and imprison Trump! Please kok let it be...

How is it bs? 80% got their taxes cut and thx to tax cut jobs came back

Shit happens m8. The dems ran a decent candidate in a district where there's adequate support as well as a never-Trump effect.

You have to be a Democrat to hold the seat after the last guy resigned to “spend more time with his family”. Adultery is a resume enhancement for Democrats.

Sad that backs are still niggers now. Just that democrats are their slaves now.

Yeah but 20% lead for Trump when he won and he did exactly what he promised. I don't understand it...

Why don't you like Trump? No russia or ad hominems. He is bringing jobs back AND cutting your taxes

Please. Let’s impeach Trump so we can get CWII started and put an end to these goddam libtards once and for all.

*Democrate are their slave masters

Why doesn’t he like Trump? Because he is a brain dead libtard who cant think beyond the shit the kike media feeds him.

No I seriously wanna know. Maybe he is from Penny. Trump won with 20% and is doing what he said he would do

Making 85k a year, my tax cut came out to $74 per paycheck. At 50k would make something like $55 a paycheck. Big fucking deal.

This is just a guess, but I imagine that the dems went all out organizing people to actually go out and vote. Elections like this usually have very low turnout on any side, so that's something you'd want to look in to. This would be seen as an early confirmation of whether or not their "blue wave" is going to happen, especially in a key swing state.

For the presidential election itself, I don't think the dems entirely expect the state to flip the way it did. For instance, it was memorable that on the morning of the election that all of a sudden there were people everywhere hyping up hillary, as if the campaign realized at the very last moment that they'd misjudged how red PA was going to vote.

For low income it's not Peanuts. Either way, what about the jobs that are coming back? What about the Al and steel industry? Think a Dem would have brought them back? If so, how?

>GOP ran a right-to-work fag in union country.

but so did trump so what's your point?

This area is big time “Rust Belt” Union Democrats. The Unions lock step supported Lamb. Lamb ran essentially as a GOP with a “D”. He is solid GOP in his positions except for his Union support without which he would have gotten 5% of the vote. There is nothing hard to understand here. The prior GOP left in scandal over adultery, which, were he a Democrat the kike media would have covered up. (Jonathan Edwards anybody?). That kind of thing is pretty much the kiss of death for a GOP seat. Trump campaigning for him was the ONLY thing Saccone had going for him.

It's all rigged. they are all the same and have the same masters.
ALL OF THEM.

How long does this seat last till its up for reelection?

$74 a paycheck? Assuming 2 checks a month that is the difference between a loan on a NEW car vs. a used one. Hardly “nothing”.

Because all the morning shows and CNN told them to hate Trump.
It’s really that simple.

It is so volatile it is gone already. This seat literally disappears in like 6 months.

It all depends on how far your $85k/yr gets you. I'm on about $80k but my living expenses add to maybe $50k or so (haven't done the numbers, but probably something like this) and so getting back an extra few thou or whatever it is is nice, but doesn't actually make any difference or alter my spending behavior.

But if that's the barrier of entry for a car or fixing up the house or paying off a credit card or going on a vacation, then sure, that's a very welcome thing.

Think January

No black pill user. Trump cut taxes and brought jobs back. Saccone had Trump agenda too

Well he won with 20% and did what he promised...

Good post. But union supported Hillary too. Explain pls

It's a good question how much difference the aluminum and steel things will affect the greater Pittsburgh area. Sure, Pittsburgh is the "steel city" but so much of the industry shut down years ago I don't know if one would expect much of any redevelopment. The area is banking on becoming a tech center, as far as I understand.

Eventually the blue collar generation will die off (aiding the big medical research industry here) and the idea seems to be that the replacement population is going to come in through the universities, and of course those kids aren't going to be doing blue collar work. What you probably would see is some impact in the cost of construction, as more and aging areas get regentrified and new apartment buildings and tech facilities and such are built.

Kiss of death for gop?
Really?
Wonder how whore bag trump flourishes then? He must grab lady death by the pussy?!?

And how would a Dem get you even more money in the first place? How would a Dem bring you jobs back? Who did you vote for in 2016 and why?

>haven't done the numbers
>argues numbers

well, hitler also did exactly as he promised, but by 1943-44 germans didn't love him because of this

I voted Trump for all the usual reasons you'd find on Sup Forums.

It's a qualitative argument m8, not quantitative. If you were around for the tax calculator threads, you'd find that there are a lot of people like me that are living comfortably enough that a few thou doesn't mean much.

>It's a qualitative argument m8, not quantitative.
Arguing numbers, especially if you throw up BULLSHIT numbers, is quantitative you fag.

It’s well known that any industry with unionized workers the salaries are buffeted up. Why do you think employers want them dissolved?

How is it bullshit? I make about $80k/yr and my bank account could easily bloat by $30k in a year if I forget to keep putting extra into investments and don't need to make any big purchases.

>keeps arguing numbers
>IT'S NOT QUANTITATIVE

I would love this 74$ more per paycheck

Lamb is basically the exact same as Trump's populist polices minus immigration. Also the faggot was a rice cooker and we don't want that ruining our state's name. We'll vote for Louie though in November.

Attached: family.jpg (900x600, 166K)

Ironically, none of Trump’s accusers have been believable. Just as the Rat’s accusation of “troll a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park” made Paula Jones unbelievable for a long time once people discovered who Clinton was she became entirely believable. Trump OTOH, is a billionaire. When you produce accusers who have been chummed up with hundred dollar bills they just are not believable.

The right wing voter base is a totality of lazy, complacent morons who consistently get trapped into recency bias after they win a big election every 20 to 30 years. This is their own doing.
>also lolbertarians split the election with their unwavering dedication to their meme ideology. MUH hundred votes is a statement

Attached: 270D7C69-AD2E-4DC8-A10E-0BB937A88E9E.gif (287x200, 64K)

I'm sorry you have a bad case of autism.

His daughters tooth.
Healthcare please

>be wrong
>can't let it go
>calls others autistic

That's not his daughter, that's his son's wife.

Because they have to many regulations, conditions and expectations. Remember Detroit?

Lower taxes and regulations lead to more money through competition. Far more effective

t. "Crumbs" Pelosi

It is pretty clear Trump is a “serial monogamist” which is it’s own kind of problem but not one the Rats can really exploit.

It's definitely tits for somebody getting started in life. I'd be doing backflips to be getting several hundred more a year in or just out of school, let alone the $2-3k I'll be getting.

Definitely good stuff even if it's not earth shaking for a lot of people.

He gets away with it because no one realizes he's not actually a Republican. He's a brand new political party based on, Fuckyouism.

Never going to happen. You guys are fucked, you were supposed to be the freedom country and the getaway for whites escaping Britanistan tyranny and look at the state of you, most Americans are prancing homosexual progressives who elected a Muslim president for two entire terms. You shit on us and our country and sure, I concede it's hopeless, but you actually have guns and free speech and THIS is what you have to show for it. Seriously, fuck the USA. You guys are such a disappointment. I'm not optimistic about BLONALD BLUMPF getting a second term at all because every American ever outside of some backwater town in a flyover state is some fucking gunphobic libtard worm undeserving of life. Good luck and so much for muh last bastion of freedom.

Yeah the lolberts man. If only a candidate would have run, who would have taken some of lambs votes...

Dude trumps a whore, why even argue against that?
Did he grab you by the pussy a coerce you to defend him, or did he pay you $130,000 dollars?

Attached: 65318D37-197D-4F6F-A2F4-1D9491A9C726.jpg (534x800, 122K)

So far, the facts in this case are a lawyer paid her $130 K to go away. I have yet to see a fact that actually ties her to Trump.

>Trump's a whore.
>Now pick Hillary, a woman in a ruined marriage because her husband was ALMOST IMPEACHED FOR LYING ON THE STAND ABOUT BEING A WHORE
The absolute state of leftypol.

I wouldn't read too much into this one election either way. As long as Trump doesn't screw up bigly, people will come back out in droves to vote him back in.

The real question is what the anti-Trump people might be organized into doing. They can be downright fanatical (as I'm sure you've noticed from the news etc.)

Yes, the “Americans” one sees in the kike media a “prancing homos”. A VERY small demographic, in reality.

Muh tech won't make your country rich, blue collar will. Yeah the industry kind of collapsed BECAUSE of high taxes and regulations. Now it will come back, because both got cut

Attached: 0CE38A32-19E3-4EAE-99D1-DA7E53329C2F.jpg (1121x1269, 311K)

Right, might as well vote for the democrats so they can completely fuck the country with socialist policies, and chip away at our constitutional. That'd be better than an extra $74 per paycheck.

I’m not saying bill is pure
He’s a whore too
I can call both whores out.
Can you?

Ideally. I'm just talking about where this election took place in particular. I'm not sure if one should expect the greater Pittsburgh area to see a lot of manufacturing come back. Maybe it could. It's an interesting question. Demographics will be changing significantly over the next decade or two, and politicians and planners already have other things in mind.

The Unions had a necessary place here in US history, IMHO, some 75 to 50 years ago. Things started going downhill for them when they let the Mob invest their pension fund. Now that mining and manufacturing are a smaller part of our GDP they are almost irrelevant but they can still punch above their weight by funding the Rats. Their days are numbered as the Rats move further left than most Union members can stomach.

Of course I can.
But how does him being a whore mean anything now? It doesn't. Trump is in an office that's already been molded from the inside out. Calling him a whore at this point is actually a waste of time.

Yeah not now!!!! Can't you think ahead? More people get jobs, have more money, can spend more, industry benefits. Less regulations and less taxes lead to more competition and higher wages

LOL. A guy believes that a billionaire who is clearly a serial monogamist who can legit date supermodels is going to screw around with trailer trash. Whew.

85k isn't impressive enough to just disregard 75 bucks per pay.

>please kok
I was mad until I read that part.

For the most part your right but his impulses might have lead him to pay off Daniels “during” the campaign which is against the law. Men with vices who they want to hide are a problem.

Nearly every ex-blue collar city at/over 100K population thinks what you describe is their future. Good luck to you if Pittsburgh can actually make it happen but likely you'll just be a nigger and spic territory.

Let's play Devil's advocate and claim we have proof.
It amounts to nothing. He hasn't broken a law and by all accounts he's a regular president. The name-calling is the only thing liberals have anymore, hoping that repeating it enough makes it the truth.
The ironic thing is even if it's true it doesn't mean shit.

>might
Well, golly gee, IMPEACH!

>Bill Mitchell

Attached: 801.jpg (640x432, 30K)

Ideally. But it's a good question how much will be spent vs. how much will just pay down credit cards or keep people from having to eat ramen or whatever.

My guess is that infrastructure spending would have bigger impact in terms of jobs and funding production. That and optimism for people to decide to blow their tax returns on fun stuff.

The Suprme Court is going to rape the unions. Mercilessly.

hrdive.com/news/in-most-important-labor-decision-in-decades-scotus-appears-ready-to-weak/518821/

m.youtube.com/watch?v=c_JGRpqln8E

Unions were never useful, they just say they are. If you have really high competition, companies are forced to pay you more and products get cheaper

We will have to see how things play out. 100 years ago it may have been common for “respectable” men to slip off to the “wrong side of town” for a few hours to get the old ashes “professionally hauled” once a week but I don’t think that is the case anymore. Maybe I just have limited social circles. From what I have seen it seems to me modern “escorts” provide services to NEETS and Nerds not prominent citizens.

I read somewhere that the district had been redrawn since 2016, leaving out some large rural areas. Any truth to that?

I don't know if it will work, but that's what the folks in charge are banking on, and so far it seems to be a viable model: attract students in to the univeristies, and then attract companies to set up shop to retain the students in the city.

The population is projected to grow substantially to the point where the UN commies are already trying to figure out how to reduce the number of single-occupant vehicles to handle the load, and high density housing and UN Agenda 21 enclaves are already being built in anticipation. From what I gather, Pittsburgh is one of about a dozen cities in the country where they're going all-in on the idea.

Premature at this point.
But he’s about to play Stormies game lets see? ;)

Is frogposting not cool anymore? When did that happen? I mean, mememagic shadilay pepe, amirite? Wtf happened? Praise kok!

Attached: 647E092C-B44E-4B04-B5F3-6BC577126B69.png (683x913, 847K)

That's because, in a weird twist, women give it away easier than they used to. Now it's just NEETs that HAVE to pay.

I would love an extra 74$ in my paycheck.

No with the left they just take more of your money to give to shit skins. And if its not the government its local government increasing your property taxes every year.

Pittsburgh is a city that can't admit that it's best days are far behind it. Steel, glass, and aluminum is what built it. It's just been on life support ever since they left.

It's the same-old same-old. Forced controversy hoping it'll stick in public opinion. Liberals have been relying on the "court of public opinion" for so long it's turned into a crutch. They forgot they have to actually have evidence.

Read about the Ludlow massacre. Realize the Unions were an answer to shit like that. They did, IMHO, have their place. I could be biased because I was a Union Vice President for a while but it was an unusual circumstance and as a conservative I was pretty uncomfortable with it.

Exactly.

Not ideally, logically. Do you even economics bro? The only factor left is how your products are taxed, if you send them to other countries. But Trump recently adressed that with steal and al tarrifs

>life support
It'll be interesting to see what happens with all the hospitals once the population dies off.

>to NEETS and Nerds not prominent citizens.

Don't forget Pajeet and various other shit skin races who cant get white women.

The GOP redrew districts, the PA Supreme Court (Rats) objected and overstepped their authority “re-redrawing” them and so far that is what they have. I expect the SCOTUS will have to get involved and expect a “re-re-redrawing” soon.

I agree with the plan. I'm just saying we'll have to wait and see to find out to what degree it works. In my mind, it's particularly important to avoid a blue wave through the mid terms because if that happens then the dems will cockblock the Trump plan just to crash the country with no survivors so they can take power, and then we're looking at being in bad shape to deal with a looming financial crash or correction.

>Ludlow massacre.
When liberals start demanding guns being taken away please post this next time.

Dunno what happened there, maybe it helped. But normally they just hurt the worker, because they hurt the economy

I suspect that if the kike media had “blue dress” proof we would have seen it but playing “Devil’s Advocate” solid evidence like a blue dress could be as devastating as it was to Clinton.

You're not playing Devil's advocate. You're just pushing empty controversy. Like usual.

The reason I mention Ludlow is because it is useful to demonstrate HOW the Unions came to power. And for the subsequent 50 years they were a positive. You are correct IMHO about them being a negative for the last 4 or 5 decades. In my younger days I enjoyed BETTER pay and benefits in industry as a blue collar guy for NOT forming a “bargaining unit”. So it is not true at this point that Union membership provides better conditions.

Hmmm... I would have expected the hope of a “blue dress” would be something you were praying for.

Gops ran a real lazy shit virgin Gop again a pretty good Chad Dem in a union steel town. Predictable results. Why is this even news? This is actually the Gop plan. Make Trump look like a loser by running shit candidates so they can demoralize Trump.

Attached: absolutely subversive.jpg (640x360, 55K)

No, because I don't care.

Give me your thoughts on PAs candidates

The whole Ludlow thing is an interesting bit of suppressed American History. And it shouldn’t be because I do feel it is very helpful for Americans and others to understand how we got to where we are today. “You have to have machine guns to mine coal.” Rockefeller. Fascinating.