Why is the alt-right so anti-intellectual?

Not a few hours after he dies and you already have TDS, TRS, and half of Sup Forums lambasting this guy for no other reason than disagreeing with them on some things. As if decades of contribution to theoretical physics (one of the most complex, high IQ fields) is somehow void because of some muh Trump shit.
Hell, you even have people comparing him to fucking black science man and bill nye, popsci retards who contributed nothing.
Someone please explain to me the logic behind white nationalists trashing a 0.0000001% white genius for such a fucking retarded reason.

Attached: lcEySD_14-03-2018_09.03.25.000000.jpg (3000x2000, 425K)

Other urls found in this thread:

scientificamerican.com/article/stephen-hawking-hasn-t-solved-the-black-hole-paradox-just-yet/
telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/10654762/The-man-who-proved-Stephen-Hawking-wrong.html
universetoday.com/108870/why-hawking-is-wrong-about-black-holes/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It's less than a quarter who have any problem with him. It's just edgelordism.

Hawkings literally wasn't even talking, it was an AI system bill gates created.

S, to spit on his whellie chair

S

Alti-Right is not Anti-intellectual.
Stephen Hawking was.

Anyone who declares that "God does not exist" is an ant-scientific douchebag.

>Stephen Hawkings
>esoteric field of physics

Yes, the invented character of Stephen Hawkings is a British puppet show. Scientific genius is the sales pitch. Looks like you purchased the whole cinema, dumbass.

Hawking is fully debunked.
>Stephen Hawking Hasn't Solved the Black Hole Paradox
scientificamerican.com/article/stephen-hawking-hasn-t-solved-the-black-hole-paradox-just-yet/

>The man who proved Stephen Hawking wrong - Telegraph
telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/10654762/The-man-who-proved-Stephen-Hawking-wrong.html

>Why Hawking is Wrong About Black Holes - Universe Today
universetoday.com/108870/why-hawking-is-wrong-about-black-holes/

Entry level physics typed up by any first year student paid a few hundred dollars. Anybody could have programmed Stephen Hawkings keyboard. Sycophant bootlickers like you are a detriment to human civilization. A gullible blight drinking up whatever the ruling class pisses down on you.

Attached: Hawkings Sycophant.jpg (550x499, 111K)

Stephen Hawking

Another British dark magic trick. A social spell cast into the minds of Americans and by Hollywood extension the rest of the world. Hawking's was an inside joke for dark and sadistic hateful British practitioners. By the British, we understand who they are since the 1657 dark age of Oliver Cromwell. Stephen Hawking was an orchestrated show. The character of the man was selectively chosen as a post-war mockery. Here is this figure pushed out in front, for all to view. A crippled vegetable in an electric chair. A dark joke against Europe and the fallen Age of Enlightenment. It was always Stephen Hawking's latest word. Gather around and hear! The spectacle of a White Man drooling over himself. His monthly demoralizing scripts presumably written by nefarious actors for decades. Who was it programming Hawking's keyboard? Only the Jews know.

Attached: Stephen Hawking - Kidnapped vegetable controlled by backstage political Jewish operatives..jpg (720x480, 132K)

Threadly reminder that Hawking was an associate of convicted pedophile Jeff Epstein

Attached: Threadly reminder that Hawking was an associate of convicted pedophile Jeff Epstein.jpg (469x334, 137K)

because intellectuals are anti intellectual

Attached: punche2.png (785x757, 272K)

Because celeberity worship is red*iT. I deleted the screencaps of the thread when spock died, but it's just fucking autistic. kys op

Hawking was a complete vegetable from the 90's, all that robot voice and opinions were done by his attendants, they saw him as an easy opportunity to brainwash college kids. I remember not long ago he was literally contradicting himself, he did 30+ years of research on black holes then one day he's like "nah I changed my mind about them"

>beliebing in (((newtonian physics)))
Might as well just rationalize the physical *non-"random"* laws of the universe with something equally subtle. How about Magic? No wait... PIXELS. Shit is all pixels and you can observe them in microscope and DNA is raw coding in phyton and you live in a simulation, nigga.

Attached: liberatorofworkingpeople.jpg (400x616, 50K)

>Newton is a jew now

Attached: brainlet.png (205x246, 8K)

>newton
is not a Jew. He was a who worshipped Materialism like most protestant brits did at the time. They just needed to rationalize their satanic departure form the church and religious world view, and did so by making shit up about the universe and its being.
>hurr rits all rendom big benk
>dis is gravitee and it surrands us

Science is the ultimate social construct. Our knowledge is limited and so is our being.

Attached: 19-27-07-brainlettttt.jpg (800x450, 41K)

Hawking was dead in 1985 few time after being evacuated of a visit in CERN. He was replaced by an actor and this explains why his wife left "him" right after.
Failed scientists wrote each speech, book or discovery "he" made after this. These scientists are paid by globalists to serve NWO best interests.

Attached: c24c285a-4695-4e1f-8340-6b7dac7bd5c1.jpg (1024x683, 102K)

Check the archive. The very first thread about Hawking's death made the claim OP is making, that everyone on Sup Forums was shitting on his grave. No other threads about his death had been made yet. None.

By this morning, I saw half a dozen threads shitting on Hawking's grave. The better question is why does the left want to paint Sup Forums as anti-intellectual?

Sup Forums loves to talk about:
>Tesla
>Nietzche
>Hoppe
>Mises
>Rand (used to)
>CS Lewis (Christ/pol/)
>Musk

The list goes on. But try to name just three intellectuals that leftists love. You can do it. In fact, I bet 99% of you will pick the same exact three intellectuals. And you know what all three have in common?
>They starred in science TV shows aimed at the scientifically illiterate
>and children

Because it feels good to know that that smug asshole is burning in hellfire for eternity.

Be smug now, you computerized fuck.

>Why is the alt-right so anti-intellectual?

They're rural and suburban retards.

S

He mooched off his celebrity status where more deserving scientists rotted away.

>The better question is why does the left want to paint Sup Forums as anti-intellectual?
Sup Forums does a good job of painting itself as retarded though

>space isn't real/flat earth threads
>tesla invented everything durr threads
>some dumb shit about numerology/astrology etc

the great genius

>Further work by Hawking in the area of arrows of time led to the 1985 publication of a paper theorising that if the no-boundary proposition were correct, then when the universe stopped expanding and eventually collapsed, time would run backwards.[136]
>A paper by Don Page and independent calculations by Raymond Laflamme led Hawking to withdraw this concept.[137]

And climate change denial, pretty embarassing too

This.

Reminder how many people didnt recognize Billy Harrington.

Reminder they're newfags of the highest caliber.

Reminder people glancing at this for the first good long while are forming impressions.

Reminder to make quality posts for anyone out there willing to read them.

We have more intelligent people here willing to engage with malicious shitposters than they have people able to overwhelm those individuals standing together. Don't lose sight of the war's goal when the memewar never ended and only went into secondgear when the losing side became embittered veterans. They're on our turf and the minds/hearts of your fellow man. We can win with honesty and logic because they rely on lies and obfuscation. We were always on the side that the common man can agree with, social pressure and what someone else thinks of them when not conforming to the ideal narrative is no match for speaking to what we all want as human beings and what we're all stuck in together.

>Stephen Hawkins intellectual
He was a larper

The left thinks cutting your dick off makes you biologically a woman.
Thinks the unfalsifiable hypothesis of AGW is settled science.
Thinks the scientific method can be replaced by a show of hands and clever marketing.

Rural and suburban retards

T-this whole jew vegetable thing is just /pol pretending to be retarded, right?

Argument to authority is a logical fallacy.

KYS OP

he didn't say that though

>Flag
>56%

based user. I too will join you in this struggle.

Pretty sure they simply believe having a feminine phenotype allows you to express a feminine social persona
Why do you need to falsify climate change it if it it's real ?

Because the bluepilled masses think that if some is le based science man then their opinion on any topic is the infallible word of God. Science isn't a simple method of observation to these people, it's a religion with figures like Hawking and Nye as the high priests telling them how to live.

>Hawking
>Intellectual
Unconfirmed cooking spice used in this post.

There's a focused effort beyond just shitposting to obfuscate the board. Pol is as high traffic as it has ever been of recent years and keeps dipping into the crazy deeper. It is better for someone on the fence to come here and see threads that rather than focusing on an ideaology attack popular scientists, celebrities and faces the average browser might most identify with and therefore get their feelings/emotions/ego wrapped up in writing this board off from there on out to a degree.

Sure, others may stick around long enough to understand pol is a fun place with fun posting and occasionally it does something serious for an actual humanitarian goal, but how many people come here once or twice and decide they're done then ripple their negative impression of what they saw here outwards to touch other lives and opinions, then grow a more unified enemy front born of swayed impression.

Great post. Belief in (((theoretical))) science is rampant these days. This is dogmatic by nature and leads to "scientism", basically a religious belief in an idea/set of ideas.

Attached: 1490412977478.jpg (493x659, 78K)

love u bb

they say phenotypes are a social construct

Pretty sure nobody says that

>Reminder how many people didnt recognize Billy Harrington.
If you recognize him, you are gay. I never knew who he was before the banner appeared.
He was never a Sup Forums meme and I've been here for years.
Sup Forums and pornography boards are degenerate and bragging about being here so long that you've actually browsed that filth to the point where you recognize some faggot pornstar, is disgusting.
You're literally bragging about wasting your life here. Sup Forums is the only redeeming thing about this website.
Go back to your homosexual pornography board, kike. I'd rather be a newfag than an actual fag any day.

I don't respect the intellectual drivel spouted by potatoes. Sorry.

Attached: 9DB0AA92-6F27-47A9-AA5E-DC8C47BFE3E4.jpg (743x564, 131K)

Stop generalizing, not all of us are shitting on his grave. I really liked Hawking a lot actually.

Your new is showing. Billy was a meme that took off not just because of the absurd autist-tier editing that went into gachi memes but became partly a celebrity because he embraced the internet while at the same time leading a perfectly succesful friendly life and carrying the message to make yourself into all you possibly can be not for others, not for status, but for yourself and being better able to tackle life.

You dont need to go back to being a newfag, you already were one and missed the point of the post that on this board in particular and the vidya board he was recognized as noone. With so many new people here, theres a lot of first impressions ripe for shifting when the oldfag demographic familiar with the fun beneath the surface is a minority and the majority are normies for lack of a better term. The memewar rages on and pol's memes can be intentionally subverted by any group that considers this board a fountain of political radicalism that has directly contributed against their goals, it seems like with such a vast amount of relatively new and impressionable traffic, it would be beneficial to engage on the same field in some manner.

Most "famous" scientists in the world

>a Jew (Einstein)
>a Jew (Bill Nye)
>a crippled Jew(hawkings)
>and black science Man

Theyre fucking meme scientists.

>theoretical physics
We call that “not physics” and in every possible way it is NOT science.

I wonder if he's still all ALS'd up in hell.

This shithole board is practically coated with brainlets, the replies in this thread are proof

>an imaginary kike on a stick told me I am flawed and therefore should not try to comprehend the world

Attached: really faggot.jpg (320x287, 13K)

t. intellectual cuckhold and homosexual pornography connoisseur.
Christ sake, I never read such a big pile of horseshit my entire life. You are rationalizing that faggot porn is OK because it's a meme.

>Anyone who declares that "God does not exist" is an anti-scientific douchebag.

Are you trying to provoke one of those useless debates which always come out of shitposts like yours. I will do it for you then:

>"God does not exist, you can not prove he does"
>"Fuck you libtard/soyboi/nigger/fedora/[any other derogatory term for an atheist], god does exist until you can prove that he does, I guess you are anti-science"
>"But A implying B or not B implying not A are both methods of scientific proof, you can not kill off one just because it fits you better"
>"Fuck you and your science I believe in GOD and GOD only, you will burn in hell with that kike Hawking , [insert another derogatory term]

Glad we could rule that one out beforehand, can we now stop making this shit threads full of brainlets trying to measure this mans accomplishments against his opinions despite not even knowing the limitations of newtonian physics and still thinking that theoretical physics are useless despite not even knowing how their shitposting machine works and what of it elements are literally applications of theoretical physics?

>"educated" politicized narcissism
>intellectual

His faggot porn is okay because not everyone on Sup Forums wants to gas everyone for differing opinions and lifestyles. He did not hurt anyone with his gay porn, despite you apparently for some reason, so he is okay in my book. And his work is responsible for some fun content on this site. Unlike you newfag nigger doing nothing but shitting up the board with your "unique" opinions.

I keep responding because it shows as crazy and apeshit as people here are the vocal ones who think less before they spew whats hopefully just bad bait and teaches newfags what not to do while reminding them they are among fellow actual people not just less-than-worth-considerings that might otherwise spread a cancer to how they view everything here and their own post quality here.

Everyone is expendable.
If its for the ideal, there can be none sacred.

Explain the logic behind it? Americans who voted for Trump are literal idiots and beyond.

I'm not alt-right, but I still had a few bones to through Hawking, may he rest in peace.

I'm got a Msc in Electromagnetics, with a focus on milli- and nano-meter wave technology, a field meets the interface between classical electromagnetism and quantum mechanics & field theory. My IQ is somewhere around 130. I'm not sharing this to let you know I'm smart enough to understand Rick & Morty, but because I just want to let you know I'm mentally capable, if I put my mind to it. In face of all the above, I shut the fuck up about climate change, psychology, social sciences and etc because I don't know shit about it. A part of getting an university degree, is to learn that you don't know shit, and your degree is only a paper that states you're capable of grasping a bare minimum.

Hawking has made numerous predictions and claims about overpopulation, climate change, politics, economics, sociology, and psychology throughout his life, and most of it is run-of-the-mill center-left regurgitated talking points.

>In XXX years we're so overpopulated we'll be standing shoulders by shoulders
>Capitalism is bad m'kay?
>The oceans will be covered in plastic in XXX years!!!

Take his statement on automation:

"If machines produce everything we need, the outcome will depend on how things are distributed. Everyone can enjoy a life of luxurious leisure if the machine-produced wealth is shared, or most people can end up miserably poor if the machine-owners successfully lobby against wealth redistribution. So far, the trend seems to be toward the second option, with technology driving ever-increasing inequality."

Hawking fails spectacularly due to his forgetfulness or ignorance of a very basic economic concept: supply and demand. If the entire middle class is replaced and rendered unemployed by automation, then consumers disappear, profits and production scale goes down, and that's not good. The incentive to support redistribution is literally built into the problem.

fuck off Rabbi

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-03-14 20-46-33.png (756x910, 548K)

Because saying God doesn't exist without evidence is anti-intellectual and saying God does exist without evidence is and I'm right and you're wrong so

*sticks out tongue*
BLEH :^)

>sacks
>coined
it's the onion, isn't it?

Oh hey that's that thing from the opening of NGE.

>Hawking has made numerous predictions and claims about overpopulation, climate change, politics, economics, sociology, and psychology throughout his life, and most of it is run-of-the-mill center-left regurgitated talking points.
This. The shitter was always standing (kek) on his own shoulders to promote this tripe. It's the SAME thing 100 IQ celebrities do. The only difference between him and some actor is Hawking was worth respecting for his work. And despite his IQ, he proved many times that he is bluepilled as fuck and not worth listening to. People like that should not use their professional notoriety for moral grandsitting.

Fuck this overly hyped cripple, he wasn't a genius just another Hollywood kike puppet actor

/thread

this place deals in fee fees, not reasoning

Push me and then just touch me

Attached: C652BC97-90B9-4A0B-ADB5-F06DD4ADCCE3.jpg (3024x3024, 2.18M)

Why? A deity is not science

Fpbp

what a fucking retarded post

you're an insufferable faggot and I'm guessing you've spent more on Rick and Morty posters than the principal on your tuition loan at pseudo-intellectual university

"POLITICALLY INCORRECT"

not "POLITICS"

>Religitards still don't understand what a theory is

It's almost like pottery. It's at the point where it isn't even predicting how these threads will be argued, but just repeating a mantra.

its a shame they forgot to put him on the charger

They tend to be too all-or-nothing and lack nuance in their thinking, that's why.

>he thought his opinions outside of physics and quantum mechanics mattered
he deserved every critism he got for parroting liberal ideology

If hes so smart how come he can't walk down stairs

>Trick question - hes dead

>Being a famous cosmologist makes you immune to criticism, even though you regularly made incredibly ignorant and idiotic comments on subjects and topics you knew next to nothing about and acting like an arrogant cunt In the process

Fuck off. Hawking was a hack. Knowledgeable in his field of expertise but a complete idiot when talking about things like philosophy, theology, or politics. He played up his “genius” card to falsely give credit to his arguments, many of which were baby’s-first-philosophy class Tier

...

>Why is the alt-right so anti-intellectual?
No access to that level

Exactly. Theoretical science is literally ideas without context. How the fuck can we accept relatividtic theoretical science but not behaviourism or sociology? it's literally the same shit methodologically.

>some random theory about the entierty of being/existence is true because we really know jack shit about it but at least we have deduced religious explanations because it just can't be God because that is too unfalsifiable but the big bang somehow is even though we have 0 proof that such a thing can even be remotely possible, oh an the big bang wad a Random event even though the universe is governed by understandable physical laws that dictate the essence and existence of every single material being as if was anything but random but we call it random anyways because it is impossible that such things can exist by design but we can still see patters but it is random but still visible and understandable by virtuslly every living organism in existance but we still call it random lmao.
Science as a religion is a fucking hoax. Our discoveries are the result of us getting to know God's plan. Material without purpose cannot exist, take a look at yourself. Why the fuck would there be living Thinking materialistic humanoids if all is "Random xD" and only meterialistic? Whats the purpose of logos and cognition in a random world filled with objects?

Science is not a war with Religion. Science is the tool to finding God. Stoo worshipping the furniture in the house he built for you.

Attached: 1467741432449.jpg (5244x6368, 3.49M)

>Why is the alt-right so anti-intellectual?
Because they've never took the real red pill and became full right?

>lambasting this guy for no other reason than disagreeing with them on some things
He was on epsteins island... you know, the island with underaged hookers..

He’s unironically produced less of value that Juan the illegal who picks my fruit and vegetables

>Why are brainlets so salty after a lifetime of mental wedgies from their intellectual superiors has left them permanently butthurt?

Gee, I wonder

Your on Sup Forums dumbass, we're you expecting a candle lit vigil?

It's mostly christfags who got triggered at him for apparently not believing in gods

Day of the SQL-i

Day of the corrupted bios

Day of the dead battery

Day of the flat tire

Day of the Ddos

Attached: Steven Hawking Is Down.jpg (600x207, 13K)

yes hawking was known for his insatiable lust for whores

Day of the HIV whore

in·tel·lec·tu·al
/in(t)əˈlek(t)SH(o͞o)əl/
1. An arrogant, dogmatic individual who
believes that because all of their opinions are reinforced by the media and popular culture it means they are an educated, intelligent person
2. Self described label for a radical leftist or socialist

Day of the EM corruption of the brain

It's just ideologies being consumed by politics.
In the pic, we see a Liberal using his death to make a point about "fake news" (which happens to be a big bugaboo for his team, in addition to something his company is working on). For such people, politics come first, regardless of the greatness of those who are part of the collateral damage.

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-03-14 at 3.56.47 PM.png (578x121, 35K)

The university intellectuals also play an important role in carrying out the System's trick. Though they like to fancy themselves independent thinkers, the intellectuals are (allowing for individual exceptions) the most oversocialized, the most conformist, the tamest and most domesticated, the most pampered, dependent, and spineless group in America today. As a result, their impulse to rebel is particularly strong. But, because they are incapable of independent thought, real rebellion is impossible for them. Consequently they are suckers for the System's trick, which allows them to irritate people and enjoy the illusion of rebelling without ever having to challenge the System's basic values.

Because they are the teachers of young people, the university intellectuals are in a position to help the System play its trick on the young, which they do by steering young people's rebellious impulses toward the standard, stereotyped targets: racism, colonialism, women's issues, etc. Young people who are not college students learn through the media, or through personal contact, of the "social justice" issues for which students rebel, and they imitate the students. Thus a youth culture develops in which there is a stereotyped mode of rebellion that spreads through imitation of peers—just as hairstyles, clothing styles, and other fads spread through imitation.

Attached: Theodore_Kaczynski.jpg (555x414, 139K)