Am I wrong and naive into believing in the democratic system in this day and age?
Am I wrong and naive into believing in the democratic system in this day and age?
100 people in your city, 55 want you gone, what do you do?
no
Who's the hole?
america is not a democracy you moron
yes
im am only answeing you because you captivated my attention with the picture so you know
dictatorship of the bourgeoisie
It's a republic democracy.
No, democracies only work with a consistently high IQ population, so if the intelligence of the people is lowered artificially then the democracy is successfully and covertly subverted.
Think of it like this, not even east Asian countries are smart enough for democracy.
roman empire
War
Which is never, that's why USA used to be Republic, before jews memed (((democracy))) into it, which is in fact just a different name for oligarchy.
Constitutional REPUBLIC
Show me a better alternative. What? Every other form of government has killed millions of people?
Oh, I'm sorry about that.
The proper term is liberal democracy and you're right it's not an actual democracy.
Your opinion is worth as much as the opinion of any retard + no ones gets to express it politically meaning it's not worth shit.
Democracy is a prostitute, she'll come to you when she needs you then when you're out of the private box you cease to exist. And she'll go with the retardation of the pleb just to get the goodies.
Meant for you
Although constitutional republic works too
You can't say republic democracy, it's a republican democracy, or a democratic republic.
Liberalism is the ideology, liberal are the qualifier, same with communism/communist and what not. Quit humiliating yourself on the pooblic spaze burger
liberal is*
Reee
>Am I wrong and naive into believing in the democratic system in this day and age?
yes.
real question is: what replaces this system when it collapses. start thinking, we have 20 years left max.
Liberal democracy also killed untold millions.
Democracy has killed just as many millions of people as fascism and communism.
>WWII in the Pacific
>Vietnam
>Afghanistan
>Iraq
The evil isn't a specific system of government, it's the institution of government itself. If you centralize all power in the hands of a minority, there's no incentive against the wholesale violation of man's rights. Only in a system of polycentric law, where a network of competing decentralized actors provide security and dispute resolution, is there serious incentive for those with power to respect man's liberty.
Leaf cucks leaf cucks leaf cucks... please! We are a republic.
All nations are oligarchies and this is the only thing they can be. If you believe otherwise you're an idiot.
You were wrong for ever believing in it. Democracy is the noose that civilizations use to hang themselves.
>there's no incentive against the wholesale violation of man's rights
Yes there is, you brainlet. It's called "your own safety." Overly oppressive regimes tend to face revolution and collapse. It is only a recent historical phenomenon that such governments have not faced these things due in large part to successfully being able to convince people that legal guns are bad and 2+2=5
kill 6 of the 55
go to jail for a few years
rinse and repeat
That's enough incentive to force government to make its parasitism and tyranny bearable, not to cease it completely. It still isn't enough to stop amoral taxation and regulation.
yes it's just a way to maintain inaction through extremely slow progress both forward and backwards it's a farce it always was.