Sup Forums:

Sup Forums:
>On Pitbulls: ban all Pitbulls because they're dangerous. Its not the owner. Regardless of how well they train their dog, Pitbulls will always be ticking time bombs.
>On guns: guns don't kill people, people kill people.

Liberals:
>On Pitbulls: it's not the Pitbull, its the owner.
>On guns: it's the guns that are the problem, banning gun will stop the shootings.

How is one side right and the other wrong?

Can't you just admit that guns are also dangerous as fuck, but you are willing to live with the increased chance of violence and ease of committing mass killings?

Attached: flat,800x800,070,f.jpg (800x800, 69K)

Guns don't make a society more violent though while pit bulls are just straight up nigger dogs that need to be gassed

Is he allowed?

I'll even say that the owner is the main component in the behavior of a Pitt bull but most dog owners are retards.. kinda like guns

Forgot pic

Attached: ozuxnms.jpg (840x840, 336K)

guns don't have a mind of their own.

>On Pitbulls: ban all Pitbulls because they're dangerous. Its not the owner. Regardless of how well they train their dog, Pitbulls will always be ticking time bombs.
Correct
>On guns: guns don't kill people, people kill people.
Correct

>On Pitbulls: it's not the Pitbull, its the owner.
Completely retarded
>On guns: it's the guns that are the problem, banning gun will stop the shootings.
Wrong

What's the problem here? What am I supposed to be arguing here?

Guns don't have fucking sentience

They don't turn on their owners unless you get a squib load and you are extremely unlucky.

I know you hate pit bulls but what about Sup Forumsbulls?

Pitbulls are living beings, they kill people on their own not the owners.