IT'S HAPPENING!

Main fucking stream is FINALLY acknowledging that IQ is genetic!

telegraph.co.uk/science/2018/03/12/dna-tests-can-predict-intelligence-scientists-show-first-time/

Attached: TELEMMGLPICT000122998345_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqezwpSKGyPgM-0LAs0W6InG0cL3MXS_gzFC4DJi4TNCU[1].jpg (1677x1047, 266K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=aQM4ebFILv4
archive.fo/uBXSH
nature.com/articles/
scientificamerican.com/article/why-have-our-brains-started-to-shrink/
telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/12061787/Intelligence-genes-discovered-by-scientists.html
nature.com/mp/journal/v16/n10/abs/mp201185a.html
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608000305
jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html
psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912003741
udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997mainstream.pdf
wsj.com/articles/SB115040765329081636
articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/10/news/la-heb-genetic-study-intelligence-20110809
psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

youtube.com/watch?v=aQM4ebFILv4

archive.fo/uBXSH

IQ is due to an interaction between genes and environment, with a large contribution coming from genes. Everyone who knows anything about IQ (even in the mainstream) has acknowledged this for a long time. Call me when they acknowledge a genetic component to racial IQ differences.

>but Y-haplogroups and mtDNA still have nothing to do with race
the waiting game SUCKS

thanks

what's funny is that many libs have no real problem with wandering around stereotypes, it's mostly when you try to write down data that they are terrified and withdraw everything they said.

For some reason Sup Forums doesn't let me post nature dot com URLs.

pretty strange. Maybe it is because of their article numbering

test - nature.com/articles/

It's almost as if they don't want people to post the truth. Really makes me think.

They will just say white genes bring inferior IQ.

>except neanderthals had larger skull diameters and whites/asians show the highest admixture with neanderthal DNA

Brain sizes don't equal to higher IQ, in fact our brain size has been diminishing and yet we're still getting smarter.

brain size in wild animals often relates to their senses to help them react and avoid danger faster.

>our brain size has been diminishing and yet we're still getting smarter.

from when on has this happened?

also, elephants obviously can't be compared to a rat, the size of the animal also needs to be factored in.

I'm pretty clever, but my wife is a dumbass. I hope our son is smart

>We can determine your heritage by a sample of your DNA

>We can determine your intelligence by a sample of your DNA

Remember this? "We put a little bit of african traces on every white mans sample cuz of muh racism"

Next up: "We lowered the white mans IQ on purpose to make everyone feel equal"

Also: We now have your DNA, so in the unlikely event you commit a crime or whatever, we know exactly who you are because you gave us that information.

yeah, try not to use 23andme.

what they did was use the < sign in a manipulative way. "HURR

Proportional to body mass, yes, it does indicate higher intellect.
See Their average cranial capacity was 1600 cu cm where ours is 1200-1400, the average male height was 65in, and the average male weight was 170lbs. Higher encephalization quotient.

>Brain sizes don't equal to higher IQ
Size matters.

Attached: 1511004024656.jpg (662x610, 54K)

It really doesn't. It's just indicates we had different life styles and hunting methods.

And I was looking for the source, best I can find
scientificamerican.com/article/why-have-our-brains-started-to-shrink/

Sorry if it was written by shekelstein or some shit, but I think that sums it up nicelly

I'm not arguing that they didn't evolve for separate purposes -- Neanderthal's biggest divergence from our own brain structure was an enhanced occipital lobe, in line with their significantly larger eye sockets, meaning their perception/threat detection was likely enhanced. Regardless of that hypothesis, the larger trend still stands, as represented in pic related and

Attached: IMG_8372.jpg (750x944, 141K)

Intelligence isn't just 70% heritable, it comes from the mother.

Because intelligence is by far the most important thing and the washes of Africans and hispanics would dumb the result down to about 90 IQ or lower. Because whites are the only ones voting right wing. Because whites have the right genes for creating greatness.
And, you know, not wanting to be eradicated from the face of the earth is also pretty appealing

Human intelligence up to 75% inheritible
telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/12061787/Intelligence-genes-discovered-by-scientists.html
nature.com/mp/journal/v16/n10/abs/mp201185a.html

Scientific consensus is that IQ tests are not racially biased.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608000305

Very poor Whites are comparably intelligent to very wealthy blacks.
jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Black children raised in White households have similar IQs to black children in black households.
psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001

The average African IQ is estimated at 79.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912003741

The average African-American IQ is 85, compared to the average White IQ of 100.
udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997mainstream.pdf

The white-black gap in SAT scores, a proxy for IQ, is increasing.
jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Genes for large brains, linked to high IQ, are common everywhere except Africa.
wsj.com/articles/SB115040765329081636

Intelligence has at least a 40-50% genetic basis.
articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/10/news/la-heb-genetic-study-intelligence-20110809

IQ scores are the best predictor of success in Western society.
psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

IQ is 75% heritable among Whites.
psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

Attached: Race and IQ - Global Map.png (1317x1652, 425K)

Damn he's screwed then