Ancaps please die

Ancaps please die

Attached: AHlzB.jpg (600x700, 72K)

Attached: 1514697280419.jpg (600x849, 227K)

Attached: 1509408205244.png (1048x628, 53K)

That's not the labor theory of value.

The labor theory of value says that wealth comes from labor, not necessarily that labor always creates wealth.

So what exactly is anarchocommunism and why does it sound like you expect humans ,whom are predators, to graze some sort of infinite resources like cattle?

sure, the labor of the entrepreneur creates 200x the wealth of the unskilled laborer.

What labor does the entrepreneur do?

>”I’ve never heard of the working wealthy.”

Dear, An-Comms Comms Soc

Our countries actually work yours don't.

USSR,Venezuela, LAO PDR, Vietnam, Kampuchea etc.

Sincerely, people who understand economics.

Attached: 18765434567854365432.jpg (421x834, 55K)

mental labour

Depends on the firm dude.
Many of people work in their own business like Car Dealership owners who also still sell cars and Lawyers who own the firm but still take cases, Barbers who own the shop and still do cuts, Tattoo artists who own the shop and have employees but still do tattoos.

Also what is marketing?
What is planning?
What is investing?
What is seeking investors?
What is management?
The list goes on...

If you ever managed a store, owned a company or know someone who has very well, you would realize this is TidePod-Eater Tier.

Attached: 1454656454.jpg (225x225, 11K)

ty for the edit

a steady time in -> money out deal is the product. people think the fat cat is selling products? no. he's selling jobs. the products are just a means to keep the job alive. in return for being provided a steady method of turning time into money, the employee gives the person who made the job upwards of 60% of what he produces in return for being allowed to work.

a god entrepanuer does not seek to provide himself a job. he seeks to create jobs that will go to other people. selling jobs is where the real money is, and the price of a job is a certain percentage of the value created by the worker.

anything that doesn't directly turn time into money isn't a job, it's a profession.

>Sincerely, people who understand economics.
>A fucking ancap

You've never operated a business, have you

it is the inability of the average socialist to understand the difficult challenges that management entails coupled with their desire to be part of the post-revolutionary managerial class that led me to realize that they are, basically put, lazy

*Ahem*
What is the United States' founding philosophy again?

Attached: z8pw2y7169xx.jpg (2048x2048, 354K)

"Get paid lots of money by the French." Suck my cock you memeball faggot.

It's funny how an mspaint comic doesn't understand basic supply and demand.

noise

Attached: 4E7.jpg (459x478, 44K)

Wow your state's education system is amazing and your debate skills are second to none.

I missed the part about getting paid by the french in the founding documents, I remember a lot of An-cap/Libertarian stuff in there though...And I seem to remember it being a rich amazing white ethnostate for all of history until recently...it is almost as is 1776>1488.
Almost as if An-caps do a better job with 1488 than Nazis spergs do.

>ancap
>trump

Attached: 3441D33HG3.jpg (1200x1120, 83K)

It was a stages of acceptance meme, Trump being in it was incidental.
I was too lazy to look harder.

If you have a problem with the point I made,say it.

Also trump has De-regulated a lot and slashed a lot of laws so comparatively he is the An-cap/Libertarian choice.

Attached: 1520868497290.jpg (1200x1200, 161K)

...

(YOU)

Attached: st,small,215x235-pad,210x230,f8f8f8.lite-1u1.jpg (210x230, 11K)

your ride is here

Attached: lovelive.jpg (1024x550, 43K)

suck my cock fascist commie

OP btfo

taxation is theft logic reversed. both can be right, depending who you define ownership. and when whole libertarian logic depends of "added value", it should be worker's ownership even according to them. kapital does not work, kapital produces nothing, paying rent for it is just theft

Attached: image.png (720x563, 162K)

There is no necessary and direct connection between the value of a good and whether, or in what quantities, labor and other goods of higher order were applied to its production. A non-economic good (a quantity of timber in a virgin forest, for example) does not attain value for men since large quantities of labor or other economic goods were not applied to its production. Whether a diamond was found accidentally or was obtained from a diamond pit with the employment of a thousand days of labor is completely irrelevant for its value. In general, no one in practical life asks for the history of the origin of a good in estimating its value, but considers solely the services that the good will render him and which he would have to forgo if he did not have it at his command...The quantities of labor or of other means of production applied to its production cannot, therefore, be the determining factor in the value of a good. Comparison of the value of a good with the value of the means of production employed in its production does, of course, show whether and to what extent its production, an act of past human activity, was appropriate or economic. But the quantities of goods employed in the production of a good have neither a necessary nor a directly determining influence on its value.

But an unregulated free market will eventually monopolies itself and turn into corporatism if left unregulated. There has to be a middle ground like government’s ability to make antitrusts.

*monopolize

so what stops you or anybody else from simply selling products and affording their own company?
Is it the lack of certain skills or the ambition? Or the fact that its acctualy quiet a risk to take with a good chance of fucking up your life completly? I mean i can understand why one has a problem with inheritance but building your own company? Go eat a dick freelancer

>But an unregulated free market will eventually monopolies itself and turn into corporatism if left unregulated
The word is monopolize, and citation needed.

If the market is truly free, monopolies are quite hard to make happen but a mild amount of regulation is fine, if applied correctly.
Typically government intervention makes things worse and creates monopolies but whatever...
This doesn't negate my point at all, nice try.

Thinks mediocrity can be masterful, when most are masterful at being mediocre.

>what does it do
>nothing

This makes no sense and undermined your argument, tard

Catch my knife in your belly. You touch my property--ever--and I'll kill you. One of me is worth 5000 ancoms. You will NEVER touch my property. You will stay nice and safe, nice and quiet, nice and useful where you are, and you will not lay a fucking finger on my farm, or I'll blow a whole in your guts, and anyone who tries to help you--I'll shoot them too.

I've already done it once. A good little leftist with his good little belly blown open. He died screaming, screaming for his mommy. Screaming and screaming.

You'll die just like him if you ever lay one finger on what's mine. And it is mine, let's make no mistake. Thief.

Cringed and saged. Opposing intergenerational wealth is objectively the same as opposing progress.

Blown the absolute fuck out, communists teeth removed.

Leftism is literal cringe.

Each one should do whatever he wants with his wealth. Capitalism was never about meritocracy as well as wealth was never about labor

Attached: Socialism.jpg (931x960, 78K)

Fucks sake, have u heard of google m8?

This

/thread

Let's look at the diamond example.
If you change the amouth of labour used to get it, the wealth doesn't change TO SOME POINT. If u make a giant expediton with a lot of workers, the wealth chages. It's just normal work, but in giant scale.
And don't u ancaps prefer gold?

I prefer palladium and platinum myself. Its catalytic activity is hugely important in industry. Rhodium is interesting too.

Let's make it into a mineral thread

>No one should get something they haven't earned

>Except free education and healthcare!!
Kys