Fired and pension gone. I've seen other anons state he was made aware of the firing via media and not Sessions and that he released a statement that amounted to sour grapes.
South Africa’s white farmers being forced off their land
Berdus and his 51-year old partner Estelle Nieuwenhuys have been raided in the Limpopo province. The farmer has three bullet wounds - two through his shoulder and one through his face that came out the back of his neck.
>“They took my hunting gun, my shotgun, two cell phones, our DVD player, our TV,” said Berdus, adding that Estelle was praying, out loud, begging them to stop.
>“They want money and they want guns. They want the people off the land so as they can go on like they want to. They want it here like it was in Zimbabwe a few years ago when they chased all the whites out and let it go to the ground.”
>Talk about not aging well I love going back and reading pre-escalator pieces about Trump, so much hubris. This vintage Chris Cillizza piece (from when he used to work at WaPo before CNN) remains the gold standard (from February 2015)
>Donald Trump wants everyone to know that he is serious about running for president in 2016. Unlike other times in the past when he was also "serious" about running, Trump has hired operatives in key states like Iowa and New Hampshire and is saying things like "I’m not doing this for enjoyment. I’m doing this because the country is in serious trouble.”
>So, let's assume -- gulp -- that Trump is serious this time around. Heck, while we're at it, let's assume he actually runs.
>IT. DOESN'T. MATTER.
>I can't emphasize that strongly enough. A decade ago, Trump might have cut an interesting figure, politically speaking. He was rich, well known and perceived as a no-nonsense businessman. That's not a bad profile for a third party presidential bid, which Trump flirted with in the 2000 race.
>But that's not the profile Trump has today. He is still rich (I think) and very well known. But, that's where the similarities end. Trump is now notorious rather than famous. He's seen as a professional provocateur rather than a serious businessperson. He has staked out positions -- questioning President Obama's birth certificate, for one -- that have badly marginalized him in the political sphere.
>Fired and pension gone If appeals process fails, McCabe potentially forfeits certain provisions, but with 22 years, he is VESTED & will receive deferred annuity at Minimum Retirement Age (MRA) of 57 (30%) or 60 (All).
Brandon Gutierrez
It's morning, probably woke up.
Lucas Rivera
Our good friend, reddit, might attempt to raise the 2 million monies that was supposed to be his pension. Its really a wonder these troglodytes even have any money left after paying for Commissar Sander's third house.
B-but wikipedia said not to be concerned! Have I been bamboozled? Has a black market awoo trade been happening right under our noses? Don't they know that's punishable by dismemberment?
Powder your face with sunshine Put on a great big smile Make up your eyes with laughter Folks will be laughing with you in a little while Just whistle a tune of gladness Gloom never was in style The future's brighter When hearts are lighter Smile, smile, smile
Tldr: fuck you negative trump supporters.
Hudson Miller
Trump fucked a porn star a long time ago. Didn't want her to capitalize on their personal fucking, so paid her to sign an NDA about it. She signed it. Decided fuck it and trying to capitalize anyway. Going to get fucked in her ass again.
I wonder if these journalists have any sense of how laughable they'll seem in a hundred years when the Trump era is studied trough the lens of history. its like reading some of the comments about Lincoln when the newspapers of the day compared him to an ape.
>The IG doesn’t place the internal investigative target “under oath”. An outside prosecutor who is assisting the IG does. Hence Attorney General Jeff Sessions is telling us what is going on
We have our own Mueller but no one even noticed. Sleepy Sessions has been busy
If you've been around this general you'd know we've known about Horowitz for about a year now. He's been investigating under the radar and it's starting to come to light.
Sessions take the boy scout theme really intense. Anyone in the media coming after him will have to cannibalize the OIG and the FBI's OPR. Beautiful please mess with those two, surely angering those with authority will end well.
The Inspector General of the DOJ has been conducting his own investigation into malfeasance in the justice system for a year now and no one has noticed. His findings are where the Nunes memo information came from, as well as what got Wray to put McCabe on leave and ultimately fired by Sessions.
When it comes to ongoing FBI criminal investigations, presidents typically refrain from describing their preferred outcomes They fear the appearance of exerting undue influence over Lady Justice. But in the case of Hillary Clinton’s email abuses, Obama made an exception >“She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy,” he remarked in a TV interview in April 2016. She has displayed “a carelessness in terms of managing emails,” he allowed >“But I also think it is important to keep this in perspective.” Well-intentioned but careless, said the commander in chief, describing Hillary’s use of a private email server. Three months later, Comey, in a Vulcan mind-meld with his boss, arrived at an identical conclusion. >“Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information,” he said in his July 5 statement, “there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information" The mishandling of classified information falls into the category of a “non-intent crime.” But let’s assume that some clever lawyer in the Department of Justice discovered a very learned and superficially compelling rationale for applying Obama’s fictive standard of intent Even so, Hillary Clinton couldn’t clear the hurdle The sheer volume of classified material the FBI recovered from her server constituted proof of intent >“Fifty-two email chains . . . contain classified information,” Comey said.
Anthony Rogers
Particularly damning was the form this material took >It is impossible to paste a classified document into an unclassified email accidentally, because the three computer systems (Unclassified, Confidential/Secret, and Top Secret) are physically separate networks, each feeding into an independent hard drive on the user’s desk >If a classified document appears in an unclassified email, then someone downloaded it onto a thumb drive and manually uploaded it to the unclassified network — an intentional act if ever there was one. One of Clinton’s emails suggests that downloading and uploading material in this fashion was a commonplace activity in her office In June 2011, a staffer encountered difficulty transmitting a document to her by means of a classified system >An impatient Clinton instructed him to strip the classified markings from the document and send it on as an unclassified email >“Turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure,” Clinton instructed. On three separate occasions staffers got sloppy and failed to strip the “nonpapers” of all markings that betrayed their classified origins The FBI recovered one email, for example, that contained a “C” in parenthesis in the margin — an obvious sign that the corresponding paragraph was classified “Confidential.” >When an agent personally interviewed Clinton, on July 2, he showed her the document and asked whether she understood what the “C” meant >For anyone who has ever held a security clearance, “C’s” in the margins are more ubiquitous than “C’s” on water faucets — and no more baffling But Clinton played the ditzy grandmother >She had simply assumed, she said, that the “C” was marking an item in an alphabetized list.
I don't have it saved, but I recently saw a picture of a banner hanging near a subway station in London that said "Twin Kingdoms" and it pictured the UK and SA as twins
Brayden Howard
>The explanation was laughable, but any sensible answer would have constituted an acknowledgement of malicious intent >Her only out was the “well-intentioned but careless” script that Obama had written for her In other words, she lied to the FBI — a felony offense. Before she ever told this howler, however, Comey had already prepared a draft of his statement exonerating her The FBI let Hillary Clinton skate. But give Comey his due. >As Andrew C. McCarthy has demonstrated at National Review Online, Obama used a dummy email account to communicate with Clinton via her private server Did this make Obama complicit in Clinton’s malfeasance? Anyone in Comey’s position would have thought twice before moving to prosecute her — and not only because the case might have ensnared the president himself >The FBI must enforce the law, but it must also be seen to be enforcing it As a rule, these two imperatives buttress each other During the 2016 election, Comey faced extraordinary circumstances If he had followed the law to the letter, he would have toppled the leading candidate for president and decapitated the Democratic party Clinton’s supporters, more than 50 percent of the electorate, would have erupted in outrage, screaming that a politicized FBI had thrown the election to Donald Trump.
William Murphy
>explain like talking to a kindergartner. OIG isn't mommy, is more like teacher, can't give timeout. Sessions is mommy, Sessions says "McCabe lacked cantor under oath". OIG can't get sworn statements, only an US attorney or the FBI itself can
