What is 0^0?

State your answer and your political belief system.

Attached: POLISH IQ.png (650x574, 271K)

The answer is 10

T. Christian Conservative

Undefined
National socialism

Attached: 1510918504698.png (1144x888, 337K)

1.
Libertarian.

1
I'm a technocrat

>This thread
>Those digits

Attached: 2015 not coding fizzbuzz in assembly.png (744x782, 392K)

0

Libertarian Satanist

0^0

Attached: 1520148480897.jpg (1280x853, 161K)

1
Classical fascism.

Attached: 1505711230074.jpg (1124x1500, 176K)

0! is 1
anythng raised to zero is 1

i believe this should lead ut to believe 0^0 is also 1?

Attached: whattup boi.png (1176x772, 1.01M)

>0^0
1 you dumb shit, mathematically proven

far more useful to say 1 than 0
t. white nationalist

the answer is ∞

Christian theocracy

666, Libertarian

Indeterminate form.
Left-neoliberal

>0^0

0, anarcho primitivism.

A sad face.

Unironically nat soc.

Yes come to think of it, it is indeterminate, this guy is right

Undefined

1.
National Socialist

Is that to the power of 0 or is it an exponent of 0?

1
Zionist / communist

Attached: dca98381f9ace88c160e16bc9d112e62--the-holy-land-jerusalem-israel.jpg (736x736, 123K)

1
Pan European Nationalist,National Socialist,Traditionalist

All numbers are equal how dare you

0w0
Anime supremacist

1488. Guess.

Theorists and nerds will say 1, pragmatists will make joke answers because it's an irrelevant question for reality.

1
Alevi, socialist leaning into national socialism

It's whatever I need it to be.

Theorists and nerds will say undefined.

It's 0 duh
I believe whatever you believe

1
combinatorist

indeterminate

Chaotic Nihilist

Attached: MFW 3.jpg (1080x720, 115K)

The way to determine the proper answer is to look at the basic mathematical definition of a power:

>x^y = 1 * x * x * x * ... (x is multiplied y times)
>x^0 = 1 (x is multiplied 0 times)

Thus x^0 = 1 for all x.

>0^0 = 1
Q.E.D.

Laissez-Faires Technocratic Dictatorship

Attached: kinga feelz.jpg (630x395, 45K)

I don't believe in Math, i only believe in Jesus

indeterminant
anarcho-fascist

Depends on what you're trying to prove.

0^0 is the codeword used to active MKultra indoctrinated agents to administer a fatal does of Florida to the illuminati

Anarcho-Schizophrenia

This guy maths

0 to any power is 0. 0^0 is undefined.

You're really showing off that American education.

>0 to any power is defined as 0
>0^0 is undefined
the absolute state of muttducation

t.

Attached: muttlett.jpg (247x204, 9K)

You should read a book on real analysis, it'll be good for you.

A calculator will show you 1, wolfram alpha seems to think it's undefined. I think that the graph for f(x)=0^x will be undefined rather than be a point

x^n = e^ (n ln x)
x = n = 0
0^0 = e^ (0 ln 0)
>0 * ln 0
Undefined

This is what happens when you let sandniggers play the white man's game.

/thread

Everything to the power of 0 is one by convention, you dumb fuck.
Open a book or ask wolfram.

tree fiddy!

Attached: hqdefault (1).jpg (480x360, 9K)

>>sci

There's a board for this but it works like this.
For there to be an answer at all there has to be a limit. Like x^0 as x->0 or 0^y as y->0. Well, the x limit is 1 and the y limit is 0 so guess what, there is no answer, it is undefined. 1/0 is also undefined. 1/x goes to -infinity if you approach from the negative side, or +infinity if you approach from the + side.

Again, the answer is tree fiddy.

Attached: Melania_Trump_Official_Portrait-small.jpg (281x422, 15K)

I dunno I have math anxiety, repeated a year in high school because I hated math. Straight As everywhere else mostly

I dunno. I just don't want jews jewing people.

indeterminate

fascist

>most rudimentary mathematical axiom
>y^0 = 1 for all y
>0^0 = 1
>but muh calculus
>UNDEFINED!

What's (0C0)?
>inb4 UNDEFINED

t.

Attached: calculus brainlet.png (586x578, 37K)

t.

Attached: wolfcuck.png (1348x612, 65K)

nigger what

you cant have classical fascism in the 21st century

What is an Islamic Renaissance?

logic and fatalism

Attached: LDhqDp3.png (321x305, 20K)

1
Communism

I don't even know what your weird ^ symbol mean.

National socialist.

Let y(x)=x^x on (0,infinity)
Note that y(x) is continuous on the interval (0,infinity)
we may extend y(x) to a continuous function on [0,infinity) by defining y(0)=lim x->0+ x^x
then taking the natural log on both sides,
ln(y) = x*ln(x)
now take the limit as x->0+
by l'hospital's rule, we have
lim x->0+ x*ln(x) = lim x->0+ ln(x)/(1/x)
= lim x->0+ (1/x)/(-1/(x^2))= lim x->0+ (-x^2/x)
= lim x->0+ (-x) = 0
hence ln(y)->0 which implies that y(0)=1
In practice you could assign any convention to define the value of 0^0, but I claim the natural choice is to define it such that y(x) is continuous on [0,infinty)

t. Conservative

Attached: 1515912454118.png (434x630, 396K)

No wonder leafs are so bad at interpreting numbers.

Attached: le 53% wiki.png (510x580, 80K)

1
Fuck if I know which of the 30 flavors of somewhere to the right I am

>by l'hospital's rule, we have
>by l'hospital's rule
>l'hospital
>hospital

t. Guillaume de l'Hôpital

Attached: eurousa.png (672x506, 277K)

So communism then?

ONE NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
t. Donald J. Trump

The reality is that there is no single answer. 0^0 can be either 0 or 1, or I guess technically anything, depending on the application. It's defined as needed. Without a common definition and no other context it can only be called undefined, and trying to "prove" it as in is pointless. Now you're trying to replace that with an axiom, which doesn't seem to make sense.

1
Absolute monarchy neo-feudal ANCAP.

Undefined, nihilist.

la ogra des americanas

The correct answer is 17 and I know this because I went to a very inclusive and exclusive Ivy League university where we punched Nazis all day. I'm a liberal Democrat.

La frondosa creatura....

Attached: derewigeleaf.png (588x575, 14K)

>0^0 is undefined

imagine being this retarded

isn't anything to ^0 = 1
Ultrazionist republican

Attached: jews win.jpg (325x319, 25K)

math is a social construct
kill you're's'elf

undefined
natsoc

retards

>L'Atrocité de Goblinu Syrupo de 49% Canadienne Chinois

Attached: le 49 tim.jpg (698x641, 90K)

Mods?

>ITT: brainlets

Alright, let's start with three basic mathematical axioms:
1.- n^x * n ^y = n^(x+y)
2.- n^1 = n
3.- n^-1 = 1/n

From here we can easily deduce that:
n^1 * n^-1 = n^(1-1) = n^0 = n * (1/n) = n/n

If n =/= 0, then n^0 =1
If n = 0, then n^0 is undefined

∞ and -∞

t. technocrat

>Incapable of witnessing numerical oigia
>Easily trolled
p a i d b i t c h e s g e t s t i t c h e d a l i v e

Attached: nazi brainlet.jpg (1066x600, 193K)

If a question has only zeroes then obviously its zero you retards. Fuck people have no common sense.

a^0 = 1 if a != 0

kys faggot leaf

We are seeing how mathematics, countries political ideology overlap

Attached: 53 lies.png (1156x1034, 866K)

that's not how it's defined, what are you a Feminist Communist?

16.
High IQ urban Clinton supporter

>axioms are proof
You colossal retard. The only reason we defined it as 1 is because of limits.

Tell me what 0^x is as x approaches 0.

According to some sources that's how it's defined. Otherwise the answer is 1.

1
Right leaning libertarian

your dick
anything that is trendy and socially acceptable, anything.

>What is 0 ^ 0
1

>Political belief
Catholic Patriot.
Racialist

Attached: 1511870839073.jpg (633x540, 36K)

>What is 0^0?

*zzzzzzzzzz*

>politics

well, no, everything... is this:
Christ.
nothing else

>christcuck
>racialist

pick one

1

european-style paleo conservative would most adequately describe my beliefs, though it's a bit all over the place

>Some textbooks leave the quantity 0^0 undefined, because the functions 0^x and x^0 have different limiting values when x decreases to 0. But this is a mistake. We must define x^0=1 for all x , if the binomial theorem is to be valid when x=0 , y=0 , and/or x=-y . The theorem is too important to be arbitrarily restricted! By contrast, the function 0^x is quite unimportant.

0^0=0
the difference between 0 and 1 is the difference between something and nothing. So nothing multiplied to the 0 power should still be nothing.

>Independent centrist.

0.5
Dunno

Infinitively close to 0

1*
I should go to bed.

my answer is not politics