Why does does Sup Forums hate atheism?

why does does Sup Forums hate atheism?

Attached: Trash_Religion_T_shirt.jpg (2400x3000, 128K)

Other urls found in this thread:

mobygames.com/images/covers/l/223193-bloodrayne-playstation-2-front-cover.jpg
forbes.com/sites/johnfarrell/2017/01/29/a-physicist-talks-god-and-the-quantum/2/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Because mainline atheists aren't logical or scientific thinkers, they're degenerates that hate God and virtuous behavior

dude fedora lmao

Atheism is for Redditors

Attached: tim.png (800x480, 212K)

atheism is a religion

an organized religion

God can only be known through the search for truth

same can be said about mainline religious people

when you stop worshipping God, you start worshipping your own asshole and all the shit it spews

this 100%

what a smart logical answer

I don't care, be atheism as much as you want. Just don't shove it down our throats like some jehova's witness, because that makes atheism itself a religion.

Because these "new atheists" are just a bunch of fedora tipping, angsty edgelord faggots.

Attached: fedoratippingedgelord.png (320x263, 117K)

atheists are not human

1-its reddit tier, leftists love muh atheism
2-its mostly cringy
3-most of the societal downturn we experienced have begun after we became extremely secularized

Attached: IMG_0571.gif (300x225, 1.92M)

I’m an atheist. Always have been.

Atheists are faggots.

We've grown out of the adolescent phase where brainlets talk in circles about questions that rule out their own answers.

I’m 40 now and never think about religion like I did when I was younger. But I’ve always been atheist. I never talk to anyone about because I don’t give a shit what you believe. People who are concerned about the beliefs of others are insecure in their own. I don’t need faith to believe what I believe because I actually believe it.

Because the same "enlightened gentlemen" that endlessly bash Christianity turn around and gobble Muslim cock. They are anti-christian, not anti-religion, and should be treated as such.

Nobody fucking cares.

Because atheism = communism

only neo-jews and larpagans have an issue, atheist mostly stay silent so as to not get entagled in obnoxious arguments where everybody just posts pictures of ugly fat people and say "THESE ARE YOUR GROUP!"

Attached: 546737758768.png (1275x802, 288K)

>Because the same "enlightened gentlemen" that endlessly bash Christianity turn around and gobble Muslim cock.

Look up Bill Maher.

Nigger what

Because priests touched our buttholes so that means God doesn't exist

You mean the gun-grabbing "comedian" fucknugget who can't decide between stroking the EU's chode and criticizing the migrant crisis?

Mainline literally anything is fucking retarded you faggot

It turns people away from Christ by filling their heads with lies.

Pretty stupid question, OP.

Attached: 49781991-18E3-457A-8502-D1A6FE3FCB20.png (800x729, 48K)

Because most of the people here are Russian Orthodox.

Attached: RussianOrthodoxSatanicChurch.jpg (1776x1337, 162K)

I dislike atheists because it's a lie. They can't even be honest even with themselves about their position. They call themselves "atheists" to give the impression there is reason to believe there is no God, yet also so when pressed to reveal that reason, they can say "It's just a lack of belief, bro." It's evil at its very core.

>I'm reactionary

>no bro, you don’t get it, i’m An AGNOSTIC atheist
Oh great, so you are a smart retard. Fascinating.

im dead honest atheist ask anything u want

Because the average atheist is a literally autistic faggot liberal.

Attached: UNHOLY TRINITY OF ATHEISM.jpg (1190x840, 316K)

Because they don't stop being religious. They turn to Marx instead of God.

What is the source of your faith that there is no God?

Because they are afraid of Islam, but will happily attack Christians.

Because atheists fail in the single task that dictate's their continual existence: reproduction.
Even the most feral niggerish religion such as Islam beats atheists on their single objective in life. 1,1 children rate will make you an example of failure for upcoming generations.

Also, they can't deny a probability of primordial structure of matter becoming to exist by act of God, which means they have to agree to existence of God.
Atheism is nothing but short sighted feminine hedonism.

Because it is Marxist.

are these quotes real?

Attached: 1516922851610.jpg (1000x600, 93K)

How do you maintain your traditions and customs throughout history. I am thinking it will have something to with government doing it for you.

Atheist are the most annoying religion-like cult

>How do you maintain your traditions and customs throughout history.
How do you?

It's the newest degenerate trend which people adopt so they can seem cool and logical and smart on facebook and twitter. Plus 70% of atheists I've seen both in the internet and irl are edgy nihilistic teens amd young adults who got bullied in middle school

It is no secret the founding fathers were not very religious. However, they did recognize not everyone could live that type of existence. That is why they put an emphases on government not picking religion.

It’s true it’s also known as scientism

I'm not religious and probably will not pass down any customs or traditions. I am old and recognize that my lack of religion was a mistake. My parents essentially robbed me of an experience and community.

Right-wingers are just pissed that their bullshit got called out.

>are these quotes real?
No, they are fake. All of the Founding Fathers were Christian. NONE were "deist." It's the left's favorite lie.

Attached: AtheistReligionOfDenial.jpg (564x576, 48K)

Athiesm is the leap of faith to commit with absolute mental certainty that a god does not and can not exist. It's an oxymoron that requires more faith than any other religion. And let it be known that it is a religion. A religion states a definitive answer for what happens when you die (I.e you fade out of existence into nothingness) and a karmic scale(I.e nihilisms existencial meaninglessness)

Thomas Jefferson cut out the Resurrection from his Bible.

care to refute this then?

>just straight up denying facts because it doesn't fit your narrative

probability - we can see that none of these gods ever do anything, the only thing we ever have and ever will interact with in existence is the natural world. If there were a god with personhood and the miracles and communication did happen, we wouldn't be limited to the exact equivalent of random chance ruling over every thing.

traditions and customs aren't done away with by default, they're maintained by default. Father to son to his son and so forth ad infinitum, why would the government need to step in at all?

if truth were determined by fertility then we should all be muslim

but no matter how many retard mongrels they fuck into their cousins, their doctrines will always be false and their god a dumb superstition forged by an illiterate pedophile highway robber

Bullshit.

>They are facts because I say so!

Attached: LincolnOnInternetQuotes.jpg (576x375, 31K)

>B-b-but there's other places on the internet where atheists post exactly the same quotes. That proves they're real, right?
Kill yourself.

>Seriously user, I need to believe that at least one of the Founding Fathers was an atheist!
You're shit out of luck, fedorafag.

>if truth were determined by fertility then we should all be muslim
Truth is determined by fertility. Orthodox people have children at much higher rates than atheist. hasidic jews have fertility rates 3 to 4 time higher than secular jews. You have to come to terms that you're smirking and giggling to your grave, but your ideas will not be dominant in the future.

First off, probability has nothing to do with anything, by your own logic you could sit around skewing the likelihood of God existing by inventing spaghetti monsters, a shockingly ignorant notion.
Second, you already set parameters on a god you ostensibly don’t believe in: personhood. This is intellectually dishonest and likely a form of ego protection, as you have no answer to deist nor classical theist interpretations of a creator.
Third, by virtue of existing in a causal universe an external creator is not only implied, but absolutely necessary. Thomas Aquinas is most famous for this sort of discussion but many philosophers have discussed this topic.

Finally, a claim such as “I am certain there is no God because of probability” is just asinine on the face of it; try harder.

> if truth were determined by fertility
you can thank Dawkinson and others for such simple narrowing down of human destiny. Just go and rape - that's atheism's core
> then we should all be muslim
Guess you should then, and marry your cousins too.

Now, do you deny a probability of primordial structure of matter becoming to exist by act of God?

It's called the Jeffersonian bible. America developed many protestant sects throughout history. They all have various customs and emphasis.

Chinamen are aitheists and they eat babies and dogs. No thanks.

Attached: Aithests are gay.jpg (960x491, 124K)

It seems like many start worshipping other peoples' assholes as well.

Atheism breeds nihilism which breeds degeneracy and general laziness

Lies

>Satanic Cross
>Nigga what?

mobygames.com/images/covers/l/223193-bloodrayne-playstation-2-front-cover.jpg

>"ignorant"
>"dishonest"
>"ego protect"
ad hominem the post.
Dear triggered Christfag, please defend believing in your magical zombie-kike on a stick with empirical evidence. I'll wait.

Aight you useless nigger, refute this

Your side just lost the debate.

Attached: Thomas Jefferson was not an atheist or a deist.jpg (1153x545, 263K)

You first, bitch.

Attached: AtheistUniverseOriginBtfo.jpg (1121x346, 110K)

>Truth is determined by fertility.
fucking lol.

>but your ideas will not be dominant in the future.
this remains to be seen, but either way this has no bearing on the truth

>Second, you already set parameters on a god you ostensibly don’t believe in: personhood. This is intellectually dishonest and likely a form of ego protection, as you have no answer to deist nor classical theist interpretations of a creator.
classical theists deny god having a personality?
i have to conclude you dont actually know anything they wrote

>is just asinine
like i said, you can cry and scream and pout, none of this changes the reality you're in, you can make peace with it or escape into retarded superstition it doesnt really make a difference to me

>you can thank Dawkinson and others
just as i said, the reason these arguments are rarely fruitful is because you buttmads jsut bring up people and say "this is your group!!! youre guilty by association!!!" and completely refuse to engage anything other than straw

>Guess you should then, and marry your cousins too.
i think you miss the point, i'm on the side that says fertility DOESN'T determine truth

>Now, do you deny a probability of primordial structure of matter becoming to exist by act of God?
no, the probability is higher than 0, but if this were the case then you would have to ask which god, and then ask why doesnt said god ever do anything since then?

>God did it first.
Show me any evidence God did anything or you're speculating out your ass. Talking out your ass doesn't serve as a foundation for anything.

My side is non religious but pro religion. I don't know exactly what I lost.

"refute this"

you set up a retarded caricature strawman and now you're asking people to defend it?

are you 12 years old?

Because atheism is bad and turns people away from salvation and the bible says there is not a single good atheist. All atheists are bad people by definition.

/thread

> the reason these arguments are rarely fruitful
top kek the irony
> i'm on the side that says fertility DOESN'T determine truth
if information that you posses dies with you, it does determine truth, it's done by others.
Now in your opinion, what determines truth then?
> the probability is higher than 0
so how can you say God doesn't exist?
> then you would have to ask which god
The God that is eternal and cannot seize to exists, hence there's rather limited amount of religions that have it right.
> why doesnt said god ever do anything since then
what would be point of giving free will if corrections would have to be done constantly?

>believes in probability
>doesn't understand the consequences of exponentially growing religious sects

Behold the atheist retard.

I personally don't believe in God but I would describe myself as a Christian or a cultural Christian. I respect Christianity, I respect its impact on the world. I follow its message and cherish its presence in this world, but I don't believe in God.

Attached: nirvana.jpg (735x490, 87K)

>56%

They offer nothing but the undermining of western society

The great unwashed masses begin to worship the state when God is dead.

This

>top kek the irony
there is no irony, buttmad impatient vulgar retards like you just shit up whatever thread they enter and prevent any fruits from being had, and you prove it in this very thread

>if information that you posses dies with you, it does determine truth, it's done by others.
this isn't even coherent, why would your information dying have any bearing on what is true or untrue?

>Now in your opinion, what determines truth then?
what is actually true, as in fact, reality, accurate, real

>so how can you say God doesn't exist?
it's my view, you can't definitively prove a negative. This is infantile stuff

>The God that is eternal and cannot seize to exists
that would be most religions on the planet

>what would be point of giving free will if corrections would have to be done constantly?
according to the bible these corrections WERE done constantly.

...

Nigger, it's pure logical game that even quantum physicist apply: it you cannot exclude a probability for it, there''s chance it occurs/ has occured.
There's no possibility of matter to come to exist in complete emptiness without external factor. This is what physics relies on. Even the Big Bang was theorised by a Catholic priest just two years before Hubble published observation related calculations.

Religious texts are an evidence along with historical data of existed persons.
You can throw your teenage temper tantrum over this, but both physics and philosophy are against you.

Because the bible says so. There's your problem dude. Bible just like all religious texts says a lot of outlandish things, so how can I take it as an authority. As smug as a lot of the new atheists are, I agree with them about religion.

I'm an atheist
I don't hate religion or religious people and I acknowledge that religion is important.
I don't talk about my atheism because I live in a muslim country and I could get in trouble for it.

I don't care what anyone is and I don't think it matters.

Yeah, I'm an avid Socialist but I don't believe Marx.

Attached: logic fart.png (1280x720, 675K)

to put it simple
All atheists act like angry females of the human sex

You simple CANNOT stop talking about religion, every time you talk you must bring religion, every topic of conversation must be related to how much you hate religion

You dont see people that DO NOT belive in aliens bringing up aliens in every fucking topic of conversation

you dont see people that DO NOT belive in ghosts shit talking people that do 24/7

>Unproven, useless quantum physics proves anything

forbes.com/sites/johnfarrell/2017/01/29/a-physicist-talks-god-and-the-quantum/2/

> But, as befitting a physicist, quantum mechanics takes up a significant share of the book. Does quantum mechanics make it easier to believe in God? Barr's answer: no, not in any direct way. "It doesn’t provide an argument for the existence of God. But it does so indirectly, by providing an argument against materialism (or “physicalism”), which is the main intellectual opponent of belief in God in today’s world."

#Nope

That's post hoc

> buttmad impatient vulgar retards
kek, being this assblasted over some cuckolded atheists
> why would your information dying have any bearing on what is true or untrue?
define the truth then, is it's about what is known, it will be wiped away along with humanity as we are the only known intelligent life form in so far.
> what is actually true, as in fact, reality, accurate, real
yeayea, it's easy to dress everything in vague empty meaning but what do reality, accurate and real mean in your view?
> you can't definitively prove a negative. This is infantile stuff
top kek, tell that to quantum physicists who apply this probability thinking on observation of reality.
If there's a probability, it can happen/has happened.
Information passage of this it a prove of God's existence.
> that would be most religions on the planet
so is everyone of them right?
> according to the bible these corrections WERE done constantly.
and how did God change humans instead of their fate in these corrections?

>There's no possibility of matter to come to exist in complete emptiness without external factor. This is what physics relies on.
what this proves:
there exist forces and materials currently unknown to us
what this doesn't prove:
stone tablets were given directly from heaven to a jewish man named moshe containing laws no more or less remarkable than other laws governing similar tribes at the time

The same things get said about vegans. Just tweak what you're saying to "some atheists do this". You wouldn't know I'm an atheist if you met me. I don't talk about things I don't believe in.

If you try to extrapolate the least assumptions, naturally you do not conclude there is no all encompassing being because why assume anything that does not necessarily follow. It is a greater leap to say there is a god than there isn't and once you assert there is a god the burden of proof is not you. To try to disprove a negative is absurd because I can assert anything as fantastic as god exists like invisible unicorns and then ask you to disprove it and I wouldn't be able to.

Attached: china paradise.jpg (1247x803, 67K)

so do you want to open a bit about the argument then?
How is materialism the main intellectual opponent of belief in God?
Or are you just parroting others?

>yeayea, it's easy to dress everything in vague empty meaning but what do reality, accurate and real mean in your view?
the exact same as they do in yours, pull up a dictionary if you struggle with these words. The meaning of these words doesnt change depending on your views of jesus so i'm not sure what you're even getting at

>top kek, tell that to quantum physicists who apply this probability thinking on observation of reality.
probability thinking isn't a definitive proof, it's just what it says, probability. You can make decisions based on a negative, you can calculate probabilities, but you can't prove the existence or non-existence of any given deity

>so is everyone of them right?
no, every one of them is wrong

>and how did God change humans instead of their fate in these corrections?
in reality god didn't change humans at all since these stories didn't actually happen

If that is your only reason you're an elitist not a genuine believer. You take a utilitarian approach to religion, not a position of genuine belief.