>he/she still advocates for Sup Forums-tier alt-rightism instead of radical centrism
What's your excuse?
Shed your dangerous ideology
>he/she still advocates for Sup Forums-tier alt-rightism instead of radical centrism
What's your excuse?
Shed your dangerous ideology
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Individualism is overrated
run of the mill centrists need to stop labeling themselves radical centrists it's really bugging me
But Peterson said girls like dangerous guys.
The kosher intellectual rises by criticizing the excesses of the spiritually destroyed pond scum of the left. He uses his station now to turn rightward and keep away any self-respecting resistance to the moral crisis of our day. The gatekeeper wily hides behind metaphor and false equivalency to bravely have no real stance but occupy hour after hour of curious minds' time. Brave. stunning and brave and smart too.
>he/she
You're not from here.
I’m not a leftwing retard persuaded by Kermit the frog
Individualism ad absurdum just gets back to collectivism.
It's like a chicken/egg question.
I've been listening to his podcasts. They're kinda weird but enjoyable to listen to. I can see why people like him so much.
*smacks lips*
HOLUP
Wachu mean YOU peeple?
Yeah we should all just be living for ourselves, not caring at all about our neighbors, our community, our nation and race while everyone else still cares a lot about all that stuff, that will save western civilization.
Be quiet ninja
An atomized, radically individualist political movement cannot succeed against the collectivist authoritarianism of the left. Once they've been broken and we live in a sane, homogeneous society then you can start talking about individualism.
That be OUR word
Peterson shills can fuck off. Learn to think for yourselves.
>atomized
>left and right
>centrism
yes, good goy, you hit the bullseye
heh, like I would believe in any coherent ideology
nazis and commies BTFO
nothin' personnel kid
Seriously its not radical by definition
>Seriously its not radical by definition
en.wikipedia.org
his cancerous fans are making me reconsider liking him
(((things we were not mean't to know)))
the idea of right v left is an amerishit idea from their retarded two-party system where issues are thrown together at random and flip flop every 8 years with no one noticing and trying to be between two meaningless ideologies isn't any help
We dont subscribe to mindless ideologues.
>allowing fans of a thing to change your opinion of thing
>being this much of a little bitch
this person might be just a reactionary
he does not get nothing done just verbatim
sure his degrees are in psychology but after all it's a pseudoscience
>Sup Forums
>alt-rightism
>t. Leaf
Yeah, no.
>No to Sup Forums being alt-right and no to fucking Leafs
yes... I never met a "psychologist" whom I'd like to even have a conversation with. quacks and sharlatans all of them
though JBP has some good talking points and his "maps of meaning" lecture series intrigued me, he otherwise pushes very bad stuff stuffed into sheep's skin