Priest who was accused of molesting younger (adult) men and was extremely opposed to gay marriage is dead.
I have sympathy for people like this insofar as they might not have felt like they had a lot of options as a gay man at the time and felt forced to parrot the company line about gays, and certainly the Priesthood, to me, is an oppressive environment for gay people, but, to be clear, I don't support people abusing their power or sexual misconduct of any sort.
thetablet.co.uk
Other urls found in this thread:
discord
hooktube.com
archive.is
archive.is
journals.plos.org
archive.is
journalistsresource.org
chaladze.com
thecouplesstudy.com
cbs.nl
quickmessage.io
archive.is
twitter.com
He is in better place now. Rest in peace cardinal O´Brien.
That christcucks like to tell people what to do but do the opposite in practice. Religion as we know it is a lie.
discord gg/dmQNdj2
add a .
F
crooked af senpai
bump
bump
bump
So he basically disavowed the globalist Pope and got accused of sexual misconduct about the same time the former pope abdicated and later on he mysteriously dies? Yeah, no, something doesn't sit right with me... Also, why does media love a pedophile story about Catholics as if paedophilia was a phenomenon isolated to that specific church but shit their pants whenever Pizzagate gets brought up? I'm not denying that the Catholic church sucks at handling cases of pedophilia but whenever left wing media pushes a story it automatically activates my almonds...
bump
Here nip
bump
Leave my shinto/buddhist faith alone and delete your fucking image
The numbers are pretty clear, the general public has more pedo cases than the church, especially secular institutions like schools or orphanages. The only reason they still love to bash on the former but are mostly silent about the later is pure political tactics. Just like they will report for weeks when a right wing nutcase does something but will be completely silent about think like he german
staate sponsored antifa having been found out to have an actual bomb making facility.
They want people to hate what made europe great. Sadly most retards will fall for it, like they did with the "dark age" meme.
*more cases per capita
Either way it is wrong to force (predominantly) gay men to live without sex and then be surprised when they act out.
>unironcally implying that faggots are pedos in disguise
Nobody is forcing men to be clerics, those going that way see it as a "no fap" life for a greater good and this is why such cases are rarer in the church.
Faggots have been forced to marry and get kids for millenia, allowing them to roam free was the mistake, just like with women. The more you pressure people, the higher the number of those living up to the exoextations. if you don't have any expectations, they will jut embrace hedonism. Those not able to compete simply must be removed. This is easy eugenics.
*clutches pearls tightly*
Nah, that's just how the world works. It isn't fair, just like the fact that men are beeing biologically overproduced to risk their life for women, as the gating factor of populational growth. Biology is a bitch. Growing up is learning to accept your fate and do the best you can do success with the cards given to you instead of dreaming about something which will never be. You can't change nature, you can only fuck it up trying. Your ability to fuck another man in the ass should not be more important than the wellbeeing of your tribe.
Genetic Evidence of Homosexuality:
Genome-Wide Association Study of Male Sexual Orientation:
Female relatives of male homosexuals have 1.3x as many kids:
journals.plos.org
News article summarizing the study:
-
Bisexual females have more teen pregnancies:
-
Straight males carry gay genes:
Nobody denied homosexuality, retard. So spare your faggo paste bin. Ever heard of the bell curve? Men are extreme. More intelligent and more stupid. Same with sexuality. Faggos correlate with IQ, meaning tht those changes prolly correlate with higher risk taking like homosexuality. All is great as long as you pressure them to procreate to give on the good stuff.
Allowong shit without context just because muh animal kingdom is pretty much the definition of beeing retarded. Animals use smaller ones as pocket pussies killing them, eating them alive or ther imoral things. We knoe, or shouldm, know better.
Do tell me, is society today a better place without those nasyt rules of not living out your inner degeerate for all?
The study, titled “Choices: Perspectives of Younger Gay Men on Monogamy, Non-monogamy and Marriage,” was conduced by researchersBlake Spears and Lanz Lowen. They surveyed over 800 single, monogamously-coupled, and non-monogamously coupled gay menages 18-40 years about their relationships. A handful of “monogamish” men were also interviewed.
“The most striking finding of this study is younger gay men’s greater inclination toward monogamy,” the researchers report. “We see this in the overwhelming number of relationships that are monogamous (86percent). In addition, 90percentof the single younger gay men were seeking monogamy. This is a sea change compared to older generations of gay men.”
thecouplesstudy.com
Are you just posting unrelated articles which are por-faggots? Serial monogamy isn't actual monogamy and the male homos are the worst roasties out there.
Try sticking to the topic of the thread, Shlomo.
So if, in the advent of gay marriage, 10 or 20 years down the road, gays become more monogamous, more likely to marry, more likely to have stable families, would you accept that as a reality?
There is no need for marriage for a stable monogamy. Further most western countries already have gay civil marriage and it still hasn't changes much.
I am in favour of something which works. Progress aka pro-LGB doesn't. We tried it long enought, it made everything for everyone worse just to give a small minority what they want - and even than its not enough. They dont want marriage, thats what civil marriage should be enought. They want to destroy the concept of the normality of heterosexuality, which is against nature. You can be a homo and marry your faggo asshole. Just don't ask to raise kids and try to claim to be as much worth like a family with kids actually producing the core of the staate.
How would you know if it changes anything when it has only existed for two decades at most. Where it HAS existed the longest we see marriages between gay males last LONGER than marriages between straight people.
cbs.nl
A lot of gay people do want marriage, whether you like it or not. Civil marriage is marriage...few are asking for religious gay marriage.
>still implying that you need a staate certificate to stay with your partner instead of riding the dick carousel
That's not how it works.
Most of the west already has gay marriage aka civil ones. So whats your point? They get betetr taxes and shit, while they can't produce kids nor have a housewife to sustain. They get the perks without the expanse and stil scream for more. Eradication of the status quo is their goal. They will never stop and you know it.
quickmessage.io
20% of gays do have kids, though. Surrogacy, adoption, and kids from prior heterosexual relationships. If gays can improve from having the right to marry and start a family, that's a net benefit for everyone.
Yes, and know follow the stats linked. Gays are like 50x more likely to use violece in their relationships and due to no or only half biological.repelant are much more likely to sexually abuse the kids, just like women and their new non biological boyfriends.
Divorcing your intact family to follow your dick despite having children is the most degenrate thing out there. This is true for gays and normal people.
>50x more likely to use violece [sic] in their relationships
[citation needed]
I just think you are full of shit.
Giving gays the right to marry means they don't have to have some sham marriage with the opposite sex then get divorced.
Gays are not more likely to abuse the kids either. That's a total myth:
Are gays more likely to be pedophiles?
>[citation needed]
Just click the darn link you stupid ass hat.
>Giving gays the right to marry means they don't have to have some sham marriage with the opposite sex then get divorced.
lol they could just get a civil marriage or just stay together with their fellow gay man. Nobody is pressuring them into heterosexuality or in fucking around, retard. That's just what higher risk individuals do, which gay men are as shwon through the extremes of the bell curve.
>Gays are not more likely to abuse the kids either. That's a total myth:
No, non-biological parents are. Learn to read retard.
>is from Ashburn
Not surprised that you're a coasty faggot.