Gun control

I am a young college professor at a major university. I have studied both sides of the gun control debate as well as the history and results of similar events in other nations, so I am more than qualified to speak on the issue. That being said, there is no reason for civilian gun ownership in the United States. The second amendment was written at a time much different from today when we had no standing military, everyone was expected to be a part of the militia, and the only "arms" were muskets. Well, now we have a military and advanced weaponry so there is no need for a militia.

On top of that, there are no instances of other nations having to use their guns to combat a "tyrannical" government and, in the more than 200 years since 1776 there has never been a tyrannical government in the U.S. So that whole argument is largely irrelevant.

Other nations that have removed guns from their populace have vastly lower crime rates and no mass shootings. Australia and the UK to name a few.

The best thing the U.S. can do is start listening to reason and start rolling back second amendment. It's not too late.

Attached: miyogdiputsuoynisnugehtnruttsuj.jpg (650x433, 35K)

Other urls found in this thread:

self-defense-mind-body-spirit.com/average-police-response-time.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

ban all people from guns, it's the only way

"Necessary to a FREE State"
Anyone who wants gun control should lose their freedoms.

Mao
Pol Pot
Hitler
Stalin
Yes Give Up your Gunsssssssss

Attached: 1492217934711.gif (659x609, 1.64M)

Attached: 1513544373428.png (764x572, 65K)

Attached: 1521345518018.jpg (960x756, 98K)

Sage
Overcooked pasta
Stale bread
sHALL

And if someone kicks your door in? I can't speak for everyone but I'd rather have a gun to defend myself and loved ones

The 2A is what makes us citizens of a republic and not subjects of a government

>in the more than 200 years since 1776 there has never been a tyrannical government in the U.S

Because the people are armed.

Attached: 1521409820789.jpg (827x628, 85K)

>so I am more than qualified to speak on the issue.

your appeal to authority is AIDS

also your IQ115 elite-welfare-parasite ass wouldn't mind telling me why the government gets to point guns at me through law enforcement agents but I don't get to point guns at criminals violating my personal safety or my property, and that these law-disregarding criminals also get to point guns at me.

You like bringing toothpicks to swordfights or something?

As well

Attached: cf9hg6yt66k01.jpg (1000x1000, 79K)

>Sage
At this point, yall might as well build a
>Sage
copy pasta database of these things -
>Sage
seeing as its the same thing every single
>Sage
time.
>Sage

Decent bait.

Have a (You).

Attached: 1447017406055.gif (360x270, 2.08M)

Attached: 1519189957784.jpg (1041x584, 257K)

>i am a soyboy cuck, you don't need guns goyim

that's how i read that

>there has never been a tyrannical government in the US
>coincidentally, the US has also always had the second amendment

Gee I wonder

I really wish gun owners would realize that you aren't helping your position with this kind of garbage. You all just scream and shout any time someone proposes some reasonable gun control but you never actually develop any arguments other than "tyrannical government" or "it's my rights!!!".

You answered your own question there. You can call the police to come and deal with whatever is going on. YOU are not a police officer and don't have the training to deal with whatever the problem is.

Have another (You).

Attached: 1469015770790.gif (320x218, 1.74M)

Lies.
Sage.

Attached: 1519794914385.jpg (1145x775, 121K)

>The fitst amendment was written at a time much different from today when we had no internet, everyone was expected to be a part of a church, and the only "opinions " were in line with community standards.

Thanks for the pasta, faggot

>YOU are not a police officer and don't have the training to deal with whatever the problem is.

what sort of a product of modernity are you that you're declaring yourself incapable of dealing with an intruder.

You probably can't wipe your own ass and we're supposed to listen to your politics?

One more (You) for You.

Attached: Cwcyehameha_crop.gif (441x302, 2.02M)

LARPing fool.
Go shill reddit...

Attached: gun begging.jpg (731x1015, 111K)

You do realize the first amendment is different than the second, right? People use guns to kill people, not words.

The second is far more of a detriment than the first could ever conceivably be.

Not incapable. It's just not necessary to do so when you can call someone whose job it is to deal with the issue.

Attached: 1508265585526.gif (446x361, 6K)

> On top of that, there are no instances of other nations having to use their guns to combat a "tyrannical" government

What? Revolutions and civil wars since guns have been around have always used guns.

Boers during the Second Boer war. Literally dutch farmers with rifles fighting British colonial forces

Enjoy having the jews have a vice grip on your balls your entire life and be in fear of wrongthink. Holocaust is a lie

Attached: 0884aa1c4847ea6f2ffdf38d13bba7d8.jpg (236x419, 28K)

Actual criminology major here.
The Clinton assault weapons ban had zero known effect.

>>professor should be working on peer reviewed articles instead prefers to seek out reviews from his peers on Sup Forums

Please tell me where you "teach" so I can never send my kids there

Attached: 1521393604524.png (607x722, 91K)

>I am well versed in all aspects of the gun debate
>there is absolutely no merit to anything said on the other side from me
>I'm intellectually honest, believe me
Obvious bait.

And your side does nothing but cry “bans guns!” On the bodies of dead white kids. But you’re ok with gang violence randomly killing kids along with gang members in the inner city, and you’re ok with the suicides by gun, even ok with some crazy black dude live-streaming his murder of old coworkers from TV, and ok with a Church full of dead people, but kill some Jewish kids and you want to end the 2nd ammendment.
Just like they want to end the 1st to get rid of political opposition.

Blacks used guns to fight Rhodesians, Boers used guns to fight British Empire.

Attached: 800px-Muzorewa_1975_b.jpg (800x1206, 132K)

Fag
>hide thread

I've said it every time. Want gun control? Amend the constitution. Easy enough, right?

Attached: 1521397646285.jpg (3012x1728, 1.06M)

>im a young college professor
oh so a cultural marxist oh right ok gotchu

Cold dead hands..... Etc
Shall not be infringed.
Also said suck my dick.

is that common core reading?

>filename
>weak bait
Is it the same faggot making all these threads? Because it sure feels like. Sage this shit you retards.

For those of you actually worried about gun violence, ban niggers from having handguns.

The real question is, are you the same faggot that shills small variations of this pasta, or are there a few of you? What makes you think your efforts would ever actually change anyone's minds here?
It's not too late to quietly kys.
>studied both sides of the gun control debate
>more than qualified
nigger please

Bumping to remind everyone that "credentials" really don't mean jack shit and the proof is, again, right here in this retard's post.

It never happens because they give up their right to the guns before their leaders go full on Stalin. Get fucked Snowflake.

>muh oppressive assad regime

You seem paranoid, what are you talking about shills for?

What filename?

>appeal to authority

dropped

Saged

Attached: images-10 copy.jpg (194x259, 6K)

>with an image

>It's just not necessary to do so when you can call someone whose job it is to deal with the issue.

what do I do in the 20 minutes where jose or mohammed is busy stealing all my shit or raping my wife?

touch myself to the thought of failed totalitarianism?

>Reasonable gun control
Find me such a unicorn and I'll happily hear you out.

>I'll take an armed citizens over armed governments any day.

Attached: 1513269386970.jpg (720x468, 54K)

>Call the police
You mean the racist, corrupt police who should be disarmed so they can't indiscriminately kill people of color? I had no idea you were such a racist

What we really need to do is clone or somehow reanimate James Madison (and maybe Monroe and Admas for consensus) and let him have a look at modern day America. He can let it stew for a couple of weeks and can then decide whether the Second should be allowed to stand or not. Its the only way to be sure.

lol, yeah, not like it takes the police 5-10 minutes to get to your house right?

Bet you've never even had to fight for your life.

So you are going to use the governments armed men to disarm citizens. Yeah, no double-standards there then.
You will fuck up, and your activism will be found and noted, and you will be on The List when the day of the rope - or firing squad happens. If you like gun-control so much, fuck off to Europe and enjoy getting fucked by islamic invaders.

For a professor you sure are fucking stupid
They had much more armaments then just muskets a civilian could own a God damn canon if they wished to do so
Also
>countries many times smaller have less shootings
Color me surprised

Halp is on the way.

Attached: 531E148D-25B2-4A34-964E-47C56891EEE3.jpg (400x400, 36K)

sage is a human right

KYS

Extra for LARP

If not a shill, Post tits and time stamp, faggot
>pro tip- you can’t..... cuz u a faggot shill

i miss scumbag steve

Attached: 1489776987953.png (327x367, 14K)

Another for give up the 1st Amendment while you give up the 2nd.

Thanks for letting us know. You have been added to the list.

>the more than 200 years since 1776 there has never been a tyrannical government in the U.S. So that whole argument is largely irrelevant.
>Young college professor
It's like you aren't even trying.

>On top of that, there are no instances of other nations having to use their guns to combat a "tyrannical" government
Bullshit. History is literally full of examples of civilians fighting their governments. This is how I know your a laRping fagit.

Attached: aaruSMJ.png (675x808, 30K)

>using status of a college professor as a claim to authority

Nice try nigger. If you're so smart, why dont you make more than 150k a year?

I don’t think trash like you can understand this, but in the interests of warning you: what you are trying to do will start a war, and it is long past time for both sides to start killing each other.

Let’s stop debating and start fighting to the death. We have nothing to say.

The time of saying is over. Now is the time of killing.

Swedes and and europeans don't have guns and are still better off than you with better democracies.

>inb4 "whiter than you Ahmed" and Sweden YES related posts

Attached: 1506523742374.jpg (1052x1236, 385K)

Everyday you start a new thread like this with a new lie. Yesterday u were a former marine. Share blue fag fuck off

>I am a young college professor at a major university
Opinion discarded.

>I am a young college professor at a major university.
do you include this claim to establish some privileged point of view? some token of worth that sets you above the mean Sup Forumsack? how about you smoke a cock instead?

Attached: 151765876586586.jpg (233x262, 43K)

Hello (((young professor))) 56 year old former future moron. Give it up or MOLON LABE

Nice bait. Shall not be infringed, faggot.

Good thing this is just pasta, because otherwise the "University" you work for is being seriously ripped off.

SAGE

Attached: 2nd Ammend.png (736x439, 134K)

>Other nations that have removed guns from their populace have vastly lower crime rates and no mass shootings

Oh like all these wonderful nations in dark blue?

Attached: 3655645654.png (391x378, 29K)

self-defense-mind-body-spirit.com/average-police-response-time.html

Police wont help you. I am not screaming but You ignoring the History of Govt's taking away guns then killing millions is proof of your inability to grasp logic. Sad really, but it's okay...when they come and take you and your family, they wont have to fire a shot because you wont have anything to protect yourself. Perfect.

>fap fap fap

Cute.
>The real question is, are you the same faggot that shills small variations of this pasta, or are there a few of you?
That is the real question.

Attached: polispozzed.jpg (1627x1187, 620K)

Lol europeans were being killed by the millions throughout the 20th century
You don't think Sweden gets out of its current situation unscathed I hope

The only argument for gun-control is that guns kill people. That is a non-argument. Lots of things kill people. And who gives a fuck if a few people get killed every now and then? There’s over 7 billion people on this planet, and they are not all special. In fact, a majority of those 7 billion are not special at all, they are just boring wastes of flesh, walking around, doing nothing for society.

Now let’s look at reasons to own guns
1. Protect yourself
2. Ability to kill people
3. They look cool
4. They sound cool
5. They make weak people uncomfortable
6. It’s my right to own one

Oh look... new opening to stale copy pasta.

SAGE.

>I am a young college professor ... I am more than qualified to speak on the issue.

this is pol, faggot. we don't believe you. lurkmoar. academics are retards.

>there is no reason for civilian gun ownership in the United States.

they're for shooting people. there you go, a reason.

>The second amendment was written at a time much different from today when we had no standing military...

small arms in common use: you don't even know the basics of this issue.

>On top of that, there are no instances of other nations having to use their guns to combat a "tyrannical" government and, in the more than 200 years since 1776 there has never been a tyrannical government in the U.S. So that whole argument is largely irrelevant.

nonsense, the entire history of the ak47 is a history of fighting tyranny. if you're going to support democracy, then rule by consent of the people applies. that which constitutes 'tyranny' is not for you to decide. for example, i would characterize parasite's move to disarm as an act of tyranny. you have marxist parasite culture now. the envy merchants and their dead-weight inadequates are pursuing a power-grab as i write this. they're religious zealots, and they're never going to accept the emerging truths of biological essentialism since it doesn't suit a parasitic reproduction strategy.


>Other nations that have removed guns from their populace have vastly lower crime rates and no mass shootings. Australia and the UK to name a few.

London is the most dangerous city in europe. mass shootings are a fake issue. crime is driven by local inequality, and local inequality is driven by genetic diversity.

the problem is superstitions of anti-violence. its unjustifiable to allow useless pacifists to whine about people being able to defend themselves. the next step in this cultural conversation is going to be tangentially eugenic. you're going to want guns.

Attached: 1508802007216.jpg (854x480, 517K)

I agree.
Also.
Socialism was conceived in a very different world from that which we have today. A 170 years old ideology can not be allowed to influence our modern society.
On top of that, there are no instances in which the said ideology has even worked.
The best thing the World can do is start listening to reason and start a commie genocide.

Attached: HomeroAldosivi.jpg (592x592, 82K)

"On top of that, there are no instances of other nations having to use their guns to combat a "tyrannical" government." Except for every revolution in history.

That one Ugandan muslim dictator grabbed guns and then killed 400k people

Appeal to authority fallacies disgust me. You are no more qualified to speak on this issue than a theoretical physicist is qualified to speak about football.
Observing an issue in a lab is easy, but you can't grasp the full concept of why we have weapons until you've had to use one in defense of your life and your family's life.
Cops don't respond fast. Once that door gets kicked in you're on fight time. You shoot him and his buddies before they can raise their guns. You have to be fast and violent, because you don't know how fast or violent those fuckers are.
The cops ain't gonna do shit except put a sheet over you and your family's corpses. At the end of the day, I'm not gonna be the one they cart off in a body bag. That's the decision I made.

You are wrong young man so wrong. "Shall not be infringed " that's all you need to know. The U.K. And Australia are much smaller than America and have never had the gun culture Americans have.
You just need to stop before you start something you'll regret , you won't live through it I can guarantee you that. If you start down this path I will come for your first amendment because it's not needed and I don't like it, see how that works?

>young college professor at a major university
so nothing you say matters?

Young fool?

>I am a young college professor at a major university.
You are clearly unfit to be a university professor. Do everyone a favor and find another job. Maybe something that doesn't involve too much thinking, since it's you're weakest side.
You are retarded if you cannot understand 2A as intended. Your attempt to reinterpret is is a shill tactic to take freedom from people, including your dumb ass.
Let that sink in you fucking this skull.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 110K)

>Swedes and europeans

Being a college professor makes you the least qualified. Kill yourself. Nobody will miss you.

You actually think guns are the reason for the difference in crime rates? You can't think of any other difference between the US and these countries that could explain it?

Even I have a gun, Ahmed.

just make shooting people illegal like how simple is that you idiots lmao dumb amerisharts

Attached: 1520537682972.jpg (761x563, 57K)

I have PhD in liberal arts so listen

OP is a faggot

>I am a young college professor

Massively ignorant with an overinflated ego. Checks out.

Back to your libtard containment cell, roastie