>American revolutionary war French and Spainish fleets supported the American rebels against the British navy >Vietnam Vietcong was supplied heavily with aircraft, tanks, AA by the Soviets >Soviet War in Afghanistan Muhjahadeen was supplied by CIA with state of the art stinger missiles >American war on Terror Taliban, Al qaeda, and ISIL supported by Saudi Arabia, Iran and used CIA weapons given to them in the 80s
Meanwhile here is a list of failed insurgencies in which the actors had no foreign help >Spanish insurgency against Napoleon >Indian insurgency against the British
Tell me again how you hope to defeat the most powerful military by insurgency?
>how you hope to defeat the most powerful military by insurgency Get foreign help
Michael Parker
>the US government wouldnt used nuclear weapons against allies of rebels.
Yes governments around the world will just be eagar to aid a rebellious group of WN losers at the risk of nuclear destruction
Caleb Hughes
They did so in Vietnam and Afghan and ISIS did they not.
Carson Lopez
American didn't lose Vietnam militarily. US was very close to victory when public decided to move out of Vietnam.
Austin Powell
Yes because the American government will kill and imprison millions of its own citizens to get the guns. They will do this while maintaining the war in the middle East go kill yourself shlomo.
Cooper Peterson
The fact that the people we're fighting against live in the same fucking country. This may amaze you, but enemy combatants have families, and also need to sleep. Preferably at home, or in the barracks.
Wyatt Diaz
If you kill them, they win
Cameron Sullivan
>vietnam and afghanistan were existential threats to us government
Holy you brainlet. Also us strategists were openly suggesting tactical nuclear weapons in vietnam.
Robert Rogers
you're alright, baguette, you're alright
Luke Sanchez
>Leaf >Military strategy We don't have a serf mindset like you.
>teehee blow of military barracks this is so easy >oh wtf they have gun turrets and are heavily fortified? >oh wtf they have autonomous drones??
Julian Martin
The same way the Vietcong and Afghanis did probably
Jeremiah Clark
Oh a green text. Im btfo!
Grow up. Historical precedent says insurgencies are mainly failures
Henry Powell
Who is going to give you military equipment equal to that of the Us military?
Levi Ward
The military isn't going to turn its guns on their own family and friends. I mean do you know how many military members are pro 2nd amendment? The military would be divided in itself.
Camden Torres
Kek.
>the civil war never happened Also rebels arent citizens. Its clearly outlined that the US military has the authority to quash rebellion.
You can support 2A without being a separatist sympathizer
Gabriel Garcia
Checked. Jokes aside, i do not think any insurgency in a relevant country can happen nowadays, without foreign powers trying to benefit one way or the other. Some may support a side for ressources (happens a lot in africa and south america), geopolital gains (ukraine, on both sides), or both (syria, on both sides too).
Adam Baker
Bend over.
Dylan James
yup...power plays everywhere we look...interesting times we've living in.
Leo Gomez
In the event that the US military decides to take guns from civilians they will be divided. The pro 2nd amendment members will turn against the government and sabotage from within.
Juan Cooper
I will win an insurgency against the US government by dying. I’m going to hang myself in 15 mins as a preemptive strike.
Think about this if you get rid of the 2nd amendment then you can do away with the others and the constitution becomes meaningless.
Logan Lewis
Reminder to sage all faggot leaf threads
Noah Foster
SAGE
Julian Allen
>Vietcong >Equipment equal to the US military
They literally used sharpened sticks lmao
Christopher Evans
Exactly. It even seems supporting a side in a civil war has became the norm for powers. I mean, Russia, for example, is weaker than NATO, but still a very powerful country, and China is on the rise. And the US or EU want to keep and expand their influence. They will not fight directly. Memes aside, it would end in a full scale massacre. With modern armies, it would end in a bad way for everyone, even without nukes. War is not a video game. The US would win over Russia for sure, but the massive casualties, especially in the navy, would put them in a weak position vs other players. So, wat do ? Proxy wars. And it allows to control ressources and bases. I think the question of insurgencies without foreign meddling is out. Because it will not happen. If, for example, the US militias decided to fight Washington, the russians could offer support in exchange of smoother relations in case they win. On the opposite, Washington could call the UN for help, in the name of stability (or rather...globalisation). Just an example, but it do not think it completly impossible. Interesting times indeed.
Daniel Gray
No common sense 'Mercan even doubts that the PEOPLE would win a war against our gubberment.
Matthew Torres
>leafs are so fucking stupid they don't know the difference between the government and the military in the states: the post Mapplenigger just stop, the more you talk the dumber you become
Couldn't we assume that a portion of the US army would mutiny and join the rebels? If there really was a rebellion the US goverment would have had to fuck up pretty bad. >Taliban, Al qaeda, and ISIL supported by Saudi Arabia, Iran and used CIA weapons given to them in the 80s And we have modern weapons now. Sure....
Aiden Bailey
Tzeench would be proud of the kikes
Caleb Cox
That's a screenshot not a green text. Refute it.
Lucas Gutierrez
>Sure He's right. The military pushed the remaining nva out of Vietnam completely into Cambodia where they were operating from. We were literally 2 weeks from destroying them completely. Read a fucking book.
Hunter Green
Biggest threat to an uprising would be the FBI/CIA infiltrating ranks. Would be especially easy since a rebellion would be most likely formed over the internet. If they infiltrated anti-war protestors and motorcycle gangs, you best believe they’d be among the ranks of a rebellion to try to kill it from the inside
Caleb Myers
You're looking at a huge portion of that military deserting and joining the insurgency once orders come down that violate their oaths to the constitution. You're looking at millions of gun-toting red staters, many of which have prior military training, disrupting supply lines and deploying hit-and-run tactics across the country. They'd do this without any orders from the top, they would just do it on their own. The military stands no chance against a large civil war without standing armies. They can't even decisively take down insurgent armies elsewhere. Does that answer your question, leaf?
