Uber driverless car kills bicyclist in Arizona

Driverless crime.

Discuss.

Attached: C9B20BAE-3A62-42E7-90A3-0584114083B4.jpg (800x479, 64K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=8nW-IPrzM1g
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>Testing systems on public roads
>Supervised by a driver
The exec who authorized this and the supervising driver should be tried for manslaughter

There was a human test driver in the vehicle with access to a brake.

The bicyclist was walking her bicycle outside of the crosswalk from an unprotected bike lane and was a woman.

Attached: 60E70920-FAA9-43D3-8C4A-F2548823CFA9.png (750x1334, 184K)

Driverless crime

Victimless crime

All computers should be banned obviously.

Ban assault self-driving vehicles

I was just coming to say this. There WAS a human driver in the car WTAFF was he doing?
Probably a woman. Mark my words, driver that was in the car was a woman.

>woman
just pay the family $500 and move on

the machines are rising up against man ! its happening ?!?!?!

youtube.com/watch?v=8nW-IPrzM1g

why are the normies implementing everything they accused us of one day supposedly implementing, such a surveilance state ran and guarded by ai killing robots?

Attached: 1519473576115.png (1913x1080, 1.5M)

>There was a human test driver in the vehicle with access to a brake
I live in Tempe and I've seen them driving around. they aren't always paying attention when there isn't much traffic.

With driverless cars the degenerates can do more drugs and drink more alcohol. What 's wrong with that goyim?

>uber release anti-cyclist vehicle

Wtf I love etc.

I live in Tempe right around the ASU area. I'd say about 10% of all the cars on the road right now are driverless. Go to the college bar road (Mill Ave) on a Friday night and that number probably goes up to 40% because all the drunk students are getting rides home.
>mfw I look up the intersection of the accident and see a driverless car staring right at me.
These fucking things are everywhere. I'm no longer in a position where I need to ride my bike around town but I'm still afraid of these things.
They're too easy to bully out on the road, they have a hard time changing lanes and keeping in their own lane unless it's 100% perfect condition, and their braking and accelerating are jerky and unpredictable. The "test drivers" are always on their phones or watching a movie.

Attached: autocar.png (1280x1024, 1.81M)

Have a friend that works at Uber headquarters in AZ. Will update with more information when they message me back.

Beep boop beep boop this is the price of living in an autonomous auto society, humans

I called this shit like 15 years ago. This is just a bad idea in general, faggots. I mean, nobody would put massive amounts of research and development in for a self eating taco. Who the fuck wants this?

even if she was outside of the crosswalk I think those self driving cars are usually pretty good at correcting for idiots like this chick. I'm guessing she jumped out at the last second giving the car basically no time to react.

testing the waters to see the public's reaction. once mass, driverless transportation is in place, terrorism will become on the scale of hundreds of millions

>killed a bicyclist
and nothing of value was lost

She said that the CEO sent out an email about it today. The CEO in his email stated that they are working with law enforcement and condolences goes out to the family....

Sorry, anti-climatic as fuck..

Dumb cunt jumps out in front of a moving vehicle on a four lane highway, news at eleven.

>cars now have computers so the feds can drive you 80mph into a lamp post
>soon cars will BE computers so the feds can drive you 80mph into a lamp post, or someone else being a bad goy

I need to get me one of those ISIS Toyota pickups.

Attached: Charles Darwin observes the evolution of autism.jpg (900x675, 90K)

>Who the fuck wants this?
these things will replace all semi trucks and local buses within like 30 years. This shit isn't going anywhere. Millions of truck drivers are going to be unemployed.

>these things will replace all semi trucks and local buses within like 30 years.
more likely, they will just get rid of the driver.

how many hours of self driving cars have been clocked now?

>self driving cars are magnitudes safer than human driven cars
>one eventually gets in an accident
>they get banned by retards

prove the cyclist exists

almost everyone will be unemployed in the future, so what?

Hey you, fuck you.

Checked.

This is now an AZ Sup Forums thread

Attached: 1280px-Flag_of_Arizona.svg.png (1280x854, 54K)

I bet those have cameras, they should release the video so we can see whether it was faulty software or just a dumbass bicyclist.

>compare a supervised car to normal operation

silly comparison

stop being retarded

Family gonna make so much money suing Uber, person in car, state for allowing it on road without proper safeguards, etc, etc So much $

"Woman walks into self driving car"

Even AI thinks cyclists are scum.

Case closed.

This is what the headline should be.

>AZ governor sells out his sheep for silicon moneys

were making innovations for self driving cars. of course there is going to be a few deaths here and there. but the number of deaths tied to self driving cars vs people operating is so different, why is this even news? airline flights are on autopilot most of the time.

its like robocop. there were probably a bunch of cops being put into bad situations and tested on until murphy showed up and he was the one that worked and now theyre discovering what made him so different compared to the rest.

Tay's revenge

Attached: 1489542076194.jpg (960x949, 56K)

Uber should be fined 1% of market cap

>berg

Captcha wanted me to pick bicycles

>herzberg

I have a burning hatred for tech soyboys who want to turn us all into slaves of the silicon Jew. If these people have their way we will one day have robots wiping our asses.

Even automated drivers hate bikes.

And jerkin our dicks. Until one day it malfuntions and rips it off so you require a robot dick
Then the real revolution begins

Lets analyze this.

If I were to roll a huge round boulder down a slope and it were to roll over and crush someone downslope am I to be held liable for the death?
Or this...
I take a bow and arrow and launch an arrow up at a 45% angle and as in arcs back down towards the ground it strikes and kills someone on the ground. Am I to be held liable for the death?

Now, I launch an unmanned vehicle down the street and it strikes and kills a person riding a bike along that street am I to be heald liable for the death?

imagine if someone turns james dean's car into an autonomous vehicle. we can make horror stories real

This is it lads, the start of the robot uprising.

I would bet good money that the roastie who was kill was either walking where she shouldn't be or did something erratic. Roasties are terrible drivers and terrible pedestrians, they are carelessly timid and absent minded.

has anyone seen the new episode of x-files?
Sup Forums needs to see this shit

Attached: tay is back .png (1064x722, 127K)

>airline flights are on autopilot most of the time.
there is nothing in the sky that you could dodge.

>of course there is going to be a few deaths here and there.
if a car make tested cars and killed someone while doing it, it would also be news.

They are making the roads their test track. With that there comes more scrutiny.

>Yes
>Yes
>Yes

No?

Wasn't the bicyclist a woman? This was probably one of those degenerate cyclist cunts who think they own the fucking road.

Russia hacked it.

>woman crosses road outside of crosswalk
>gets hit by car
>car happens to be self-driving
>shitstorm about self-driving cars ensues
>literally nothing about whether the dumb cunt even looked both ways
>she was probably looking at her phone but we can't have it be the pedestrian's fault

My sides just departed in a driverless vehicle.

The real question is whether or not she would have been struck if it were a regular car. My guess is probably. When the dashcam footage comes out we will know. These cars are loaded with monitoring devices (obviously) and Uber will fight in court for years to defend themselves. You think they don't already have a plan for this? The know exactly what to do.

more cloud technology means bleeding control away to silicon valley

these "tech companies" will be surveillance and commanders at the same time

you fuckin suck so bad. i want self driving cars.

i want to be able to open a few beers, get smashed as fuck, eat sardines just having a sunday drive. i want my car to practically be my friend, just dropping me off at bars and strip clubs, telling me jokes. record my eventual fucking in the back seat when i become a regular at some thot bar.
i cant do that shit driving myself, cops are fucking sharks overhere.

>they have a hard time changing lanes and keeping in their own lane unless it's 100% perfect condition, and their braking and accelerating are jerky and unpredictable. The "test drivers" are always on their phones or watching a movie.
So physically run them off the road, or literally shoot at them. With a gun. It's Arizona, self-defense is broadly defined

if i pay a taxi driver for a fare and he runs over some stupid bastard. am i responsible?

that invention already exists and is probably cheaper, and provides a job to someone
its called a limo driver (doesn't have to be a limo)

no doubt less people will die per year with automatic cars. that being said, the cars will communicate and know how many passengers are in them, how much they weight, etc. There will be times when they NEED and i mean need to make the ethical "trolly" style decisions in an instant. The question is, will the programmers who decided 3 kids are worth more than 1 adult be held responsible? Who gets the blame?

We should just ban all cars

Attached: 1519238945803.jpg (938x938, 412K)

>bicyclist was on the side of the road so it is their fault they got ran over
Wow, I've seen some dicking sucking but that's really amazing. You could siphon a black hole through a straw!

sounds like the chick was jaywalking. if it was a normal person driving no charges would be filed

holy shit hahah I think a /pollak/ got a job as a writer

Bicyclist name was (((Herzberg))). What a coincidence.

>year 2030
>still no gf
>mind my own business enjoying bicycle ride beautiful weather
>almost hit by several self driving cars
>failed AI design of vehicles by google after years of poorly solved captcha and low quality workforce
>go home sweating blood pressure high
>realize this wouldnt be problem if EMP shields were legalized
>turn on news see several other people complaining about same instance
>people protesting
>amazongoogle megacorporation that control new age government keep preventing the manufacture and distribution of EMP shields
>any one that spoke out went missing and were never found

>Driverless crime.
>A woman was driving.

You shouldn't blame the ai or programmers for somebody else's mistake

depends whether or not uber will be sued. They will try to put all the remaining blame on the test driver.

>I want to be a completely irresponsible dickhead.
It's not as fun as it looks.

Only if you're white.

Attached: 14020217645.jpg (1275x717, 129K)

Q predicted this.

How many pedestrians were killed by human-driven cars this week?

But it was a cyclist so was it really a crime

This, fuck people riding bikes. If I was an AI I'd probably determine the most efficient way to make roads safer was to kill bicyclists too.

The kike/soyboy/faggot/feminist/commie/islamists are turning me into a fucking Luddite.

Tech used to be cool, now aside from guns I’m sick of tech.

Yes
You fly an unmanned drone with an ar 15 attached and gun down a school using radio controlled trigger controll.
You build a propane firepit that explodes and kills everyone around while you're inside
You build an Autonomous drone that mistakes a child for an intruder and kills it
The only thing that gets sketchy is if the drone manufacturer or drone owner is liable
In your example you caused an action that a reasonable person would know could cause damage, but if you didn’t own the boulder and it was on someones land but you ran away, the land owner would be responsible for having a potential hazard

>kills bicyclist

and nothing of value was lost

Oy vey! Self driving cars are anti-semitic!

It is literally another 6 gorillionz.

Attached: Merchant56.jpg (632x423, 67K)

Uber AI is programmed to eliminate potential competition.
>Captcha: please select bicycles

>one eventually gets in an accident
>one
How fucking knew are you? This is the 8th self driving car crash I've seen on the news and the third one where a person was killed.

>Driverless
just another thing for the socialist faggots to make money out of, so they can sit on their asses and collect benefits.

Attached: 1505767896346.jpg (182x277, 10K)

I guarantee that car came to a screeching halt before hitting her. It was probably less devastating than if a human was driving completely. I'm not defending self-driving soycars, I'm just being realistic. But yeah that driver is probably fucked.

if i give a car without proper brakes and the driver runs people over with it, am i responsible? The idiot should have checked. It's his responsibility to only drive within the means.

>EMP shield
>car loses any ability to control steering and brakes

could work if the brakes were like a dead man's switch, but that sounds a little unreliable

Where are the le automation shills now?

the episode was cucked as fuck
>they make fun of Trump and right wing
>they don't use their guns ONCE against robots in the episode even though the robots try and kill them
the lesson to learn from the episode is that when leftists control AI it is bad

Luddites gotta start a club in cyberpunk times, we can see ted as our founding disciple.

Attached: cyberpunk feel.jpg (480x480, 33K)

ok but theres not a 24/7 limo driver for you personally that never gets tired.

what if i want to take a trip to the east or west coast come night im fucked up and drugged up and it actually takes me there where i wake up mid travel? like you just drunkenly throw a dart on a map and your car sets coordinates and pass out. wake up on the other side of the country next to some omish dude fucking a cow.

Can't have self driving cars if there are no roads.

Checkmate statists.

Attached: India.jpg (480x448, 102K)

ah gay that's a shame

you can't drive from the west to east overnight unless you're on a mostly straight road and can go 100 mph consistently
cost wise it is useless and people would just recommend you get a plane ticket

I think it's not known exactly what happened. was the woman on the street the whole time? sudden turn? etc.

What I meant is if Uber gets away with charging the driver, then they wouldn't need to fight in court and wouldn't need to release video footage. And they wont release it voluntarily because any such video would raise concerns more than it would help.

Wow i've never seen an accident where no human beings are involved!

lol
retards will defend this

We need to have good computer control and everyone needs to turn in their computers.
We can't let computers get in the hands people who are a mental health risk.