Liberal Cuck Gun logic

Edited some HuffPo shit, would the Sup Forums help spread the edit version

Attached: received_1202790993185537.jpg (1600x960, 149K)

Here is the edited pic

Attached: received_1202790989852204.jpg (800x960, 68K)

Checked

Spread this too
1

Attached: adamsguns.jpg (236x471, 36K)

2

Attached: adamsguns2.jpg (564x564, 68K)

3

Attached: franklinguns.jpg (303x395, 27K)

4

Attached: hamiltonguns.png (589x427, 430K)

Spreading as we speak. Let's do this.

5

Attached: henryguns.jpg (564x734, 79K)

6

Attached: jeffersonguns.jpg (900x600, 125K)

7

Attached: jeffersonguns3.jpg (564x668, 46K)

8

Attached: jeffersonguns4.jpg (324x720, 35K)

9

Attached: washingtonguns.jpg (657x657, 71K)

10

Attached: washingtonguns2.jpg (456x720, 58K)

11

Attached: washingtonguns3.jpg (290x290, 19K)

12

Attached: foundingfathersguns.png (652x3055, 2.77M)

The original is fucking retarded, who the fuck thinks this is a good quote?
The second works regardless of wether or not you support gun control

Neither the original argument nor the edit really make sense.

A child is old enough to be the victim of molestation. But they're not old enough to have an opinion on being molested. They might have actually enjoyed the molestation; doesn't matter they're a kid.

Same way a child has neither the right to an adult opinion on guns, nor the same rights as adults to purchase guns

>If embryos are old enough to be aborted, they're old enough to have an opinion on abortion

>Randomly capitalising words
dumb founding fathers

I have a lot of Founding Fathers' quotes on liberty too if you guys wanted