Speech Control = Thought Control

>Without the freedom to Speak there is no freedom to Think.

Prove me wrong, faggots.

Attached: IMG_20170427_190615.jpg (647x474, 35K)

>INB4: "Do you say EVERYTHING you think?"

No. That's not the point and you know it.

Attached: 1514360128094-pol.jpg (750x537, 109K)

Leftiest fought for freedom of speech couple of decades ago, now they fight against it.

Attached: 17f.png (600x634, 716K)

Attached: lupc4m.jpg (512x512, 50K)

>Not being able to yell nigger at someone is inhibiting my freedom to think
t.rural retard

Why should I be prohibited from yelling "nigger" at someone?

Attached: IMG_20170830_191645.jpg (547x365, 34K)

BIKUZ WY WUD U NID TO THIS, FAKIN NAZI???////

Just as yelling fire incites panic and is illegal if done knowingly as a false alarm, yelling nigger incites anger and needless provocation.

Literaly any statement can make people feel uncomfortable and may be considere as provocation.

Attached: 8e5.jpg (885x710, 60K)

Should I be likewise granted the power to prohibit you from speaking words which I personally find offensive?

Attached: 3479b169831f3cc9776fc9c724613941.jpg (320x331, 15K)

False equivalency, Since Fire is an objective "panic source" and a danger to life/property, whilst insults and the whole offence taking is purely subjective

And if I subjectively deem your words to be an "objective panic source" then I may also restrict your ability to speak?

In my opinion, communism is a threat to my life and liberty. Does this subjective opinion allow me to restrict speech promoting communist ideas? Should I be legally allowed to use force to prevent such speech? What standard for "objective panic source" will be considered sufficient to justify use of force? Your standard, or mine?

Attached: IMG_20170820_195515.jpg (750x638, 63K)

Communism is economics system and have no in common with right of free speech.

Attached: 31f.jpg (292x271, 26K)

>Just as yelling fire incites panic and is illegal if done knowingly as a false alarm
maybe the idiots who hear a verbal call of fire should use their other senses to determine if there is in fact a fire?

>yelling nigger incites anger and needless provocation.
and when the truth needs to be told what then?

Communism is a system of totalitarian government that also includes an economic component. Don't get it twisted.

Also, this response does not address the actual issue: who gets to decide what speech is allowed and what speech must be silenced? Give me that power and I have no complaints, but you won't like the result.

Attached: IMG_20171117_025905.jpg (1024x989, 206K)

>muh merican education

>Leftiest fought for freedom of speech

Only because they could use it to push their poz, once that was done now they are all about destroying free speech via "hate speech" definitions to crush the opposition before it can get a foothold.

Attached: 1519046909551.jpg (750x750, 88K)

Be simple call it Hypocricy

Sometimes you don't know you want to listen to other people's opinions until they say some retarded shit.

Attached: racismtruth.png (1280x1236, 2.15M)

While we can think without speaking, we can't speak without speaking. The loss of freedom of speech means we must think that we know to be false in order to speak without persecution. By making us say their propaganda we must also think it, if we think it constantly and it becomes a normal thought, we will think it when we do not need to, we may even believe it. You and I might resist, the majority will not. This is why the socialist first wants to control what we can and cannot say, so that he may dictate our thoughts, there has never been a socialist movement that did not first come for a countries language, it is why they always come through the humanities, arts and every other profession of the pen.

So yes, the death of free speech is the death of the mind and the coming of hell on earth.

/Thread

Attached: IMG_20171010_023427.jpg (720x864, 89K)

Communism is first and foremost a system of organising society such that every one is supposedly equal. In order for all to be equal they must believe that such a state is desirable, they will not come to this absurd conclusion naturally so they must be manipulated into believing equality is good and inequality is evil. Controlling their speech, then thought, then actions will bring this about. There are three means by which an entire nation can be brought into near total equality; War, Famine and Tyranny. What communist state has not sought and found these?