How did they catch the Austin bomber?

The news said he was traced using to a motel using surveillance footage from a FedEx drop off store and cellphone triangulation technology. The surveillance footage i understand but presuming he didn't use his cell phone while in the store how was cellphone triangulation technology used to find him?

Attached: 50696789.jpg (533x612, 58K)

Everything you buy is recorded if you don't use cash.
The send that to a fusion center were everything is processed.
Check for who bought all the right ingredients, then use past cell phone location information, and voila!

Cell might have reached out to wireless in fedex store.

...

was he really dressed like the unibomber?

Thanks for the reply, user. But how and when are they getting the cell phone information? This guy drops off packages but how did they get his cell phone info?

Apparently they have accessed Google searches of people in the area somehow to find those looking for bomb plans.
So the government already knows if what kind of porn you like to watch.

Interesting thought...

They also posted shit if reddit.

>FBI/ATF glow in the dark team gets tired of bombing Austin
>Austin Police kill random Austin native
>blame the murdered for the false flag bombings
all in a day's work.

Assuming he carried a cell phone, which would be stupid, easy enough for them to find the small group of unique cell phones that had been in each of the locations.

Also video footage from FedEx store narrowed it down to ethnicity and age range.

They do it backwards, find all the phones that have registered at those specific locations. Each bomb location and the FedEx store. Get subscriber identity, subpoena carrier. Start tracking movement of that cell phone, move in at a socially innocuous time, ie 1am, for minimal disruption.

Cellphones constantly ping the towers so that, among other things, the phone network knows how to route incoming calls to get to you. GPS is also always avaliable

This is fun how you guys believe that the perpetrator wasnt (((them))). They just wanted to inform you about 'cellphone triangulation'

Too bad the fbi was never going to pay out $100,000 to anyone.

these

>what is a subpoena

They were looking for someone in flyover states who was sniffing his own farts as hard as if he was from California. The circle got really small from there.

If Location services is enabled, which I think it is by default, most apps are constantly pinging and running, so you’re leaving a digital trail even if you’re not making calls. They probably got records for the towers near the bombing locations for the relevant days, took all the numbers, and did a query for the ones that showed in all locations for each relevant day. That’s easy shit. An 8yo can do it in excel.

Anyone think its weird Ted Kascynski has been shilled in here for months and then a Unabomber copycat spikes up out of nowhere?

Like toilet paper but less useful.

will someone pick up the torch and carry on where he left off?

Nice digits, but no. The Ted shilling started after the first bombing.
If the info about this guy is true and not a government piece of fiction to blow some patsy and cover up dirty shit...
This kid was a retard.
Doing terrorism (yes this was domestic terrorism) with your cellphone in your pocket is retarded tier. So he deserves to be blown to hell.

may the next man learn from his mistakes

I think you're missing the point of what he is trying to say.
Which if i'm not wrong he is stating
>why is cellphone data even going out in the first place
Which is answered simply with every few microseconds your cellphone sends out a ping for connectivity services.

Only way to not be traced is to turn it off or simply not fucking carry it when you're doing illegal shit.

Industrial Society and its Future has always been pol tier reading and recommended here, murder notwithstanding. If this youngfags inspiration was Ted, he did a shit job.

Waited for the next explosion you dummy

Mark Anthony Conditt - Think he got bullied a lot in high school?

Attached: DY0RErTX4AEnrlW.jpg (750x784, 66K)

They already have everyone in a database who has an ID. Why do you think they tell you not to smile in ID photos?
>run surveillance footage against ID db.
>google search(95% of peoples cell numbers are online).
And thats it

>yes this was domestic terrorism
How? What was his political goal? What was his religious goal? Are all serial killers domestic terrorists? Why do we use the term "serial killer" or "murderer"?

Finally someone points this out. I did find the whole technology is evil bait odd. It was probably that faggot.

Your cellphone is not secure. Even if it is turned off it can be accessed remotely to power it on. The only exception is removing the battery or the device not having power. It makes you wonder why non removable batteries became the standard in a phone when it makes the manufacturing process more difficult and and allows for less consumer choice and repair. Was it to reduce the shelf life of your electronics and make you upgrade more often? Or was it so everyone was traceable?

Very easy. Just like old school PC game hacking.

Once they had surveillance footage, that gave them a time and a date.They looked through recorded data logs of every phone that pinged at the surveillance camera geo-location, at the FedEx drop off at that time. Basically your phone can be used to do more than live triangulation of where you are now, they can also see where you have been. If you commit crimes, don't have a tracking device, aka a cell phone, on you..

They also cross referenced cell data from other surveillance locations, narrowing it down to their suspect pretty quickly.

Put a bullet in your skull tin-foil man.

ISAIF is mentioned frequently on this board and has been for years because the theories outlined in it are well researched, well defined and easily understandable.

Attached: uncle ted was right.jpg (314x475, 19K)

this guy was a complete idiot, with everything we know about PRISM and surveillance, what kind of retard goes dropping bombs in places with their cell phone on them

ted's been talked about for years

it was all big psyop. screenshot this

Attached: project blue beans.jpg (624x1024, 113K)

> Idiot was caught on camera in a very obvious manner of clothing
> Idiot drove to the FedEx location
> If the FedEx location itself didn't have cameras, then nearby streets/businesses likely did.
> All you then had to do was look out for his car leaving the area at the approximate same time. Either right on camera from the FedEx lot, or down the street -- it doesn't matter. Just look for all traffic at 3:05PM or whatever time it may have been coming in and out.

They developed information about the suspect, and were somehow able to look up his Google search history and possibly triangulate his cell phone or use GPS.

I have no idea what they did exactly, but this guy was doing this shit out in the open. He had HUNDREDS of federal agents after him. I knew he would get caught quickly.

The Unibomber by comparison only struck randomly out of the blue every once in a while, and lived completely off the grid in a cabin in the woods. That's why it took them so long to catch him.

This guy did too many bombings, too soon, too fast, in too concentrated of a location.

The authorities were clueless when he was just leaving random packages/trip wires around. But once he tried to mail something and was caught in a commercial district on camera, he was fucked.

Good work ATF/FBI/Police. This guy deserved to be caught, but I wish we could know his motive.