JF vs Andy about porn (no date) JF vs Jay Dyer about religion (No date) April 1st Flat_earther vs JF about flat earth Lowtax vs Anglin (no date) Alt-Hype vs Spino on race realism (no date) Ryan Dawson vs Halsey (no date) After every major stream ancap user will host a /bybs/ stream
Reminder that Peterstein is a faggot who will never have the balls to face any serious white nationalist
Henry Phillips
have you guys made sure to donate your shekels today? dont forget to donate
Christopher Hernandez
THREADLY REMINDER THAT AQUA AND SATANIA ARE SHIT
Joseph Brooks
he is a neo liberal shekel whore. no point in endangering his business model by enganging with people that might drive away his core audience of insecure /r9k/ cancer. just ignore him and report his channel from time to time for terrorism and child abuse
William Sanders
his videos on religion and related stuff are really good desu
Leo Powell
>JF vs Andy about porn (no date) >JF vs Jay Dyer about religion (No date) >Lowtax vs Anglin (no date) >Alt-Hype vs Spino on race realism (no date) >Ryan Dawson vs Halsey (no date) i think its safe to say most of these aren't going to happen
>Schedule for this week 3/22/18 - 8 PM EST - The BA Experience Christopher Cantwell vs RC Maxwell
3/23/18 - 8 PM EST - The BA Experience Mike Tokes vs Nick Fuentes
3/24/18 - The BA Experience Baked Live at Anti-Gun Rally Los Angeles
Andrew Jackson
>endangering his business model by enganging with people that might drive away his core audience A world of delusion is what you are living in. You only wish your sad group of circlejerkers had any kind of appeal to hijack from far more successful speakers.
Camden White
where were you in the last thread?
Samuel Rivera
whats the gestalt on Karen? and why is Warski still up when they shut down Alaska-fag?
Peterstein fishes in the same segment that the group you think I'm part of does. The difference is, Peterstein is dry, a beta and not funny or entertaining. Him losing his core audience to a more entertaining platform and hosts is an obvious risk for his internet income I can't stand his whimpering voice and beta talking style. But yes, he has some material that isn't complete crap and totally unoriginal
Jeremiah Phillips
>he doesn't like kermits voice >he doesn't like watching peterson cry about pinocchio pleb taste
>The difference is, Peterstein is dry, a beta and not funny or entertaining. Him losing his core audience to a more entertaining platform and hosts is an obvious risk for his internet income If your stream daddies platform was so great it wouldn't rely on Peterson to give them an audience.
Gabriel Allen
why would you say that?
Adrian Smith
>No idea why she's involved in any of this Megoguy got into a shitflinging contest with a couple of her pals, rather than let it die down she decided to join in.
>stream daddies Top Kek. Could you teach me how to read minds over the internet? How do you know what my interests are?
Michael Gonzalez
The argument is Peterstein is disingenuous you fucking moron
Camden Harris
It's the very short summary. The Jimbrigade can problably give you a way longer summary.
Hunter Evans
Jimmiekids are asleep/at school right now, maybe in a few hours
Oliver Johnson
So you admit Peterstein has an audience he can lose. Good to know.
Xavier Young
>(((successful))) yeah weird how he came out of nowhere... If you can't see what his purpose is, you're beyond retarded
Josiah Perez
>not wanting to sabotage his career by pandering to individuals whose ideas would legitimately repulse most people means he's a shekel-grabbing whore
This is why the alt-right is failing.
Julian Evans
Did you make sure to donate today? >alt right: since Peterson doesn't take us seriously enough to debate our ideas we should find someone to do it to prove superiority >user: hold my beer *outlines argument* >alt right: WOW R U SUM KIND OF FAGET kek
Wyatt Campbell
>Anyone who is effective, and doesn't stoop to our brainlet loser tactics, is a shill.
holy shit, this latest bybs is fucking shit, why is there an annoyng roastie on there? why has joachim got so far up his own ass? why are there SO MANY FUCKNG PEOPLE ON THE FUCKING STREAM TALKING OVER EACHOTHER? and why can they only get absolute retards on to oppose?
Easton Wood
All the right had to do was follow Trump's 2016 campaign rhetoric and they failed miserably. Braving Ruin pointed this out last week after the whole Heimbach scandal, it's so frustrating.
Adrian Evans
bybs died a while ago now, didn't you get the memo? Stop feeding those fags views
Robert Campbell
>petersteinfag strawmanning to win the argument
Tyler Perez
I liked some of the shows before, joachaim has got really fucking smug lately, and this roastie adds nothing but annoyance
Luke Rodriguez
Wut? why should I? Russia is already sponsoring through Coach. Your interpretation rigs of >if they kill us, we win mentality.
Justin Kelly
>if they kill us, we win Explain?
Grayson Ortiz
>muh genocide A petersteiner couldn't contain his nose even on an anonymous forum.
Gavin Thomas
>claims others are strawmanning Nice try brainlet. >alt right: if we get someone to defend peterson's ideas and he loses and the epsiode gets enough views we might get peterson's attention >user: >JP says nationalism gives people common language, culture, heritage and tradition >That extreme individualism degenerative to society and instills no sense of duty or responsibility >That extreme collectivism is authoritarian and condemns a people to a herd with no capacity for independent thinking >alt right: *no argument* later on >alt right: Is this what peak individualism looks like? >user: I believe you'll find from my first post in this thread that I've said the middle area is the ideal position to be in. >alt right: PETERSTEIN CUM CHUGGER This is why nobody takes alt right seriously. You can't even formulate a coherent argument.
Yeah, that's exactly what you did, because you can't defend Peterstein any other way.
Ayden Rivera
That's way harder to pull off than it sounds
Scout is too iconic elsewhere, might be confusing as to who it's supposed to be.
Asher Williams
on a previous stream, not sure why they keep having her back, and that faggot stoned mexican
>OMG YOU GAIS WE'RE ALL FWENDS LOOK AT OUR DIVERSITIES!!
Asher Evans
You see the argument outlined in plain and simple language. You're free to try and debate it or continue to ignore it and make baseless attacks as is traditional in alt right """"""""'debate"""""""""""
Sebastian Hill
>the alt-right is one person
Julian Reed
scout without face is unmistakably metokur, just add the stars and you're done
Eli Myers
Then maybe the IA or jim81jim avatar, other than that I have no clue
Matthew Myers
>alt right: HARDCORE COLLECTIVISM IS THE ONLY WAY. DONATE TO STREAMDADDY AND DEFEND HIM TO THE DEATH EVEN IF HE'S WRONG. >"oh wow, get a load of these drones." >alt right: WE'RE A LOT OF INDIVIDUALS
Elijah Bell
>>JP says nationalism gives people common language, culture, heritage and tradition >>That extreme individualism degenerative to society and instills no sense of duty or responsibility >>That extreme collectivism is authoritarian and condemns a people to a herd with no capacity for independent thinking >>alt right: *no argument* I didn't provide any argument because he had a point I agreed with I'm not sure what yours is
Liam Rogers
He needs to believe it to construct his strawmen. So you better be a single person, even though the "alt-right" didn't exist prior Clinton's speech.
Jackson Hernandez
this is a stretch but how aobut putting the stars on the bow instead try to put the stars on or change the jaw head shape to directly copy the scout people will pick on that
Jace Garcia
>he had a point I agreed with Well that's kind of the point, isn't it. Your little group completely misrepresents this stance on collectivism vs individualism on the regular because eradicating individual thought is the best way these people can get those donations from the weak and impressionable.
So do more of the alt right agree now that some form of balance is preferable?
Landon Robinson
nobody here gives donations you dumb newfag get the fuck out of here
Jonathan Robinson
>nobody here gives donations Doubtful. These guys have a 24/7 eceleb shill thread up on Sup Forums
Jace White
A mindset of weak, insecure lefties. The idea that if you don't open up for ideologies that are obviously not compatible with your own identity and even dare to exclude them, you are a racist bigot regressive nazi. I linked you to this because you legitimately seem to think, that the majority is repulsed by the way of argumentation and presenting of talking points by the group that you seem to mistake with the new nazi buzzword, the alt right, which it isn't regarding the growth of them. Point is, that Peterstein could, if he was a talented entertainer, get more income and viewers by engaging with what low lifes like you put in the basket of alt right, but will not, because he is probably not as stupid to not know, that he isn't entertaining at all and might lose income and viewers. Thinking that he doesn't engage with them because of ideological differences is ignoring about what this whole youtube game is, easy money.
yeah and I'm the OP the only belief that unifies the alt-right is the preservation of white race and culture
Zachary Powell
>So do more of the alt right agree now that some form of balance is preferable? There isn't a """""consensus""""" in the """"""""alt right"""""""" on almost anything. Personally I think totalitarianism and "eradicating individual thought", as you put it, is the right way to go, although most of the """"""alt right""""""" will disagree on that.
Nicholas Gutierrez
His success wasn't overnight. Don't go to them so quickly it makes you look paranoid.
Caleb Gray
>the only belief that unifies the alt-right is the preservation of white race and culture A simple idea that becomes increasingly complicated by the very current of culture that permeates by the majority of the alt rights behavior. In a sense, I oppose the alt right as a grouping because the people who define it make all of us look bad. >Personally I think totalitarianism and "eradicating individual thought", as you put it, is the right way to go Yeah, well, that's probably because you wouldn't be able to get people to agree with you on most anything otherwise.
Jose Wood
>Yeah, well, that's probably because you wouldn't be able to get people to agree with you on most anything otherwise. Exactly, that is the trouble with democracy and freedom, it divides people and drives them against each other.
Jace Walker
let's pound some super chats
Christian Foster
>h-hey schlomoshekelstein, d-don't say stuff like that, not cool, bro
Matthew Bailey
I still don't get whats your problem
Adrian Wright
>Don't go to them so quickly I didn't, I waited to have confirmation and I had it with his "I can't do it" faggotry now I am sure he is not being honest
Cooper Rogers
nigger did you just ctrl c v your shitty gt from last bread?
Luis Howard
except he's actively shilling against white nationalism, you dumb cunt
Dominic Ross
time to tune out
Xavier Brooks
but he's doing so by a painting a strawman of it what you can do is to say >yeah we agree, that is bad >here's what we propose - with the actual position that way you remove detach the strawman from the alt-right and redirect it to let's say ubermentch meathead skinheads or aryan brotherhood tier shit
Jack Watson
He is a typical huff farting centrist. He wants to be a rebel but without leaving the bounds of comfy mainstream conformism. So that's why all that concern trolling with "alt-right" not behaving like an official political party.
Eli Diaz
I am personally in favor of forms of municipality, where regions are able to preserve their ethnic unity and culture in the places that they find this desirable and neither schools of thought can enforce themselves where it isn't desirable.
In Europe, this is a bit more complicated, because I don't believe countries named after ethnicities should absorb millions of foreign ethnic groups, yet I am pretty fucking certain that an ideology defined by ruthless enforcement by means of slaughter of anyone guilty of "wrong think" will be very conductive to harboring support and sympathy from the popular masses who will resist you from enforcing it.
Easton Adams
uh did you mean to (you) me?
Zachary Davis
is this that dumb alt right bitch?
Cooper Lewis
>In Europe, this is a bit more complicated, because I don't believe countries named after ethnicities should absorb millions of foreign ethnic groups, yet I am pretty fucking certain that an ideology defined by ruthless enforcement by means of slaughter of anyone guilty of "wrong think" will be very conductive to harboring support and sympathy from the popular masses who will resist you from enforcing it. "Slaughtering muh minorites" is your strawman and never was the point of alt-right. Also the "masses" (hello /leftypol/) will not resist for shit, since they gobbled up anti-white jewish leadership just fine.
Austin Morris
yeah except I meant to reply sorry I'm a little dizzy
Nicholas Brown
I think I might have gone overboard with the headset
habermann is barely recognizable there, just go with the faceless scout, trust me
Christian Sanders
But then what's the relevance of the headset dick cumming into his mouth?
Gabriel Howard
doesn't even look like a dick
Brandon Morgan
>I think we should kill everyone who doesnt bow down to our totalitarian state >"Well you should expect most people to resist it" >WHAT ARE YOU A NIGGER LOVER WOW PROTECTING YOUR PRECIOUS JEWS This is why everyone hates alt right
Brayden Foster
bah, you're right, I'll keep it in my fun ideas I'll save for later cupboard
Samuel Anderson
>painting a strawman of it because that's all he has and he knows it he has to keep avoiding serious WN because he is well aware that he will have to concede too much to keep his delusional individualism credible
Blake Cooper
When is Ryan Dawson going to debate Halsey?
Also, Klan of Dusty is cleverly backing out of the Alt Hype discussion/debate of Race Realism. Dusty wants to charge people for his appearance. ($500 for 30 mins)
>yet I am pretty fucking certain that an ideology defined by ruthless enforcement by means of slaughter of anyone guilty of "wrong think" will be very conductive to harboring support and sympathy from the popular masses who will resist you from enforcing it. Of course what I *want* is Utopian, but I don't actually see the need for mass slaughter, the nazis did it pretty well with "removing" the communists and other subversive elements. What I *want*, which is again Utopian, is a "state", where peoples desires are shaped in a way in which they don't actually go against the state, as such the state would become effectively voluntary. For example if people don't *want* to commit crimes, you do not need police, that should be the final conclusion of totalitarianism.
As for the resistance to my ideas, yes, of course. But yours aren't exactly *that* popular either, you also have to fight the establishment, which hates you.
What makes delusional totalitarian collectives credible?
Benjamin Flores
You really shouldn't post selfies on Sup Forums.
Connor Wood
Who is this semen demon!?!
Also checked
Brody Jackson
wow look the very strawman we were talking about
Luis Hall
Bloodsports IRL was one of the best films I've watched in my life. Seeing how most people reacted positively except for a few students and the police, yet you didn't know if they were about to be punched or not at any given moment. Kino stuff.
Liam Richardson
>avoids the question You wonder why nobody actually expects debate from alt right, since baseless attacking and donating to your edaddies is all you have.
