Why doesn't CNN like to name their sources?
SOURCES SAY
because they usually don't have any.
because its fake news
Their sources don't exist
>Conservative outlets don't do this
Because their sources are glow in the dark deep state fags who got together and agreed to tell the same lie
>there are major conservative outlets that exist in 2018 that aren't just controlled opposition
thats called professional journalism
>do they use "some say," "sources" and "reports?" be honest
Fuck off leaf
>making things up and retracting them months later is professional journalism
I see why amateurs get more attention
Because this is their source.
I thought congress shut down the investigation? I remember hearing something about them stopping it on the radio. Is it still going on or are dems just grasping for anything they can get?
Also that bitch looks like a pit bull fucked her face up. Ugly as puke.
most on this subreddit seemed to be brainwashed by russian trolls.
You don't name sources because if you name them, then they won't be sources in the future, to wit: sources will be purged. Or, if in russian, then dictator putin will have source assassinated with a nerve agent.
>according to someone familiar with his thinking
Media is a joke these days
That's a big ass
>subreddit
Oh man you are in the wrong neighborhood my dude
why cnn?
Their main source is CIA nigger fantasies.
Brraaap
It used to be to protect people. Pre-internet dox protection. By protecting people, people will come forward if they don't feel threatened.
Now it's because the sources don't exist. Sources is now code for imaginary.
When you're too much of a pathological liar to be trusted to speak to with the special counsel