Is communism the ideology the world needs, but doesn't deserve?

Is communism the ideology the world needs, but doesn't deserve?

Attached: 1517064067395.png (378x368, 238K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Revolution_of_1918–19
gommies.gom/fug/
gommies.gom/starve/
gommies.gom/ohfugme/
gommies.gom/ohshid/
gommies.gom/1984/
gommies.gom/guck/
gommies.gom/probaganda/
gommies.gom/XDDDD/
gommies.gom/wheresfood/
gommies.gom/benis/
liveleak.com/view?i=e24_1399498421
dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-4278662/China-counts-100-billionaires-Communist-legislators.html
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-02/xi-s-anti-graft-campaign-could-boost-china-s-economy
nbcnews.com/news/china/china-s-president-xi-beefs-his-anti-corruption-crackdown-n851491
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Officials_implicated_by_the_anti-corruption_campaign_in_China_(2012–2017)
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

yes

Yes, we need Communism to kill off all the Communists. But we do not deserve such a thing

Yes.

Attached: 1430951809701-0.jpg (1024x682, 395K)

>Be OP
>Be a Faggot

better dead than red

Fuck off, fascism is the answer, but we weren't ready for that truth

Communism is the anti-Christ, Fascism is the second coming

Attached: IMG_6420.jpg (706x1024, 81K)

>ideology that never won a single war
Reminder that communists have beat the nationalists every time

Attached: 0C969634-C0D4-4DD4-9974-7FF94ABBFA38.jpg (284x177, 30K)

Idc I want the Jewish Reich

Attached: JEWISH REICH.png (2116x936, 208K)

Notice how communism died in communists countries almost 30 years ago? There's a pretty good reason for that.

Communism will never work with humans.

Maybe if we were all machines it would but we are way to prone to being corrupt when given the power that a Communist system gives one.

Attached: Berlin_Wall_being_smashed_down.jpg (564x423, 56K)

Hohol wypierdalaj to north korea we have no place for dirty commies

also

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Revolution_of_1918–19

Spanish civil war?

Also starve yourself to death idiot

Reminder that communists starve their own people to death

Hello gomrades! XDDDD Dis general is for disgussion of margsism-lebonnism, da ideology of revolutionary socialism and gommunism.

Gommunism is da next stage of guckery following real society.

Wat exagtly is gommunism according to gommies:

>Gommunism is a stage of guckery in which the produgtive infrustrugture runs away from gommie country, and no goods are produced and beeple starve. XDDDD
>Gommunism in full form is obressive, statist society dat follows maxim "gib gib gib!" :DDDD
>To achieve gommunism we must replace broduction with murderous obressive rulers liek me, fug working glass beeple. XDDDD Struggle while I liquidate you all lol. When capitalists run away we win and I kill you all. Eventually the functions of state cease and state becomes murderous and indistinguishable from other gommies. Da state withers away liek da people.
gommies.gom/fug/
gommies.gom/starve/

GL uses philosphy of gib and starve, see here:
gommies.gom/ohfugme/

It is recommend you kill yourself so you can avoid starving.

Resources:
gommies.gom/ohshid/
gommies.gom/1984/
gommies.gom/guck/
gommies.gom/probaganda/
gommies.gom/XDDDD/
gommies.gom/wheresfood/
gommies.gom/benis/

-----------------------------------------
Da sdages of gommunism.

>Sdage one
Bourgers aren't allowed to vode :DDD but otherwise da system is digtadorshib of gommies. Everything is stole by digtadors and digtadors rule all.

>Sdade two
Withering
All beeple who aren't digtador glass starve. XDDD Once glass disabears and we steal everything more beeple wither away. Bolice begome unnecessary as beeple are dead lol :DDDDD Central blanning begomes unnecessary begause sgarcity caused starving. Money is all ours.

>Sdage three
Gommunism.
No beeple. No food. My money. Much benis

Attached: gommunism.jpg (250x250, 13K)

Attached: greater israeli reich.png (766x600, 35K)

No, none of them where /ourgoys/, only kulak trash that deserved it.

Attached: communism will win.jpg (800x420, 124K)

it doesnt need it
but hell it deserves it

>they weren't ours
They were Russian citizens. How can you advocate for a system that handles citizens like shit?

Attached: commies and yuris comment.png (1360x980, 489K)

Attached: 318.jpg (600x394, 36K)

>simple people deserved the unjustifiable tragedy
you commies have no self respect

Attached: l01bzzrkmkqy.jpg (720x720, 88K)

I bet the thought of holocaust keeps you up at night too.
Citizens who commit treason need to be punished for order in society to be preserved.

Attached: socialista_iphone.jpg (260x194, 9K)

Sorry, I wasn't listening, too busy trying and failing to find the Soviet Union on a map.

You know what is there, though? Spain.

Attached: francisco_franco_in_1936_by_shitalloverhumanity-d5pz7aw.jpg (894x894, 125K)

killing kikes is nothing wrong , there is a reason for it
but starvation is something else , it kills everyone, innocent and criminals

Have you ever met an innocent Ukrainian?

Sometimes I like to peruse the glorious history of the good little revolutionaries of Spain. They did such an excellent job whooping those Nationalists, and they lived long happy lives afterwards.

Attached: Anarchists dead.jpg (1628x478, 279K)

>not a nationalist spain
i cry everitem

Attached: 170208_FAS_franko.jpg.CROP.promo-xlarge2.jpg (1180x842, 457K)

>Let's kill farmers because why the fuck not

Attached: brainleter.jpg (451x432, 24K)

liveleak.com/view?i=e24_1399498421

Here's two, and one good communist. Well, he becomes a good communist about halfway through.

>implying starvation killed ukrainians only
kikes have been shitting our world since day one
and what did ukrainians did

Attached: 3BB6DD9F00000578-0-image-a-62_1483104363510.jpg (636x382, 89K)

The problem is that communism doesn't just kill commies, it kills everyone.

Attached: 11111.jpg (254x198, 7K)

there's a whole lot of americans that deserve to die under it, but no, i wouldn't say the world needs anything like the systems of communism we've seen thus far in history

Kulaks were not farmers, they were the exploiters of serfs and practiced illegal usage of common lands after the Lenin's degree on land.

Attached: truth about holodomor.jpg (546x640, 48K)

shit wrong one

Attached: giphy.gif (460x358, 3.16M)

Allow me to explain the deranged mind of the Leftist to you.

In his deranged mind, nothing can ever be his fault. If his retarded program fails, it was because Capitalists sabotaged it. If his people starve to death, it is because Capitalists didn't help him feed them. If he nationalizes industries, steals from Capitalists, and then drives everything into the ground and implodes, it is because the Capitalists didn't help him steal from them.

So when the Ukranian farmers refuse to be stolen from, and then he forcibly steals from them at gunpoint but still can't feed everybody because he's an idiot and his commissars sold the food on the black market, whose fault is it?
No, not his. It cannot be. It must, MUST be their fault. The farmers are to blame. So he kills the farmers.

And then... Well. Then it's the Capitalists' fault for not supplying him with his morning bread and coffee. And don't forget the cream Porky!

OwO
*notices your bulge*
What is this?

Read Mussolini you fucking brainlet

Pretty much. It would work if all the people were ideal. But since they are not ideal, it will never work.

src?

Nope. Marx should be murdered in the cradle by a time-traveler.

Its the ideology we deserve, but not the one we need.

ukrainians werent the only ones doing this
after the first famine took place in soviet russia a lot russian farmers took up arms in order to defend their property

Attached: 3BB6B56900000578-0-image-a-40_1483101618214.jpg (962x673, 202K)

working on it

It was not theirs to steal from the commons.

Like that would have changed anything. De leonism would have then been the new marxism among us in the radical left.

>be ivan in 1921
>vlad comes
>he says that reds took all food from the village 50 km away
>all people there are starving now
>vlad says that we should defend the food we have currently from reds
>agree , take up arms
>reds come , shoot reds , reds go away
>mfw they send an entire army to take one village
>we starve now
>mfw some fagg who has never lived in a communist world is saying i deserved it

Attached: Why+communism+doesnt+work+_8c69885bc7217d3b273aa1863103590b.jpg (1000x823, 248K)

>muh experiences
>muh feelings
>muh injustices

In every societal aspect post-Tzarist Russia was an improvement. People would have not sided with us if they thought that their lives were good.

Socialism-the-target is an enormously powerful meme which is nearly impossible to disagree with. Socialism-the-movement, in turn, is a near-perfect civic religion. This is not a good thing, as history has shown time and time again.

The only way for Socialism to be achieved is with proper understanding that Socialism is an Anarchist philosophy - NOT the other way around. The goal of good government is ALWAYS to minimize governance.

Communism in every aspect is regress or failure.
Communism wouldnt fail everywhere if it improved the life of people.

the other way around

communism is the ideology the world deserves but does not need

It has not failed and it never will. Chinese market socialism pushes on without an failure.

Attached: 1436578761178.jpg (315x300, 23K)

Can i have some free weed?

Attached: Kiew-III.webm (320x240, 2.82M)

>dont trust tzar , even though he was actually making some economic reforms that could have saved the country , trust us , we wont starve you to death , i promise !

you're quite dumb fucker.

Attached: 1519209752034s.jpg (250x244, 6K)

>wasn’t real socialism

Attached: 50B75198-76B8-4C0F-A053-983D2DB074AE.png (644x598, 121K)

Entering the ww1 was such great reform.

there are a lot of people in chinese communist party who ironically millionaires

losing it was even better

With the help of capitalism of course

mt family had our own island on the dneper before the reds forced us off it... does anyone care? no.

Attached: 47844668.jpg (1024x1024, 128K)

Yes, and Xi`s latest anti-corruption crackdown have been getting them executed or imprisoned for the better part of this year.

It has failed everywhere and will never work.
Chinese capitalism working hand in hand with western capitalism has pushed out pretty much every aspect of marxist theory bullshit safe the color scheme.

Attached: 1521213136244.jpg (762x785, 193K)

State capitalism is necessary evil before entering socialism, as Lenin stated in his essay "left communism an infantile disorder"

dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-4278662/China-counts-100-billionaires-Communist-legislators.html
doing great job

i honestly wouldnt be surprised if you actually start killing them and then china turns into the shihole it used to be

Attached: classic_sonic_stalin_by_14duckmin88-dakb479.jpg (759x530, 49K)

That was the case in last years party conference, lot of things have changed in 2018, even half of leftypol are supporting China again.

>That was the case in last years party conference, lot of things have changed in 2018,
like what , gimme source fagg

i searched in and found nothing of cleansing of the commie party in china

Yes. As long as most people are still mentally slaves to capitalism it will never happen though. Just look at all the capitalists on this board, pathetically fighting the capitalists' battles on the internet in hopes that they might one day get a juicy piece of steak from their master's table.

bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-02/xi-s-anti-graft-campaign-could-boost-china-s-economy

nbcnews.com/news/china/china-s-president-xi-beefs-his-anti-corruption-crackdown-n851491

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Officials_implicated_by_the_anti-corruption_campaign_in_China_(2012–2017)

>lets see what Raphael Lemkin, the inventor of the term genocide had to say about this:

The fourth step in the process consisted in the fragmentation of the Ukrainian people at once by the addition to the Ukraine of foreign peoples and by the dispersion of the Ukrainians throughout Eastern Europe. In this way, ethnic unity would be destroyed and nationalities mixed. Between 1920 and 1939, the population of Ukraine changed from 80 % Ukrainian to only 63 %. In the face of famine and deportation, the Ukrainian population had declined absolutely from 23.2 million to 19.6 million, while the non-Ukrainian population had increased by 5.6 million. When we consider that Ukraine once had the highest rate of population increase in Europe, around 800,000 per year, it is easy to see that the Russian policy has been accomplished. These have been the chief steps in the systematic destruction of the Ukrainian nation, in its progressive absorption within the new Soviet nation. [...] This is not simply a case of mass murder. It is a case of genocide, of destruction, not of individuals only, but of a culture and a nation.

I'm starting to become a communist, it seems like the most redpilled way of running a society. Capitalism has ultimately led to the end of the west. Capitalists like outsourcing jobs for cheap labor to save money, capitalism is always about fucking over someone.

>skips of NatSoc

Attached: download (2).jpg (272x186, 7K)

*over

>policies of Stalin and other communist chieftains is "Russian policy"
You and your paid "expert" are so dumb you're causing a rift in timespace. Kill yourself, but not before taking your national victimhood fantasy and sticking it up your subhuman ass.

>Capitalism has ultimately led to the end of the west

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

Let me tell you, once and for all, what leads to utter and total ruin of the society - end of morality and nihilism.
No matter the political or economic system, without ethical considerations of your decisions, all systems are bound to produce injustice and suffering.
Communism, due to its sheer emphasis on the material, distorts man's view on value and productive effort, effectively killing the one thing that capitalism gives him, which is the hope that personal effort matters.
Communist ideology kills off any individual striving and thus renders individual ambitions and drives dead. Without those, men lose their desire to be empathetic, and thus they lose their ability to be ethical.

You cannot manufacture love and loyalty on demand, nor can you rationalize suffering without reward. Communism is its own worst enemy and will always lead to failure.

Attached: 1509058431145.png (500x514, 269K)

Yiff in hell, furfag.

Negative on both counts.

Commies do, however, need and deserve a bullet to the brain.

Attached: tet execution.jpg (1024x739, 161K)

We need robot communism. A society ruled by artificial intelligence. Robots take over the labor; perfect communist paradise.

>What could possibly go wrong?

reminder

Attached: 5716047c5f2e986b406cc807b592ac33d0f373bd6aa523d636117e5ce9cbc320.png (1078x608, 370K)

Attached: berlin-wall-fall.jpg (1200x826, 157K)

his real name was Moses Mordechai Levy, not Marx

How'd that work out for you?

That revolver to the head took away much support for your shitty regime.

based gommie poster :D

I won't disagree with you about communism, however capitalism does not inspire ethical and moral decisions. By design, it is competition-based survival of the fittest. Suffering is necessary for the system to work. Suffering in an idealistic and unrealistic view of communism is not factored in at all.

Which is ironic, considering the piece of shit being executed was a child-murdering VC assassin. The photographer, Eddie Adams, did regret taking it because of how the left distorted its meaning.

That being said, Nguyen Ngoc Loan was a hero, and this photo is a personal inspiration to me as to how every Marxist plague rat should be dealt with.

Attached: south vietnam flag.png (2000x1333, 2K)

>My welfare state is good!
>Your welfare state is bad!

>cash led to black markets
>implying if you take away cash people wouldn't trade their goods and services in gold&silver/alcohol/cigarettes/lighters/literally everything else that is small, limited in number, and hence has a real world value.
Commies are so fucking retarded.

socialism nearly succeeded in Cuba, it only fell apart because of Hurricane Irma. In countries in more stable parts of the world there's no reason it can't succeed except for the disruption to it caused by capitalism

>however capitalism does not inspire ethical and moral decisions

To a degree where your reputation is what allows you to make money, you are bound by the common rules of the market. There are implied ethics in the free market, and cheats get a bad name very quickly, on top of the police apparatus that is available to enforce all contracts and exchanges.
communism by contrast takes that away from people and monopolizes all aspects of life in one amalgamated mechanism that caters for everyone but fits no one.

>suffering is neccesary

Not really, suffering occurs when poor decisions are made and misfortunes happen. Bad investments are not necessary to the growth and random acts of God disrupt the economy and put uncertainty into the system which prevents stability from occurring - and stability is required for continuous and predictable investments to happen.

If you had ever gone to Cuba anytime the past 40 years, you'd realize how full of shit you are

First people need to stop stealing and stop being full egoists, then well talk about the possibility of communism

It always seems like the greatest conflicts are over minor differences.

How can you consider a hammer or a toothbrush a personal property, when in cummunism there's no property?
What is difference between personal property and private property?
If private property covers means of production, what stops me from disassembling a mean of production and claim the parts to be my personal property?
Why would you waste resource producing more than say (hypothetically) 1 hammer/toothbrush per 7 persons?

How can one cultivate and harvest crops to personal use, when there's no personal property to be used for farming in cummunism?
How do you allocate public land for this personal farming?
Who allocates the public land used by the collective?

The ten Planks of Communist manifesto:
#8 "Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture."
> Equal obligation
How can a stateless and non-hierarchical society enforce this?
> Your work-time is equivalent to everybody else's work-time
Am I forced to sit and drawn hentai for as long as others work in factory, if I don't want to do manual labour as an artist?
If "... each according to his needs", what stops me claiming to acquire 70% of goods to suffice my needs?
How can anyone else define how my needs are sufficed?
How can a collective deny me coming over demand 70% of goods that others have gathered through hard manual labour, while I can provide them only hentai sketches?
How is Theft defined in cummunist world, when there's no property in non-hierarchical society you can steal from others?

Not if we segregate them into their own shit hole community