So this is dead serious - my wife did a DNA test and found out she was 1% African, 99% European. I also did this test and came out 100% European. Needless to say, I married a nignog. Need srs advice. I mean I jest I love the woman but I am serious my wife is 1% black and sometimes when she misbehaves I can see the black coming out.
My wife is 1% black, wat do
Christopher Hall
Other urls found in this thread:
squawker.org
chicksonright.com
youtube.com
pastebin.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
journals.plos.org
newscientist.com
m.pnas.org
nature.com
twitter.com
Ethan Williams
Accept that you have Jungle Fever and try to move on. It's the only way. Otherwise, she gets half your shit.
Easton Wood
Pizzaniggers white?
Andrew King
Brayden Miller
Its not true. Those places like 23 and me intentionally put some black dna in the report just to fuck with people and make em think they wuz kangs
William Morales
1% really, fuck it make it .05 % call it a margin of error.
Kevin Perez
It is Google afterall. Naturally they are going to lie.
Benjamin Martin
I got the same shit, don't worry about it
Jeremiah Murphy
>italian
>white
Hunter Cox
Carter Phillips
Does this mean I can say "nigger" without reprimand if I get a test back like this?
They really didn't think this through.
Jayden Clark
This.
Don't trust the smaller numbers. The slimy cunts just can't help themselves; they have to shove their agenda into everything they do.
John Myers
The only people who come close to this magnificient mustache are Burt Reynolds, Sam Elliott and D. D. Lewis.
Have some respect you faggot.
Jace Bailey
The ceo is Anne wojcicki, look her up and you will understand
Sebastian Miller
...
Matthew Cooper
Have kids and raise good athletes. Hopefully that 1% of Nigger includes fast-twitch muscles
Luke White
Anyone with a long and wide upper lip space (thin aryan lips) can rock the stache. If u have a thin upper lip cuz of fat lips than you’re genetically ungifted or Irish
David Cook
Cucked larp bait.
Christopher Hernandez
But you do realize the results below 3% are a meme that can't be trusted?
Jayden Young
sage
Colton Gutierrez
the genetic test is wrong
Lucas Morris
Divorce user,it is the only way unless you want mud babies
Carson Bailey
If you just revise the frequency and severity of beatings slightly upward then you should be fine.
Connor Reed
Imagine that, she was 100% white before the miles of black cocks she had.
Isaac Gonzalez
There was a story that came out where the folks that ran the DNA testing company we're SJW's and they purposely had results display a tiny fraction of Nigger heritage just to fuck with white folks.
Grayson Morgan
I wonder who runs 23andme...
Oh.
Kayden Scott
Not SJW's, more like SJEWs
Jonathan Garcia
I've seen this exact thread before
Dominic Hernandez
hahahahahahaha
how stupid are you njål? they screw with you with these tests and they admit it
Cameron Moore
La pasta è servita.
Christopher Sullivan
Don't be silly now, that's just pure cohencidence.
youtube.com
John Roberts
REEEEEEEE!!!!!!
BECOME A WIFE BEATER!!!!!!!
In all seriousness, divorce her and tell her why. Do it big league in public around a bunch of your friends, and let everyone know why.
Brayden Nguyen
This has been proven false. I'm sure though plenty will correct me saying it's just a cover up though.
Jacob Morgan
Holy shit why is this place so fucking gay these days
Brandon Jones
Many DNA testing come out 1% black just to spite white supremacists.
Not even kidding. It's okay, get her tested in two other places that are not in the SJW bandwagon, sue and get rich.
Jason Johnson
Source of proof? Otherwise you are false
Lincoln Smith
Just look at the article it cites cracked as a source for their claims.
Logan Lewis
Ok so you have no proof or counter claim besides where it came from, therefore nothing
Justin Gutierrez
>Not using these tests strictly to get lists of which alleles you have.
>Not realizing that the people who package the results arbitrally label alleles 'African' or 'European.'
>Not knowing that all modern Europeans are descended from Siberians who wandered through north Africa 37kya-14Kya, acquiring African alleles. Pic related.
>Not cataloging alleles with the intention of using CRISPR on your own skin cells to create a culture which can be used to make stem cells to bioprint organs, or at least modify some of your sperm cells to carry the desired genome.
Link;
>pastebin.com
>Ideal TOPite Genome (Annointed:)
Josiah Turner
>italian
>white
ay caramb la madre santa de jesus cristo en la cruz de dios
dios mio
Asher Torres
That was a complete made up lie
Easton Sanchez
Who cares when you all originated from Africa?
Adrian Cooper
Only one option. Immediately kill yourself for being a faggot
Noah Anderson
and the claims in the cracked article shows what someone could possibly do(based on someone not being happy with their results) and not what someone actually does. I guess I have to hold your hand and walk you through this. I guess I overestimated your critical thinking.
William Turner
Occasionally the DNA testers openly admit to putting ~1% nigger in their results to 'fuck with racists' because they are trying to be PC instead of doing their fucking jobs.
Don't worry about it, user.
Nolan Wilson
It's probably bullshit, 23andme has been caught maliciously adding black and Jewish ancestry where it doesn't exist.
What do you expect giving your DNA data and good money to a kike operated company whose CEO is married toa google YouTube bigshot
Ian Thomas
We didn't.
That is an outdated theory.
Man came from Asia, blacks split off from the other genotypes at a very early stage and are barely able to be considered human.
John Wright
How do you prove your racial purity without dna tests?
Luis Reyes
>giving your DNA to Jewish Shadow Organizations
Goodluck later on when they release an altered flu virus that targets your specific DNdA
Wyatt Nguyen
Justin Kelly
Not only that this "interview" came from an anonymous employee.
Benjamin Hill
She's not 1% black they lie on those tests to "mess with racists." She's misbehaving because she's Italian.
Wyatt Young
Why all of these 23 and me threads all of a sudden?
Christian Lewis
It's a coordinated attack by shills trying to discredit dna testing. They want to keep us in the dark. Dna testing dispels the myth that we are all mixed
Caleb Moore
piss off jew
Kevin Ramirez
>1%
Maybe you get a second opinion?
People do it for cancer, why not nogitis?
Alexander Stewart
What are legitimate genetic testing services that don't interject false nigger dna?
Ethan Hughes
She doesn't have 1% african in her, they just put that shit in their to fuck with people. She's pure user.
Joshua Walker
siberians killed my hamster markus one year ago. He was a syrian nationalist
Levi Long
Don’t you mean propels the myth? Every test result includes %1s of various lesser races.
Xavier Hall
I know this is fake, but its completely pathetic that some people here would actually be bothered by "1% African dna", gets even more sadder when you are also unaware of how these results are generated in the first place.
Brandon Rodriguez
it's doctored user, they have admitted to this and their target audience is "white supremacists"
Sebastian Ramirez
This idea literally comes from an article whose source is a comedy website's interview of an anonymous "employee" who says they would rarely tamper slightly with data if the customer was unhappy with their results or just due to numerical reasons.
Alexander Taylor
You should get tested for AIDS
Jack Wood
she is literally 1% black and you are thinking about leaving her
yeah you should leave her, she deserves better
leaver her and then kill yourself and make sure she sees it
Gavin Diaz
BLEACHED
Julian Kelly
>When Inside Edition had a set of triplets send their spit in to Ancestry.com and 23andMe, they got wildly different results from both services. Neither gave each triplet the same ancestry results. “Tests can be a crapshoot. For DNA tests, they use genetic markers, which are little variations in the DNA one or several groups may have, but others do not. The more markers there are, the more accurate the test will be.”
These tests are garbage.
Owen Brown
Can you tell us some good non-Jew Sites to test DNA?
Jayden Sanders
You can measure your skull to see to what subrace you belong to...
James Cox
Measure and compare to what?
Nolan Cook
First off sage you faggot.
Secondly even if you are being legit why you care? It's literally 1 percent you ape. No one is fully pure unless you are a literal inbred.
Joseph Stewart
Description of the European subraces.
Main 6 ones are: Nordic, Mediterrenean, Alpine, Faelid, Dinaric, East Baltic
Anthropill > falling for the (((23andme))) memes
Adam Sullivan
pickle rick!!!
Adrian Russell
>not including specific measurements and numbers
Kayden Morales
b-but aren't luigis white?
William Young
Probably 1% genetic information left over from her last romp with Tyrone
Joshua Stewart
If you have a glass of milk
and you put in 1 drop of hersheys chocolate syrup
you've got yourself chocolate milk.
Nicholas Williams
> Whiter than you, Tyrone Perez
Hudson Ramirez
>no one is pure
WRONG
Dominic Jackson
Nigger Lover.
Michael Nguyen
It is included in these classifaction, I assumed you are not lazy...
Nordic - cephalic index lower than 81, facial index higher than 88, nasal index lower than 70, light pigmentation, ectomorph leaning towards mesomorph
Dinaric - cephalic index higher than 81, facial index higher than 88, nasal index lower than 70, dark pigmentation, ectomorph leaning towards mesomorph
Alpine - cephalic index higher than 81, facial index lower than 88, nasal index higher than 70, dark or mixed pigmentation, endomorph
East Baltic - cephalic index higher than 81, facial index lower than 88, nasal index higher than 70, light pigmentation, endomorph
Mediterrenean - cephalic index lower than 81, facial index higher than 88, nasal index lower than 70, dark pigmentation, ectomorph
Faelid - cephalic index lower than 81, facial index lower than 88, nasal index higher than 70, light pigmentation, mesomorph
Dominic Smith
>and sometimes when she misbehaves I can see the black coming out.
Henry Brown
Well if it is good enough for the NYT, I guess it is good enough for some silly internet news site.
Joseph Bell
>sisters: JewTube CEO and Commiefornia teacher
Cooper Gutierrez
hey you fucking italian oil driller, i saw this fucking exact thread back in 2015 made by an italian guy. stop posting this pasta luigi
Daniel White
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>A long-debated question concerns the fate of archaic forms of the genus Homo: did they go extinct without interbreeding with anatomically modern humans, or are their genes present in contemporary populations? This question is typically focused on the genetic contribution of archaic forms outside of Africa. Here we use DNA sequence data gathered from 61 noncoding autosomal regions in a sample of three sub-Saharan African populations (Mandenka, Biaka, and San) to test models of African archaic admixture
>Three candidate regions showing deep haplotype divergence
>Interestingly, the Mbuti represent the only population in our survey that carries the introgressive variant at all three candidate loci
>Extensive simulation results reject the null model of no admixture and allow us to infer that contemporary African populations contain a small proportion of genetic material (≈2%) that introgressed ≈35 kya from an archaic population that split from the ancestors of anatomically modern humans ≈700 kya
>One candidate locus with an unusual segment of DNA that extends for >31 kb on chromosome 4 seems to have introgressed into modern Africans from a now-extinct taxon that may have lived in central Africa
>We estimated an initial split time of 1.25 Mya (95% CI, 0.7–2.1 Mya) and an admixture time of 37 kya (95% CI, 1–137 kya
Nathan Morris
The MCPH1 gene also shows signs of introgression;
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>The gene microcephalin (MCPH1) regulates brain size during development and has experienced positive selection in the lineage leading to Homo sapiens
>Instead, our data are consistent with a model of population subdivision followed by introgression to account for the origin of the D allele
>the lineage leading to modern humans was split from another Homo lineage, and the two lineages remained in reproductive isolation for ≈1,100,000 years
>During this period of reproductive isolation, the modern human lineage was fixed for the non-D allele at the microcephalin locus, whereas the other Homo lineage was fixed for the D allele
>These two alleles are differentiated by a large number of sequence differences accumulated during the prolonged isolation of the two populations
>At or sometime before ≈37,000 years ago, a (possibly rare) interbreeding event occurred between the two lineages, bringing a copy of the D allele into anatomically modern humans
>Whereas the original D-bearing Homo population had since gone extinct, this introgressed copy of the D allele in humans had subsequently spread to exceptionally high frequency throughout much of world because of positive selection
>Speculation about the identity of the archaic Homo population from which the microcephalin D allele introgressed into the modern human gene pool points to the Neanderthal lineage as a potential (although by no means only) candidate
>Furthermore, the worldwide frequency distribution of the D allele, exceptionally high outside of Africa but low in sub-Saharan Africa (29), suggests, but does not necessitate, admixture with an archaic Eurasian population
>It would be of great interest to sequence the microcephalin locus in Neanderthals or other archaic Homo lineages, should it become technically feasible to retrieve and analyze nuclear DNA from ancient hominid remains
Blake Harris
Which they did;
>journals.plos.org
>from Neanderthal individual from Mezzena Rockshelter (Monti Lessini, Italy)
>We show that a well-preserved Neanderthal fossil dated at approximately 50,000 years B.P., was homozygous for the ancestral, non-D, allele
>certainly shows that speculations on a possible Neanderthal origin of what is now the most common MCPH1 haplogroup are not supported by empirical evidence from ancient DNA
So if Neanderthals and blacks both lack the D-allele of MCPH1, the hominid who carried the modern D-allele existed 1.25Mya, than how could humanity have evolved in Africa?
Instead, some strain of hominid clearly evolved in Eurasia, as they say;
>suggests, but does not necessitate, admixture with an archaic Eurasian population
If a human being was kicking around 1.25Mya in Eurasia? Where's the evidence? Here;
>newscientist.com
>Sep 4, 2017 ... A set of ancient footprints has been found on a Greek island. They are extremely old – 5.7 million
years – yet they seem to have been made by one of our hominin ancestors. At that time, hominins are thought to have been confined to Africa
These are older than the Laetoli footprints in Africa. In Africa, we also found with an anatomically modern metatarsal and metacarpal (Hand and foot bones), dating back 1.4Mya and 3.6Mya respectively;
>m.pnas.org
>metacarpal from Kaitio, Kenya, dates to 1.42 Mya
>In all ways, this bone resembles that of a modern human in overall proportions and morphology
>The bone is long, falling within the upper range of modern human European and African American males
>Applying stature regression equations developed for modern human males (32, 33) yields stature estimates of more than 167 cm
>KNM-WT 51260 falls within the observed ranges for modern humans and Neandertals
Benjamin Gray
>dad is east baltic
>his dad is med
>my mothers dad is full on dinaric
>i'm med
what kind of mix up is this
Carson Reyes
Andrew Hall
>nature.com
>The finding, published today in Science1, centres on the discovery in Hadar, Ethiopia, of a 3.2 million-year-old fourth metatarsal bone
>At Laetoli, Tanzania, some hominins walked across a bed of wet volcanic ash 3.6 million years ago. "When I saw those footprints being excavated, I thought, gosh, you'd lose these on a modern day beach, they have an arch and a totally human gait," recalls Latimer. However, the movements were so close to human that many palaeontologists doubted they could have possibly belonged to the ancient A. afarensis
>"This work certainly puts a nail in the coffin of that argument," says Latimer
It's only conjecture that these bones belonged to A. afarensis, or belonged to the same species that made the Laetoli footprints. They're anatomically human, and the fossils classified as A. afarensis display non-human traits.
So what we really have here is evidence of anatomically modern humans dating back 3.6Mya. Combined with this, we have genetic evidence for the modern MCPH1 allele dating back 1.25Mya, and originating from a Eurasian population.
When I first presented this hypothesis, it was an embarrassment to cite African footprints and bones as evidence for a 3.6Mya old Eurasian human. But now that we have the Trachilos footprints, we not only have evidence of humans dating back 3.6Mya - we have evidence of humans dating back 5.7Mya OUTSIDE OF AFRICA.
Africans in fact have only existed for about 37,000 years, and were created when whites literally had sex with apes. We know they were whites, not Asians, because the bones belonged to a ^167cm individual.
So no, we did not evolve in Africa.
Ethan Ramirez
I think they just sent out a shitload of results to white people telling all of them they have african blood. i saw 2 or 3 more white women describing this just this week. be very very wary who gets hold of your dna
Ethan Cruz
Cerrá el caquero, seguro sos 75% italiano.
Nolan Howard
>needless to say
That's where you outted yourself as a larper.
Nathan Rivera
that 1% is probably just microchimerism from the blacks she fucked before you.