>Vikangs were just a bunch of Larping pagans that never achieved anything
Hah! Do you really believe that! I will have you know we vikings colonized half of europe and crashed the roman empire!
Pic related
>Vikangs were just a bunch of Larping pagans that never achieved anything
Hah! Do you really believe that! I will have you know we vikings colonized half of europe and crashed the roman empire!
Pic related
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Greenland was Norwegian during viking rule
Viking Age Scandinavia also had a population of 250k, yet it colonized Christian Frankia, which had 14 million, at it's peak, while also founding Russia, sailing to the Americas and Persia and so on.
Besides, literally all southern european nations got COLONIZED by Germanics.
Pic related.
The muuuuh meds vs. nords spam is pure d&c sliding, don't fall for it.
No the Greeks spainards and italics used to be more white, due to race mixxing they are now swarthy
And we took down the Jewish state while founding England
Snownigger spam is d&c cancer, but
>vikings
>taking down Roman empire
makes no sense.
The Visigoths (UK: /ˈvJzJˌɡɒθs/; US: /ˈvJzJˌɡɑːθs/; Latin: Visigothi, Wisigothi, Vesi, Visi, Wesi, Wisi; Italian: Visigoti) were the western branches of the nomadic tribes of Germanic peoples referred to collectively as the Goths.[2] These tribes flourished and spread throughout the late Roman Empire in Late Antiquity, or what is known as the Migration Period. The Visigoths emerged from earlier Gothic groups (possibly the Thervingi)
Thervingi are nords
So when you say "viking," you mean "Germanic?"
No North germanic
en.wikipedia.org
Nords from gothland
made the visigoth kingdom
and the eastgoth kingdom big suprise dum dum
>Italics used to be more Swarthy, due to race mixing north Italians are now cumskins
FTFY
Fair enough. It's an odd usage in English, just so you know. We tend to use the actual meaning of the word rather than pretending it was an ethnic designation.
Are you keks actual traditional Pagans or romanticised, women lead Neo-Pagan larpers?
How was it morally right for VIKANGZ to go around and rob fellow white inhabitants of Europe?
Do you consider slavery to be righteous and kidnapping women from neighbourhood to be used as sex slaves your right, like nogs do in the US and South Africa all the time?
Is raping others morally righteous in your opinion?
Are you going to follow your ancestral traditions and conduct human sacrifices on regular bases in time of celebration to receive blessing from Odin and other gods?
Did you kek even know that Odin demanded you to sacrifice 9 person for you for every 9 years?
And that Viking chieftains did even murder their own sons to receive longer life?
If Paganism is superior to other religions, why is the practise dead in Europe?
Why is it only such shitholes as Amazons and African jungles where pagan traditions are alive and ruling their KANGZ societies?
How did Christian steal your traditions when your own ancestors chose to convert their ritual habits for embracing Christ?
>Lands taken
Good grief, don't you know what year it is? Those lands must be given back to their original owners!
All peoples attacked each other, the christians Franks did the same in Europe. Christian instituted nobility ruled all the former lands of the, once mostly freemen, tribal europeans. 90% of the population was in some form of bondage and servitude (as recorded by the Domesday Book) during medieval times, and they also had slavery for the most of the period.
Very Christian Venice was a major slave-port of Europeans. Frankia ran a slave-route to muslim-held Spain, all done by jews with the consent of the church. The Eastern Roman Byzantines sold slaves to their arab enemies who attacked them YEARLY. There were customs like "prima noctae" reported in christian places in Europe, and also by even the clergy, the church at some point owning 30% of european lands and collecting "benefices" from them (which were sometimes amounted on relatives of the pope, who became rich man by collecting up to 63 of these all across Europe).
Is christianity dying in Europe because it's "inferior" to atheism and Islam? Then don't claim the same of paganism or whatever else. Don't forget that the majority of christians are non-whites, too. As for traditions being secretly kept under christianity, they had to be, or else they would be executed - and they cared a lot about these, for a reason.
Stop with the bullshit.
they did try to expand their area of operations in our land but were btfo'd quite decisively and their next forays weren't significant enough to be recorded in history
Dont you know that the africans got inferior iq?
>human sacrifices
Not all gods take human sacrifices, friendo.
Rise of the Rus' and the collapse of the Khazarian state
Trade routes of the Black Sea region, 8th–11th centuries
By the 9th century, groups of Varangian Rus'.....
en.wikipedia.org
We defeated you still in the larger war for caucasus
>a couple of varangian mercenaries fought for the losing side in a civil war in Georgia
>b-but we btfo them LOL!
Vikings attacked Persia and Azerbaijan, rather than Georgia, though, not because they couldn't take your lands, but rather because there was nothing to take there and Persia was richer (and more accessible)...
Maybe pagans should be supported after all
Are you daft?
We defeated all of Caucasus in a big war
Not one leaf was left untouched after we sacked their capital
Khazaria was no more after that war
Pagans are larpers
vikings were not pagans they were christianzed from nothing
>we wuz Romanians 'n shiet
top lel
>When you are the rightful ruler of all this clay and part god
Feelsbadman.jpg
>there was no religiosity outside christianity
>you have no history, goy
"Traitors and deserters are hanged on trees; the coward, the unwarlike, the man stained with abominable vices (homossexuals), is plunged into the mire of the morass, with a hurdle put over him. This distinction in punishment means that crime, they think, ought, in being punished, to be exposed, while infamy ought to be buried out of sight." - Tacitus "Germania", chapter XII.
>can't read what I was saying
I literally said the same as you.
You blue blooded?
>danish greenland
Nope
It's true.
Once upon a time, we had balls.
learn your geography, man
Khazaria was north of caucasus. I don't know what you did in the north, vikings never crossed the caucasus.
Well, there it is. Full retard. Combined with not knowing what a viking was, I'm calling kikish troll and bailing.
No of course not
We have the middsummer girls and our traditions are all aryan but much of the religion part has been subverted by foreign gods like the black sun for example
that is an occult jewish symbol for saturn
that was put in himmlers palace in the 90:es
Here is a pic of Khazaria that did include Georgia
And you fell with them
>v*king genes
>it's another episode of "cherry-picking"
Claiming that brits are more beautiful than nords is just beyond retarded, though...
No one cares.
Our G-d is the real one and made us rule the world.
Your Wadan and Cheesus are dead religions.
>average looking N*rd woman
> the christians Franks did the same in Europe
> secular landlords did it so of course Catholic church in in fault!
kek
> and they also had slavery for the most of the period.
aha, whom were they enslaving, mutt?
> all done by jews
no shit, why do yout hink there was so much anti.semitism
> with the consent of the church
> implying church had political or man power to stop this
and whom were Jews trading as slaves?
> "prima noctae"
reported yet not proven, also stop with your cuckolding fantasies
> the church at some point owning 30% of european lands
indeed, through inheritance from land lords.
> Is christianity dying in Europe because it's "inferior" to atheism and Islam?
Nah, people are just lazy and don't want to be treated as responsible men.
> Then don't claim the same of paganism or whatever else
Paganism is cuckold's religion and women lead these days, you don't even sacrifice animals as your traditions would demand.
> Don't forget that the majority of christians are non-whites
don't care, more money for church's schools and unis and missionary work
You might want to actually read the history of the Visigoths before taking pride in them. There is little at all to be proud of.
>spainards used to be more white, due to race mixxing they are now swarthy
>Namque rutilae Caledoniam habitantium comae, magni artus Germanicam originem adseverant; Silurum colorati vultus, torti plerumque crines et posita contra Hispania Hiberos veteres traiecisse easque sedes occupasse fidem faciunt [...]
>Trans.: The swarthy faces of the Silures, the curly quality, in general, of their hair, and the position of Hispania opposite their shores, attest to the passage of Iberians in old days and the occupation by them of these districts
- Tacitus, Agricola XI, ~98 AD
>Silurum colorati vultus; torto plerique crine et nigro nascuntur; Caledoniam vero incolentibus rutilæ comæ, corpora magna, sed fluvida: Gallis sive Hispanis, ut quibusque obtenduntur, assimiles.
>Trans.: The Silures have swarthy features and are usually born with curly black hair, but the inhabitants of Caledonia have reddish hair and large but flaccid bodies. [The Silures] are like the Gauls or the Iberians, according as they are opposite either nation.
- Jordanes, Getica I.xiii, ~551 AD
Any other idiotic ideas?
>98 AD
Be under roman empires rules for 500 years in the most southern part of italy
Be suprised that after 500 years of race mixxing you are black
Italics were blonde and blue eyed, redhaired some
>Italics were blonde and blue eyed, redhaired some
On second thought, before you try to read anything about this history of the Visigoths, you should probably learn how to read first.
>COLONIZED by Germanics.
Nordics not germantics you swarthy southern faggot
ad hominem not an argument
Many people believe that the nords are north germanics
that may or not be true dane bro
>christian nobility, instituted and maintained with the consent of the church is "secular landlords"
>the church also wasn't one of the biggest landlords and had several prince-bishoprics and so on
Pottery...
>aha, whom were they enslaving, mutt?
They were enslaving other christians and europeans, but that doesn't seem to bother you. And he calls me mutt while using the "templarfag" flag lel.
>Prima Noctae reported yet not proven
Dude, wedding customs in places like Pommerania, to this day includes things like brides dressing in black so to look ugly and not caught the attention of landlords... I wonder why that is...
>indeed, through inheritance from land lords.
See, I made the goyim donate half of their productive lands to me! Lands that formerly belonged to european freeman! Haha, why would you ever bother with that amirite? It's not like entire religious wars were fight in part over it, like the Thirty Years War, which killed almost half of the german population and divides the country up to this day - but christian unity eh?
>more excuses
>don't care about the majority of your religion being niggers, and the church focusing on more "missions" in Africa, instead of fighting degeneracy in Europe
Yeah, these wonderful missions in Africa, who feed niggers, give them medical services, keep them artificially alive, prevents them from using condoms and even directly import them into europe, their "christian brothers", to hallelujah singouts for their welcome... Hand-in-hand with globalists too...
I wish the churches were "our greatest allies" and sheit, it would have been much easier. But that is far from the truth, and we can see beyond that. Lurk moar.
Here's a start: en.wikipedia.org
>ad hominem not an argument
The fact that you somehow read anything about Italics when I was talking specifically and in no uncertain terms about Iberians doesn't require any legitimate argument from me. It has literally nothing to do with what I posted.
>Vikings founded Pula
>Pula means dick
what did they mean ?
Another ad hominem by the swarthy north african rape mongrel
Pic related
Care to post any evidence to back up your claim that the phenotype of Iberians has substantially changed since Tacitus wrote his description nearly 2,000 years ago?
Or is this an "ad hominem" too?
>christian nobility, instituted and maintained with the consent of the church is "secular landlords"
> there are no sinners amongst Christians in this world
kek, do you even leave your flat?
> the church also wasn't one of the biggest landlords
and since when were they one of the biggest landlords? What did Catholic church do with the wealth?
> prince-bishoprics and so on
> implying this is wrong
> They were enslaving other christians
yeah nah, that was forbidden by the Church
> and europeans
if pagans were such idiots that they declined freedoms and civilisation offered to them, no wonder they were given to Jews to deal with
> like brides dressing in black so to look ugly
is this supposed to prove something, mutt?
get me the laws, not some girly rumours of the past.
> Lands that formerly belonged to european freeman
that's not how feudal land laws worked you illiterate mutt. Those lands were owned by Christianised Europeans, descendants of those whom gave up on their niggerish pagan traditions.
> and divides the country up to this day
Indeed, Catholic know how to have fun with carnivals and are loyal to their cultural identity while Protestant areas push forth of modern degeneracy and support globalist immigration.
> instead of fighting degeneracy in Europe
>implying the Church is not doing this
you mutts with little knowledge of our Old World never seem to amaze me.
youtube.com
Have a look!
Why are you posting a video about Romans and Greeks as though this has anything to do with Iberians. Do you even know where Iberia is?
>there are bad sheep everywhere, goy, so we shouldn't care that homossexual and pedophile abuses have been reported among our leadership since roman times
But I see denial is your answer...
>What did Catholic church do with the wealth?
Popes like this jew (Borgia) sure enjoyed things. They enriched their relatives, (en.wikipedia.org
>that was forbidden by the Church!!1
Nigger, I pointed out how one pope was at a time the biggest slaveholder on the planet. Even church historians agree the church could not have called for the abolition of slavery in Rome, or else it would cause a massive revolution. Some popes even endorse slavery as a "consequence of natural law" and to maintain society. Even the Domesday Book records 10% of England was enslaved by 1100. They only abolished the enslavement of other christians thousands of years later, when feudalism was entirely entreched in Europe and the church powerful almost supreme - thus by that time slavery was almost inconsequential and nobody would care.
>fucking BASED enslavement of europeans
But they were given "civilization" amirite, sold by christians (((greatest allies))) to the civilized arabs. LOL Declined the "freedoms and civilization" """""offered""""" to them by dark ages feudalism? Haha the joke!
>girls traumatized of landlords during weddings, to the point of becoming a tradition, proves nothing, goy
Servitude was passed through generations - in many places, like Russia, serfs were bought and sold. They could be tortured at suspicions of "treasonous" behavior and other arbitrarities, like demanding produce they couldn't make and so on...
But you talk about "knowing history"... Kek. Lurk moar.
bumping
bumpi
bumpen yo
> homossexual and pedophile abuses
nigger you were talking about slavery before. Step your game up and stop running away with goal post.
> among our leadership since roman times
> that pic
kek, do you mutt actually believe there are uncorrupted people?
> supported wars to gain lands for their family members
supported in what sense? It's a well known fact that the Church supported wars conducted by kings through sell swords against heretics and pagans.
> like any normal state
no "normal state" existed in this era you illiterate mutt.
> their tithe money who could be used for enriching Europe
Who do you think founded local construction project and kept up early universities, schools and funded local doctors?
> how one pope
indeed, only one pope
> could not have called for the abolition of slavery in Rome, or else it would cause a massive revolution.
welcome to realpolitiks, but stop denying the reality that selling Christians to slavery wasn't forbidden
> records 10% of England was enslaved by
and who were these 10% of population?
who were the slave owners?
> They only abolished the enslavement of other Christians thousands of years later
This was done way before.
> thus by that time slavery was almost inconsequential and nobody would care.
weren't you bitching about Jews being slave masters of Europe and Venice being one of the biggest slave ports a moment ago?
> they were given civilization amirite
exactly, white niggers couldn't improve themselves
> (((greatest allies)))
> implying
you mutt need to stop watching history with modern meme goggles
> Declined the freedoms and civilization
yeap, once you lose you had an option to either submit and receive mercy or face consequences
> by dark ages feudalism
> he felt for socialist meme
with all of that architecture, philosophical and scientific knowledge, they sure were civilised, unlike mud hut sitting, human sacrifices conducting white niggerish pagans
Your an idiot, all nordics are Germanic but not all germanics are Nordic. Nordic is more of a geographical term than a racial one and if you think it is a racial one then all the Nordics from Jutland would not be Nordic since they didn’t historically speak Norse unless and were just assimilated Germanic tribes. Also Norse and the old West Germanic language that would become Dutch and German were mutually intelligible at that time so yes you are definitely Germanic.
> girls traumatized of landlords during weddings
still missing your prove you useless mutt
> like Russia, serfs were bought and sold
Russians didn't adhere to Catholic binding laws.
Also, whom in Russia sold the serfs, Muslim land lords or Christians?
> They could be tortured at suspicions of "treasonous" behavior and other arbitrarities, like demanding produce they couldn't make and so on
again, which demography of land lords did this?
and pull me those laws you useless mutt
That's not the flag of Karelia but concept art for Karelians btw.
Why are you hiding your flag?
Really makes me think.
larpers can't help themselves, they just want to live in their dream
Because he thinks that hiding something will hide his stupid logic that Angles (an ugly Germanic tribe) mix’s with celts creates beauty which obviously is a fallacy.
WE
WUZ
bamp
Why do you keep bumbing this I personally find the Swedish empire part of Nordic history more interesting than VIKANG period
>you're "moving muh goalpost" by pointing all the fuckery going on in the church
This is peak butthurt.
>kek, do you mutt actually believe there are uncorrupted people?
There were no pedophiles in the NSDAP, once one was found, he was shot. It's easy to talk about "purging degeneracy", but when it comes to your church leadership...
>no "normal state" existed in this era
But there was a normalcy of people using the resources of the land in other forms rather than to feed prince-bishops and church benefices and tithes...
>Who do you think founded local construction project and kept up early universities, schools and funded local doctors?
Who were the only ones allowed to do it? In a time where the church could ban all books it deemed as heretics and priests even filled the role of the "scientist" and historian, all having to fit with the bible? The Greeks and others had philosophical academies, mathematical schools and institutions of learning... Before christianity.
>indeed, only one pope
Literally dozens of examples...
>stop denying the reality that selling Christians to slavery wasn't forbidden
It wasn't up untill the late middle ages: en.wikipedia.org
>and who were these 10% of population?
Christians, mostly anglo-saxons but also Irishman and other celts. None of them were pagan at that time. Slavery of christians was fully legal in the British Isles (and mostly elsewhere) up to the 1100's. And again, it was replaced by strenghtened serfdom.
>with all of that architecture, philosophical and scientific knowledge,
Literally called the dark ages. You can't make up this denial. All for "christian identity" and shitting up on your own ancestors...
>what is a search engine
>it was not "true christianity™"!!!
And you still miss the fact that the slavery of christians by other christians (and even by non-christians for most part) was fully legalized in Europe and by the church up to the 12th century, it still had remains in Europe even during the time of Colonialism. And again, it only withered away due to 90% of the population being in servitude, which was more profitable for lords anyway...
>being this jealous
ha
hahahaha
hahahahahahahaha
>Oldenburg was taken by Vikings
Wrong. In fact they were brutally buttraped.
Vikings landed here and in East Frisia, went to plunder Bremen and other towns, while this happened troops from Oldenburg burned down Vikings ships and killed the Kangz on their march to their already burned ships.
Plunder was kept, of course.
t. Oldenburg
>Vikings took over Finland
Explain Sven.
If you know so much about that place then tell me why they have a Nordic cross on the flag, I am genuinely curious and don’t feel like looking it up myself
nation with tiny empires bragging about tiny empires
They got vikanged before that
When the Goths took over the roman empire they stopped at oldenburg on the way
Goths are swedes Roman empire crashed you, We crashed the roman empire
Finns are Vikings to
First of all
>we
Vikings were 1200 years ago, Sven.
Second of all the roman empire was destroyed by mainland germanics.
Stop WE WUZing
Do Finns consider themselves Scandinavian?
Goths were east germanic.
Holy shit youre literally worse than kangz.
>Normandy's conquests
>Viking conquest
No sweety, if Normandy was still viking by the time they invaded Sicily and England, there wouldn't be so much french in the english language.
Ok you kraut have a look
en.wikipedia.org
The Visigoths (UK: /ˈvJzJˌɡɒθs/; US: /ˈvJzJˌɡɑːθs/; Latin: Visigothi, Wisigothi, Vesi, Visi, Wesi, Wisi; Italian: Visigoti) were the western branches of the nomadic tribes of Germanic peoples referred to collectively as the Goths
isigoths emerged from earlier Gothic groups (possibly the Thervingi)
Tervings or Thervings) were a Gothic people of gothland SWEDEN
Geographically they are as scandinavian as sweden, but the young edgy kids in finland insist they are not
As far as I know, it is because the ducal family originally came from Schleswig, which at that time still belonged to the Kingdom of Denmark (the northern part is still illegally occupied by Denmark btw). Therefore, the original was rearranged to the Nordic Cross.
However, it could also be quite different.
Just cause they spoke French didn’t mean they were French either faggot
>They got vikanged by danes
Then vikings rule over you!
Sleswig was administered under a danish ethnic family!
And so are you !
N-noooooo! I don't want to feel the pain!
Well and all germanic people originally came from north germany/south denmark but you dont see me walking around claiming swedes or vikings were basically german.
Goths are classified as east germanics that's a scientific fact.
(((scientists)))
the only fact here is that you are germanic and we are north germanics
and north germanics are far greater than the germanic
every time i see a german immigrant here in sweden i am just amazed over how fair they look but how untermenchen they really are, they do have the chacteristics of a nord but they lack the spirit and the mind so much, this is what happens when you mix with the slavs kraut!
HEHEHEEHE
Didn’t Hitler think that any Germanic country was basically German and should be under a pan-Germanic Reich. So if someone so influential could larp as other Germanic groups why can’t sven
I think you might simply be dumb.
Now listen here, buster. The germanic people, that includes mainland germanics and north germanics, originated in north germany and south denmark. From there they spread south to north italy, west to the netherlands, east to modern day poland, and north to scandinavia and iceland. The germanics is a group of people that can be subdivided into west-germanic (netherlands, germany, austria, switzerland), east germanics dissolved into other south european cultures like spain and france their language went extinct and finally north-germanics namely sweden, norway, iceland and depending on who you ask finland but they are mostly finno-ugric.
And FYI sweden is the sick man of the germanics pic related yep i had to do a scrollshot to even find sweden on that list
Lay off that arrogance faggot and keep your facts straight
You know the gauls who were in what became Normandy just didn't disappear, and scandinavia didn't become suddently empty.
Most vikings who settled in Normandy were from Denmark which had a total population of 300 thousands. France had 5 million people. So we're talking about thousands maybe tens of thousand of vikings mixing with hundreds of thousand of gauls.
complete lie, the aryan race landed in France then went up to scandinavia through denmark, the krauts that stayed in germany mixed with slavs
Also i have a higher iq then you kid, and my country has dominated yours throughout the ages
Does not matter if the soldiers mixed, it is allways a game of nobility
That's not true every germanic country has a distinct culture and hitler knew that
He never planned to annex norway or sweden where did ypu get that idea?
People also like to claim we wanted to conquer the whole world under a german world government or that we wanted to kill all non germans and thats simply bullshit.
Wow, do you watch rick and morty?
Sweden had a few decades of relevance in the 16th century iirc but that's about it.
Since you are straight in denial of widely accepted facts im going to leave this thread now.
Good night.
>hen
Lel
Yea leave you fucking kraut when you loose the argument
we dominated you did we not?
thats all what matters
>complete lie, the aryan race landed in France then went up to scandinavia through denmark, the krauts that stayed in germany mixed with slavs
This goes against everything with actual genetic evidence.
You can't really call the spread of Germanics a lie, this is well documented. It was much more Denmark and Scania than it was northern Germany, though. The tiny bit near Denmark, maybe.
>He never planned to annex norway or sweden where did ypu get that idea?
That's not true, though. He planned a Germanic empire, and Norway and Denmark would be a part of that, and of course the Low Countries.
Go to bed kid! Read a book!
Hitler actually promised Vidkun Quisling that Norway would be fully independent after the war was over. Besides, pushing the German language on the Scandinavian and low countries would have been more trouble than it was worth.
just cause the pesentry of Normandy mixed with Gauls does not mean it makes them French Because the same thing happened with England with the Anglo-Saxon invasion of England but England is still a Germanic country and has around 60% Germanic dna which probably would be around the same for Normandy before it was absorbed by France after the 100 years war and it was mainly the peasantry that mixed the only mixing that the nobility did was with some franks but that still made them primarily Germanic mostly Nordic and the English nobility is much more Norman then the French would ever be
>my v*kang ass is one firreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
If that was the case then why did he even invade in the first place because Norway was neutral before they were invaded.
Neutral but their government was far too friendly with the British. And even if the Norwegians didn't allow the British to use their territory to launch an invasion of Germany, they might have forced the issue anyway. And before you say thats utterly fantastic or improbable, note that the Soviet Union and Britain jointly invaded Persia simply because they didn't want to embargo and completely disavow the Krauts.