Is Jason Unruhe /ourleftist/?

>hates SJWs
>believes in nationalism
>hates feminists
>hates BLM
>believes in a strong state
>hates trannies and knows they're mentally ill
>defends masculinity
>defends traditional values

How is he not one of us yet?

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-03-22 at 8.32.55 PM.png (609x563, 116K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=J8n_lg4ZE_s
youtube.com/watch?v=zcCj7AU43mw
twitter.com/MaoistRebelNews/status/977005675271344128
youtu.be/fW6lnmx0ETw
youtube.com/watch?v=J7E4BkZEcAg
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_categorization)
youtube.com/watch?v=2PUTaHK2kOU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Jason calling out BLM racists:
youtube.com/watch?v=J8n_lg4ZE_s

Jason exposing the JQ:
youtube.com/watch?v=zcCj7AU43mw

Some commies/maoists I like

twitter.com/MaoistRebelNews/status/977005675271344128

/ourguy/ 100%

This is not the first time Jason has pissed off the Twitter left. He called Anarchopac, another Youtuber, an "upper middle class parasite leeching off Third World exploitation" as he refused to use his preferred pronouns. When Anarchopac complained, Jason said he "should kill himself" and that he "doesn't respect his right to live".

He's pissed off so many that people have made literal death curses against him:
youtu.be/fW6lnmx0ETw

That makes him ours. He will be a NazBol in three months tops.

i unironically like The Roo

Good. We need to recruit more leftists.

I don't actually agree with him though, I just think he is funny. He is the Sargon of Communists basically.

Did you watch his debate with Sargon?

Nah. The last thing I watched related to the Roo was a video where some weird Jewish occultist Pol Pot fan tried to put a curse on him or something, back when I posted on /leftypol/.

youtube.com/watch?v=J7E4BkZEcAg

Fuck off Jason

>nazbol
What did you flip flop AGAIN?

Daily Reminder: Commies are the fucking scum of the earth; however, Joseph Stalin is the ONLY MAN IN HUMAN HISTORY to have reversed sexual liberation and avoid the civilizational collapse that it inevitably brings.

I'm not Jason.

Hi Jason. You are a broken record, 10 years on and still running your shitty communist news network.

Stalin was based. He is the greatest leader to have ever existed.

Yes you are. You've posted on Sup Forums before mate, I remember roasting the shit out of you.

When? Where? What was the topic?

I knew it was you.
Nah a few months ago just like now I decided to lurk Sup Forums for the afternoon, saw a thread where you were shilling your videos. I and a couple others engaged you and basically made fun of you lmao.
Glad you're finally weening yourself off of materialism.
Blood is stronger than gold.

Every communist deserves a bullet to the head and an unmarked grave.
Every single one

Why? Jason rejects idpol and is redpilled on the JQ. He calls out Jews and their philo-semitic lapdogs.

Which videos? Can you prove it?

Class is ID, dumbass

No. Class is materialist, identity is idealist.

Brocialist piece of shit doesn't put 1st world trans, PoC and non-gender conforming problems first. Always with actual "Bourgeois" problems and 3rd world solidarity first. Like literally, JUST!

>class is an identity
Are you mentally challenged? I'm gonna identify as a billionaire tomorrow, sure that will work

By your own logic here, race isn't an identity, simply because I'll be white regardless of whether or not I identify as black.

Communism is crab in buckets tier mentality thay attracts nothing but sadists and thieves.
You think this guy plans on being a worker busting his ass in his percieved communist utopia? He sees himself in a comfy party official position dictating and presiding over people. It doesn't matter how many times he rightfully calla out the left and kikes.

Identity is grounded in the material AS WELL as the spiritual.

Yeah you could actually, it might be because you're nuts but that is the essence of identity. If you reckon you have millions of currency you then can reason you are a millionaire, even if you aren't.
This also explains why Turk Ashkenazim larp as Judeans, and even strive to outdo them in the maliciousness towards other peoples lmao

Race is also materialist. By identity we mean fake identities like trannies, genderqueers.

So you think people can identity as different races like Shaun King who thinks he's a nigger? Because that is what your comment implies dumbass

Race is an identity because it's not a biological category, but rather a social one.

He's pointing out how whites are victimized by the SJW philo-semitic media.

You are fucking retarded if you actually believe that

>race isn't a biological category
wew lad.

So how is race a social category, and what makes class more meaningful?

are you that reddit that I need to put /s ?

Attached: ToxicSeedJunkie.jpg (1200x1645, 381K)

Race is entirely biological and also mental. There's a reason why whites make different civilizations than blacks.

I disagree with him on principle but it's a bit of a white pill to see a leftist starting to call progressives out on their race bullshit.

Attached: 1501520266337.gif (460x259, 1.93M)

Now you understand the racial spirit?
Jesus who managed to finally get you to read the necessary materials to learn?
I'm shocked a Canadian so entrenched in some materialist bs could ever wander onto a better path like this.

I'm not Jason.

> There's a reason why whites make different civilizations than blacks.
Yeah material conditions
ever hear of Thomas Sankara? Ever hear of neo-imperialism or debt enslavement of African nations?

Because race is just based on phenotypcial traits. It's not influencing your material social relations.

Literally read the Wikipedia article
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_categorization)

Ever heard of IQ tests?

Stop fibbing Jason

>death threats
Why are people still worked up about these? It’s usually people in another country or kids who can’t afford the plane ticket. Also, arm yourself.

>Wikipedia
kek
>race is just based on phenotypical traits
Wrong again, sweetie.

Yeah like how more wealthy individuals score higher on tests or how socioeconomic and access to good food early on life make up the absolute vast majority of differences. Iv'e heard of that alright.

The mind is material. Whites and blacks developed in different material conditions, yes. This explains the differences in brains.

Attached: jiceberg.jpg (1024x576, 35K)

Fuck off Jason.

Even when those factors are accounted for blacks still score lower.

Are you a race creationist or race materialist?

>provides no sources
>MUH WIKIPEDIA even this is 99,9% consensus in science
Fuck off

And the difference between IQ is rather small if existent at all. Just go take a look at Thomas Sankara.

Due to cultural and societal differences on education,early education,maternity bonding,diet and people you associate with etc. Are you going to disagree that a rich white man born in the West in the same wealth category as a another will rate higher on iq due to a stricter oriental bringing?

Sankara was educated in the West by whites.

I fucked the last bit up so let me rewrite it

A rich white man will score lower on a iq test then another rich white man raised in a oriental society.

Asians have their own evolutionary patterns.

And? Then Blacks given the right circumstances any iq differences if any can be minimized to the point where they no longer effect anything and just eating the right food and being educated well would be the main differences.

So when will you be coming out as nazbol officially? Or are you afraid of /leftypol/ and company laughing at you?

But Europeans and Asians have different cultural understandings of tests and education, a White or Black person raised in one of these strict Asian society's given social acceptance and no discrimination would rank hire then some middle class American.

Again, I'm not Jason. DM Jason this thread over Twitter and he'll tell you it's not him.

Lmfao stop it man come on

I'm serious. Do I need to post a pic of my hand with timestamp?

Here's Jason calling out a black idpoler:
youtube.com/watch?v=2PUTaHK2kOU

Also lemme just argue this.

>hates SJWs
He wouldn't hate people who want equality though, just obnoxious ones who ignore class issues. Marx also hated feminists and anti-racists who put that over class issues
>>believes in nationalism
Only as so far as a defense and a unifying factor against capitalist intervention.
>>hates feminists
Yeah the outward crazy ones, Jason would still agree with gender equality along with class issues.
>>believes in a strong state
Same as with my Nationalism point
>>hates trannies and knows they're mentally ill
Many Communists think this
>>defends masculinity
Many Communists do this
>>defends traditional values
Same with the Nationalism point, he's coming off a 1940's Soviet viewpoint which given the time was actually incredibly progressive

Billionaire is an identity because it's not a biological category, but rather a social one. Also stop lying to yourself.

>Many Communists do this
Most "communists" today are trannies.

Most "Communists" aren't even Communist. I bet most self confirmed Socialists think Bernie is amazing and a true Red Socialist and argue for disarming people. Anyway for all the shit antifa gets it's basically full of liberals who think welfare and equal rights are Socialism/Communism and they also just want to break shit.

If that's the case, why are so many self-proclaimed communists anti-gun, anti-family, anti-nation, pro-fag, and race deniers?

>unemployed and lives in moms basement
/ourguy/

>Anti-gun
No Communist is this, and if they are they fall into the line of liberals who think Communism is when white people pay extra tax and there's less police.
>anti-family
The modern nuclear family is the result of property inheritance and the beginnings of slave society's/Feudalism and mans strength against the weaker sex. Before this almost all humans lived in basic communistic style tribes. I am for strong nuclear families with the inevitable outcome of ending the tying of women to the household and the restriction of them as unequals in society.
>anti-nation
The nation state and Nationalism are only handy until Communism can be reached, since Nationalism is a very handy tool for defending one self. IE Soviets,North Korea
>pro-fag
This issue varies some view Capitalism as creating Homosexuals and some are just pro homosexuals (not the outward aids spreading ones) Take North Korea you can be homosexual as long as you do not go against the State or ruin national unity.
>race deniers
Race is a pretty minor thing like Iv'e argued in some of my posts and plays a pretty minor if any point in society, even then Communists are not for total equality and do not think everyone is equal. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" his inherently accepting that people have different needs and abilities. Lenin btfo of some liberal professors who tried to argue this everyone is the same nonsense.

No, the family unit is entirely natural and necessary for a functioning society.

Nations are just as biological as they are political. In fact, biology is highly influential in politics.

>No, the family unit is entirely natural and necessary for a functioning society.
Nope, the modern nuclear is one which developed out of early cities and settled villages which is where the first man said this is MY field and MY house and i'm going to give it to MY son. This inheritance passdown then tied women to the household and the proto-nuclear family was created. If you abolish property you abolish the nuclear family. One man One Wife will however still be the norm for society
>Nations are just as biological as they are political.
Nations did not exist before people claimed ownership of land, even then Nationalism as we know it basically didn't exist in any real way until Napoleon and the French revolution
> biology is highly influential in politics.
To a degree since men prefer to be politicians and take lead, but your upbringing and your morality are the real factors

Nations and families are both entirely biological. Nation and biology are the foundations of politics, not the other way around. This is an entirely mateiralist view.

lmao, i know fatima and a friend of hers visits leftypol. jason is retarded but he cracks me up

i think he's more of the molyneux of the left. his antics are just funny. just looking at him is funny

Yes it is materialist, the conditions of property and Capitalism/Feudalism are the conditions of the nuclear family. Before property there was NO NUCLEAR FAMILY. If you abolish property you abolish the material conditions of the nuclear family.

Also Nationalism basically didn't exist before the Napoleonic wars and Napoleons conquests. Medieval peasants in France didn't have a French nationalistic zeal and no such thing existed until the French revolution and Napoleon

>Nations did not exist before people claimed ownership of land, even then Nationalism as we know it basically didn't exist in any real way until Napoleon and the French revolution

Are you memeing or is this the actual extent of what you're being taught in history classes.
It isn't true.

Yes, there was. Ancient Greece had a nuclear family model.

Humans have always organized ourselves by racial groups. Races are distinct. This is a material fact and if you deny it you are not a materialist but a creationist.

I like Jason. Been watching since 2012. Faggots here refuse to look at the third world perspective of finance capital cuz u racist

Jews profit tremendously off the exploitation of the 3rd World. ((((Israel)))) was entirely created through blood diamonds (De Baers) and blood bananas (United Fruit), both companies run by (((them))).

>Are you memeing or is this the actual extent of what you're being taught in history classes.
Nationalism didn't exist to any actual real extent, Nations obviously did.

>Yes, there was. Ancient Greece had a nuclear family model.
Which originated when the first people claimed personal ownership of the land. Do you think Cavemen or hunter/gathers had nuclear families? Also Sparta had an entirely different model of family where children where ripped out of their mothers hands and raised communally.

>Do you think Cavemen or hunter/gathers had nuclear families?

No but that's why they don't progress. It's also why nogs can't keep stable families as they didn't evolve within that model.

yes he is

too bad he's a commie

The nuclear family is a result of agriculture. It is an answer to the question of what to do with land once the owner dies. Pre-agricultural people groups still exist today. They do not have nuclear families.

It's true that nationalism is a modern phenomenon. While people groups and ethnicities certainly existed, nations as such did not.

Did you not pay attention in European history? There was no Nation of Italy until the 19th Century. No German nation until the 19th Century. No French nation until the 18th Century. The United Kingdom wasn't united until the 1707. Greek Nationalism didn't happen until the late 18th Century, and didn't result in Greek independence until 1823.

The very idea of a "nation" is entirely modern.

>No but that's why they don't progress
They didn't progress because they didn't have any farms or cities not because mummy and daddy hunter/gatherer only gave berries for their children. I'll say it again the nuclear family developed when farming was discovered and people settled and people claimed land and passed it onto their children. Also this inherently makes the nuclear family a unnatural thing since it was created artificially rather then Humanities natural state. The nuclear family just fits the current form of society we have quite well and if you change this society of capitalism and property then the family changes as well to one which is still very beneficial to society.
> It's also why nogs can't keep stable families as they didn't evolve within that model.
Sparta was also very efficient and won the Peloponnesian War despite not having a nuclear family and children being raised in communal "families". So the conclusion is just having a nuclear family isn't much of a decider in whenever or not your society works otherwise Sparta would of never came to power.

yes he could be /ourleftist/ Jason.

Black Americans had stable family structures until the 1970s. The current state of the Black American family is a result of lending policies based on red-lining and zoning policies that became popular in the 70s, the collapse of urban property values due to White Flight that same decade, the destruction of the welfare system under Clinton in the 90s, etc.

Turns out that when you systematically destroy wealth in a community, family structures suffer. Who could have guessed?

I'm not Jason and Jason isn't a hereditarian (yet).

Rome. Greece.

Rome wasn't a nation. Rome was a city-state that expanded its citizenship to certain residents of the Italian Peninsula during the Republican period after it expanded its territory, and then to a whole raft of people and ethnicities during the Imperial period. Many Emperors were not natural-born "Romans." Heliogabalus was a Syrian. Hadrian was ethnically Spanish--or from the people that inhabited the Iberian Peninsula at the time, at any rate.

Greece was a group of city-states that had a common language and common cultural elements. They were constantly at war with each other, often allying themselves with non-Greeks in their internecine battles. The greatest conqueror among the Greeks and spreader of Greek culture--Alexander the Great--wasn't even Greek, but Macedonian.

seems like a right winger pretending to be a leftist imho

just like all those altright accounts with females as avatars when IRL its the average neckbeard

Attached: 1506788855252.gif (225x168, 2.21M)

Greece was a collection of city states who would sometimes band together to fight off Persians in-between killing each-other and some turncoating for the Persians. There was no push or want for a United Greek society and no form of nationalistic pride over being Greek, no one identified as Greek you identified as Spartan or Athenian only in a very loose sense did you ever slightly identify as Greek.

The same with Romans since they had more of an imperial cult and local religions and township identities were stronger. Nationalism literally didn't exist in any meaningful way until the French revolution since the modern state didn't exist nor did identifying as a member of that state exist for the longest time. Just look at the divides in the HRE or medieval feudal kingdoms between neighboring cities.

At least he realizes how anti-white things have gotten. I can respect him for that.

the problems with Marxist Leninist (I assume that's what you are) is that they have no solution towards the browning of western civilization, many of them reject the notion that the west can't be continued by non western people
I think you guys argue for a society that would work at the beginning of civilization, but it's not tuned to sort out problems as fast as something like fascism or national socialism. These ideologies are responsive, yours in an end game or beginning game deal

Yes.

But they were still Indo-european.

HUDDLE, SAVE, POOL, INVEST, ACQUIRE, ACCUMULATE AND PROSPER!!!!!!
t.guy who's rural kulak family has done this system since 1961 and is continuing to this day with 39 young, working family/in-law members pooling massive funds annually

He's the old type of leftist. I remember him saying homosexuality and transgenderism would exist in a communist society