Legalizing prostitution would be an easily solution to a lot of the problems in this country people dont want to talk...

Legalizing prostitution would be an easily solution to a lot of the problems in this country people dont want to talk about.

Change my mind.

Attached: site_197_Spanish_710741.jpg (704x396, 27K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407304/#!po=11.1386
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00444.x/abstract
psycnet.apa.org/journals/senpai/24/6/766/
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00996.x/abstract
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470475/
nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opinion/actually-prohibition-was-a-success.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

It'll never happen with the rapid bible belt and all the politicians who use hookers constantly that don't want to get caught

Attached: Awkward Stage.jpg (803x803, 104K)

Attached: 1512866150483.jpg (200x200, 6K)

It will never happen, the guv won't benefit from it.

Certain government officials could obviously get some business stuff in order before the ruling to open up the first legal whorehouses and get rich.

>Change my mind.
you afraided to kissing your owned daughter 'cause she suck too much penis in his prostitution carrier

so child prostitution should also be legal? What kind of prostitution are we talking here?

Attached: 1521341209387.png (1024x576, 850K)

It would certainly protect chicks if it was regulated.
Plus, let people do what they fucking want if it doesn't harm anyone.

Obviously the sex would have to be consensual, and children or anyone under the age of 18 by law cannot consent.

What problems exactly?

Here's a better solution: Criminalize adultery, end no-fault divorce, put sodomy and fornication laws back on the books.

Prostitution creates an underclass of whores who will never be able to marry, and sexual liberation in general is a guarantee of civilizational collapse. Prostitution also doesn't actually solve anything.

Attached: 1481366851197.jpg (4920x4161, 2.69M)

>It would certainly protect chicks if it was regulated.

Of course. Im picturing it being like a fancy message parlor is now. Very clean, well run and regulated.

>Here's a better solution: Criminalize adultery, end no-fault divorce, put sodomy and fornication laws back on the books.

Nope. Taking away people's freedoms is never a better solution. Even though morally I agree that would be beneficial for everyone to follow.

>Plus, let people do what they fucking want if it doesn't harm anyone.
No, neither you nor anyone else is an island. Your actions perpetuate culture and have an impact on others. Sexual liberation is literally one of the biggest threats facing the Western World you dumb nigger.

>Sexual Regulations and Human Behaviour. London: Williams & Norgate ltd., 1933.
>Sex and Culture. London: Oxford University Press, 1934.
>Sexual Regulations and Cultural Behaviour. London: Oxford University Press, 1935.
>Hopousia: Or, The Sexual and Economic Foundations of a New Society, with and introduction by Aldous Huxley. New York: Oskar Piest, 1940.

>Feldman SS, Cauffman E. Your cheatin’ heart: Attitudes, behaviors, and correlates of sexual betrayal in late adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 1999;9:227–252

>Treas J, Giesen D. Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage & the Family. 2000;62:48–60.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407304/#!po=11.1386
>"Having more prior sex partners predicted a higher likelihood of future ESI"


onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00444.x/abstract
>Teachman study correlating number of sexual/cohabitational partners with divorce, using 1995 National Survey of Family Growth

psycnet.apa.org/journals/senpai/24/6/766/
>"Both structural equation and group comparison analyses demonstrated that sexual restraint was associated with better relationship outcomes, even when controlling for education, the number of sexual partners, religiosity, and relationship length."

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00996.x/abstract
>Sexual restraint in relationship correlated with better relationship quality

>shows pic of legal age chick
>"child prostitution"
Where compartment of you ass did you pull that from? Or is this just bait?

Freedom is the world's biggest meme though. What good is the "freedom" to be a degenerate? Why should anyone be allowed to enjoy such a "freedom."

The only way this becomes even mildly tolerable (ignoring, for a moment, that sexual revolution has never occurred without causing severe civilizational waning or collapse) is if the welfare state was completely dismantled. That won't happen though, because the only freedom degenerates want is freedom from the consequences of their actions

Attached: thisthis.gif (300x186, 446K)

I think its important to have the freedom to be degenerate if you want to and even go so far as to say that banning degenerate activities like sodomy at this point would only increase the amount of people doing it.

Its like how they say you cant be a good person unless you are capable of evil and just choose not to express it.

Ive Never really understood why its illegal to start with :l
I mean if you want to sell your self for sex or that and you enjoy it, whats wrong? Isnt affecting my life at all

Change your own mind

>Its like how they say you cant be a good person unless you are capable of evil and just choose not to express it.
Jordan Peterson, please go. This isn't about forcing people to be "good," it's about preventing behaviors and stifling cultures that have always signaled decline.

>I think its important to have the freedom to be degenerate if you want to and even go so far as to say that banning degenerate activities like sodomy at this point would only increase the amount of people doing it.
How is banning sodomy going to increase the number of people engaging in sodomy? Are you inferring this from the myth of "failed prohibition" (which largely worked)?

It would benefit society as a whole. It would remove the one leverage card self righteous women have, which is their pussy. You could just go buy it like a pack of cigarettes.

>How is banning sodomy going to increase the number of people engaging in sodomy? Are you inferring this from the myth of "failed prohibition" (which largely worked)?
Can you name a single instance where prohibition wasnt a massive failure?

>Jordan Peterson, please go. This isn't about forcing people to be "good," it's about preventing behaviors and stifling cultures that have always signaled decline.
But the problem is this is entirely objective. I agree that the behaviors you mention do signal a decline in our culture, but you could see how the other 50%+ of this country on the left side will say the opposite. Its not something that could ever be implemented and im not sure it would even work out.

OP How much does your mom and sister charge?
Do I get two for one?

Attached: 1509448604406.jpg (720x540, 44K)

>Do I get two for one?
No they charge separately and dont work well together.

>But the problem is this is entirely objective.
subjective*

there's a kid there, you dumb nigger baby.

No shit. I'm not saying we shouldn't have solid familial relationships. Enforce proper relationships, not through law but through reason.

For single guys that want a payed one night stand it's not going to be a huge issue.

Hate on those that fuck out of their relationship when they already have kids. Society already sees them as the shits they are.

I'm more concerned about the freedom aspect. Let people do as they wish as long as it's not harming anyone. What they do might make people think of them less, so then maybe they'll learn a lesson.

Stuff that authoritarian shit back up your ass.

Imagine a world where your wife pisses you off and you can threaten to just go to a legal brothel and get a blowie while watching the game.

I'm talking about OP's pick.

if you want to pay some one for sex and are too scared if its legal or not your not going to do a good job fucking some one you paid.

basically it doesn't matter if its legal or not if your worried about it being illegal you shouldn't be paying for sex.

pussy

You can pretty much do that now, just minus the legality. You're almost guaranteed not to get caught.

he said "prostitution" should be legal, WHICH FUCKING ONE? THERE'S A MILLION AND ONE TYPES OF PROSTITUTION YOU HEADASS.

Maybe for some. I wouldnt know where to go.

Itd be nice to just have a regular place you can pay with your credit card and build up membership points for a free rimjob or something after a certain amount of visits.

>Myth of prohibition being a failure
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470475/
>nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opinion/actually-prohibition-was-a-success.html

Prohibition managed to cut down on alcohol consumption significantly. Organized crime appeared prior to prohibition and continued after its repeal. It's also important to note that prohibition was being enforced at a time when the U.S. was taking Italian immigrants, and Cesare Mori was cracking down on the mafia in Sicily on Mussolini's orders. Guess where the Mafia members who weren't rounded up went?

>subjectivity of sexual liberation=decline.
It's not though, & there's very little academic work to support this.

Sir John Glubb noted this in "Fate of Empires." Oxford-educated Anthropologist, J.D. Unwin focused almost entirely on sexual liberation in his works. He found that sexual liberation undermines monogamy, saps vitality and energy from societies, reduces societal participation and has in every case resulted in severe civilizational waning, or outright collapse.

The only exception to this rule happened after his death. Ironically it was the USSR. You can't infer much from that, simply because the USSR was anomalous in general, and SexLib happened at the legislative level first, culture second; whereas it's been the other way around in every other case. Additionally, Stalin had political power that previous and successive governments simply aren't capable of imagining.

>Sexual Regulations and Human Behaviour. London: Williams & Norgate ltd., 1933.
>Sex and Culture. London: Oxford University Press, 1934.
>Sexual Regulations and Cultural Behaviour. London: Oxford University Press, 1935.
>Hopousia: Or, The Sexual and Economic Foundations of a New Society, with and introduction by Aldous Huxley. New York: Oskar Piest, 1940.

>The left will argue the opposite.
Of course they will. They're wrong. They're enemies to be defeated, not respectable opponents to be compromised with.

Apparently OP doesn't like the price one has to pay, otherwise it's pretty legal.

>muh freedom
Great argument, you libertine fuck. That doesn't refute anything I posted or linked to. Sexual promiscuity is not "harmless." It's socially and culturally corrosive and should be treated as such.

Degenerates shouldn't be reasoned with. They're immune to reason, otherwise they wouldn't be degenerates in the first place. This is why we need the state to shove rifles in their back.

Prostitution is legal. It's called Marriage.

I wouldnt mind paying double what I would pay on the street if it had a nice waiting room with magazines and a TV and a bed with soft sheets

I'm sorry, I thought you were intelligent enough to realize common understandings of words, especially when they apply to routine illegal activity, but I guess I have to spell it out for you.

I don't have crayons, but lucky for you I have a glitter gun.

>THE TERM PROSTITUTION (IN AMERICA) REFERS ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY TO PROSTITUTION OF LEGAL AGE WOMEN.

What? Did you think we were talking about bestiality you goddamn tard? OP HAD A CHICK ON THE DAMN PICTURE.

Pick the shit out of your brain.

When will people learn that repressive force doesn't solve shit?

If American's (or any other countries people) don't have the willpower for a solid relationship WITHOUT THE THREAT OF A RIFLE AT THEIR BACK KEEPING THEM IN LINE then maybe they're not meant to have a functioning society.

>repressive force doesn't solve shit
[Citation needed]
Stalin managed to end sexual liberation with repressive force. Prohibition was on the road to working in America (it would've been a complete success had we not accepted Sicilian immigrants and capitulated to pressure during the Great Depression).

>If you can't do X maybe you don't deserve a functioning society
This is the problem with the "muh freedumbs" crowd. You guys let the left ruin society and culture, and instead of fighting back, you just shrug it off by saying "well if people aren't perfectly reasonable individuals maybe we don't deserve a functional society. Civilizational collapse is better than 'treading on me™'"

>You guys let the left ruin society and culture, and instead of fighting back
Trying to change the minds of half the country by force wouldnt end well. It will never be voted for, and no one has the balls to propose it. Its great in theory to force everyone to adopt your worldview by force but its really not practical now, not in this country at least and its the only one that matters.

We're unironically due for civilizational collapse in the next 40-100 years though. It's really not a matter of if, but when at this point. The only academic I've seen dealing in related subject matter that disagrees is (((Steven Pinker))) who's just hopelessly naïve.

Such conditions are required to do something like "force" good policies on people. Thankfully, it's right around the corner, relative to historical timespans.

I want to believe but I dont think men have it in them anymore.

It is one of many solutions. Real sexbots similar to HBO's Westworld and artificial wombs would solve the rest. Western females are absolute cancer.

Currently? No they don't. Even though they're being robbed by elites, income inequality is at Gilded Age-levels, the family unit is collapsing, their nations are being undermined by foreigners, etc. They don't currently have it in them. They're not hungry, and they're sedated on hyper-consumerism. That's not going to last.

Ask yourself this, do the American hegemony & American government survive another Great Depression? Probably not. There's no stable foundation to Western life anymore, additionally we're living in the end of a historical era, which signals massive social, cultural and political change regardless. There are a handful of known possibilities that could tank the global economy, never mind the unknown ones.

Prostitution is legal here, I like it but I dont see what problems it solves other than alleviating the sexual frustration of guys

>Currently? No they don't. Even though they're being robbed by elites, income inequality is at Gilded Age-levels, the family unit is collapsing, their nations are being undermined by foreigners, etc. They don't currently have it in them. They're not hungry, and they're sedated on hyper-consumerism. That's not going to last.
Have you met the young crowd coming up? Because they are all much worse.

>other than alleviating the sexual frustration of guys
This is a pretty important thing you shouldnt undervalue.

Too bad Germany is a shithole beyond repair it doesnt really matter.

Yeah, millennials are atrocious. Because they're living in a decaying civilization. Wait until they have to skip meals.

Yup. School shootings for one thing would go away. I bet none of the school shooters had access to pussy.

Do you think everyone have to live the same life as you?

>Do you think everyone have to live the same life as you?
I dont think its about living the life. You could argue that having a wife and children and raising them with good moral values is objectively better than being a degenerate faggot who bangs dudes at truck stops though.

>Why should anyone be allowed

>Thinks he knows everything better than everyone else, if only he could force the "degenerates" to do as he says at gunpoint
> hasn't heard of Dunning–Kruger effect
> being that dumb is actually meeting the technical definition of degenerate, unlike the people he calls degenerates.

>objectively better
how? What are the universal objectives that are more rationally approached by your method?

Have you ever heard of sexually transmitted diseases OP? So while you solve a couple problems you're essentially quadrupling the spread of AIDS and Herpes and other shit that you don't want more than 1% of the population to have.

Studies have shown its pretty obvious that children who are raised a two parent home are more successful. That much at least is undeniable. Its also hard to argue that it isnt better to produce a next generation of people who have been raised with good moral values.

>Have you ever heard of sexually transmitted diseases OP? So while you solve a couple problems you're essentially quadrupling the spread of AIDS and Herpes and other shit that you don't want more than 1% of the population to have.
You're assuming that when its legal and it has become major business that employees wouldnt be regularly tested.

will never happen, women will never surrender their monopoly on pussy

I don’t want to change your mind. Legalize drugs, prostitution, and protect free speach. Show me the victims.

Im going to blow your mind. Ready?
Marriage, dating is like prostitution.
Just test this theory. Dont buy yournlady anything for a month. See how much sex you get.

Yes you have to keep your wife happy to produce a family that survives. That's always been the price men have to pay and its not going to change any time soon.

We have an entire population of men who were raised in an entirely different way than men have lived in the past. They have no social skills and have spent most of their time usually with video games that extend into an isolated line of work. They have absolutely no social skills and are incapable of dealing with women.

As pathetic as they might be they exist and no one is talking about it. The kids growing up are even worse. There's examples of this everywhere. If its not addressed there is going to be a lot of angry men out there.

Maybe, I do think it should be legalized, but I'm not sure how much of a difference it would make. Once sexbots go mainstream though it's going to revolutionize society.

Germany also has "erotic zoos" for anyone who misses the goats back where they lived before Merkel let them in as a refugee.

Attached: 27750507_10155319710193310_7517840326590962410_n.jpg (766x960, 68K)

What problems?
>m-muh virginity
Literally go on /soc/, there are legions of women just as pathetic as you who'll fuck anything for free.
Isn't prostitution legal in your country?

> won't somebody think of the children
A truck stop faggot wouldn't produce many children to neglect.

>keep your wife happy to produce a family that survives. That's always been the price
You can woo them (make happy) like nature intended, and they can kill your seed by popping in the pill just like that. Someone is not playing by the rules.

>A truck stop faggot wouldn't produce many children to neglect.
Is not producing children better than producing and raising children with good moral values?

Yah, I mean it worked out super well for france so I can definitely see it being the same for the USA

What makes you think that the logic behind weed legalization would apply for prostitution? Anyone with a hotel could do it just as fast.

Blame the government that basically forces poverty on you if you want a large fanily unless you are among the super rich.

It leaves more lebensraum for your moral kids.

Attached: 1451199151557.gif (444x272, 789K)

>a lot of the problems in this country people dont want to talk about
Like what.

Prostitution is legal here and we have many of the same problems that you have

Then maybe you should go all the way and legalize brothels, making everyone involved more safe.

>Change my mind.
I live in a state where prostitution is both leagal, and the prostituts have workers unions.
While many of the problems I think you're thinking of aren't solved directly.
They still get reduced in severity, and as such I can't see why I would want to cahnge your mind

actually it would cause more murders, because psychos can just find a whore and kill her because he hates women. I'm not a woman but i can see this shit happening, anyone else see it too?

Attached: 1515509684564s.jpg (236x250, 7K)

This. Porn and being able to bang sluts without repercussions has ruined many men, including me. I wish I had never gone down the slide of sexual degeneracy and could go back to square 1.

insightful pic