Summarize your political beliefs in one sentence

I am a constitutional eco-libertarian minarchist who supports a minimal night-watchman state and opposes environmental pollution as a simple matter of property rights and violation.

Attached: 35457052756.jpg (500x323, 41K)

So you're a faggot?
Nah, solid views user

Go make your opposition research somewhere else amateurs

We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.

Basically a liberal in every way except hating muslims

I am a National Socialist.

I am a traditionalist who believes in systems that both fit with human nature yet elevate it to greatness; I want to preserve the cultural and ethnic diversity of this world by not mixing it into oblivion.

I just want to watch the world burn.

I am a white male.

>Summarize your political beliefs in one sentence

Extreme xenophobia, distrust of the elites, removal of every faggot that will try to cash in on my nation or jew it out.

Other can be a matter of discussion.

Fuck off and leave me alone.

Attached: HI.jpg (1350x900, 531K)

i'm an inconsistent centrist hypocrite.

makes sense to me, its really too bad the us is so obsessed with dismissing views like that as racism and white supremacy
this is basically what im all about

Same, I just say libertarian, with the state ensuring muh freedom essentially

i came here to post this. authoritarians, left or right, disgust me.

i value freedom above all else.

Attached: 1466635918623.jpg (720x720, 72K)

The only human rights are property rights.

liberals must be exterminated

sure. until i come for your property with my property.

think it through, edgecap.

Attached: 1507166551616.png (720x552, 236K)

Attached: 1511670602340.jpg (600x600, 218K)

why not a face?

Attached: Hillary.png (232x261, 141K)

Fuck off I do what I want
I will side with whoever I need to if it allows me to do what I want whenever I want
As long as I'm free then it doesn't matter

I like anime.

Compulsory governance is inherently a violation of our fundamental right to private property, therefore it is dangerous to consider it legitimate.

Let it all burn.

Attached: chaos2.jpg (469x469, 28K)

I'm sorry, Mr. Nosenberg, but I can't let you have goy child sex slaves and polute the air and water.

Attached: 1502319190366.jpg (572x750, 120K)

gas the jews

Come and Take

Tommy?

this
although has an interesting point, which takes precedence, his right to his life, even when taking your property? or your right to protect your property?
i tend to agree, but anarchy can only last so long before a group takes control. if a state of some form is inevitable, i would rather it be a streamlined minimalist state that provides little more than protection from external threats and official resolution of property violation cases

>mfw nothing is burning

Attached: 0EC67278-02E3-48AE-9C57-5766353170F8.jpg (235x512, 70K)

Attached: 73BEFCA8-353E-4092-97C9-3A6747383572.jpg (500x681, 112K)

I seek maximum freedom, the only way to preserve it, is to promote traditionalist values and cultural norms.

Attached: IMG_0765.jpg (400x256, 76K)

must secure polish nation and future of our country

Attached: DHjxbjNUwAE7mYS.jpg (978x916, 104K)

I'm a jingoist absolute monarchist of divine right with protestant church doctrine as its official government defended doctrine.

This pretty much. Dugin is pretty tight.

Attached: collapse_of_western_civilization.png (1734x1352, 2.12M)

>muh freedom
Fuck off you open borders faggot. Following freedom to its logical end would mean you're perfectly find with pedos, the destruction of your people, culture, and race. As well as always resulting in shoving things up your own anus.

1984 meets brave new world

I approach it without considering rla right to life. There has to be a valid reason to kill, however, or there is chaos. Some reasons may be to maintain genetic health (ie abortion/infanticide), assault, home invasion, etc.

Attached: 10_mythos_05.jpg (500x386, 51K)

Aryanist
>constitutional
what if the constitution allows for slavery, ok with that?
>eco-libertarian
what happens if averting ecological disasters require a supranational government that takes my money and I refuse to give it to you?
>minarchist
government should be as large as necessary to complete its purpose
Who counts as white?
so you recognize inequality between cultures and thus people and yet you still call yourself a liberal?
interdastign
you know that this is America, right? Give it an American flavoring and then we can discuss it
you ever think that there might be a reason why traditional systems fell? why not preserve what is good, rather than preserve all the shit we have in this world?
this guy gets it
you ever think that the elites want you to distrust people from other countries?
most honest person itt
retarded leaf
your waifu a shit
your traditional values and cultural norms are preventing me from living the lifestyle i want to lead, you call that "maximum freedom"?
don't really like protestant church doctrine necessarily, but i can see the appeal

Attached: chad yogi virgin occultist.png (2892x1185, 552K)

come and take it if you think that's how it works

Unironic libertarian fascist

Right-wing Authoritarian who actually cares about humanity and don't want to see what makes us human destroyed by the globalists

By denying someone else's rights he forfeits his own.

Fuck Off.

I'm not implying that we enforce traditional values or cultural norms by means of the state. Ergo, yes, I would call that advocating for maximal freedom.

Question to all of the sneks. How will you protect your children ? I especially want to hear about protecting them from corruption of modern world, of numerous movements to take your children and turn them into hedonistic white guilted pitiful existant mutts.

I just want to enjoy guns, burgers, freedom in a nice white country.

>who counts as aryan?
>american flavoring: george lincoln rockwell. done.
As in a state with a heavy hand that is limited to libertarian principles by a constitution or something Does that differ from a night watchman in any way, or do you mean to imply that the state promotes traditionalism and/or coordinates national effort in times of emergency?

Attached: DCDBHbaXgAELAyM.jpg (1200x687, 344K)

I take white peoples money.

Attached: 1521313768205.jpg (825x631, 112K)

No step on snek.

Simply by spending time with them. Kids with two parents at home already do far better than those from single parent home's and far more so when the parents are invested in their education.

just let me be alone

>There no rights other than property rights
>If you break someone’s rights you lose your’s

What did he mean by this?

Government get out

You're not wrong ,it increases chance that they'd turn out right, but how will they do in nigger/muslim neighbour ?

Good point. I'd advocate living in a relatively isolated neighborhood or at least monitoring who they associate with.

I am a capitalist fascist, I support light economic regulations but harsh regulations regarding racial demographics, marriage and the spread of information in general.

In that case, it could work.

I guess it's bad luck of being a Pole, but for us there is no possibility in being ancap

>you ever think that there might be a reason why traditional systems fell? why not preserve what is good, rather than preserve all the shit we have in this world?
>preserve what is good

That's the point. I think things like a white-majority population with a democratic-republic government in the USA are a good thing. But I think it's silly and short-sighted to assume that everything "new" will be better that the old. Communism, for example, is a fairly modern idea, but you'll find very few who see it as a good thing. Our current society, while having a very high standard of living, has lost its path in the human need for community and spirituality.

Attached: ah.gif (245x245, 581K)

I want to see a classless, stateless society in which the means of production are owned by the people who work them.

i would say that the only valid situation for taking another's life is when they are violating your property. attacking you on the street, invading your home, stealing, trespassing, etc () property rights are nothing without the means to enforce them
no. i mean constitutional in that what a state can and cannot do must be specified in a constitution and this constitution must be followed rigidly.
i don't know. for somebody to cause an ecological disaster of that scale, i would venture to say that the only recompnse that would even approach the amount of property damages caused would be death of everybody involved in the incident. hopefully that would act as a deterrent. as for averting the disaster after it happens, i honestly have no idea.
im less concerned with the actual size of a government. im more concerned with what functions it has and how much they cost. a minimalist state should have few functions, and it should perform those functions as efficiently as possible without violating the property of citizens.
raise them as well as i could, teach them as well as i could, and if they still fall into madness then that's what happens. i won't enable their lifestyles, but they can still live however they want

I mean it's pretty much impossible to live a consistent ancap life in any state. I hope that within my life we can establish an ancap city-state in the US

Before answering the question, it should be established that our children cannot, and in my opinion should not be entirely shielded from the degeneracy that pervades our society. In short, we should seek to educate them, and steel them for what they will face. Coddling them will only make them weak.

First, move to a more conservative city/region/state. A healthy community and great neighbors are a great start.

Second, if you cannot move to a more conservative region, seek to enroll them in a private school that isn't insane. If none are available, home school your children. Thus, you'll be able to more directly instill them with ideal values.

Finally, if everything goes to shit, well, we yanks still have the 2nd Amendment. For now.

So it's creating a voluntary association of people who freely choose to live in a traditionalist society? I have no issues with that in terms of freedom, though I still think that tradition is not necessarily good, tradition works in alignment with natural selection, but is working in alignment with natural selection the goal/purpose of existence? I'd prefer to set up an environment in which the traits I value are selected for, rather than working within the environment I was given.
>>who counts as aryan?
As Hitler said, it's revealed by the achievements of the individual, not by any ethnic origin or background.
>>american flavoring: george lincoln rockwell. done.
alright, I think an ethnostate based on whiteness/european ancestry/caucasian racial identification is 1. unrealistic for america and 2. not necessarily selecting for the traits I value, and hence not desirable
A people, a folk, can be formed out of many distinct blood groups
>white-majority population with a democratic-republic government in the USA are a good thing
For a subset of Americans, yes. If you were born black, jewish, mexican, etc would your viewpoint change? If so, why should anyone listen to anything you say policy-wise? It's as ridiculous as someone voting for welfare when they're poor and voting against it when they're rich; such individuals do not have the mental capacity to rule over a large group of people.
>But I think it's silly and short-sighted to assume that everything "new" will be better that the old.
Of course, but what is known to be bad should be done away with, regardless of if it "works."
>has lost its path in the human need for community and spirituality.
I strongly agree

Attached: resist.png (1400x2700, 786K)

Violent, unflinching death to Jews, pedos and tyrants.

I can't. Pole is born with burden of thousands of his ancestor's lifes sacrificed for his well being. I am born as part of bigger collective and I consider it an honor.

Good reasoning but it doesn't look bright for any of your points.
First, whites are being outbred everywhere they live. Second, no idea how it's in US but here private schools are not worse if it comes to indoctrination. Third, youngest generation is heavily brainwashed,they're all about bernie and weed, many of them would want to repell 2nd Amendment.

It's not a bad argument just not sure if after that you could look at them and say you did everything you could to give them good life.

People have done that multiple times but it has failed always.

We wuz kangz

Attached: IMG_2167.jpg (624x618, 90K)

I agree with this. Definitely allow your children to be exposed to (((alternate))) viewpoints, but it is your responsibility to ensure that they hear multiple sides to an argument. I'd advocate using the "steel man" technique, where you present ideas with which you disagree in the strongest possible way before critiquing them (opposite of straw man).

It's always the jews

Attached: jews_always_the_jews.jpg (441x345, 42K)

>literal state of americans
your country was never white in the first place.

we need a new religion

I respect that
>t. German/Scandinavian mutt

Humanity must create artificial intelligence in order to apply order to existence.

I understand what you mean in terms of tradition and natural selection not being sufficient goals in and of themselves. I should clarify. I see the preservation of tradition and the moral structure it promotes as fundamental to the sustenance of liberty. Thus, allowing for a greater threshold of liberty within society. Thereby creating a healthy cycle where freedom and traditional values/culture sustain each other. Out of curiosity, what traits specifically would you attempt to select for?

Bleeding heat liberal

>you ever think that the elites want you to distrust people from other countries?

I know what happened when my country trusted USA. Never fucking again.
Not to mention the niggers we used to occupy.

What country do you live in?

>First, whites are being outbred everywhere they live.
Depends, whites in the areas I've laid out (Conservative, rural) have an above replacement level rate of reproduction. The whites that don't have above replacement level rates of reproduction are overwhelmingly libs from metropolitan areas. Good riddance.

>Second, no idea how it's in US but here private schools are not worse if it comes to indoctrination.
Again, it depends. Private schools are a mixed bag. Some in N.Y. will push white privilege on their students. Others will, and have fired teachers for even presenting the idea to their students. In short, I'll review the schools curriculum and reputation.

Third, youngest generation is heavily brainwashed, they're all about Bernie and weed, many of them would want to repeal 2nd Amendment.
Millenials, yes. They're almost a lost cause. Gen Z on the other hand, is a great opportunity. Don't get me wrong, I'm well aware that the "Generation Zyklon" Memes are really overstating the case, but they present a great opportunity for a widespread pushback. And besides, I'll instill my kid with basic moral values and critical thinking skills. As such, I can only do my best to prepare him to face the crowd on his own.

extinct humanity now

I value: Me > anyone else.

Attached: n'wah.png (790x768, 107K)

Get the fuck off my property

no step on snek

>I see the preservation of tradition and the moral structure it promotes as fundamental to the sustenance of liberty. Thus, allowing for a greater threshold of liberty within society.
I see that, but I'm sure you recognize how that's not exactly a stable position; you promote traditional society so people can be more free, but then freedom potentially will lead to those values getting undermined, give people an inch and they'll want a mile.
>Thereby creating a healthy cycle where freedom and traditional values/culture sustain each other.
And within this cycle, is the goal to maximize happiness? Stability? Dominance of the culture/values?
>Out of curiosity, what traits specifically would you attempt to select for?
Good question. At a very broad level Aryanists seek nobility. Some people I know define it as the refusal to tolerate enslavement, but I think pic related has a more exact definition of it. Some associations with it would be a love of life, but not an attachment to it; a shunning of enjoyment, rather than loving enjoyment; abominating suffering instead of being indifferent to it; accepting death, not fearing it, but of course there's much more to the concept than just that. I pretty much fully agree with mundusmillennialis.com on this stuff.

Attached: MM 47.png (1061x610, 104K)