How would Sup Forums, the wisest board on Sup Forums, decide?

How would Sup Forums, the wisest board on Sup Forums, decide?

Attached: 1521197846755.png (960x720, 226K)

Just leave the flute on the ground and let them decide

I'd give all 3 my flute

The flue is B's, she can sell it or give it to whomever. If A pays or if B decides to gift it C it's up the her.

Are any of them named Israel?

break the flute over my knee and spank all three of them

I take the flute and persuade the children to fight among themselves.

Capitalism.

B.

I'd give it to C because the other two are women.

give me your address so I can personally end you

Attached: 402.png (1015x1527, 441K)

right of conquest

yes. Otherwise, B is a slave.

why do I have the flute????

CHILD B

B

B
B

B because A will find a way to con her out of it regardless

My answer is correct because that's what's going to happen anyway because this world is run by the cry of the baby

I let them fight until they surrender or die then and the winner gets the flute pretty simple

I feel like B is commie bait; i.e., she made the flute but she was paid by someone else to do it (thus she's not actually entitled to it at all). But assuming there's nothing more to the story than what's written on the image, I'd give it to B.

B
Possession is 9/10ths of the law.

c because he is male

Child B, since ownership starts with the person that makes the flute, unless child B passed the ownership of the flute to someone else, she is the rightful owner.

Trick question, I give it to the nigger because diversity and teach the kids the need of sharing , and give them the seed of racisim at an early age

Child A obviously. Why give it to the others that can't play? Do you know how shitty a flute sounds if you don't know how to play it?

It's B's by right. Being skilled or poor doesn't entitle you to steal someone else's property.

Easy, find the most Jewish one and hand them the flute. This is what Western Civilisation was built for.

shove the flute up a's ass, then give it to b, and kidnap c and use him as a rape toy because nobody will miss him

I take the flute and persuade the children to fight among themselves.
Is this not already what everyone does? otherwise you are one of the children IRL.

I thought Sup Forums was supposed to be high IQ.

A is self-entitled
B owns the property
C is self-entitled

The children are fighting over a flute, the flute is not yours. You have no business taking it or distributing it. Communism is garbage.

It states she provided the material and time to make it. You're presuming someone paid money to compensate her.

blow it out your ass

who the fuck are you to distribute flutes? who is paying this fag to make flutes? the person who gets the flute is who pays for it.

Attached: merchant seahorse.png (564x750, 79K)

>The one that makes me cum first
King Solomon, Proverbs 3:11-13.

Attached: 12312441.jpg (655x650, 103K)

Its a good lesson for children BTW.

Verry well put together.

You are retarded.

Wellington St, Ottawa, ON K1A 0A4, Canada

B already has the property rights on it.

"I" can not "give" it to someone else without stealing it from her.

Whoever wants it the most will find a way to get their hands on it. Let nature decide.

>rights

that thing that doesn't exist, that object only has value as an instrument in skilled hands, Child B also should realise that. Americans are sheltered bitches.

A is the correct answer

Take 50% of the flute from B. Give 25% of the flute to A so that we hear music. Let B have 50% of the flute so that they continue making flutes. Give 25% of the flute to C to keep the peace and live in hope that one day they will either make flutes or make music.

thats gay. you are a gay man.

Well B owns it so its up to her if she wants to sell it or give it away to A

It's not commie bait from the dialogue. Assuming each child is being truthful, it is rightfully B's. She wasn't paid to make it, she made it of her own volition. She provided the materials, the labor, and the skill. It's hers to keep to do with as she pleases. Giving it to A or C without compensation is theft and the real commie bait here.

ill give them my flute if you know what i mean

Attached: 1520203581541.jpg (640x684, 35K)

IS A MAN NOT ENTITLED TO THE SWEAT OF HIS BROW?

my n*gga

Attached: First_century_Iudaea_province.gif (575x792, 31K)

Kek reminds me of blow my whistle song

why childs?
why not adults?
If you imagine adults instead of children, the hidden fourth participant arises.
Who the fuck is "distributing" B's flutes and why?
will B make another flute if somebody takes this one from him?
how the 4th will take it from B? by guns? is B armed?

Unless B was compensated for the flute somehow then it's hers.

Child C can go get lost in a fucking storm drain. Entitled little shit.

The point of this is morally it has to be C, right? He might not play the flute now, but he can learn. A is meant to represent capitalism consumer culture, and is obviously wrong, and B is a red herring for socialist noobs- falsely misunderstanding the idea behind Marxist thought. The moral answer has to be C.

idk why that's .gif
cuz i'm a gook

FPBP
Cage match on PPV for ownership rights.
Someone better frisk the ghetto kid tho, you know that faggot has a knife and possibly MUH GUN.

>this is an actual ethical problem for socialist scum
if the proper answer (B, in case you're confused) isn't obvious to you then you're brainwashed pinko and should kill yourself.

>which should you GIVE it to
more like give BACK

I take the flute and pay the media to persuade the children to fight each other. I import more children to devalue all their contributions.

elelelellelelelelelelellelellel

Let them fight to the death for the flute, it's the only way.

For an actual answer, B made the flute so its hers and not the other children's.

C can get fucked for being an entitled little shit

C looks like a faggot

why the fuck does B have blue hair, did that bitch fuck someone else?

inb4 shill cocksucka

If you choose Child B your a fucking Communist.
Child A deserves it because that was the intended demographic. Child C is a nigger.

A. Fascism (might makes right)
B. Communism (prioritizing means of production)
C. Utilitarianism (maximizing happiness)

if the flute is so easy to make a child could do it why not just make 3 flutes.

scarcity fallacy.

all the technology, materials and labour exist to provide for the material needs of all the people in the world already.

The problem is they are controlled by a greedy few who want to keep the rest of us in poverty.

B gets to decide if it's for sale, it's B's creation and property.

Take the flute and give it to a more deserving Jewish kid.

Fuck that, I already know it's directed at giving it to C but that's the worst.

Child B should get the flute. Just encourage them to share.

I hate "social justice" because it's justice based on emotion and the eye of the beholder. That's not justice, that's moral tyranny.

This is a trick question, right? There's no way a girl would be able to make a flute.

Child B. She fucking made it

Give flute for Child A
Give Child B some candy and told her why child A should get the flute, because child A can play it
Punch Child C in the face because become a commie

A, why the fuck would you have a flute if you cant fucking play it.

they must already have one if they have learn to play.

you can't learn without having one first.

You're retarded.

reality.

kill yourself

>child B provided the cost (material) and labor to produce the flute on her own time
>child A is a spoiled self-entitled little shit
>somehow B is the communist choice

Are you retarded, m8?

Why would anyone even consider giving it to A? Even if you're a commie you're exploiting a worker (B) by depriving her of the fruit of her labour without compensation.

B. You made it and provided the materials? It's yours.

Give the flute to child B, because it's theirs. I'd buy child A and C a flute, and pay for flute lessons for child B and C. Any decisions I make after this depends on the outcome of the children's efforts to actually play the flute.

Because if you don't play the flute and receive it, thats a redundant and excessive waste.

B.
Unless B built the flute as an employee of one of the other children, in which case the fruits of her labor are hers exactly 0%.

Give to child B and tell her to sell it to child A, then tell child B to teach child C how to make flutes

There is only one solution to this
Battle royal fight to the death

Attached: D5C1FAF2-96BE-456B-A414-F7DFB8053CDC.jpg (720x404, 86K)

how can you play if you don't have one?

Ah, music of democracy

That's why A should pay for B to make another one, call it trade
And if A wants to be charitable, A can pay for B to make something for C
But even better would be if C realises what marketable skills he has and B employs him

The three children fight to the death, the victor gets the flute and their reproductive rights restored. There shal be no weak genes in our future.

B

Bunch a capitalist profligate faggots going for B

>If you choose Child B your a fucking Communist.
Read the picture again, brainlet. Allow me to rephrase it;

You find 2 niggers and a white kid fighting over a flute, who do you give the flute to?

B, because it's their flute, they made it. It's not your flute, you didn't buy it, the niggers just want it.

B.

Well fine we're all communists. Its not an insult to me.

Attached: stalin enduring legacy.jpg (225x346, 22K)

the only correct answer

Then A can buy it from B, like a civilized person instead of crying like a bitch because she thinks she's better

Attached: 1521844240461.jpg (606x456, 51K)

So basically:
A is kid that that can actually play the flute.
B is kid that owns the flute.
C is nigger.
Give a knife to each one, the one that survives gets the flute. Or just give it to B anyway but that wounld't be fun.

What if she made it as a memento, as a testament to her skill, or because she just fucking wanted to? It's hers and giving it to anyone else would be theft. If you bake a pie for yourself, but someone steps in and forces you to give it up to a "connoisseur" because they can "taste better than you can" would you not say that's unfair?

b selling flute to a is a good idea, they can always make another one.

c should find out how b learned and teach themselves to make better flutes instead of being a slave to b though.

B

clearly Child B is the owner of the flute and gets to decide who can have the flute, so I'd give it to Child B

A and X arguments are retarded anyways. Let's make an analogy with a car:
B made a custom car by buying parts and welding them together like in a pimp my ride show.
A would sound like:
>I can drive car better than you this is why your car belongs to me
And B:
> Because I am poor your car belongs to me

See the flaw?

>a redundant and excessive waste
first, learn what redundant means before using it you stupid mutt, and then
>receive
how can you receive what you made yourself? "Oh thank you for giving me what I made myself"

Only niggers will pick C.
That being said A and B are both viable options, depending on the circumstances.
If it‘s critical to survival (e.g. in stone age discussing who gets the spear for hunting), then A is the obvious choice, because that improves the quality of life of the whole community.
However a flut is just for entertainment, so there is no factual need to give it to A, therefore B should keep the flute. If A really wants it, A can still offer something to trade or just ask/learn how to make a flut herself.
That is called common sense.

The three scenarios are literally summaries of how each of those philosophies fundamentally conceptualize justice. Stay mad eurobros.