HAPPENING; MARCH FOR OUR LIVES

Constitution of United States of America 1789 (rev. 1992)

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

LIVESTREAM: CLICK "EMBED".
youtube.com/watch?v=Ud5Lq7D5YvU
How do we, as Americans, take care of the main problem plaguing our nation as we speak? We must apply pressure to all those who stand in our way by informing them of the manipulations of the men in suits who are emotionally detached from the common man.

They only seek to slowly, ever so painstakingly, eliminate our freedoms. Average men do not want to believe this and those men will jump to conclusions and call us mentally flawed. We will resist this. We have influence and have manipulated many events by simply sitting down on our computers and turning on our connected devices. Those who harbor ill will to the American people recognize us for that trait of influence.

People who support that filth are disconnected from common American ideologies and prefer the homeland to be unguarded and vulnerable. THIS IS WHAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS TRIED TO PROTECT US FROM. DO NOT BE ENTRANCED BY THEIR CAMPAIGNS OF DISINFORMATION.

Attached: 'MURICA.jpg (640x385, 62K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=j1oMVG1ZMlA
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/246
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Nothing will happen. Guns won't be banned.

Soros is getting rid of the constitution. Did you ever think we would be having a discussion about free speech? Or our right to bear arms? The constitution is thisclose to going away. Thank Soros, the school system and your government

>guns get banned May 1
>school shooters switch to bombs, school bomber blows up entire elementary school killing 1,300+ children age 5-10 on May 2

Attached: A15D60E0-C306-4B2D-982F-45681AE3A462.png (1490x1208, 754K)

>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State

How many of you are in anything that could be described as a well regulated anything? The 2nd A expressly allows reasonable regulation of guns.

In addition to this, there is zero danger of the state rounding up all the guns. This fear is gined up by the cucks at the NRA who are a one issue deep state super PAC.

I saw a picture of Emma Gonzalez tearing up the constitution.

More like
>Guns banned may 1st
>School shooter still uses a gun because criminals break the law

All able bodied men between 17-45 are considered militia you faggot. In order to make a well-regulated militia we need guns. We need a well-regulated militia in the off chance that the government goes complete totalitarian and we need to fight back. If you want to be controlled your whole life then fine, but do not bring that shit into my life.

I just came for posting this

Attached: 948bb42b3fb5343-a-nw-p.png (1247x1030, 2.06M)

>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
That first part is the reasoning, not a qualifier for getting the right. In fact the bill of Rights applies to the people without limit from birth.
>the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
This second part is the right.

It effectively says the people need the right to keep weapons to secure their freedom should the need for a militia ever arise. And why would it make sense otherwise?

>Unarmed populace
>Government turns tyrannical
>Go to form a militia to fight said government
>Government denies your petition to own weapons because they don't think they're being tyrannical
>Send you and your family off to a work camp in the dead of night

>Mfw they're are unironically leftists out on the street begging the Trump administration to disarm them while also thinking Trump is Hitler

Attached: 1521562549914.gif (350x250, 686K)

Also regulated does not mean controlled by law. It means properly supplied.

Attached: Lnbp79m.jpg (819x783, 160K)

>guns get banned May 1
>3 million casualties by May 2

Read the second militia act of 1792 if you're confused as to the definition of militia.

yes!!!!!! these based black men speak such powerful words!!!!

>How do we, as Americans, take care of the main problem plaguing our nation as we speak?
Remove gun free zones

Saved

What the fuck is this and why is America not being nuked for this.

No you cuck all abled bodied men age x to y are not. Go read the comstitution.

A bunch of untrained fools who have never drilled together =/= a well regulated militia.

youtube.com/watch?v=j1oMVG1ZMlA

>yfw

Attached: price of freedom.png (1200x800, 454K)

and jews and cucks who let the kikes destroy this countrt through (((women's liberation)))

>That first part is the reasoning, not a qualifier for getting the right. In fact the bill of Rights applies to the people without limit from birth.

Wrong. Its a condition of the right. The rest of your argument falls apart after that.

In the early foundation of America people drilled together in a, wait for it, well regulated manner. Going to the back 40 to shoot beer cans is not a well regulated drill.

A bunch of poorly trained fools took on the British Empire at its height and won.
Also the draft would show that the government disagrees with you.

See
Answer that question. Why would the government need to give itself rights, dumb ass?

Incorrect.

Attached: 56% mutt Emma Gonzales ripping Constitution.gif (250x252, 1.09M)

Attached: 56% mutt Emma Gonzales ripping Constitution.jpg (678x995, 310K)

Solid argument. Got anything to back that up?

No actually. Groups of well regulated militia eventually formed into an army to beat the British. They were not a bunch of randos with gums. Go read some history.

so wheres the national marches for the 700000 plus children that will be chopped up and thrown in the trash by abortionists this year? nvm i guess gun control is more important lol

Attached: 364834363_df6ee9a141.jpg (500x375, 90K)

You reference a meme picture as proof of your opinion? Well played, but no.

The english langiage.

>muh stronk womyn
midget spic mutt trying to act all tough and stronk lol, when will women learn that fighting is for men.

Regulated militia are the reasoning foot the second amendment, not a qualifier for having the right granted.
If an enemy force comes to town, you need everyone to have a weapon so you can form together and fight back. Being that America formed out of a government of oppression it stands to reason that you're not going to require the state allow people to take up arms. What tyrannical government would say yes to that?
In the face of tyranny it would be worthless and without it, it wouldn't need to be protected as a right.

Same as free speech. Inoffensive speech doesn't need protecting.

Burn this bitch at the stake, that shits meant to protect them and pretty much everyone else, and they say "Fuck your rights". If you don't want me to have them, neither can you.

>Languige
I rest my case.

Attached: idiot_woajk.png (488x463, 28K)

It's a fake pic user

original was of her tearing up a paper target

Anyone ever see the start of the movie Ghost Ship?
That's what I imagine happening to one of these demonstrations.

No really though I should not have watched that movie when I was little.

It's an example of the identical grammatical format with any of the politics of gun ownership removed. If you can stop being obtuse for two seconds you'll see that breakfast isn't the qualifier for owning food, just a good reasoning for it.

How out of touch are these people? They must realize this isn't appealing to the average voter. Didn't the last election show them you need more than the Spic vote to gain power? Why do Dems keep pushing a losing strategy?

Attached: 1472375698809.jpg (604x522, 126K)

Do Argentinians really think they're white?
That's hilarious

Is that the movie where everyone gets sliced in half by a line snap?

Well shit, I just got baited.

Today is part of Soros American Spring. The purple revolution. As has happened so many times throughout history, those of us who can see what's going on are ridiculed and called crazy by the people we're trying to protect with our warnings.

>Regulated militia are the reasoning foot

Your interpretation flatly incorrect.

Well regulated militia are the requirment for unregulated ownership. You can have a cannon in your barn, sure, but you need to be part of a formal and well regulated militia.

Meme flags spread fake news. Ban em

It's time to kick out all foreign invaders.

Attached: 1521534180946.jpg (657x657, 79K)

I know you are btfo, so do stop embarasing yourself and "rest your case".

Wouldn't work given that these people are ironically unarmed.

>Revolutionary socialists calling for a society where only police and soliders have guns

No its a meme pic. Make your case if you want a response.

>so wheres the national marches for the 700000 plus children that will be chopped up and thrown in the trash by abortionists this year? nvm i guess gun control is more important lol

kek. I immediately use this argument on gun grabber faggots when they being up the whole "think of te childrenz" routine. Shuts em up real good.

Again, if the point of the second is to protect the freedom of the people as is clearly stated, why would the people need the permission of a potentially tyrannical government to own said guns?

If your government isn't tyrannical there is no need for taking up arms against it.
If it is, they would never give you guns with which to fight them.

Locally your argument makes zero sense.

when is the civil war gonna start, I;m getting bored with no happenings.

WTF is this bald bitch doing? Say something or get the fuck off.

A healthy body being necessary for strong soldiers, the right of the people to exercise shall not be infringed.

Does that sentence mean I can only exercise if I'm in the military?

Logically*

Some very simple copy-pastas I just came up with, to mindlessly post in the livestream chat:


0.6% of deaths in America are murders, and 0.2% of that 0.6% (only about 0.01% of all US deaths) are from mass shootings.

This is a mental health issue, not a gun issue.

"To conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens." -Adolf Hitler

Nobody blames the gun when cops shoot people.

So if guns kill people, I guess pencils misspell words, cars drive drunk, and spoons make people fat.

>it was kgbniggers
t. yuri

A silly example, here:

A well regulated transportation industry being necessary to the economy, the right of the people to own cars shall not be infringed.

This means you can own cars, however this ownership can and should be well regulated. The 2a in no way restricts reasonable regulation. In fact, it requires it.

It's 2018 and people still think protesting causes change. Iv'e never understood why people protest nowadays, it's fucking useless. Then after a week or two it's completely forgotten like it never happened. If your lucky enough then maybe some change will happen, but it will be so minute and insignificant that it goes unnoticed.

Why do people still protest these days?

Attached: Nigger.jpg (360x240, 92K)

Attached: 1521848348504.jpg (1184x1153, 765K)

What they dont seem to realize is that even if they get everything they want and more, guns will always be as easy to obtain as heroine.

It's a shoop.
In the original she tears a target.

Bad example because you're talking something that is already regulated and operating from the assumed given that cars should be regulated.
Try again with something that the state doesn't regulate already.

>leftists out on the street begging the Trump administration to disarm them while also thinking Trump is Hitler

THIS

>this silence
Kek

Jesus this 'music'

Guns are already regulated as well friend...so the example holds.

I cant do it OP, the cringe is too strong

Attached: 17800366_10100867903192020_3574811626216741248_n.jpg (739x425, 37K)

Big boy surely isn't going to participate in a 'run for our lives.'

Please god let a true patriot light this shitfest up with automatic dakka.

Today I am going to play FPS games

Hello ATF

And they should not be as given by the SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED that is part of the amendment.
Now put on your thinking cap for a second, find something the government does not already stick it's dick into, a try to create a similar sentence.
You can't in good faith find an example where the prior is a qualifier for the latter because that isn't how that sentence structure world.
Hell, even with that car example it only implies that you should have a car that won't fuck up the transportation system. It in no way says you need government regulation on cars. More over, dot is state by state, not federal.

>taking a knee too
I wish the worst for leftist

Attached: 1321785552277.jpg (1095x1195, 234K)

Suck my johnson

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/246

>Guns banned may 1st
>Civil war breaks out and the kikes and communist get hung from every lamp pole on the way to DC as the militias rally to save the republic

One can dream.

Im glad I never participated in garbage like this as a kid.

It seems like a massive feelgood pep rally with everyone holding signs that say self-righteous nothingism.

I had the cops show up at my doorstep last night at 11 o'clock for writing an email to one of these faggot organizers saying the day of the rope is coming. top KEK. if only the authorities were this proactive with Nicholas Cruz, someone who actually said he was going to shoot up schools and was reported to the FBI.

Omg I could only take seconds of this bullshit. If you are brainwashed enough to listen to these ass clowns then please leave the US and find some dictatorship to live under. God damn the ignorance is astounding with these fucking people....

Works*

US v. Cruikshank, 1875. The right to bear arms exists independent of the Bill of Rights and the Second Amendment only guarantees the government will not infringe upon it. In addition, there are similar clauses in many state constitutions from the same time period which very clearly state that it is a right regardless of militia membership or anything else, and there is plenty of writing in the Federalist Papers which makes it clear that militia membership was never intended to be a condition of the right. It also helps when you understand that militias at the time were just the civilian population who brought their own guns, no training necessary. In fact, one of the founders writes in Federalist Paper No. 29 that requiring training of civilian militias would be a great inconvenience to the people and thus should not be required.

FOX NEWS JUST CALLED THESE KIDS FUTURE CONGRESSMEN

Even as conservative European this is infuriating to watch.

Tearing up a mock constitution is akin to saying to "fuck your rights, because we CIA psy-op kikes cry were going to subjugate you". How the fuck hasn't there been massive outrage over this bullshit yet?

That's how I feel, don't like gun ownership then go enjoy life in red China.

if you show any outrage, you will be made into some nazi terrorist and have police show up at your doorstep accusing you of being the next mass shooter.

>should not be
Your opinion, which is just that, is not and has never been shared by the SC. Well regulated militia imply and probably require regulation of arms.
>Hell, even with that car example it only implies that you should have a car that won't fuck up the transportation system.
It does imply that you should not have a car that fucks up the transportation system. I tottally agree and that is the point. Glad you are coming around to the logical conclusion.

DoTs are state agncies and yet funded by the Feds and therefore broadly standardized in their regulation.

More over, see
Every man between 17 and 45 is a part of the militia. The only difference is if your enlisted in the military or not. But even civilians are militia in the legal sense.

Sadly this negative influence come from those outside of our borders. These wealthy people have no problem operating outside the US.

SCOTUS interpretation is wrong and all this protest is going to comminate in a ruling that will overturn all of the regulations.
Mark my words.

All able bodied men are part of the militia.
The second amendment grants the right to individual persons, not just the militia fucktard.

why is this even legal? it's basically calling for the destruction of the bill of rights and should make you a traitor to the state.

Joined the NRA today

Attached: 27DB007F-4D8E-4E01-8179-DF2117427998.png (750x1334, 522K)

Jesus H Jones I fucken hope not

Attached: angerey 3.png (789x575, 241K)

Shall not be infringed retard

Stealth shill thread? The stream can't even pull in over 5,000 views and the event looks like it has less than twenty thousand people participating.

Check. Fuck off