What does Sup Forums think about this?

What does Sup Forums think about this?


>In the category of “gross anime things,” let’s talk a little about an increasingly popular gross anime thing commonly referred to as “Really 700 years old.”
>That’s when a 700-year-old demon with the body of a young girl who, somehow, finds herself in a sexually compromising position. Yep.
>Historically, the trope has referred to otherworldly spirits like Koenma from Yu Yu Hakusho who, although he’s 700, looks like a toddler (complete with a pacifier). There’s also classics like the badass fighter Lady Kayura, whose hundreds-year-old lifespan isn’t apparent with her 12-year-old looks. It’s not always sexual. And it’s not always young girls. But lately, there’s been a lot of that, and oh man is it gross.
>Now, there are, for example, childlike goddesses who are literally referred to as “loli big boobs”—I see you, Is It Wrong To Pick Up Girls In A Dungeon?. I see what you did there. It still doesn’t fly. Nope.

Other urls found in this thread:

sys.Sup
archive.is/ILdrs
poll.fm/5vwdy
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

It's definitely an anime related topic worth discussing on an anime image board, and the best part about it is that it doesn't violate any Sup Forums rules, so there's no reason to delete it.

I think it's an article from a shitty website, and like all floundering cesspools of online publishing, now regularly put out dumb, inflammatory articles for people to hate share and keep their traffic up

the worst thing you can do to these people is pretend they don't exist

Why do you have to use kanna in your shitposts?

Literally hundreds of other lolibabas and you choose kanna?

And you're doing exactly the opposite.

She is by far most popular X00 year old loli in recent years.

posting the classic report link
sys.Sup Forums.org/a/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=165266691

Ah, upping your shitpost with the additional maxresdefault.jpg.

Thank you.

True but this isn't kanna specific.

This is just going to fuel shitposting about my maid dragons

I'm all for more lolis if it keeps out the normalfags

I love how these threads trigger lolicons so damn hard. Now watch them try to deny it!

I think you should stop pasting tumblr posts and calling it a day as if they're worth discussing at all.

reposting the classic report link
sys.Sup Forums.org/a/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=165266691

3 threads in less than an hour.
Fuck off

The best kind of post is no post. Report and sage.

Fuck off, Kotaku.

archive.is/ILdrs

the fuck is a lolibaba?

nobody cares about your dumb fucking kotaku article you retard. stop posting.

hey OP watcha doin'

Friendly reminder making unjustified reporting is a violation of the rules and can result is a ban

>mods gave up after 3 threads
Classic.

global 3, 6, 10, and 11

...

Hestia isn't even childlike. She's a midget with adult proportions.

OP doesn't violate any of those rules. Like 11 isn't even close. You are however in clear violation of rule 7.

reposting the classic report link again
sys.Sup Forums.org/a/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=165266691

where are the mods?

...

Take this shit elsewhere, you fucking faggot.

>Who is Shinobu?

>Kanna
>lolibaba
Are you new or retarded?

>You will not post any of the following outside of Sup Forums: Trolls, flames

I think he's a bit of both

>Normies don't like loli

Water is wet.

Masturbating to loli hentai probably

The one right thing is that it's wrong to lewd kanna. Ravioli loli is for hugs.

>oh man is it gross.
Cool. Now, shall we talk about homosexual sex scene being aired at dinner time on national TV channel in the US?

>discussing anime on Sup Forums is considered trolling nowadays

If you want to talk about American TV, then go to the TV board. This is the anime board.

reposting the classic report link yet again
click this link to report the thread
sys.Sup Forums.org/a/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=165266691

Also announcing your reports is a rule violation. You've also made this same post several times in a single thread, which is spamming. That's 2 broken rules.

>homos fucking each other in the ass and it being aired at dinner hours is not gross
>cute girl drawings are gorss
Nice double standard there... kys disgusting kotaku shill.

I didn't report this thread, I'm just making sure everybody knows how to in case they forgot.

No one said whether it is or isn't gross but the topic of American TV has no place in Sup Forums

And nobody gives a SHIT about kotaku shills' opinions.

Making the same post 4 times is still spamming. It's also a very low quality quality contribution to the thread and could be considered flamebait. That's several broken rules.

it's not a real thread so it doesn't matter

Okay, that's your opinion, and the wonderful thing about the internet is that it allows forums like this to exist where people can share and discuss their opinions.

She's not an adult in a loli body though. She is a child of her race. They explain this in detail.

...

Why do Ironic weebs always have social media names where every letter is spaced out like that

Because double−width fonts are cool。

Why are you name dropping kotaku? Are you trying to advertise them?

Gays aren't as mentally ill as the """" people"""" who enjoy lolishit (read: pedoshit).

take a loli
now shrink their head slightly

CONGRATS now suddenly instead of being a loli, it's a sexy college student

it's almost like pedophilia has nothing to do with drawn cartoons, and neoteny is a fetish that has literally existed since betty boop?

>sexy college students have child like bodies

Really made me think there pedo

>Normies
Your crossboarder is showing

But what about characters like Kanna that actually behave like children, having not only their child like bodies but their child like personalities sexualized as well

>child like bodies
Well you completely missed the point of my post, congratulations, you're retarded.

Take any college age anime character, and enlarge their head slightly. congratulations, now it's a loli. I wonder if you still don't get it, usually people who just yell "pedo!" don't use their brains so I don't expect you to.

I think Pedos should be impaled on a pike. That way we don't have to deal with those subhumans

>Take any college age anime character, and enlarge their head slightly. congratulations, now it's a loli.

This is some mind boggling autism. Please tell me this is just bait.

>

nothing about kanna's body is childlike, neither is her personality.

why is it always the people going around, calling other people pedophiles, that can't seem to differentiate between real life children, and cartoon children? how do you honestly think that kanna's personality/body is reflective of a child in real life? that's a more disturbing perspective than someone who gets off on artistic renditions of cartoon characters

You mean a scene with two consenting adults?

That's how body proportions work. It's literally that simple, sorry you're too stupid to understand that proportions are what seperate adults from children.

reminder that people paid for this thread

Everything from that post is just oozing with insecurity. I'm genuinely glad I'm a well adjusted enough human being that I'll never have to resort to fetishizing children because women my age don't talk to me.

>nothing about kanna's body is childlike, neither is her personality
That's objectively wrong. She was stylistically designed to be that way.

lolicons don't think about children, we think about cartoons

anti-loli pricks see a lewd loli, and their first thought is of children in real life. they are literally closer to pedophiles than lolicons

>listen just because someone is sexually aroused by a depiction of childlike behavior and childlike physical traits does NOT mean they are sexually aroused by children

My fucking sides, these mental gymnastics subhumans use are pathetic

poll.fm/5vwdy

why is this thread still here

Sure thing Nobuhiro Watsuki. I'm sure those 2d arts kept you satisfied.

Seconded.

Because this isn't your lolishit safe space faggot.

Get out kotaku devs.

ha ha btfo!

Kill yourself pedoshit before someone else does it.

>unironically allowing kotaku to shill their anti-anime propaganda on Sup Forums undisturbed for 2 hours
I am disappoint.

>ITT: insecure lolifaggots get triggered the fuck out

Back to the kitchen, bitch.

WEW LADS, those lolicons are such sensitive boys...

>this triggers the kotaku roasties

they paid the mods 200 bucks to leave it alone

heh heh, manipulating these lolifaggots is SO EASY

What? What's the guy holding and why is it censored?

WHEEEEEEE LOLIFAGGOTS ARE ALL SHITTERS!

>yw never get gangraped by breitbart chads dicks
>yw always be a sad roastie blogging for kotaku

It's on auto-sage so whatever.

Eh, too bad for lolicons; they'll never be actual human beings.

That usually means mods don't give a fuck and we should be seeing more kotaku threads in the very near future.

The more lolifaggots post, the funnier it gets.

Give them your hand and they'll take your whole arm.

Can't wait for the next one of these threads!