This thread is for sharing memes and information/research about the Femin Virus, otherwise known as Disease X.
Do not read these threads and then go commit acts of violence, any solution to this issue must be taken at a government/international level.
>CDC official Timothy Cunningham murdered for trying to expose Femin virus archive.is/3ev8X >WHO announces Femin virus as “Disease X” archive.is/QwzgO >The Oxytocin hormone and it's importance to pair bonding, maternal behavior, in-group preference, pregnancy and other functions archive.is/HOGiQ >Biological and psychological differences between liberals and conservatives archive.is/mpHHf >Birth control causes frontal lobe brain damage, as well as other things like infertility, cancer and depression archive.is/vXXr8 >How Civilizations Fall: On the role of radical feminism in the decline of civilization archive.is/6GonD >Gloria Steinem's history with the CIA and use of the Femin virus on American black communities archive.is/VBhRu >The Bronze Age collapse was caused by a Femin outbreak archive.is/t3cvv >Elevated Femin infection rates helped cause the Cambodian Dark Ages archive.is/45gAp >List of symptoms Femin hosts display (work in progress) archive.is/mH9nn
>its a retrovirus >strains of it have existed forever >ancient ruins and mythology depict it as a warning of what it is, how it manifests, who it effects, and how destructive it is >it seems to start to naturally show itself when a civilization starts to build dense cities/industrialize >women stop wanting to have kids, only want foreign men, hate males >everyone turns degenerate/pedo/gay/trans >society collapses everyone goes down with it >cia/paperclipped gnatzis figured out what it was and identified a strain >it was weaponized >it was released in the ghettos of america and poorer areas of western europe in the 70's >today whites are infected as shit >it is sometimes being administered in soyboy food products like starbucks drinks >a cdc official was murdered for exposing it >the who calls it disease x >all feminists have it >there is no cure
What the femin virus is NOT:
>some stupid bacteria shit spread by cats >some stupid shit spread by vaccines >some kind of retarded living meme effect >a dumb r/K theory, feminists are caught in an endless cycle of trying to destroy their reservoir of mates not attract them
Anyone pushing these themes over and over is a shill
Our proposed method for how the virus acts: it is a retrovirus that inserts its genome into the human genome. The inserted genome disrupts the DNA sequence and expression of a gene involved in regulation of oxytocin hormone signaling.
This causes disparities in oxytocin, which is involved in maternity, pair-bonding, ingroup preference, and dopamine/serotonin regulation, all things that feminists tend to lack.
There's no shilling here. We present an argument and we research it. The other thread was moved to another board where they know it will be dead in the water.
The Feminist is immunized against all dangers: one may call her a nationwrecker, whore, roastie, slut, it all runs off her like water off a raincoat. But tell her that she has an incurable virus and you will be astonished at how she recoils, how injured she is, how she suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
>demographic most in favor of abortion: liberal women >least in favor: conservative women archive.is/tke5R
>Even Women Didn't Want To Give Women the Vote >If women got the vote, they would have to serve in the army and on juries. There would be fewer children but more divorce. Men would become less chivalrous and reverent of womanhood. >Women would take up men's occupations, and men would take up women's occupations; the result, according to an antisuffrage booster, would be a "race of masculine women and effeminate men and the mating of these would result in the procreation of a race of degenerates." >"If women achieve the feministic idea and live as men do," wrote a male doctor who opposed female suffrage, "they would incur the risk of 25% more insanity than they have now." >Of the 535 members of the 108th Congress, only 73, or less than 14%, are women. All but six of America's 50 governors are men. archive.is/xdB0C
Remember that turning a society's deities into feminine forms or worshipping snakes is a known sign of a femin infected civilization which is approaching a total and complete collapse
As the pastebins show, you can also find snake imagery in other parts of the world totally unconnected to Indo-Europeanism, often combined with human sacrifice practices
Prescott Bush and E.H. Harriman are notable figures here. Cold Shore Harbor Laboratory was funded by generous grants by Andrew Carnegie, Cornelius Vanderbilt, J.P. Morgan and John D. Rockefeller.
we dont need these threads. you're intentionally making us look stupid by discussing old topics and posting shitty graphics i know what you're doing jackass
Jeremiah Martinez
responding to my own post to give it attention 1
Jaxson Jenkins
responding to my own post to give it attention 2
Dominic Wright
responding to my own post to give it attention 3
they're gonna call me a 'shill' but just look at the shit OP posted yourself like this is such obvious shariablue garbage stop letting it be posted
Noah Torres
responding to my own post to give it attention 4
Jackson Martin
Feminism has been debunked? How do you even figure that when it's still rampant?
And I can see what you're doing. If the thread bothers you so much you can easily go to another one. One thread isn't going to hurt Sup Forums's precious reputation. As if the blacked thread and tranny threads aren't the problem.
>some stupid bacteria shit spread by cats >some stupid shit spread by vaccines >some kind of retarded living meme effect How do you know it is not these things?
Nolan Price
You mean the bacteria or whatever that has no major symptoms that can explain the insane behavior of feminists? We've been over this already a dozen times.
Feminism isn't really human nature user. You don't see anything comparable to it with animals in the wild and it doesn't fit in with what women naturally want.
Your obsession over Frank still fails to wane I see.
>A famous case study that highlighted a neurological disease that caused impulsive sexual behavior and could have been an expression of an underlying pedophilic orientation was a right orbitofrontal tumor in a 40-year-old man (Burns and Swerdlow, 2003). Prior to the discovery of his tumor, the patient had overtly claimed no sexual interest in children, but after the tumor progressed, he made sexual advances to his prepubescent stepdaughter and began a pornography collection, including child pornography, resulting from impulse control loss associated with orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction. Although his behavior was non-exclusive and his preference was not explicitly tested, the most striking fact about his symptoms is that all pedophilia-like symptoms disappeared after resection of the tumor. Even more, after the tumor recidivated, the pedophilia-like symptoms remerged and disappeared again after the second resection, thus showing a clear causal link between behavior and brain function. However, the clear majority of orbitofrontal tumors do not result in pedophilic behavior, meaning this case study should be interpreted cautiously.
Aaron Sanders
>A further publication with two case studies highlights the role of the temporal cortex in regulating sexual behavior (Mendez et al., 2000). In the first case, a 60-year-old man developed fronto-temporal dementia and presented with increased sexual drive the molestation of extrafamilial children. The second case was a 67-year-old man who developed hippocampal sclerosis that similarly increased his sexual desire. He attempted to molest extrafamilial children. Both patients sexually abused their own young children, suggesting a latent predisposition to pedophilic behaviors existed in these patients prior to disease onset. Both patients showed hypometabolism of the right temporal lobe as measured with FDG-PET. After treatment with antidepressants (paroxetine for the former patient and sertraline for the latter), a decrease in pedophilic behaviors and desires was reported (Mendez et al., 2000). These findings support that dysfunction in the prefrontal cortex may prompt a latent predisposition to sexual attraction to children through disinhibition, whereas a dysfunction in the temporal cortex might elicit this response through sexual preoccupation (Jordan et al., 2011b). This does not explain the etiology of pedophilia as a sexual preference but as an acquired hypersexual behavioral disorder, and furthermore one that rarely presents in the realm of fronto-temporal dementia and hippocampal sclerosis. Clear here is the expression of pedophilic behaviors resulting from the neurological diagnoses, but not why these behaviors were pedophilic rather than hypersexual in nature. For further discussion of dementia and its relation to hypersexual/pedophilic disorders, please refer to Mohnke et al. (2014).
This here outlines a way you can mess with the mind to induce pedophilia in someone. I'm curious how the virus can do it without resorting to a tumor though.
They are naturally more left leaning but that doesn't explain why so many of them display symptoms of severe mental illness and lose most, if not all, of their maternal instincts.
Ryan Watson
>toxoplasmosis and memetics didn't exist in past civilizations Except that they did
Brody Bennett
Notice how all of those species reproduce at a replacement level? Those species also don't display the clear sexual dimorphism seen in humans.
Mind telling me the symptoms of toxoplasmosis? And memetics is not enough to cause physical changes and the severity of mental illness that feminist have.
>Only a handful of studies of MRI-based structural differences in pedophilia have been published so far. By means of voxel-based morphometry (VBM), several alterations of gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) were found. In 18 incarcerated exclusive heterosexual and homosexual pedophilic men with histories of sexual offending against prepubertal children, a significantly lower GM volume in the bilateral orbitofrontal cortex, bilateral insula, bilateral ventral striatum (putamen), precuneus, left posterior cingulate, as well as superior and right middle temporal, parahippocampal gyrus, and in the cingulate compared to 24 teleiophiles was found. These findings were corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate within the whole brain (Schiffer et al., 2007). However, only the left parahippocampal gyrus would have remained significant had a Bonferroni correction for the 15 additional ROI analyses been applied. The authors proposed a theoretical frontal-executive dysfunction and suggested that – similarly to obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders – these findings may form a neurophysiological circuit contributing to the pathophysiology of pedophilia.
>In another study with 15 pedophilic forensic inpatients in comparison to a healthy teleiophile group, GM reductions were found in four pre-defined ROIs comprised of right amygdalae; in right septal region, the bed nucleus striae terminalis (BNST), hypothalamus, and the substantia innominate bilaterally (Schiltz et al., 2007). Later on, amygdalar volume reduction was confirmed by a post hoc manual volumetric analysis, unpublished until now (Schiltz, personal communication). These results could be related to a developmental hypoplasia and underscores the influence of right amygdalar lateralization on regulation of sexual behavior, supporting the temporal lobe hypothesis of pedophilia.
I haven't seen any studies that suggest they can't dream. Some of the feminists who are having sex with their students might be, but otherwise that behavior isn't really that commonly observed in females. Some scientists aren't even sure if it's possible for women to be pedophiles.
>One study was published showing that, in comparison to non-sexual offender controls (n=11), convicted pedophilic offenders (n=9) show only GM volume decreases in the centromedial nuclei group of the right amygdala which extended into the laterobasal nuclei group and the cornu ammonis of the hippocampus, although this finding did not survive correction for the large number of predefined ROIs (Poeppl et al., 2013). Interestingly, pedosexual interest, including the strength of such interest, and sexual recidivism were associated with GM volume decreases in the left insular and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, while preference for younger children was associated with GM decreases in the orbitofrontal cortex and bilateral angular gyri (Poeppl et al., 2013).
Seems like if you know how to mess with the brain you can even specify the intensity of the pedophilic desires and even what age range they are particularly attracted to.
I know it's a hard pill to swallow user but if you read through the stuff that we've compiled I think it will make a little more sense. Right now I'm looking at the biological differences in pedophiles as we believe that the virus can cause pedophilia in some individuals.
Gavin Reyes
>By comparing 44 pedophilic men with histories of sexually offending against children or child pornography consumption, with 53 men with histories of non-sexual offenses, differences were found in the WM only, highlighting a bilateral connection route traveling the superior fronto-occipital fasciculus, as well as a right-sided alteration in the arcuate fasciculus. No differences in GM were observed (Cantor et al., 2008). These findings were upheld in a follow-up confirmatory reanalysis (Cantor and Blanchard, 2012) and interpreted as insufficient connectivity in pedophilic individuals, rather than simply GM reductions in disparate (sub-) cortical regions (Cantor and Blanchard, 2012).
>Studies to date contain shortcomings either due to the sample sizes, to the configuration of the control group, or because the methodology of VBM was used in a restricted way by focusing on a priori regions of interest. The take home message of the present structural imaging MRI studies of pedophilia is that while there have been different results from different studies, one finding has been replicated across studies: reduced right amygdala volumes in pedophiles compared to teleiophilic controls (Mendez et al., 2000; Schiffer et al., 2007; Schiltz et al., 2007; Poeppl et al., 2013). This finding supports the temporal lobe theory of pedophilia referred to in Section “Introduction and Conceptual Framework.” Diffusion-tensor imaging is a method of WM imaging that holds promise to validate and expand previous VBM results.
So while some results may vary, abnormalities in the amygdala are both common and key among pedophiles.
Bentley Russell
>Research has highlighted alterations in pedophiles through positron emission tomography (PET) and functional MRI. For example, in a PET study of pedophilia, a decreased regional cerebral metabolic rate for glucose was found in the right inferior temporal cortex and superior frontal gyrus, without Bonferroni correction. This rate decreased in the pedophilic group after presentation of girl and women cues, whereas it increased in the teleiophilic group (Cohen et al., 2002). The authors interpreted this as a consistent brain abnormality underlying decreased glucose metabolism in the temporal and frontal cortices implicated in cortical regulation of sexual arousal. The small sample size of seven participants in each group limits the generalizability and confidence with which the results can be interpreted.
>In fMRI research, the first study that included a single homosexual pedophile found increased activity of the anterior cingulate gyrus, right prefrontal cortex, and basal ganglia in response to pictures of minimally clothed boys, regions that comprise the attentional brain network with the right orbitofrontal cortex (Dressing et al., 2001).
>Decreased activations were seen in the hypothalamus, dorsal midbrain, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and right lateral parietal, right ventrolateral, and right occipital cortices, as well as in the left insula in 13 hetero- and homosexual forensic pedophiles when viewing sexual stimuli as compared to emotional stimuli as compared to teleiophiles (Walter et al., 2007). Based on these findings, it was suggested that the missing sexual interest toward adults could be explained by impairment in subcortical regions associated with the autonomic component of sexual arousal, i.e., lack of activation seen in hypothalamus and dorsal midbrain in pedophilia. Additionally, using a regression analysis approach, the activation in the left DLPFC was inversely correlated with the score on the child abuse subscale of the multiphasic sexual inventory (MSI), indicating also possible alterations of cognitive processing of sexual stimuli in these subjects (Schiffer et al., 2008a,b).
>Homosexual and heterosexual incarcerated pedophiles were examined with fMRI to determine whether there were differences associated with age and child gender preference. Among homosexual pedophiles with a history of sexual offenses against children (n=11) in comparison with homosexual (n=12) controls, the substantia nigra, caudate nucleus, the occipitotemporal and prefrontal cortices, thalamus, globus pallidus, and the striatum were activated in response to male child sexual stimuli, whereas these were not among the matched homosexual teleiophiles (Schiffer et al., 2008a). This was interpreted as an increased effort in evaluating respective stimuli in pedophilic compared to control participants. In another investigation, heterosexual pedophiles (n=8), when compared to heterosexual teleiophiles (n=12), after presentation with female child sexual stimuli displayed significant activations in the amygdala, hippocampus, substantia nigra, caudate nucleus, the medial dorsal thalamic nucleus, and the inferior temporal gyrus, suggesting a similar response pattern to sexually preferred stimuli as seen in healthy heterosexual males (Schiffer et al., 2008b). Pedophilic males showed a signal increase only in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in response to the preferred sexual stimuli (no activation was seen in the control group to sexual stimuli of adult women). An interesting finding was that whereas the healthy male teleiophiles activated the orbitofrontal cortex in response to both sexually explicit adult female and female child imagery, this activation was not seen among male pedophiles. All together, the authors suggest that orbitofrontal deactivation, as shown in pedophilic participants, represents a dysfunction of the neural network necessary for the appropriate cognitive component of sexual arousal processing.
Pretty interesting bro, trying to put together an idea of what this means for us and how it could be influenced.
What's up with the the shill attack already?
Dominic Murphy
Had one thread slid and another moved to /bant/ by a mod. Things are quiet now but the shills have really started going off the deep end, the one spam shill in particular. Glad you enjoy the research, when it comes to some of the pedo stuff it deals with parts of the brain that I'm not familiar with so it's a little more difficult to wrap my head around.
>tfw you have to resort to talking to yourself under a proxy when 31 out of 56 posts are literally (you) because your thread keeps slipping to page 10 >tfw 2 other threads died in the same evening without even reaching 50 posts
How schizophrenic of you to push that same dead narrative as your one pedo friend. No one ever bought that shit before and they aren't going to do it now.
>There were also attempts to investigate the perception and emotional processing of visual sexual stimuli. For example, the right amygdala showed greater activation in homosexual pedophiles when they were presented with male child sexual stimuli compared to heterosexual male teleiophiles who observed female adult sexual pictures, although the participants were not matched for sexual orientation, thus potentially obscuring true ‘pedophilic’ activations (Sartorius et al., 2008). The authors interpreted this increased amygdala activation to stimuli depicting children that were observed in pedophiles as a possible fearful emotional reaction combined with sexual arousal, supported by the lack of an appropriate amygdala activation to adult female stimuli (Sartorius et al., 2008).
Asher James
>Poeppl et al. (2011) used a block design in their study to investigate sexual interest in pedophiles (nine pedophiles with a history of contact offenses and 11 non-sexual offender controls) that consisted of male and female nude Tanner scale imagery, including Tanner scales I, III, and V, corresponding to prepubescent, pubescent, and adult images. Results of whole brain analyses showed significantly greater activation in the middle temporal lobe, hippocampus, posterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, medial frontal lobe, and culmen of the cerebellum in pedophiles to the Tanner I>neutral contrast. When compared to control teleiophiles in the Tanner V>neutral contrast, pedophiles showed a significant deactivation in the right insula. Furthermore, in the between group contrast of interest (pedophiles>Tanner I, teleiophiles>Tanner V), there were significantly greater activation signals seen in the postcentral gyrus, right middle temporal gyrus, anterior midcingulate cortex, and the amygdalae bilaterally (Poeppl et al., 2011). The authors interpreted these findings as an easier sexual arousability in pedophilic as compared to non-paraphilic participants when stimulated with purposefully non-erotic material (Poeppl et al., 2011).
>In a similar study, Habermeyer et al. (2013a) investigated eight pedophiles (three with a history of contact offenses, five with a history of child pornography consumption) and eight heterosexual teleiophilic controls in an event-related design consisting of erotic pictures of boys, girls, men, and women. In an ROI analysis including the middle frontal gyrus, only the pedophilic participants showed activation in the girl contrast, whereas controls showed deactivation (Habermeyer et al., 2013a). A further finding showed that during the immediate processing of erotic stimuli, both groups showed significant activations in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, a finding the authors attributed to the crucial role this region occupies in the critical evaluation of and attention to sexual stimuli (Habermeyer et al., 2013a).
Henry Nguyen
Frank will crash the rare market if he doesn't stop uploading public pictures on goybook
>Two recent studies investigated functional connectivity in pedophilia and have supported decreased connectivity associated with CSA, but not with pedophilia. Specifically, Kärgel et al. (2015) examined functional connectivity at rest (RSFC) in 26 pedophilic men stratified according to offense status (14 P+CSA, 12 P–CSA) and 14 HC within (1) the default mode network and (2) the limbic network. Pedophiles who engaged in CSA depicted diminished RSFC in both networks compared with HC and P–CSA with diminished RSFC between the left amygdala and orbitofrontal as well as anterior prefrontal regions. These findings highlight a diminished resting state functional connectivity in offending pedophiles as compared to controls, suggesting a relationship to CSA more than to pedophilia. Using complex multimodal integration of brain structure and function analyses, Poeppl et al. (2015) found that the functional role of brain regions that are altered in pedophilia were linked to non-sexual emotional as well as neurocognitive and executive functions, which were previously reported to be impaired in pedophiles. They suggested that structural brain alterations affect neural networks for sexual processing by way of disrupted functional connectivity and that structural alterations also account for common affective and neurocognitive impairments in pedophilia.
All you're doing is showing that there's merit to the information by show the incentive to attack the threads as much as you do with your failed doxx.
Is that even Frank in that picture? His face looks different.
Xavier Cooper
What does he keep getting pictures taken doing? He doesn't work... does he attend church parties or something?
>Research found that the activations seen in heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles to child stimuli are nearly indistinguishable from those in heterosexual and homosexual healthy males to adult stimuli (Ponseti et al., 2012); this supports the assumption that pedophilia is primarily a sexual age preference similarly to teleiophilia. The activation pattern among heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles and healthy male teleiophiles includes the caudate nucleus, cingulate cortex, insula, fusiform gyrus, temporal cortex, occipital cortex, thalamus, amygdala, and cerebellum. Despite the similarity in activation patterns between pedophilic and teleiophilic men, the novel pattern classification technique has been successfully applied based on the presentation of preferred sexual stimuli and resulted in a mean accuracy of 95%, with 100% specificity and 88% sensitivity (Ponseti et al., 2012; Mohnke et al., 2014), thereby showing a promising new approach for classifying subjects. These studies included fully admitting pedophilic participants only; therefore, further research should verify its use with partially- or non-admitting pedophiles. The promise of functional predictors is, however, also supported by a similar study which, in contrast to Ponseti et al. (2012), used a highly hypothesis-driven approach of several impaired functions.
He's probably used to it. I think the success of the Q larp hurt his ego more; archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/femin q/ >DONT LET THIS SLIDE Anon5 CONFIRMED WORKING WITH Q user to EXPOSE Femin BIOWEAPON Virus outbreak >I have IMPORTANT INFORMATION that needs to get to Trump and Q user!
After 14k posts under his trip his only followers are himself and perhaps one gullible retard. Meanwhile Q roused up the entire boomer generation without any effort.
>In their study, Walter et al. (2010) could show that a bi-dimensional discriminant function analysis revealed highly significant group separation when activations for cognitive appraisal or passive consumption of visual material are considered in their respective specific brain regions. A recent study investigated response inhibition in pedophilic males and found that pedophilic participants had slower reaction times and less accurate visual target discrimination which corresponded to greater activation in the “No-Go” condition for the DLPFC bilaterally, frontal eye fields, and supplementary motor areas, but in the left anterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, and angular gyrus, they showed greater activation in the “Go” condition (Habermeyer et al., 2013b) in an uncorrected voxel-wise analysis.
>As research shows, there are regions that differ in neural activation among heterosexual pedophiles, homosexual pedophiles, and matched healthy teleiophiles. However, limitations in these early studies included controlling neither for sexual preference nor orientation, using insufficiently differentiated inter-study paradigms such that all generalizations had to be limited to the exact study and paradigm utilized. Furthermore, pedophilic participants were all incarcerated or judicially involved [a notable exclusion to this being (Ponseti et al., 2012)], underscoring the need for studies investigating non-incarcerated pedophilic participants. As previous research in normal human sexuality has shown, there are notable differences between healthy heterosexual and homosexual men. This should be kept in mind for future neuroscientific investigations (Hamann et al., 2004; Ponseti et al., 2006, 2009).
Pretty sure that was one of the shills going around posting that. No on in here who's a regular buys into that Q shit.
>Even though first hints for a familial transmission of pedophilia date back to the early 80s (Gaffney et al., 1984), only limited research has been conducted into the genetic contributions to pedophilia. Twin studies of sexual orientation hint at a heritable component of homosexuality (Bailey et al., 2000; Santtila et al., 2008; Långström et al., 2010). Most recently, a Finnish group published the first twin study investigating pedophilia. This was a population-based twin design analyzing 3967 male twins and their male siblings. It was shown that genetic influences contribute to sexual interest, fantasies, or activity pertaining to children under the age of 16years (Alanko et al., 2010). However, the heritability estimated in the study explained only 14.6% of the variance; in comparison, the heritability of almost all psychiatric disorders is estimated to be above 30%, with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder ranging as high as 70–80% (Alanko et al., 2013). Based on their findings, the authors concluded that future research should address the possible interplay of genetic with environmental risk factors, such as own sexual victimization in childhood (Bienvenu et al., 2011). Another recently published study reported genograms of five families with unusual high occurrence of paraphilias (mainly pedophilia). They found familial aggregation of paraphilias with no clear Mendelian type of transmission. Intriguingly these families included carriers for different types of possible developmental disorders such as conduct disorders, deafness, blindness, and epilepsy (Labelle et al., 2012).
Interesting that pedophilia appears to be inheritable. That gives some strength to the theory that the virus causes it.
Did anything I say contradict that? Are you accusing me of being connected to the Deep State now?
>Support for a neurodevelopmental pathway comes from research investigating epigenetic dysregulation of sexual development in general, physical characteristics, and functional as well as structural brain differences in pedophilia. Pedophilia seems to have a small hereditary component, with cases clustering in families and familial transmission of deviant sexual fantasies and behaviors (Gaffney et al., 1984; Alanko et al., 2010).
>Sexually offending and incarcerated pedophilic men show increased rates of left-handedness, have shorter stature, experience twice as many head injuries before the age of 13 as normal counterparts, and seem to have lower intelligence than teleiophilic men (Blanchard et al., 2003, 2007; Cantor et al., 2004, 2005, 2007). These variables are present in pedophilic men significantly more often than in healthy control, but it is not clear if the reason for this is the sexual behavior disorder, the pedophilic preference, or even another factor.
It's cute how you two shills copy cat off of each other. You can't even make up your own insults.
Landon Richardson
P qredicted this. Anyway it would be good to establish specific brain patterns among pedos,they probably pass those genes on to their next generation of fucked up people- whole families of psychopaths. How likely is it that mutations could influence significant brain structure in these areas without selection for it? Makes sense they have "neurocognitive impairment," but this looks like significant differences that couldn't have just arisen from a few simple mutations by chance? at least not all in one generation
Connor King
I'm not reading every post in the thread, you mong, just the ones you made I replied to.
>The push for neurobiological research has resulted in three major aforementioned theoretical developments, all attempting to explain various aspects of pedophilia. The frontal lobe theory is a contender to explain offenses against children from behavioral disinhibition and uncontrolled compulsive behaviors. Noticeable structural and functional differences in size and function of the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex have been found in pedophilic men with a history of contact sexual offenses against children (Burns and Swerdlow, 2003; Schiffer et al., 2007, 2008a,b; Poeppl et al., 2011).
>The temporal-limbic theory tries to explain pedophilia through structural and functional differences in the temporal lobes, thus focusing on the misattributed emotional salience and valence toward children. Several case studies highlight temporal and amygdalar lesions or functional activation differences that might contribute to the development of a pedophilic sexual preference (Cohen et al., 2002; Joyal et al., 2007; Schiltz et al., 2007; Walter et al., 2007; Sartorius et al., 2008).
>The dual lobe theory suggests that both frontal and temporal disturbances are responsible for the range of behaviors seen in pedophilia, such as diminished impulse control as seen with orbitofrontal deficits and hypersexuality through the temporal lobes (Seto, 2008, 2009; Poeppl et al., 2013).
For it all to be explained by environmental factors would require a lot of different occurrences that would make the condition rarer than it appears to be.
You should really read more often, it might help with your broken English.
Levi Scott
>They found familial aggregation of paraphilias with no clear Mendelian type of transmission. Intriguingly these families included carriers for different types of possible developmental disorders such as conduct disorders, deafness, blindness, and epilepsy (Labelle et al., 2012). >Interesting that pedophilia appears to be inheritable. That gives some strength to the theory that the virus causes it. Especially if it affects other senses- although I am curious about where in the sensory pathway it effects, because those can be caused by troubles all along the path from sensory contact to the brain. Wish I knew more about neurobio to help, although there might be specific receptors on these neurons that makes them susceptable to viral entrance
Hudson James
Frank probably jerks off to interracial tranny porn
Anon5, the person the shills in this thread attack repeatedly because they hate the spread of his information. These threads are to spread awareness and research it.
It's most likely a movie script mixed with something from a videogame (probably Planetside2 or some Blizzard game)
Angel Fisher
Read the article on the WHO in the OP post:
>The WHO says that "Disease X represents the knowledge that a serious international epidemic could be caused by a pathogen currently unknown to cause human disease, and so the R&D Blueprint explicitly seeks to enable R&D preparedness"
In other words, it's not an actual disease. It was a hypothetical one used in a training exercise. Larp5 is just relying on gullible idiots not reading the OP, or being too stupid to realize what it means.
It could be also implied that it's a disease they are still working on figuring but want to prepare people for. There has always been the possibility of freak outbreaks, why now make mention of it and make it so public??
Daniel Sullivan
Why now are they suddely having a campagin for this, when outbreaks like this have always happened and we've always had to prepare for them. Now they're acting like it's a big deal that a new epidemic could happen, which they've put a placeholder for in their top diseases. You'd think they'd just carry on carrying on with preparations but they suddenly get all up in arms about something that's always been a threat. Right as feminism is about to collapse europe
Eli Peterson
Radical feminism run amok is a serious problem for the west and the entire world, and this fucking retarded misdirection shit is only further evidence of the the insanity it breeds. It's not a literal virus though, it's just what happens when you give full grown children (women) voting power and then proceed to play them like the solipsistic emotionally driven one-string fiddle they are.
This feminism crazy train has no brakes, women will obviously never, ever vote to take their own endless entitlements / privileges / "rights" away and they will keep voting for more far leftist big government feminist insanity until all "men" are castrated at birth and injected hourly with estrogen and then we're all murdered in the streets by the 3rd world goblin berzerker hordes.
I see the person they brought in to handle the thread earlier is no longer around
You're being honeypotted, what I find both odd and funny is that you'll just keep bashing your head against the wall with the same tactics/strategy over and over while intel is gathered on you
