Harvard Geneticist "We have to accept race realism" - NYTIMES article

mobile.nytimes.com/2018/03/23/opinion/sunday/genetics-race.html

"This is why it is important, even urgent, that we develop a candid and scientifically up-to-date way of discussing any such differences, instead of sticking our heads in the sand and being caught unprepared when they are found." "we risk losing the trust of the public and we actively contribute to the distrust of expertise that is now so prevalent."

"It will be impossible — indeed, anti-scientific, foolish and absurd — to deny those differences."

Harvard is now agreeing that pol was right. 900+ comments from libtards screeching.

Attached: 2j1sdhk.jpg (1000x1500, 392K)

...

How many of these threads are you making, and why are you doing it with a autistic spree? Just who are you gathering data for? At least use a different op picture for crying out loud, yes thats a beautiful asian, but if you are just going to keep remaking this topic, at least give us different eye candy to complain about.

Attached: 1498697059154.jpg (498x341, 35K)

And also archive the Jew York times, faggot

they are on our side on this debate now

from the comments

>The problem is not that humans differ in many ways, or that these differences are caused by our genetic background. It is not either that these variations tend to be grouped by place of origin, or that these variations do lead to differing abilities.

The problem is that we instinctively categorize people into all-or-nothing groups, and then treat these groups as the only relevant factor. Then, we impose tribalism to define "our" group as superior to the rest. That leads to such absurd results as portraying the ancient Egyptians as white (they were black) or the Chinese as backwards (in 1400 they were the most powerful and advanced country).

>Indeed, modern genetic research demonstrates that all non-Africans contain Neanderthal genes. So, if you belong to that group, remember that you, and not they, are descendents of what we have put down as the cavemen.

KANGZ

“This is an important discussion to have and Reich approaches it with appropriate caution. However, he may commit a common philosophical and scientific error.

In his explication of cognition or intelligence, he cites both intelligence tests and years of education. What he does not acknowledge is that both of these measures, which he admits are imperfect, are measures of those things that a controlling population has deemed of value. While I'm not a slavish devotee of theories of multiple intelligence, it is clear from my work as an educator, that many people are brilliant and perceptive in ways that are not measured by standard assessments or valued in the selection process that is a gateway to continuing education.

The self-fulfilling prophetic issue is that a set of "intelligences" and a set of social traits have been ordained as the default standard, thereby perpetuating the perceived value of those humans who determined the standard and possess those particular traits.”

Fucking this!

I WILL SEE TO IT THAT MOST MILLENNIAL WHITE WOMEN BREED WITH BLACK MEN!!! FUCK YOU RACISTS!!!!!

huh

Attached: 1280px-Baal_shamin_temple02(js).jpg (1280x840, 320K)

Based David REICH

I read this, but it's just a delusional kike. He accepts our premises but irrationally rejects our conclusion - that stereotypes and racism are natural and justified. This position is not good for us - it's just laying the framework of delusion necessary to acknowledge scientific reality while still denying social reality. Other liberals will imitate this and be pushed even further away from reason and truth.

In the future, when the basilisk has created the dystopia that we can all see forming before our eyes, the argument will adapt to become "this world really is shit, but we were still right to kill the evil nazis that tried to prevent it from coming to pass because the world they would build would be even worse".

The only lesson here ought to be that there's no limit to the depth of delusion possible when your mind is given over to evil.

>The problem is that this imposes tribalism

>But anyways, the white tribe is the worst tribe anyway

Stop posting this shit. One fucker agrees with basic biology and you post the shit out of it. He will be turned down, so did Pinker and so did Watson. We absolutely need change

>we risk losing the trust of the public.
Maybe they are wakeing up to the fact live in South Africa style America won't be any fun.

>What he does not acknowledge is that both of these measures, which he admits are imperfect, are measures of those things that a controlling population has deemed of value.
This is wrong though. A real IQ test. Not the wais test or anything used for psych intake/screening, but a real iq test is just a measurement of your ability to see patterns among abstract symbols. Thats it.

No, IQ tests absolutely measuree the g factor, or general intelligence. They're positively correlated with success on all other types of cognitive tests, and success within society, or overall positive lifetime outcomes.

uh, do you not see the point?

>>Indeed, modern genetic research demonstrates that all non-Africans contain Neanderthal genes. So, if you belong to that group, remember that you, and not they, are descendents of what we have put down as the cavemen.
Even Neanderthals are smarter than niggers.
Kek

Attached: 1496295861237.jpg (600x763, 76K)

>They're positively correlated with success on all other types of cognitive tests, and success within society, or overall positive lifetime outcomes.
Yes.
But they don’t have any cultural bias like the first post was implying.

Social reality is reality and so it wont matter what they say. They will find that no matter what they do, nothing will work. It will be money and effort thrown into the abyss. They will not be able to say
>Yes there are racial differences but your kids must go to the same school and live in the same neighbourhood and mix to the fullest degree.
It will mean nothing to normal people who deal with reality.

>REEEEEEE I dont want to see opinions that don't support my narrative goy!

Attached: 1477382680856.png (354x504, 129K)

Why do you say "even neanderthals"? Neanderthals had 20% larger brains than modern Europeans, and were therefore most likely much smarter than us too. You're probably basing your statement on geico commercial depictions instead of facts. We modern humans are domesticated and exhibit neoteny, and like all domesticated animals we have much smaller brains than our undomesticated ancestors.

Agreed.

HAHAHAHAHHA FUCK YOU LYING JEWS!

I read this article. It is admitting the truth and at the same time the author is trying his best to weave a new narrative that even though the racists were right all along the racists can't be allowed to think they're right because some pilpul, subtlety, double speak, bullshit, "it's not that simple" rhetoric!

This is why the Jews alway lose in the end, they have to lie to get ahead. The truth and justice WILL win again!!!11

Fuck you all, cowards, leftists, sucks, Jews, Globalists, fuck you all, enjoy all your cognitive dissonance, I have NONE! Goodnight and fuck you all!!11

Sup Forums has been infested with these /kpop/ posters fuck off you faggots.

>Why do you say "even neanderthals
Oh I'm sorry, did Neanderthals create our modern
systems of accountability, sciences, and standards? No? Quit sperging out like a fucking autist it was a joke.

>he shits on Harpending (F) for claiming niggers are genetically lazy because they didn't have to work so much like we did
what a cuck. This is what people do when they don't like a correct claim, they raise the bar of what they'd accept as evidence for it high enough so that they can dismiss it. And you can always raise the bar higher, like Flat Earthers do.

No, you weren't joking: you're uneducated and have accepted the mainstream media's popular depiction of 'cave men', and are now transparently trying to play it off, fucktard.

And just to add to this: normal people have at the same time access to other competing framework of ideas that make more sense. What we see in this article is basically an identity crisis among the group of people who always saw themselves as "le intellectual vanguard". They will not be able to fall back on any coherent framework of ideas that support multiculturalism (multiculturalism is by the way the existential rationalization of jews in western society, it's their peace of mind) because they can't really backtrack on any issue without being "racist" or "white supremacist" because they went too far in and invested too heavily in the idea that multiculturalism would actually work out in the end.

They wuz kangs. And we killed them. Apologize, sapiens.

Magically, life forms separated by thousands of miles for thousands of years evolved or didn't evolve exactly the same way under entirely different evolutionary pressures even though that same evolutionary pressure is readily acknowledged as the impedes for all superficial changes between the same life forms.

You are such a fuck coward. Are you Jewish by any chance?

And his carrer is over on 5, 4, 3, ....

Why would there be any backlash to such a reasonable argument from an esteemed geneticist? Especially one that is fully allied with Sup Forums and an alt right thought leader now.

The author is a huge kike, that's why he's trying to shit on evil racists. Our guy is Gregory Cochran who wrote the 10,000 Year Explosion and the blog West Hunter.

Harvard wants to get on the right side of the history. They are in a mad scramble to follow Sup Forumss intellectual truth. We should make sure to applaud articles like this that show such capitulation to reality.

a) thats not what they're saying
b) its likely a partial cause for many white traits, and i doubt you think whites are inferior to blacks

wtf im a liberal now

>Why would there be any backlash to such a reasonable argument from an esteemed geneticist?

Because leftists are retard.

As Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn once said
>"Everything that you add to the truth, subtracts from the truth."

Harvard is on our side now. How can leftists compete?

You post like a reddit fuck.

Yep, and in a very kike fashion it's clear that Reich isn't primarily motivated by looking for the truth, he's only looking to keep up the appearances with evil racists, like kikes are worried they're losing when it comes to sounding more true, so they have to accept some truth to sound better.

No one wants to accept that the blacks who stayed in Africa were to lazy to explore the world and stayed and fucked the last remaining subhuman ape men

Archive the New York Times story.

Of course there are racial differences.
Problem is that people like you attribute everything to racial differences and that's just retarded and simplistic.
You have various cultures in Europe, even though Europeans are a genetic cluster. Genetics can't explain everything.
>inb4 some retarded posts that debunked IQ map
>inb4 some retard doesn't understand what haplogroups are

how do cultures explains that northern europeans are taller than southern europeans, retard.

>m-muh cluster
doesn't make us homogenous, that's why Icelanders dominate strongman competitions, island genetics

Exactly right, i wonder how long will it take for them to admit race iq

When will they announce that they discovered that people with haplogroup W have a receptor in the brain for Watermelon

>But he goes further: he cites studies which search for traits like laziness as if this idea is not itself a social construct.
>laziness is a social construct

Gotta double down on these excuses why some races can't pull their own weight.