>According to the Report of the Carnegie Commission on The Poor White Problem in South Africa (Stellenbosch University, 1932), it was conservatively estimated by 1929 that out of a total of about 1,000,000 Afrikaners, more than 300,000 were very poor that is, they lived on a pauper level. An equal number were poor but lived above the pauper level. These figures were obtained prior to the calamitous depression of 1930 which brought about widespread destitution among all sections of the community.
>Although scientific racism played a role in justifying and supporting institutional racism in South Africa, it was not as important in South Africa as it has been in Europe and the United States.
>This was due, in part to the "poor white problem", described by the report. The report raised serious questions for supremacists about white racial superiority.[7]
>Since poor whites were found to be in the same situation as natives in the African environment, the idea that intrinsic white superiority could overcome any environment did not seem to hold.
>As such, "scientific" justifications for racism were not as widely used in South Africa as they were in other parts of the world.[7]
>there was "little doubt that if the natives were given full economic opportunity, the more competent among them would soon outstrip the less competent whites".
>Boers were poor after two wars with the mighty British Empire and after the latter employed an extensive scorched earth policy wiping out Boer resource and infrastructure You should kill yourself
Angel Sullivan
One black guy literally overthrew the Spanish government and texas was so shocked they had a black president they literally started a revolution lamo.
Excuse me sir, according to the current manual of style, White Supremacy is no longer the preferred term, it is either White Sovereignty or the more "progressive" White Swaraj.
Connor Ross
How the fuck was Rhodesia a white supremacist state?
The bottom two never lost wars or any military engagement. The top two only managed to lose to other whites, who’s constituents and soldiers were also white supremacists
Jonathan Harris
Nah its the natural way of life. White power forever, I'm sick of these minority scum coming to OUR ountries that we fucking built, and just oozing themselves into our gene pool. Fucking scum.
Day of the rope can't come quick enough
Christopher Lewis
Your stupid source sounds makes it sound like there is only two options, landless peasant or feudal lord. but being a yeoman farmer is also possible. Its such a stupid source with the "HE THINKS OF HIMSELF AS A FEUDAL LORD EVEN THOUGH HE IS NOT" how the fuck are you suppose to know what he thinks of himself??? Its a commie projecting him idiotic lense on to people who don't give a shit.
In the appalachia in the south where people didn't own slaves, people voted against secession, because they didn't own slaves so they didn't care if slavery was eneded. This idea that you fucktards try to push that these poor whites in slave socieites saw themselves as lords even though they were poor is not backed up by any data
Ian Sanders
answe me you fucktard I want to fight you over this. I looked up the data. Your lies have no more effect on me
Jeremiah Rogers
I'm taking your non-answers as a sign that once your retarded narrative crafted by someone else is blown out of the water you don't have the capability of thinking for yourself and thus can't answer
Daniel Edwards
The source is the Carnegie Commission report that was used as the blueprint for Apartheid.
At every point in history whites needed racist affirmative action policies to get ahead. This was repeated in th US (Asian Exclusion Act, Jim Crow), Australia(White Australia policy), South Africa(Apartheid).
As soon as whites have to compete on a level playing field, they fail and start complaining about white genocide.
>This was repeated in th US (Asian Exclusion Act, Jim Crow) These were immigration restrictions not affirmative action. Keeping Asians out of the country was a desire to maitian an ethnic balance. Keeping niggers from coming into your town is because you don't want niggers in your town.
White australia is again an immigration policy. Apartheid is again an immigration policy.
Pray tell, if whites liked having blacks around so they could feel superior to them, why the fuck did they do everything in their power to keep the blacks the fuck away from them, to the point that they were willing to go through sanctions and ostracization from the world community? Obviously being around niggers is not fun
Caleb Wilson
>being a yeoman farmer is also possible.
They literally had no land. It's written right there in the report.They were poor and living with Africans in slums.
Apartheid was designed to give them affirmative action. There's a reason why today there's still less than 1% of Afrikaners who actually own farms.
Benjamin Nguyen
>ethnic balance
Not an argument. Whites couldn't compete against harder working and smarter Chinese. At one point, Chinese men represented nearly a quarter of all wage-earning workers in California.
Jaxson Howard
>"little doubt that if the natives were given full economic opportunity, the more competent among them would soon outstrip the less competent whites
There is no doubt about this. Its a bell curve, there is overlap.
I think fundamenetally misunderstand Sup Forums sub 100 IQ whites are as much idiots as sub 100 IQ people or any races, its just that most black people are sub 100 IQ so more of them are idiots
Chase Collins
>They were poor and living with Africans in slums As they should if they had sub 100 IQ
>At one point, Chinese men represented nearly a quarter of all wage-earning workers
Yeah and people didn't want the place to be overrun with chinese. If 1/4 of the population was a foreign group I would be concerned too
Cameron Powell
can you link me to the actually Carnegie commission report instead of your idiotic interpretations of it
Julian Walker
feel free to leave
Luis Butler
I'm assuming you are a commie. Opposition to immigration among the working classes is not a white only thing. Ceasar Chavez was a mexican farm labour organizer in the United States, and we was vehemently opposed to illegal immigration because they served as strike breakers.
A restrictive immigration policy serves to turn your country into one giant Closed-Shop Union.
When the white upper classes seeked to import labour from abroad to undercut the working classes, they would routinely stop them from doing so like a union would do when the boss would try to bring in scabs.
The MOST famous example of this was the American Civil War, where northern white americans fought a war to make it so the rich southern plantation owners would stop buying up all the good land and working it with slaves
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleeding_Kansas >the pro-slavery element arguing that every settler had the right to bring his own property, including slaves, into the territory; anti-slavery "free soil" proponents argued that permitting slavery in Kansas would allow rich slaveholders to control the land to the exclusion of non-slaveholders
They passed laws to stop the LITERAL importation of undercutting slave labour before that and seeked to contain it in a certain geographic area, because the white working class was against slavery because they knew it undercut them
Jeremiah Sullivan
>thinking that blacks won the civil war, and wwi and wwii lol, tyrone, you would still be a slave were it not for white pity
Jaxson King
Also in South Africa there is massive opposition WITHIN the black population to the migration of more blacks into the country, again because of wage undercutting. The fact is that nobody wants people willing to work for a cheaper wage moving into the territory
Bentley Roberts
why is being a beta cuck inherent to the white identity ?
When you have snowstorms and wolves then you need to evolve high empathy and trust to survive as a group for thousands of years in such a climate. This later went on to hurt us, as foreign nomadic tribes could exploit our naivity easily.
At the time the naturalization policy was such that only whites could obtain citizenship, however they hadn't specified an immigration policy, so it wasn't so much as they were "legal immigrants" so much as you anybody could just come and go as they pleased, its just that the only people who decided to come were from europe. It was only when non-whites even tried to come into the country that an immigration policy was even necessary.
Jacob Williams
In South Africa there are legal immigrants, and the blacks don't like them.
Opposition to immigration is just a general rule. Nobody likes immigration. The US didn't even like white immigration once whites started coming into large numbers, which is why they passed the National Origins Act.
>Europeans were legal immigrants. The law was changed to favour Americans who couldn't compete on a level playing field. Its the same thing. People don't like immigration in general
Grayson Collins
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1924 >Samuel Gompers, a Jewish immigrant and founder of the American Federation of Labour, supported the Act because he opposed the cheap labor that immigration represented, despite the fact that the Act would sharply reduce Jewish immigration
Andrew Wright
Pray tell, why were the Palestinans so against Jewish Immigration in the Mandate period? Its just because they couldn't compete right. It certainly wasn't because they were being outnumbered by a group of people and this group of people ended up taking over the country. Certainly being opposed to immigration for purely ethnic reasons has never happened before
Zachary Brown
Watch the extended vid with sound. The black was in his face going on about racism. The white warned him 3 times to step off.
Eli Edwards
Nativists deserve to have no rights and no property. They deserve punishment because God hates them for not contributing to all of humanity
Gavin Hall
>They were poor and living with Africans in slums If this was true then why does your source is bullshit because it was implying that all the whites thought of themselves as feudal lords even though they were super poor. Somehow this doesn't add up. If they thought of themselves as above the africans than the idea that apartheid was created to prevent a raindow communist uprising against the boureoisie is completely full of shit because obviously their was no risk of that happening.
Its the same bullshit as that quote "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires"
They make the exact same argument in every situation, regardless of the actual situation.
"Saw themselves as feudal lords"
or
"Hoped to one day own slaves themselves" for the south
Maybe just maybe bullshit communist arguments are bullshit in every context
Justin Morales
God Save the Queen!! >There's a reason we took over the world.
