Jordan Peterson JQ

So Jordan mentions how Jews are over represented because they have high IQ's and are more "competent" therefore they deserve this position and should not be criticized.

By that logic does that mean that blacks having the lowest IQ and the lowest compitence deserve to be on the bottom of society and no further fuss should be made about helping them out?

I would hate to think that this man thinks whites should bend over to Jews because of their "superiority" while at the same time bend over to blacks because we are the cause of their suffering. How can you play the race card where whites always lose, its going to have to be one way or another. Either we recognize race and essentially accept this natural cast system of we have to share power and wealth of everyone including Jews.

Its shit like this that makes me think JP needs to stay in Canada. These faggots seems to have the biggest hardon for supporting the satus quo I've ever seen.

Attached: 1449099039252.jpg (1279x1706, 553K)

Other urls found in this thread:

onlinestatbook.com/2/calculators/normal_dist.html
eurocanadian.ca/2018/03/steven-pinkers-anti-enlightenment-attack-white-identitarians_17.html
web.archive.org/web/20120705191053/http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/jews-do-control-the-media/
solargeneral.org/wp-content/uploads/library/bell-curve-richard-j-herrnstein-charles-murray.pdf
onlinestatbook.com/2/calculators/normal_dist.html]
jordanbpeterson.com/psychology/on-the-so-called-jewish-question/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerus_clausus
twitter.com/BasedBasterd/status/977952446122287109
youtube.com/watch?v=pdFPR_c8qBk
youtube.com/watch?v=IFFnT9JaG2g
youtube.com/watch?v=mJRpeq0s9Ls
youtube.com/watch?v=kpoI2tN4yuE
twitter.com/RichardBSpencer/status/978117041835081729
youtube.com/watch?v=2pE2ms1P56I
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Peterson makes the obvious error that because Whites and Asians are also above 100+ iq on average, and they are in far greater numbers than the Jewish population, there should be more Whites and Asians in positions of power than Jews even when Jews are over-represented and Whites/Asians are proportionate.

Juden Peterson is just scared of the alt right label sticking if he seriously answers the JQ, he's a smart goy and knows that conditioning is too strong

Anti semite is losing some of its power but its still close to pedophile in terms of getting someone shunned by the mainstream

This

His role isn't to answer such questions, it's too dangerous, the truth is slowly being memed by anons online.

Boomers and Gen X liberals are the goodest goys, but young people don't give a shit about Jews or Israel nearly as much left and right.

>he's a smart goy
Ah yes, fucking BASED 4d chess grandmaster

Attached: E5E2E047-212A-4F3B-9053-A0B0E6AFF6A4.jpg (609x343, 32K)

> meme as a verb
You need to return to reddit, flaggot.

I'd hardon that ass

Why are people raging about him so much anhyway? He's doing good work aside from this, definitely not an enemy, this isn't his area. Let him play coy.. I don't get why he's supposed to be the man for the job

Is this only a problem for the autists who only think in black/white or what? Seems like Sup Forums is split on him

Only took 1 min for someone to take the flag bait.

>That room
Why do girls take pics like this when their rooms are disgusting

Attached: 1483324942504.jpg (187x200, 6K)

> bait
Did you take that from some “Sup Forums glossary” sticky on reddit?

You lack logical reasoning, though. If the Jews have significantly higher IQ, than it follows there are groups with extremely low IQ, right? You can't have it both ways. At this point you arrive to the conclusion that you can't expect the same outcome, because the inputs are different. That's what you want, right? But now, you are butthurt because the jooos. They are giving you the tools you want. Take it.

Seems like he's just cribbing from Cofnas in his recently published attack on Kevin McDonald's work, although I admit I haven't read the full paper yet. He's recently become best buddies with Steven Pinker and seems to endorse the idea that the best way to deal with the alt right is to engage with them "seriously", although their idea of seriousness does not apparently include any person-to-person debate with prominent alt-righters. They'd rather just snipe from their ivory tower.

Even as cowardly as it is, this approach has the potential to end badly for all of them. As you pointed out, the admission of human biodiversity is as close as you can get to blasphemy against the cult of humanism.
It appears to me that IQ distribution only partially explains Jewish over-representation in academia, but it fully and easily explains supposed under-representation of other minorities. Further, if the "long tail" of the IQ distribution is supposed to matter so much, what the hell are all these women doing in Ivy League institutions and when are we sending them back to the kitchen?

The only reason they aren't going to get pinched badly from both sides is that rebuttals to their arguments will probably never be published. They'll throw bombs at the radical right and then hide behind the skirts of the authoritarian left to shield themselves from the counter-volley.

Spread the word it's been decided.
Whites are starting our own version of Zionism.

HITLER wanted to peacefully send the Jews to Madagascar.
To honour that spirit, whites as a collective will be pooling resources in order to purchase either the island of Madagascar or a large swath of mineral & farm rich land in Africa.

As our new Atlantis is in its infancy, every male will be required to work farming/construction/fishing with his AK-47 slung over on his back.
Even though we will have bought the land fair & square we must be prepared to fight for our property & the laws we have instituted.

Whites only.
No lefties.
No degeneracy.

Spread the word that you were on Sup Forums when whites started Atlantianism.

Peterson is stooping to actual nigger-tier levels of argument by omitting any context of per capita vs absolute numbers.
In the pool of highly qualified college applicants, whites dwarf Jews in terms of absolute numbers.
Whites overrepresent their share of the population in performance at something like 70-% of the population
>up from le 56%
of the population due to there being so many blacks and hispanics who underperform compared to the average American.
Even if grant for the sake of argument that Jews in the U.S. have let's say a 130 IQ (they don't), it still wouldn't account for the massive discrepancy, because that number would still be dwarfed by the number of whites in total numbers.
Whenever these boomers try to dive on the grenade of whites noticing Jewish hypocrisy by using Ashkenazi mean IQ (I am skeptical of the data collection on this), they are also tacitly implying that we should organize our society in a caste system with Jews on the top, then whites, then brown masses, then blacks on the bottom a total meritocracy. One of which whites would dominate due to simply having WAY more high threshold people for intelligence.
Having real SEGREGATION at the national level would be the most fair and dignified solution to all races but Jews can't abide living in a true Jewish closed system, even if the other races foster open trade with one another as nations.
That's why they keep some amount of Arabs around in Israel to do the undesirable jobs. A true Jewish ethnostate cannot exist in harmony because they would be nonstop trying to Jew one another, forever.

Attached: DTdrUU6VoAAt6Xw.jpg (656x656, 46K)

The American population of Jews vs. Whites:

Above 145 IQ:

200,000,000 Whites * 0.0013 = 260,000 Whites above 145 IQ

6,000,000 * 0.0228 = 136,800 Ashkenazi jews above 145 IQ

There are 1.9 times more Whites with an IQ above 145 than there are Ashkenazi jews with an IQ above 145.

This means that 136,800/(136,800+260,000) is the probability that a Jew will hold a job requiring a 145 IQ.

136,800/(136,800+260,000)=0.345

>34.5% of Jews should hold positions requiring an IQ above 145 in a perfect meritocracy.

Feel free to do the calculations yourself: onlinestatbook.com/2/calculators/normal_dist.html

Attached: 1475301093690.jpg (1154x1500, 1.16M)

>I would hate to think that this man thinks whites should bend over to Jews because of their "superiority" while at the same time bend over to blacks because we are the cause of their suffering. How can you play the race card where whites always lose, its going to have to be one way or another. Either we recognize race and essentially accept this natural cast system of we have to share power and wealth of everyone including Jews.
This kind of flawed reasoning is exactly what Peterson is trying to promote. He is also trying to redefine the JQ to be only about "how" jews obtained power, and not about "what" they are using their power for and "why".

He is libeling everyone on the alt-right as being obsessed with jews having power because we think jews did not earn it (a straw man), and knocking down this straw man at the same time by "proving" that it's only due to having higher average IQ that they have obtained so much power in our countries.

Peterson's aim is to paint everyone who dares question jewish power (anyone who touches the JQ) as being the same as the radical left. His assertion is that Whites in the alt-right are interested only in painting themselves as victims who are oppressed by the jews so that they can "get into the identity politics game".

The problem here is that the way the radical left plays the victim to set up their oppressor / oppressed dichotomy is by pointing at a majority group (Whites, straight males, Christians, "cis" genders etc.) and declaring that they are oppressive simply by existing as a majority group (though it's true that the Leftists also assert that the majority groups also practice nepotism to maintain their power, while denying that any other factors could be responsible, such as IQ).

It is not a valid comparison. Peterson is attempting to construe Whites who question jewish power as being irrationally resentful and obsessed only with power itself, rather than with how that power is being used, and why.

Attached: 1522035969187.png (431x562, 439K)

checked
>Steven Pinker
You might enjoy this essay and review of one of his latest books:

eurocanadian.ca/2018/03/steven-pinkers-anti-enlightenment-attack-white-identitarians_17.html

If Peterson has thrown his weight in with this anti-White hack then that's three more nails in his coffin as far as I'm concerned.

Right, let's just assume the White population adheres to a perfect normal distribution. It's not like any group can be broken down into distinct subpopulations or anything. Nope, if you can assign a label to it, it must precisely follow a normal distribution!

You are correct, normal distributions can be biased. IQ is hypothesized to be right side biased because low intelligence is not advantageous for survival.

With this in mind we can assume that the Jewish population would be even more right side biased compared to the white population, due to experiencing more evolutionary bottlenecks (die offs).

This means that my 34.5% figure is accurate, or under calculated.

>This means that 136,800/(136,800+260,000) is the probability that a Jew will hold a job requiring a 145 IQ.
That's right, but that is if the the pool of candidates are only jewish or White. There are more than twice as many East Asians in the USA as there are ashkenazi jews, so the probability is actually lower than 34.5%.

That calcualtion was done with the assumption that jewish mean IQ is 115 and White IQ is 100, which are, frankly, debatable figures.

The question of what exactly the average IQ is in a given discipline is also pretty hard to quantify, so it's not easy to determine what exactly the ratio should be.

t. I'm the one who wrote that pasta

>so it's not easy to determine what exactly the ratio should be.
Not that I think the ratio should perfectly reflect IQ distributions. That's just what Peterson seems to be indicating should be the case.

Well said, I see hes aware of the holes in his arguments and simply won't allow himself to be confronted with it. I didnt realize he was avoiding any real debate with so called "alt___" but i remembered a few people like red ice or the unslaved podcast was turned down by him. So he obviously sticks to places where his ideas wont be challenged.

Well thats it for me, if he's not a shill he might as well be.

Thanks for the serious replies this bored is astoundingly better late night when the kids are in bed.

Attached: 1449271353924.jpg (640x640, 96K)

No, they can't. Look up the definition of a normal distribution. If it's lopsided, you have something else.

Assuming a normal distribution is a decent guess when you have no other data but a mean and a variance. But that's it. And that breaks down pretty quickly. Let's say I give you a mean and a variance for Mormons. You'll say OK, they're normally distributed. Then I give you another mean and variance for midwesterners. Normally distributed! Then another for Irish. And Italians. Gaussians all around, you say. But the means are all over the place. Now tell me what the distribution for the combination of those groups looks like. Does it look like a fucking gaussian to you?

Maybe I'm going out on a limb here because I'm in no way a statistician I find the assumptions behind your reasoning specious.

To accept one fact is to inadvertently accept the other. Or you are a hypocrite, or scared to speak the truth.

Yea it's a clusterfuck but if you want to criticize Jews as more represented than they would be in a perfect meritocracy you have to prove that it is actually so with hard data.

no meme responses pls

>Jews
>IQ

Attached: 20170213_000337.jpg (660x580, 80K)

Peterson rejects the JQ because it's formulated in a completely wrong way. It's not a matter of intelligence or equality, it's a matter of morality. It's obvious that Jews couldn't get into so many positions of power if they were dumber than the host population. But how did they get there? Through nepotism, usury and deception. What do they use those positions of power for? To control the host population and exploit it for their own economic and geopolitical goals. This is what the JQ is about.

>if you want to criticize Jews as more represented than they would be in a perfect meritocracy you have to prove that it is actually so with hard data.
web.archive.org/web/20120705191053/http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/jews-do-control-the-media/

>Let’s be honest with ourselves, here, fellow Jews. We do control the media. We’ve got so many dudes up in the executive offices in all the big movie production companies it’s almost obscene. Just about every movie or TV show, whether it be “Tropic Thunder” or “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” is rife with actors, directors, and writers who are Jewish. Did you know that all eight major film studios are run by Jews?

All eight major film studios in Hollywood. Should be less than 30% in a perfect meritocracy.

Attached: 1517807341256.png (650x994, 600K)

That tight belly hhhnngggg.

aaahhhhhhugggh

haaablaauuublaaauuuggghhhhhhffffhhfhfh

Attached: file.png (481x508, 322K)

This. He fails to realise that Jews in group preference means that even without some global Jewish conspiracy you'll still have Jews infiltrating key positions in society. Which is why so large portions of the mainstream media is controlled by Jews. As a side not if white men controlled as much of the mainstream media as Jews do then Jewish academics would have called it racial discrimination and a glass ceiling.

>nepotism

So what? They support their own kind. Isn't that what white identitarians want with their own kind?

>usury

Credit is not a crime. Don't borrow if you can't pay it back. (But whites are smart?)

>deception

That is, getting manipulated by people smarter than you.

Face it, Jews are smarter, and that's why they're vastly more successful. You've essentially admitted it.

This is SJW logic.

Different industries will have different distributions, and different cultures will tend to cluster. The Jews succeeded in Hollywood. There's no conspiracy, they just saw opportunity and worked hard.

Yes, the question of how Jews attained their positions of power is much less interesting than whether or not their interests align with ours. Would we simply put an AI in charge of everything as soon as it exceeds human performance in IQ tests? Hey, it seems like it's destroying our civilization but it must be part of a grand plan that we're too stupid to see, pass the lobotomy pills.

>low intelligence is not advantageous for survival

No. This is only the case if there is a winter every year that exterminates those who do not think ahead and plan as well as no birth control.

Currently being stupid and degenerate is pretty much a prerequisite for having lots of kids. In the current year intelligence lowers your genes transmission chance.

>Isn't that what white identitarians want with their own kind?
Not at all dumbass. Within an homogeneous society, authority should be established exclusively on the basis of merit.

>Credit is not a crime
But usury is. It's literally illegal to charge more than 50% interest in most countries.

>getting manipulated by people smarter than you
That's not what it is you retard. Deception is manipulation through false data, hoaxes, frauds. Intelligence can play a factor, but immorality is at the base of the issue.

Jews are successful because they are parasites.

>
;ppl up the central limit theorem. a normal distribution is a perfectly reasonable assumption when dealing with large population sizes if you dont know the distribution

Isn't that what I said? It's a reasonable assumption if you don't know anything else. However, if the population is not homogeneous it's going to be wrong. This is why we have things like gaussian mixture models.

THIS

Attached: jordan peterson race.png (629x439, 30K)

So let's take this a little further by factoring in East Asian (Chinese, Japanese, and Korean only) demographics and IQ. We'll be using the IQ scores from 'The Bell Curve' (Herrnstein & Murray, 1994):
solargeneral.org/wp-content/uploads/library/bell-curve-richard-j-herrnstein-charles-murray.pdf

----

IQ (source: Herrnstein & Murray, 1994, pp. 273–278)

White Americans: 103
East Asian Americans: 106
Ashkenazi Jewish Americans: 113

Population (source: Wikipedia)

White American population: 197,870,516
East Asian American population: 6,790,000
Ashkenazi Jewish American population: 4,700,000

IQ above 145:

White Americans:
197,870,516 * 0.0026 = 514,463

East Asian Americans:
6,790,000 * 0.0047 = 31,913

Jewish Americans:
4,700,000 * 0.0164 = 77,080

[Probabilities calculated with: onlinestatbook.com/2/calculators/normal_dist.html]

Therefore:

If drawing job candidates from a pool of only White, East Asian, and Jewish Americans, and the job requires an IQ of at least 145, in a perfect meritocracy that considered nothing but IQ scores:

77,080 / (514,463 + 31,913 + 77,080) = 0.1236 = 12%

12% of the candidates hired for the position would be Ashkenazi Jews.

For the thesis of Peterson's essay to hold, Jews must be represented at a rate no higher than 12% "in positions of authority, competence and influence (including revolutionary movements)" in the USA:
jordanbpeterson.com/psychology/on-the-so-called-jewish-question/

Attached: peterson_gate_keeper.jpg (475x640, 168K)

>This is SJW logic.
That's exactly the thing, Peterson is trying to apply anti-SJW logic to the JQ, and accusing the alt-right of being no different than the Left.

The user asked me for an example that disproves Peterson's thesis, see here for more:

Juden Peterson, professor of the pseudo-science of psychology.

The amount of Jewish geniuses is only a fraction of the amount of goyim geniuses.

Had this simply been a matter of IQ Jews wouldn't have much influence at all.

>This is SJW logic.
So actually, it's not SJW logic, it's Peterson's anti-SJW logic, i.e. it's logic based on meritocracy that assesses primarily IQ.

The thesis of Peterson's essay is that jews are not over represented "in positions of authority, competence and influence (including revolutionary movements)" due to nepotism or conspiracy, but because they have higher IQ on average (as well as some psychological traits due to their IQ, which he primarily uses to explain their involvement in Leftist politics).

The user was asking me to provide an example of where Peterson's thesis does not hold, i.e. an example of an institution of some kind that has jewish over representation relative to both their demographics and IQ. I cited Hollywood as an example.

>The Jews succeeded in Hollywood. There's no conspiracy, they just saw opportunity and worked hard.
Jews created Hollywood about a century ago, and to this day it is still dominated by jews. If Peterson's thesis were correct, despite the fact that jews founded Hollywood, over the decades meritocracy should have reduced jewish representation to around 12% (), but it is still the case that it is dominated by jews.

Please note that I am not arguing, like the SJWs, for equality of outcome based on demographics and IQ (though the SJWs consider demographics only, not IQ), I am simply giving examples of how Peterson's thesis fails to accurately describe reality.

TL DR: Peterson is wrong.

Attached: kermits_burning.jpg (599x555, 39K)

I'm surprised nobody is demanding Jews be put in a separate category in college admissions.
It would wreck them like it wrecks Asians.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerus_clausus

Holy crap she could splatter my chest any day.

twitter.com/BasedBasterd/status/977952446122287109

March For Our Lives is a recruiting operation for Antifa.

Kids were being distributed anti-white, anti-cop propaganda at the event.
The deep state is now trying to swell its Alt-Left paramilitary group ranks with underage kids. SPREAD THIS INFO EVERYWHERE.

>What this means:
THE DEEP STATE IS TRYING TO GET KIDS TO MURDER WHITE PEOPLE AND POLITICAL DISSIDENTS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

_______________________

SES (Senior Executive Service): an army of no-background check required for the hire executives with access to ALL INTELLIGENCE, who nobody knows how much they make (and they are the most well paid federal employees there are), that the POTUS CANNOT FIRE.
This right here, those 10000 parasites are a very important part of the deep state.


Intro and link to info dumps: youtube.com/watch?v=pdFPR_c8qBk

More on SES: youtube.com/watch?v=IFFnT9JaG2g

Even more on SES: youtube.com/watch?v=mJRpeq0s9Ls


>GOOD DUCKING NEWS ANONS
DEEP STATE TURNING ON ITS OWN:
youtube.com/watch?v=kpoI2tN4yuE
Groups of deep statists create group to support Trump.

Attached: SethR.jpg (502x499, 134K)

>jews have the highest IQ
yep, and rice farmers in china moonlight as rocket scientists.

For anyone with interest/attention span - Spencer's response to Peterson Tweeting at him re "dismantling" the alt-right.

twitter.com/RichardBSpencer/status/978117041835081729

>Jews are over represented because they have high IQ's and are more competent
>whites should bend over to Jews because of their superiority
>whites always lose
yes

Attached: dumbgoys.jpg (870x822, 141K)

>The mean Ashkenazi Jewish IQ appears to be around 110 Lynn and Kanazawa 2008 - moderately lower than MacDonald’s estimate of 117.
source: Nathan Cofnas

wud berry my dic so deep who ever pulled it out would be crowned king arthur/10

Thanks for the data. Check out my calculations done here with a Jewish IQ of 113:

t. 93 IQ Sephardic jew

Anyone have any memes where a wojak sits in a really clean room while his civilization is on fire in the background?

>if you want to criticize Jews as more represented than they would be in a perfect meritocracy you have to prove that it is actually so with hard data.
Using the calculations from: Let's take for example the United States Supreme Court as an example: 33% of the current Supreme Court Justices at this time are Ashkenazi Jews. If we assume that each of the Supreme Court judges have an IQ of at least 145 (difficult to quantify, but it is likely an over-estimation of the average IQ of the judges), according to the thesis of Peterson's essay, this is an over-representation of almost 300%.

Attached: zero_evidence.png (1036x1036, 494K)

respect your masters, goy

Attached: 1487549066136.jpg (636x358, 82K)

>what is mutually assured destruction
I often wonder what it must be like to be a jew watching the world collectively wake up to the machinations of your people, and what I would do if I was in your position.

I really have no idea what I'd do, but maybe it would be shitposting on Sup Forums desu.

the destruction only goes one way , the goyim are destroyed until their power is managable , and then they are enslaved to serve greater israel

Attached: alternate_history__a_greater_israel_by_televisionadscom-db053hx.jpg (1264x632, 153K)

>That's why they keep some amount of Arabs around in Israel to do the undesirable jobs.
In defense of Jews, every single society does that.
Everybody imports plumbers and toilet scrubbers from worse off societies.

the Chinese are woke to your tricks.
nobody can guilt them into anti-anti-Semitism.

And he's convincing a generation of young men to avoid the question as well. That's dangerous. He's also making bank doing it, which sounds Jewish itself.

I see OP also ventured to Sexy Beautiful Women and saw that hottie in that specific thread. Whoah.

You think your country is going to conquer China?

LMFAO

Attached: 1521864857304.gif (619x350, 2.15M)

>is going to
your mistake is using the future tense

Attached: 1497724760010.jpg (680x630, 121K)

>he thinks Israel controls the Chinese government
Prove it.

Attached: 1518691854290.png (500x448, 166K)

Peterson: Western civilization is great
also Peterson: you can't be proud of it

The real issue isn't even that Jews have so much wealth and power, it's what they do with it.

>Too dangerous
Literally making 10 times his salary through patreon and donations.

As Metokur said "I'll pay you 250,000 dollars a year to call your boss a faggot repeatedly, sure you may lose your 25,000 a year job but what do you have to lose"

The Zundel case set the legal precedent in Canada for discussing the Jewish Question. It's perfectly legal here, you won't get dragged in front of the Human Rights tribunal as long as you're discussing the truth. There was no legitimate danger of Peterson being taken in front of the Human Rights Tribunal over his position on bill C-16, they were idle threats. That's what the State does here. They try to intimidate you into silence. There are enough legal precedence here that you're pretty safe as long as you're not screaming for a race war.

more competent = ability to disregard morality for gain.

I don't know why you're discussing IQs when the real problem has nothing to do with meritocracy and everything to do with the fact that Jews are culturally incompatible with every host nation they infest and the fact that they insert themselves into positions of power through nepotism and guilt-shaming to attain the leverage necessary to dilute and destroy National Identities in the name of selling little girls thong underwear and nigger noise, THAT is the problem.

There is no meritocracy for Jews, they don't belong here.

>I don't know why you're discussing IQs
I actually agree with you and think that the IQ debate is a red herring, I just wanted to also prove that Peterson's assertion that "there is no conspiracy because they are just high IQ" is unequivocally false. See my post here for my thoughts on his game of focusing on "how" jews got power rather than what they use it for:

she needs to clean her room

>The Zundel case set the legal precedent in Canada for discussing the Jewish Question. It's perfectly legal here
I wish more people knew this, both so that people will stop saying "Peterson can't talk about jews because he'll go to jail in Canada", and because Ernst Zundel made an incredible sacrifice to set that legal precedent. Zundel was one of the greatest Canadian heroes of all time.

Attached: MacDonald.png (1000x1211, 934K)

We all know Jews created a jewish majority state in a formerly arab majority area in palestine simply because they have high iqs. They didn’t conspire to ethnically cleanse palestine, all the arabs simply left because they were jealous of jewish iq.

Attached: toes.jpg (286x227, 13K)

The average IQ in Israel is like 95.

It really only answers part of the question. It explains how they got in that position but it doesnt answer other things like "Do they have Americas interest at heart?"

I remember watching some new york political assembly vote on some gun control bill after sandy hook. One of the dudes had an american flag next to an israel flag. How is that not a conflict of interest? Its really odd to see a country bend so far backwards for another.

JPs IQ argument is just an extension of most of Sup Forumss main arguments regarding blacks. Sup Forumss just reacting the same way a black person would if a white person told him that white people were just better. Obviously Sup Forums isnt one person but it seems clear.

I really admire JBP, but on this issue he is just plain wrong. His first mistake is asserting that Jews have a mean IQ of 115. By his OWN admission, attributing alleged characteristics of a group to an individual IS the definition of racism. He said as much in one of his talks.
Also, since when it is even remotely acceptable to claim that a certain race has a certain IQ? Can you make the claim that the average black has an IQ of 85? Or the average Asian of 115? I don't think you can do this. And even if it were true, which I'm by no means sure of, you could never do the research to prove this, nor could you publish it, nor could you reference it.
So his whole theory goes to shit over his claim that Jews are smarter than everyone else and this is why they are so dominant in positions of power. It's complete garbage. Why aren't Asians dominant? This is all just a bunch of nonsense. Jordan done fucked up.

Attached: 1436554998091.png (331x292, 7K)

People excel at what they're good at. All the worlds heavy lifters are white. That's not a conspiracy, we're just strong. NFL quarterbacks are white, not because they cheat to get their, but because they're smart and think quickly under pressure.

Blacks have a thicker skull and longer limbs, hence they are harder to knock out and run faster. Therefore, they excel in boxing and positions that require you to run or jump. They fail at thinking.

Jews are good with money so they excel at banking. They are good with language and manipulating the truth, therefore they excel at being lawyers.

There is absolutely a secret society where the jews call the shots and are actively trying to ruin the fabrics of society. They want us miserable. Yes that is 100% true. But so many lawyers and bankers are jewish because it what they excel at.

It's not a conspiracy that most football coaches are white. Whites excel at teamwork and organization.

Clever Jews pick different career choices to clever whites. They ALWAYS have throughout history. All the shills already know this though.

That's mostly true in current year, but that doesn't mean the citizens of those countries want that to happen.
Sure the owner of X hotel chain wants 3rd world immigrants from all manor of countries flooding in to clean the hotel rooms so they can pay them less to squeeze out the highest profit margins possible. But that doesn't mean if you put it to a vote that all the people staying in that hotel would want it.
I suppose you could make the argument that BOOMERS would vote for it, but I think it's more that they were so spoiled by a booming economy and material comforts that they were too distracted to notice or care.
Also there are exceptions of nations that are conscious of this and are avoiding it, for example, Japan, or Central European countries like Hungary or Poland.
Even if Central Europe is not as wealthy as Western Europe, this very thing is what has allowed them decades long warning about this both in the form of 3rd worlders only entering the MOST wealthy and therefore most gibs-providing countries and avoiding them in the process, but also their experience dealing with communism.
Funnily enough, their experience with the USSR fucking them up so bad, is not only part of what is making them wise to what is happening, but also ironically being the very thing that saved them from the past decades of slow burning vibrancy, due to not being able to afford gibs for them.
One of the chants they were doing in that Polish mega march was, "CLEAN BLOOD." If that doesn't indicate the absolute desire to avoid vibrancy coming in, I don't know what does.
youtube.com/watch?v=2pE2ms1P56I
Getting mass migration into 1st world countries is something that has to be thought of as a multi-stage rocket, and cannot happen all at once in places that have not been broken down by the multi stages of pozz first.

Attached: poland football banner.png (999x528, 1.02M)

On Spencers recent podcast he BTFO peterson its fucking great.

Because above a certain IQ, say 120-150, intelligence doesnt really matter.

They start measuring ideology and that is where white males and asians go wrong being more conservative, they are shunned.

Its ideological filtration

STOP POSTING ON Sup Forums YOU FUCKING INTERNET ATTENTION WHORES!!! THIS IS NOT YOUR FREE ADVERTISING SITE. ATTENTION WHORES ARE HUMAN FILTH!!