Guess I'll have to post this for you bigots again

Apologize

Attached: 1515732925333.jpg (576x720, 101K)

you both need and deserve a bayonet

It's not a paradox. It's a contradiction.

Freedom is more important than tolerance. The freedom hating commies need to have their freedoms removed so that the rest of us can have the freedom to talk openly about why Hitler did nothing wrong.

Attached: 35f.jpg (1600x1144, 1.1M)

>1 post by this ID

slide thread. fuck off and kill yourself you faggot retard. no bump.

Attached: paradox of tolerance.jpg (700x875, 153K)

Also this is only true if you are a virtue consequentialist. Pretty retarded philosophical view. Takes the worst aspects of consequentialism and mixes them with the worst aspects of virtue ethics.

Well done.

kek

Die in a fire, kike!
No bump!

Attached: ToleranceOfCommunism.png (800x1000, 401K)

>(((Karl Popper)))

Attached: IslamTolerance.jpg (768x960, 132K)

These two. It's circular reasoning that uses the mechanism that it seeks to eliminate, guaranteeing its existence. Popper is trash.

how do you define 'intolerance'

>memeflag
apoolagize

Attached: 1521749434664.png (500x535, 60K)

Exactly. You can't make "tolerance" one of your fundamental values. if you tolerate everything, you tolerate intolerance and foster an intolerant society. If you don't tolerate any intolerance, you're being extremely intolerant. In the end, there's no escaping from the need to decide what must be tolerated, and what must not be tolerated.

For instance, if you probe the values of those who smugly say they "won't tolerate intolerance", you often find that they won't tolerate communities maintaining suitable conditions for raising children, they won't tolerate rational avoidance of danger, and they won't tolerate any sane response to the presence of hostile foreigners or people with loyalties to hostile foreign nations. They will tolerate every form of depravity, every barbarism, and any infiltrators or saboteurs.

Tolerating contradictions in your reasoning leads to insane thinking and self-destructive behavior.

better version

We really shouldn't have tolerated leftists in the 60s

The man has missed the point of his own thought experiment. If your society doesn't tolerate any intolerance, then that doesn't leave any room for the intolerance of intolerance. So, the intolerant people win. If you tolerate intolerance, then the intolerant people still win. The question isn't "tolerance or intolerance?" The question is: "What do we tolerate?"

Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.

Attached: Theodore_Kaczynski.jpg (555x414, 139K)

>It's a Communist lies and misleads people episode
>In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.
>o-obviously this means we should lock up people who disagree with me!
It's time to go back to your gulag comrade.

Attached: 435745534.jpg (243x240, 20K)

>Hitler rose to power because people respected free speech too much

imagine being this retarded