What is monarchism? It is the belief in an absolute right wing authoritarian government, whose figurehead is a heriditary ruler.
> Why monarchism?
Because it is the only system that does not lead to moral/societal collapse
>Communism Inefficient, leads to starvation. Also a godless system with crooked morality
>Libertarianism/Anarchism Trusts people way too much. Inevitably leads to weakness and decadence
>Democracy People very oft vote against the very survival of the state and well being of its citizens. Additionally, only the worst and most slimy can hold power
>Facism/Nationalism A tainted brand that lacks the aesthetic of a king. Also has a struggle for power in the state, as opposed to a ruler trained from birth.
Monarchism is tried and true, and the only system that can truly save the west. Abandon leftist concepts such as "freedom", they are luxuries that we will have to give up in order to survive.
It is. Except it is controlled nepotism, and the nepotee is trained and qualified
William Mitchell
Democracy >random people who start their careers in debited to campaign financial backers >leaders only interested in short term gain to try to win the next popularity contest >will happily loot own country since they don't have to deal with the consequences Monarchy >leader was born into role and raised from child to fulfil his duties >long term planning only a lifetime leader can provide >have to make sure the country is in the best shape it possibly can be since son will inherited >right to rule derived from religion and ancestors, system is inherently traditionalist and nationalist
Not really. That's about unqualified preference. Hereditary monarchy is about the most qualified person getting a job to help about transitional chaos.
Julian Diaz
If you want to worship a dipshit king why not go to any of the monarchist shithole countries that exist? We don't want you here in AMERICA.
Christopher Hall
>worship Not how it works. Is it because you worship your jew leaders that it's hard to understand the difference?
David Gonzalez
>have to make sure the country is in the best shape it possibly can be since son will inherited >implying this means anything to the common man A king couldn't give less of a shit about his subjects. He loves them like a rancher loves his cattle. If they produce they live, when its time to slaughter them they're slaughtered, it doesn't really matter to him if they live or die, to a king his subjects aren't people.
Ian Murphy
>Hereditary ruler
Are you fucking retarded you uneducated mongoloid? Plenty of great monarchs have been non-royal blood.
Don't be makin these threads in the name of our ideology if you don't know what the fuck you're writing.
Gabriel Torres
UK is a monarchy and it protects more the Pakistani rapists than ethnic British girls of low income family. Fuck off.
Andrew Gonzalez
>A king couldn't give a shit
Depends on the King. A King can be deposed.
Ayden Davis
>He loves them like a rancher loves his cattle Exactly. He can't survive without them, and needs them to prosper so he can prosper. Self interest is a great motivator.
Jeremiah Parker
>only the king can step on me
Charles Phillips
Not all monarchies are hereditary you kike. Monarchies are good if you have a good monarch.
Justin Edwards
The UK was not always like that. The whole "do nothing, lets keep them tolerant of us" philosophy was after the last King George abdicated to fuck a American whore. Really rocked the boat, that one.
However, current Queen is a failed monarch I'll give you that.
Cooper Ward
Have a look at the red head English prince. Would you want him as your king?
Wyatt Adams
>UK is a monarchy It's a parliamentary (((democracy))) first and foremost.
Non-hereditary ruler is a bad plan, though. Because you're turning an non-political position into a political one which can be owned.
>after the last King George abdicated to fuck a American whore *King Edward VIII
Tyler Morales
Queen wasn't great but she didn't have much of a choice. The world changed and left monarchy behind. She supported Brexit
Jaxson Morris
>Americans who LARP about monarchy
off the charts pathetic cuckoldry
Tyler Cox
>A tainted brand that lacks the aesthetic of a king
This is stupid, absolute monarchy is even more tainted.
>Also has a struggle for power in the state, as opposed to a ruler trained from birth.
Fascism wants to end of pluralism. Besides, you have little to no mediocrity if you're just given the title.
Most modern monarchs are just super welfare users, they could use what little influence left to speak out against degeneracy but they don't. Do you want Prince Harry running a country?
Wyatt Jackson
Where is she or where are members of royal family talking to the victims of Oxford, Telford and Rotherham? Where's the moralising role of royal family in society? that is refered in >Because it is the only system that does not lead to moral/societal collapse
Please find me something about royal family talking about Rotherham, Telford, Oxford.
Logan Mitchell
The Government usually leads it's own state to it's downfall.
In the UK, the monarchy has to remain apolitical, and can't comment on political matters unless requested by parliament, as per various agreements.
Isaac James
Although the Kim family doesn't call it a monarchy could North Korea in theory be considered a monarchist government? The role of Dear Leader is handed down from father to son and the majority of the important decisions is made by him. Not to mention Juche is just hardcore Korean nationalism cloaked in Soviet clothes.
Kevin Collins
They're cowards at best then, children are being raped in your country and you're worried about an agreement?
Nicholas Phillips
>They're cowards at best then There's just nothing they can do. As is, they can try and gently influence. But to go full retard (american style) would mean being deposed and having no barrier between Israel and London (like we see with DC).
Michael Bell
You contradict yourself here, you say they act as a barrier against Israel yet at the same time are so powerless they could be deposed by simply standing up for their own country.
I understand why some people want kings, there were virtuous kings like Charlemagne, but they don't exist anymore. European royalty doesn't care about power or really anything, they're hedonists who will go along with whatever so long as they get paid.
Cameron Martinez
>You contradict yourself here Not at all. It's a soft barrier and placeholder, and if the time comes, a rallying point. Without them there is nothing. Like we see in Germany, France, and the USA.
Samuel King
> Without them there is nothing. Like we see in Germany, France, and the USA.
The west is all in the same situation, monarchy or republic. That is because of the Rothschild banking system that dominates us.
Jaxon Sullivan
No argument there. But at least under a monarchy the people aren't divided.
Hunter Walker
>Trusts people way too much. >lets hand over all the power to a single person I never get this meme statists love so much.
Jaxson Morales
Fuck your outdated ideology.
Ethan Sanders
>t. John Oliver
It's about putting power in the right hands. Go ahead and list all those successful anarchist civilisations in history, and describe where they are now.
Austin James
>arguing against a straw man How to always win a debate 101
