what did this guy die for? the islamist will just keep on killing enabled by the French political establishment. he made the ultimate sacrifice for a regime that incubated and cosseted his murderer
Arnaud Beltrame, Hero or Patsy Sup Forums?
how dumb do you have to be to willingly hand yourself over to some armed haji.
He died for the sake of the hostages.
A woman was exchanged for him, and he helped inform the policemen preparing for the assault.
im actually surprised that a surendermonkey did a noble deed.
we wasnt french, was he
He was a Freemason, why should anyone care.
thats an interdasting proxy user. mind if i save your flag?
This, especially when the guy explicitly says he wants to kill cops. It was just retarded. A lieutenant colonel doesn't exchange his life against a single civilian, this shit only happens in Jewllywood movies.
I couldn't stop you from saving it anyway.
this is true. but even in these dark days user, a little civility goes a long way.
When will Jupiter expel these muslims?
What are the odds that that woman was a dumb "rapefugees welcome" progressive ?
It was very brave of him but even if I found the courage to do so, I would personally never throw my life away for strangers
Probably the woman was a refugee herself.
This is why the terrorist wanted someone else to kill.
kys
he died like a dog in the name of the people who now commemorate him as a hero of their liberal democracy. he fucked up.
NON NON NONmon frere
my i remind you, in my impeccable french that i remember from highschool that
monsieur lambert et dans la machine a lavier avec les chiens vert
cop that faggot
I'm sure the French will repay his sacrifice by importing 1000 refugees for every victim.
i just figured it out.
he read SIEGE in reverse.
indeed. ever hear the joke about the five french cats that tried to swim the english channel?
The fuck you're talking about, Kraut. Remember that before the m*slims, you're the cancer of Europe. And you too, liked killing civilians like dogs. Fucking subhumans.
That's an interesting sentence. Maybe an Emu could speak a better French though.
Why did you leave us with the fucking Krauts, again.
>Maybe an Emu could speak a better French though.
doesnt translate into arabic too well im afraid
You can all fuck off.
It's a battle of symbolism. When there's a terrorist attack, we usually talk endlessly about the terrorists. This time, we talk about the heroic gendarme who gave up his life to save civilians. It's a moral victory.
Also keep those jokes for the Krauts, France took very little refugees and most of what we have actually want to go at your place.
>we usually talk endlessly about the terrorists
You're a bluepilled normie if you think that's bad
ill answer this for you
une deux trois cats sank
your french is awful mate
your country is awful. awfully brown
He had no child, his wife can get BROWNED
Why would he? We do have imported way too many immigrants, even before Syrian/Lybian shenanigans. Of course, no Western power really has anything to say, since it's all pretty much the same scheme of things occurring in each of our countries. There is not one Western power that can criticize any other on immigration. Of course, Eastern's opinions are, just like their visas demands back in the days, discarded.
That's really sad. I see you're trying to bant like a true Brit, but really your banter is illogical at best. It's almost like the Englishmen purposely displaced the individuals unfit for their society to a common place, a place where you'd be from. Maybe some place far away from Britain.
Whoa, Rare Flag
Say with me, user.
"Sup Forums is the Worst Board of Sup Forums"
We are merely importing our abbos
You must be familiar with the new parisian perfume
France is already the niggest country in Europe
> France gains moral victory from defeat.
No wonder you fuckers surrender so much.
any wonder any frog you speak to sings the praise of vichyssoise aka traitor tureen
See? This is why Westerners will be dying, because they're lazy and stupid like cattle
They believe blindly in rich and educated elites, that they form a meritocracy and govern the country in the best way possible thus they shouldn't be checked and supervised. Westerners believe in the idea of a "neutral" state, that is people who rule have no subjective preferences but they rule according to objective and the best directives
This makes Westerners easy to manipulate and passive. This way journalists, academics and bureaucrats can brainwash the naive Frenchies into not interrupting what the educated riches are doing with the country, not to be interested in politics. All of course covered by the notion of "neutrality" and "professional government"
And who pays the price in the end? Rich journalists, academics and bureaucrats? No! Dumb Frenchies who are too lazy to have views and follow politics because they believe in their "professional" governance
In a way, you are right.
If the terrorists are real, their only gain from these things is publicity.
If instead the publicity is towards the French hero, the terrorists gain nothing.
The only problem is that these are all jew-funded, and will continue regardless.
The best thing that could happen is if France kills every last semetic, jew or muslim, and reinstates the monarchy, whatever remains of it.
Reminder that as soon as the jew is done with the 'west' and the north, they will move onto the south and the east.
If you don't realise it is a matter of a few years, you are as utterly naïve as you think those in the 'west' to be.
>you are as utterly naïve as you think those in the 'west' to be.
This isn't an issue of the jews you moron, but of approach to the country. Poles don't believe in professional and technocratic bureaucracy. They're following politics and they're keeping educated riches in check
Why do you think Poles are accused of populism? Because they were following politics and saw what the preferences of bureaucrats, artists, journalists and they decided to put limits to their actions. They don't want an all powerful judiciary, brainwashing media and they don't want multiculturalism. Poles are far-sighted in this regard, they predicted the future because they're distrustful and are naturally interested in public affairs
While Frenchies started to think something is wrong only when their country caused their deaths
The south and the east of Europe are already third world shitholes so they don't actually need to change anything there.
The real reason is money.
If there was more money in Poland or Portugal, they would be funding more forced immigration etc.
Note that the economic centres are the first targetted.
Germany was the economic capital of Europe, so they sent in millions upon millions.
No German wants that.
Like I said, they are going in order of wealth and cultural importance.
Spain, Italy and Greece will come next. In the last couple of years they've already started flooding here. Italy has been filled from the south as the route into northern Europe, Greece too.
Only a couple of countries are actively resisting, and what happens when Poland/Hungary are completely surrounded.
EU will just lie like the kikes they are, and say "genocide" etc like they always do, and humanitarian action the shit out of you, and no one will ever know.
They did the same in kosovo/Serbia, and all the others.
Poland should use this time to steal some nuke tech, or develop something, because only inconceivable force will preserve your people.
That's why we are low on the priority list.
Do you really think they will any country pure, regardless of what a shithole it is.
It is the people they are targeting, they already own all the money.