A Gun DMV

Would it be reasonable to remove all gun restrictions NFA, tax stamps, magazine limits (where they exist), etc. under the condition that a DMV type organization be formed that would issue gun licenses like drivers licenses? This would mean a similar permit and test system.

Attached: dmv2.png (534x401, 32K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_carry
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

SHALL

This would be trading current infringement for less infringement.

Why would we want anything to aspire to be like the fucking DMV? Fuck that. I'd consider it a personal insult if I wad subjected to 4 hours of waiting and paperwork so some 80 year old can fuck up my paperwork and have the feds bust my door down.

Problem is that would only apply if I want tto bring the gun in public, I can buy all the cars I want and use them on my own land with no license insurance registration etc so long as I don't leave my property with them. Current US car law.

Only zero infringement is acceptable faggot. There is no compromise.

>current infringement for less infringement.

2/10. I'd rather keep the current system then have some government agent keep lists of gun owners and their information. That shit has been leaked before

outside of complete shitholes, the dmv doesn't take long at all. all the memes about the DMV being slow originate from overpopulated cities.

You are an idoit. Illinois already has a foid card, residents have to pay a fee and wait to get permission from the state police to buy ammo, long guns, pistols, or even air rifles (over 1200fps) and what entitlement do us citizens get to enjoy in exchange? Fucking nothing.

You and the NRA need to realize this is not a game of trades and compromise. Not another inch.
At least not until we get back several miles.

Attached: 1511468278620.jpg (640x427, 26K)

Getting rid of the NFA and literally all current gun control is the miles.

Until some dipshit perpetrates a mass shooting, incites protests and gun grabbing, and we're back and beyond to square -1 because we now have a fucking DMV of all things regulating firearms.

Attached: babbabbababkrabs.png (845x984, 845K)

>Not another inch.
>At least not until we get back several miles
That's kind of OP's idea. Of course it'd have to be better than FOID

Bullshit. Fuck you and get the fuck off my board, you cum-slurping, ball-sniffing nigger faggot

...

That's inches kid.

Attached: 1514263514805m.jpg (1024x973, 116K)

I'd be okay with it, but most people would not. A permit is seen as the government giving permission to own a firearm rather than an implicit right

No registries. Ever.

For 300 years, Holland kept a registry of residents by religious affiliation. For 295 years, nothing bad ever happened because of it. Then the Nazis invaded and instantly had a complete list of every Jew in the entire country: names, addresses, occupations, number of children.

No fucking registries.

Good copy pasta for arguing against the leftists

You can trailer them to another private property and use them there.

As with every proposed piece of legislation:

> What specific problem are you solving?
> How will your solution solve it?
> What unintended consequences can you easily foresee?

This would be "DMV type" only in the sense of issuing licenses, not in the sense of registry.

They would issue the licenses but not record how many licenses they give out or who they give them to?
How is this any different from registry?

What is a mile then?

That too, not sure how that would translate to firearms, but I do that with my off road vehicles all the time.

What the fuck? No it wouldnt you tard

Registration is the enemy. That lets people know what you have and how much of it.

Fuckoff and no not comply.

NOT

why the fuck would you want any institution to be patterned after the fucking DMV

no, it would create a backdoor registry. it's better to assume anyone who can legally own one does

BE

this is why the Hughes amendment pisses me off so much
There was no problem
Since there was no problem theres nothing to solve
fuck the unintended consequences, they fucking intended to infringe on law abiding citizens rights, even though there was no problem

>still compromising
>post-March 26th, 2018
they are not interested in compromising, they are in it for ban.

there end-goal is a total repeal of 2A and making gun ownership either cucked to the point of it not being fun anymore or totally outlawed for the average joe

Attached: 1490892404559.jpg (374x767, 62K)

Legalization of 36 gun warships and recreational McNukes.

Fuck nukes, government shouldn't even have that shit. Warships and anything else is all good though, just no nukes and no bio weapons that should be the only "weapons law" and it should be global.

>no nukes
>no anthrax
>prolly no mustard gas/ vx1
SHALL

The government can’t take guns they don’t know anything about but they can certainly show up to your house and take your AR once you cucked yourself into registering it

That would be fine.

INFRINGED

>gun licenses
no

why would you want to replicate the shittiest of government departments and then give them power over a constitutional right?

Sounds like a gun registry to me.

>all these not an inch faggots in this thread
>all these muh infringement faggots
>not one did anything as state by state got its infringement anus gently pushed in
>did nothing when Florida cucked, nothing when Vermont just cucked
>nothing when the next state cucks
It's like a bad joke at this point

Attached: 1522162537706.jpg (250x250, 16K)

You’re on the right track, just the wrong agency. Use the SSA instead of DMV. Have them issue a social security card to every citizen, shortly after birth. This card wil be proof of their right to keep and bear arms. That covers the permit part of the equation. Now, about the testing part, that could be handled by putting the CMP back into public schools. Starting at kindergarten, children would be trained in the proper use of firearms. This would be a regular class, just like gender studies. Schools would have to make room for a range, that shouldn’t be too difficult. Naturally, students would be tested periodically to ensure they understood the material. They could even attend Appleseed events for extra credit.

When the students graduate, and turn 18, they can buy whatever guns they desire. They’ve already got their gun licenses, those were issued at birth. Regular and appropriate testing was included in their school curriculum, so that aspect is covered. And of course, the flip side is, NFA and GCA go away.

>Would it be reasonable
Nope. Get the fuck out.

I don't know if kindergarten kids have the motorfunctions to handle firearms. But I don't know much about kids.

>Require test on paper
>Test is filled with vaguely worded questions and such
>Choose wrong answer for 1 question
>"Sorry user wrong answer, can't give you gun. These things were designed to end lives, better I deny you because better safe than sorry."
>Have to come back and retake the test in 90 days
>More "trick" questions
>Fail again
>"Okay user one more try and we have to bar you from owning a firearm"
>Come back again in another 90 days
>Questions such as "When did the original ______ bill pass and who voted yes on it"
>Can't list all the anti gunners who voted yes on that bill
>Fail test for 3rd and final time
>No gunz forever now


I can legitimately see that happening. They already put mildly retarded questions on driver permits in my state, no doubt it would be 10,000 times worse with guns because "child killing murder weapons".

If you look at most murders and shootings it's usually committed with illegally acquired guns, and are often committed due to mental health or for a drug/gang related reason. Provide mental health and not only do you cut down on mass shootings, you also cut down on suicides in general. Legalize and tax drugs and you get income from that, and people don't need to fight over drugs anymore. Then anyone who uses those drugs ends up ODing or they get shot and killed after they try to rob someone for drug money. Problem solves itself and you make money off it.

>36 guns
>not 74
get a load of this decklet

Attached: USS_Delaware_drydock_1833.png (1068x874, 1.21M)

That's some Jim Crow voting laws shit.

nigger if you found any of the questions on the written driving test hard or "tricky", you legitimately shouldn't be on the road.

Would it be reasonable to shoot you in the fucking face? Yes. Yes, it would.

Attached: hurt feelings report.png (496x640, 131K)

unpopular opinion, I'd legitimately be fine if guns had the same regulations as cars.
unless you're taking them out in public, there's essentially no restriction on anything period.
Seeing as how we already need ccw permits in most states, nothing would change in that regard.

DMVs only work because public roads are a thing.

What are you going to do, restrict bullets to public bullet roads? This idea doesn't work within the Constitutional and legal framework of the US.

Attached: fuck off.png (800x495, 60K)

blow me

I aced my tests. But the wording on the questions have definite potential to be misinterpreted and the wrong answer being chosen.

>felony
Your case doesn't hold water

Attached: Test1.jpg.CROP.article920-large.jpg (920x1334, 159K)

Yet in every single one of those states, you need some cuckstamp bullshit if you want a rifle with a 15.9" barrel, or a suppressor, or something capable of automatic fire.
all of that would be legal and completely unregulated essentially everywhere you'd actually shoot.
I'm not really sure how your map is supposed to be a counter to what I said anyway, outside of like 3 states, you need a permit to concealed carry anyway.

>I'm not really sure how your map is supposed to be a counter to what I said anyway, outside of like 3 states, you need a permit to concealed carry
But you need nothing to carry openly, which is what the map is representing; something you would know if you had spent a single fucking minute googling the image.

>draw a line around
lines are straight.

lines can have curves, dumdum

God i want a warship

We have something similar in NZ it works pretty well. The emphasis isn't so much about failing people but making sure that they're safe. When I sat my test there were several people who answered incorrectly and they're told which questions they got wrong and to think about which answer might be better.

actually a reverse image search of that picture doesn't show anything to do with guns. Neither in the thumbnail or expanded view.
Open carry is for faggots anyway.
A retarded dmv like system would be one step back, but like 30 steps forward for gun rights.
You could go to your lgs, drop a couple hundred bucks, and walk home with a glock 18.

the second that line touches the other end, it's no longer a line though.

So? Jews should be physically removed. Maybe look at the current state of things, guess (((who's))) behind it.

Look boys n’ some sorta inellectual
GETIM

>actually a reverse image search of that picture doesn't show anything to do with guns.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_carry
>Open carry is for faggots anyway
Any right not publicly exercised is effectively a right lost.
>A retarded dmv like system would be one step back, but like 30 steps forward for gun rights.
So, the NFA except for ALL guns would be "30 steps forward"? Okay, nigger.

So stop before you connect with the other end of the line. Jesus, aren't uneducated niggers supposed to be able to figure this shit out?

>So, the NFA except for ALL guns would be "30 steps forward"? Okay, nigger.
I really don't think you're understanding this.
There would be no regulation of any gun you own. You can buy literally anything. You can make literally anything. You can shoot those guns at your house, your buddy's house, at a range, wherever.
The only thing that would be regulated is carrying in public.

shall not be infringed
Get fucked cummy

Attached: 1521388343836.jpg (1024x586, 86K)