Post all beaver redpills you got.
BEAVER REDPILLS
Oliver Young
Other urls found in this thread:
philosophybasics.com
philosophybasics.com
twitter.com
Anthony Moore
Why isn't there a /philosophy/ board for all this garbage to be contained in?
James Myers
Ye i'd like that too.
William Flores
yeah gimme more 2IQ memes
Dylan Sullivan
Nathan Jones
You got more?
Brandon Wright
yeah but it'll cost you
you've got to tell me what you want em for
Christopher Diaz
i'm waaaaiting
Angel Brooks
John Perez
Nathan Jones
William Nelson
Robert Young
Daniel Ramirez
Jason Foster
Luis Rivera
Kevin Hall
Cameron Wood
Noah Ramirez
Henry Russell
Jeremiah Hill
Blake Cook
man this is some good shit
I saved em all a while back without reading everything
Ryan Ortiz
Jaxson Sanders
Benjamin Anderson
Benjamin Butler
Henry Sanders
Blake Walker
Tyler Smith
Henry Long
Ian Mitchell
Brody Peterson
Alternatively
Mason Bailey
Jose Williams
that was the last one folks
anyone with more please add
assuming there are more, I dont' know
Adrian Jenkins
Sounds like a university teenager faggot.
Basic concepts all isolated and thought about with a holier than thou attitude and the nerve to think what he's saying is correct. We dont live in orwellian dystopias. He is the first one to fall for the memes of propaganda when he thinkg "the world is X way but I tell you how could it be in Y way". The world is all ways at once.
He also fails to understand that "this is it", meaning, as Leibniz put it, "What happens now is the best of all probable happenings", not talking about moral good, but meaning what happens at each moment is the only thing that can happen in that each every moment.
Wishful thinking is cool and rationality takes things far, but rationalizing things is not describing any truth, as he himself says that truth is irresponsive and irrelevant to that rationalization.
Lincoln Brown
I would also like to add the absolutely deceiving nature of the texts if you happen to believe them. One is not big enough to put itself over things and just talk about them as if spitting truths. It is not the same to say "X is like this and if Y happens, it changes to Z" on the internet (the abstract) as saying "Hey, or X is Y, let's do something about it" to your colleague in real life.
BIG difference, which is very very difficult to grasp if not totally impossible in the eco chamber that is Sup Forums
Parker Edwards
have a (you)
Brandon Martinez
>One is not big enough to put itself over things and just talk about them as if spitting truths. It is not the same to say "X is like this and if Y happens, it changes to Z" on the internet (the abstract) as saying "Hey, or X is Y, let's do something about it" to your colleague in real life.
How could anyone not know this? In one sense you aren't making any; in another sense you're stating the obvious. You seem pretty full of yourself m8 -- stuff full of anti-intellectualism and inaction justified by referencing Leibniz. What are you trying to do, debunk the validity of hypothetical thought itself? fak aff.
Mason Gonzalez
Found the jew guys. Thought Franco got rid of them...
Carson Sanders
I"m going to second this. I enjoyed some of them but then I ran into ones where I actually knew the literature of had a background in the context he was talking about.
It instantly spoiled the illusion.
He has never worked in a large corporation or bureaucracy. He would have an entirely different view of why people who work a 9-5 for substandard salary would suck at their jobs.
The idea of "oversight" as an answer to bureaucracy kinda seals the deal that he is completely displaced from the topic. Most bureaucracies have so much oversight that it becomes impossible to obey and enforce all of the rules. This leads to a state where you pick and choose which rules to apply to your subordinates, which forces you into being corrupt because you stop being an impartial arbiter and must make choices on what matters which will quickly lead to not enforcing the rules against the good old boys.
Here you can tell he hasn't even done the research on what he's talking about.
>african tribes which can't tell their left from right
Nah bro, tribal people get heightened senses of direction and but don't track concepts like numbers or time. There are languages where direction is always referenced with each noun. Cooler than that they use absolute direction. So instead of saying "bird" you'd say "bird-south of me" and repeat that for every noun.
>didn't have a word for a color. Orange is named after oranges
nah bro, shoulda used wikipedia.
When he stumbles onto topics of the military you can tell he's never sat next to a grunt.
Asher Mitchell
It's probably someone in uni and for the first time. Only a fanaticism or drive akin to that assfucked to the students in university justifies this grandiose collection of pomp. In fact I bet he's middle or high class, as all uni faggots are.
For someone that talks about saying no to the powers, he seems pretty happy in the position of power, rallying others to his cause.
You're a good goy, a good turkish goy.
I'm trying to raise awareness about the fact that all the beaver collection is just a sperg in the end. You can enjoy a movie and it may be well done or make sense, but never confuse it with reality. I do this because by reading it I feel some may think he's right (and that is probably his intention) when in fact he's mixing things and adding here and there to fit a narrative.
Jonathan Hall
There is nothing wrong with correcting mistakes that's for sure. I am pretty sure that categorically using buzzwords for what seems a good effort to present material relevant to pol instead of all the random bs that gets posted is suspicious though.
Camden Watson
High grounding and rejecting is a leftist tactic though... you did it not me.
Austin Robinson
Critical thought is not a kike tactic. He's the one who's high grounding from the start.
The revolutionaires of today are the civil servants of tomorrow, it's how the system works. They feed them all this bullshit in uni, then they feel self-important and spread the cancer, only to age and occupy the vacancies on the state. I'm sure you watched the Yuri video. It's the same thing.
Dominic Smith
>"Sounds like a university teenager faggot."
>proceeds to spout off like a university teenager faggot
Jaxson Johnson
Look ok sorry for calling you a jew and all, but the American below is right. You sound indignant without actually bothering to provide valid criticism or useful material. Thats why I found you suspect.
Nolan Jenkins
I was at some point in my life so it makes sense. Regardless of how I formulate things, there's further content there. You can say it and understand it as you want. I stand my case that beaverfaggot is a fag.
Cooper Turner
>Critical thought
What is Deconstructionism?
philosophybasics.com
What is Post-Structuralism?
philosophybasics.com
Who are you who chose to not know your own history?
Ryder Flores
>I'm trying to raise awareness
Well you're failing, by being unclear and vague.
Jack Murphy
You appear to be confusing critical thought with critical theory. "Critical theory" is a title given by solipsistic ideologues to their thought-terminating philosophy to make it sound credible. It isn't credible.
Gabriel Nguyen
The best castor post
Ayden Lopez
It would be immensely easier to sift through these with the filenames used to describe them, or posting them with an introduction.
Yesterday's morning redpill thread has all of these Beaver posts with a relevant filename and there was some really good discussion on other topics as well. Check it out!
Luis Thomas
Do you thinks it's a beaver, because of that one meme, from niggermania, comparing that beavers have more advanced housing system than niggers?
Carter Gutierrez
bump for visibility