It is commonly said that Germany started World War 1. How accurate is this?

It is commonly said that Germany started World War 1. How accurate is this?

Attached: this is not okay.jpg (305x270, 17K)

They every right to take down that American shipping ammo to the British. They gave a clear warning too.

it was Serbia that started World War 1

It's also commonly stated that you can get flu virus from low temperatures. stop listening to echo heads

>americans honestly and unironically think both world war 1 and 2 started when america got attacked
>american edgemasters defend foreign militaries killing american civilians to pretend to be redpilled

I look forward to edgy americans defending 9/11 and being islamist-boos in a few decades time

Russian autism, British autistism, french impotent rage.

Attached: 30A2A20B-746B-4DED-9210-02DB138542CB.jpg (1024x640, 113K)

Attached: D936FA83-4CC0-4227-B6CA-E036DA66FE0C.jpg (720x405, 65K)

the second russia declared war the alliance were already set. Although you could make the claim that they didnt really need to attack belguim, but hindsight is 20/20 of course.

Technically it was Austria-Hungary by actually acting on their ultimatum to Serbia, but yes, you're right, the Serbian government probably assassinated the archduke.

no. the germans never do anything wrong. they are good boys and did not do anything.

Wasn't Germany forced to defend Serbia because of a defense pact?

Very. They had a bustling economy with production power and wanted to land grab before smaller states could keep up.

0%
It was Britain

Germany is the most responsible nation for the war, because A.) Germany urging Austria-Hungary to keep pressuring Serbia was a main cause of the war and B.) Germany's invasion of Belgium and preemptive declarations of war made the war go from what could have been a regional conflict to a true world war. However, Sup Forums is infested with autistic prussiaboos who legitimately believe that Germany is incapable of any wrong and constantly cite their " 1/74 Germanic heritage".

Attached: 1521920827721.png (1830x3212, 2.44M)

Everyone is responsible desu

>I look forward to edgy americans defending 9/11 and being islamist-boos in a few decades time

Those are called liberals.

It was Gavrilo Princip, a member of the Serbian Black Hand, that killed the Archduke. He was part of a movement that wanted independence from the Austrian-Hungarian empire and Muslim oppression. Today he is regarded as little more than a terrorist, despite Serbian/Yugoslavian nationalist groups praising him for his devotion to his country. Ultimately, he was a young man who died in prison of skeletal tuberculosis. He lived a harsh life, and was in part responsible for the death and suffering of millions

kek

>It is commonly said that Germany started World War 1. How accurate is this?

Austria Hungary started a war with Serbia then Russia mobilised which forced Germany to launch their war plan.

>it was Serbia that started World War 1

No it wasnt.

You have it backwards. Germany was allied with Austria-Hungary, who went to war against Serbia after the Archduke was assassinated. They were dragged in to assist the Austrian-Hungarians once the British,French, and Russians were dragged in to assist their ally, Serbia.

World War 1 began with the Zionist coup in the US in 1913.

Everything else about the Zionist plan to destroy the bloodline monarchies of Europe and replace them with goverments controlled by finance (i.e., Zionist debt-money) follows from this event.

The Zionists' century of World War is nearly over, with the (((Trump))) administration simply a vehicle for making Zionist and genocidal Jewish supremacist Kushner the President in 2024. Once a Zionist and Israeli sits openly on the world's most powerful throne, in command of mankind's greatest killing machine...the Great Culling of the goyim will begin.

Attached: Jared in love.jpg (800x450, 34K)

>Germany urging Austria-Hungary to keep pressuring Serbia was a main cause of the war
I don't think we ever pressured them, we said we'd back their every action which I'd call encouragement but not pressure.
>Germany's invasion of Belgium and preemptive declarations of war made the war go from what could have been a regional conflict to a true world war.
We told both Russia and France to stay out so the conflict can stay local, they refused.
The Belgian government straight up sacrificed their armies so France and Britain would keep them in power.

Everyone wanted a war.
Nationalism was in the air, the ravages of the napoleonic wars upon europe had been forgotten and all the major empires had built up armies and resources with nothing much better to do than prepare for a massive eventual fight against one another.

I'll be happy to accept that the germans were particularly eager to "prove themselves" having only come onto the scene rather recently as a sovereign nation and empire, but if you consider the convoluted system of alliances which were given as the reason why countries such as the UK or Japan halfway around the world felt they needed to get engaged, you have to admit that everyone was pretty happy to join in and play ball.

Before the war you had an artistic movement called "Futurism" which was all about the glory of industry, speed, technology and warfare, thanks to the war you had a generation of writers all writing about becoming disillusioned with what the hell they were all doing. There's one book (who's name I forget) about a young man who is physically gelded by his war-injury, the irony being that he went to war to become a man, only to end up literally less of a man than he was before and there's a rather famous scene in "All quiet on the western front" where the soldiers ponder what they are fighting for.
"Why are we at war with France?"
"Because France has insulted Germany"
"So, like a mountain in France insulted a mountain in Germany?"
"No, the people of France have insulted the people of Germany"
"I don't feel particularly insulted though".

It's technically correct. Germany declared war first. However, Russia had already ordered its troops to invade Germany before the declaration and did not plan to make a formal declaration. Austria declared war on Serbia before any other formal hostilities. France and Britain had mobilized their armies first. Italy had made a secret agreement to join the war. And Serbia had refused to stop organizing and funding terrorists against Austria.

It was complicated. If you really want to know it in depth, I recommend the War That Had Many Fathers, which is about the lead up to WWII but spends the entire first chapter (~100 pages) about the lead up to WWI starting from around 1890 with some brief discussions of how European politics had got to that state. It was written by a post-WWII West German general.

>Everyone wanted a war
The Zionists are masters of deception and deceit. Their classic manipulation (of all sides) is "Let's you and him fight."

I don't think Serbia was allied with anyone. Russia, citing muh pan-Slavic nationalism, warned Austria that they would intervene if Austria tried to end Serbian terrorism with military force. Russia was part of the Entente alliance.

That was the excuse. If you stop and think about how retarded that is it's obvious that people wanted a war be it Russians, Austrian or Germans (and everyone else secondarily) and getting outraged over Archduke Whogivesafuck being shot seemed a good enough reason.

So you're saying J Rod OG Kush will be the prophetically King of David talked about in the Protocols?

The assassination was just a part of what the Austrians believed was a Serbian state funded terrorism campaign with the aim of uniting the Balkan Slavs under the banner of Serbia, at the expense of Austria and Turkey. The assassination of the future Emperor (who wanted to transform Austro-Hungary into a federal system that would give unprecedented rights to Slavs in the Empire) was seen as the last straw. The Habsburgs appreciated the danger of a succession crisis, plus it was personal.

The Austrian demand to Serbia was primarily the end of all funding of terrorism and the formation of a bi-national special police campaign to find, arrest, and prosecute pan-Slavic terrorists in both their territories. Serbia's refusal was seen as further evidence that Serbia was a willing participant in the campaign of terrorism.

All the other powers were purely interested in war for realpolitik.
>TMYK

In essence, pretty close.

Kushner is a Lubavitcher, the violent Jewish supremacist cult (note Trump's first pardon was of the Lubavitcher rabbi that was part of the gang that raped and eviscerated the US town of Postville, Iowa). Kushner's family funded the illegal settlers who wrote "The King's Torah," which stated God says it's legal (Jewish for "holy") for Jews to murder non-Jewish babies if a Jew believed those babies might grow up to harm Jews.

The Lubavitchers believe that if they can bring about the "apocalypse" then God will give all the Earth to the Jews, to rule as neo-pharaohs forever.

That's the person who will be in charge of the entire US military arsenal.

The Rothschilds, Netanyahu, Soros, the Russian oligarchs (who are also Lubavitchers, that's the Trump-Russia connection) are all united behind Kushner.

Read the 4plebs archived threads for greater detail. Kushner must be stopped.

Attached: jta.jpg (909x930, 70K)

It's a lie written down in the treaty of versailles

When the police kill someone they always make up a reason to justify the murder.

Where have you heard this? Every teacher I've had that taught WW1 tried to implant in our skulls that Germany didn't start WW1

It's mostly to stop any legitimacy of Germany being innocent. It is to try and quell what really caused the Nazis to emerge. They are trying to rewrite prior events to shift the narrative.

This is pol, make up your own narrative you are already delusional as is.

Because if the patsy isn't guilty...then someone else must be.

Can't allow the lower classes to even have the thought that "history" might not be "true."

Jews did and only jews.

>I recommend the War That Had Many Fathers
Thanks, and czech'ed.

It was the serbs with the help of the jews

It's more complicated than what people think so normies just blame germany so they can make Germans look ultra bad for starting both world wars.
You had Austria hungry fucking around in Serbia with pan slavism going on with Russia supporting panslavism.
Germany couldn't keep up with Bismarck's alliances and let Russian alliance slip and let Russia become allied with France, surrounding them so they tried to maintain their only alliance with Austria by supporting them blindly so the balance of power in Europe could be maintained.
Germany did fuck up though. They fucked up by writing the blank check to Austria after the assination and then the major officials left Berlin so they couldn't be contacted. Assumed England would honnor their treaty with Belgium if Belgium was invaded because they only wanted to pass through to attack France and not harm Belgium. And they thought everything would be on a perfect time table to defeat France before Russia made it to the front lines on the east.