is monarchy the only non-degenerate form of government?
Is monarchy the only non-degenerate form of government?
you say that while showing the picture of rulers who killed millions of their citizens. Could have at least showed a picture of a good ruler, like Saint Louis IX
>What is Plutocracy
they're all inbreds so no, alberto
/thread
monarchy's no longer exist because they were degenerate. just look at the remaining monarchy's and tell me that they aren't degenerate....ie...KSA
elective is the only nondegenerate form of monarchy
also >that spanish faggot alfonso
Yes for Eastern, not for Western
right st. loooeeee. his people were starving while he was getting his ass handed to him while on crusade
why are you upset? People were starving beforehim, and after him. He was nonetheless a great king who cared for justice, catholicism, his people.
Yes
>wanting to live under a king
only cucks want to live under a monarchy
>What are the constitutional monarchies in Europe
Unless you just mean straight up absolute monarchies. Othwrwise, you're wrong and should have specified.
No. AI is.
>t. Ping Pong Ding-a-Ling
if it's a constitutional monarchy, yes. if it's an absolute one, no
This assH* is not a good exaple...
The people is not ready to give up his illusory right that is the right to vote.
Try again.
Monarchy.
Not degenerate
Choose one
Depends on how you define degeneracy. Often kings and nobility tend to be extremely decadent so I question your assertion.
>Literal mammonism
try reading history
there's thousands of years of rule under monarchy for you to peruse
i think you'll find several flaws
>mammonism
Why do you assume that I would chase the money and power? Agrarianism is where the fun is at, no need for tickbox constant self improvement culture.