Lol

Lol

Attached: 1521167153138m.jpg (1024x955, 240K)

Could someone post the original please?

So blacks can't stop committing crimes?

Instead of "don't commit crimes" it says "trust us". That's the only difference.

In all seriousness though, slave owners should have paid reparations, and I would be in favor of descendants of slave owning families paying reparations. (Not whites in general. Not the US government.)

That would be anti semitic though.

>

I'm sure that's not the real original version but the JIDF version.

...

>anderson cooper and the rest of the vanderbilt clan
>paula deen
>bush dynasty
>john mccain
>apparently even some of obama's ancestors

Bad goyim! We are not liable for the crimes of my... our ancestors!

Attached: Angry merchant.jpg (297x365, 33K)

We are. They call it gibs

Ah, Barry Deutsch. His work appears on Everyday Feminism. Typical leftist cartoonist. No artistic or comedic talents, extremist, fat, and unsightly.

Oh, and Jewish.

They were literally forced to give their estates to freed niggers, you dumb nigger.

Who was?

What about reparations to the slave owners that eventually had to give up their slaves? those people arnt cheap, damnit!

Attached: mfwniggers.jpg (532x399, 56K)

Everyone in Sherman's path got their land raped and then given to freed blacks. Most of it was given back to the rightful owners during Reconstruction, but not all. Moreover, the conditions of post bellum south meant estate holders had to rent out their land to freed blacks on a semi-permanant basis.

Blacks got their reperations just fine

>being given property and then having it seized is a reparation
>being permitted to lease someone's property is a reparation
ok user

Infinitely more charitable than nogs deserved

Where are my reparations having Scottish lineage from the English? Or reparations for my Welsh side? My people were raped and marauded and oppressed and broken. Do I get gibs?

I'm not necessarily opposed to reparations by slaveholders if we’re doing it in 1866 and to the people who actually owned some. Reparations per se after they’re dead, no sir.
I think you can also seriously consider the tax burden to pay for the various programs of Reconstruction a form of reparations.
Unless I’m very much mistaken, not a single person was ever charged or re-enslaved as a result of that “loophole.” People would be imprisoned, sometimes wrongfully, but that ain’t slavery and they’d get out anyway...

If you can establish the evidence and convince a judge, sure.

No, slave owners should have been given reparations by the federal government because effectively they suddenly had very expensive property seized for no recompense. Also, good luck actually quantifying what reparations should consist of and having nogs be satisfied with it. If you give every nigger in the US $1,000 they'll say it should be $5,000 and if you give $5,000 they'll say it should be $10,000.

Someone post the gibs me dat version

If you buy property that you don't actually have a right to own (e.g. stolen property), tough shit for you. If you buy land that someone else has title to, and you don't buy title insurance, tough shit for you.

It's true, you can't possibly expect niggers to have the self control to not commit crimes.

>that you don't actually have a right to own
By what standard? At the time it was completely legal. The government approved of it, many governments around the world participated in it, and people put money into it. Then the federal government decided it was no longer legal and seized their property with no recompense. How do you think it would go if the government decided all cows were to be freed and would not compensate farmers for their lost property, but would arrest anyone caught trying to herd cattle or keep them as farm animals? Quite badly, I imagine.

This is all covered very well by Rothbard in Ethics of Liberty. I don't need to regurgitate his arguments to you.

the biggest slaver traders were merchants. traders = merchants. oy vey who could've figured this connection out. its an ah-negma.

Attached: vampires_01.jpg (611x404, 57K)

What are your thoughts of Lands in South Africa being siezed black people who had no part in developing those lands and moved there after the fact? Face it they are unable to co exist with us and us with them.

Violation of property rights, obviously. SA is a nonsequitor though.

>Hehe, thought you were gonna get me to explain my rationale for a radical moral statement? Nice try kid, read X book. L8er sk8er

How to red pill the negros on the jewish slave masters

>Violation of property rights
So the real issue is that the american government hasn't paid reparations to slave owners who had their property (subhumans) appropriated from them.

If the property you're buying is prima facie unethical to own then it doesn't matter whether your statist overlord renegs his previously given consent--it's not a taking and the state is an illegitimate institution anyway.

Finally we get to the root of the issue!
There is literally nothing wrong with enslaving human beings.

Attached: STOP.jpg (470x406, 39K)

There is nothing unethical about owning subhumans.

>the "loophole" is that you only get jailed if you commit crimes


Does this guy even read his own writing?

literally "i should be allowed to commit crime" nigger logic

Ok and if true, what is the reason why I couldn't ethically acquire you as a slave?

I don't have subhuman DNA.

But it's not. Slavery as penalty for crimes or being on the wrong side of war is a just punishment.

I know I'm kind of missing the point here, but if this is set right after the passing of the 13th amendment, why are the white people dressed like they're from the early 20th century?

They have been paid their reparations in the form of decades of welfare . We over paid their reparations , now they owe us .

Because the person who drew this has a rather poor grasp of history. He knows the basics but the finer details, like changing fashion trends, largely elude him.

Jews didn't invent slavery you dingus. Your ancestors were slaves of the Swedes, who enslaved each other in turn. The impulse to make slaves of one's enemies is as old as warfare itself.