Author is pedophile and doesn't try to hide it

>author is pedophile and doesn't try to hide it
Sigh, why do they do this?

>girl wears a bathing suit
Oh my god call the police

I never knew that elementary girls cannot wear swim suits. OP is a faggot.

>I'm a pedophile and I try to hide it
-op

what's wrong with being a pedophile?

>Sees a girl in a swimsuit
>immediately thinks of pedophilia
There’s a seat with your name on it OP.

>tummies and armpits are the most sexually attractive parts of little girls
>often not covered by swimsuits or tank tops

UNNFFF

>Sigh

Faggot.

OP's a faggot and secretly in denial. He's just projecting to get attention.

Back to r*ddit with you.

That's an abusive oldhag not a loli. Reported.

He clearly drew her to be coquettish.
Would a non-pedo draw this? No.

Clearly you’re the one with pedophilic thoughts.

Why are you in denial?
All he draws are flirtatious little girls.

is OP retarded?

At my local park parents have there daughters (7-11 year olds) dressed in booty shorts with navel showing.

only a very sick man would think of licking her all over

Where are you getting these pictures? The police will find the images you’ve saved to be very suspicious.

Only a true monster would consider kissing her neck and inner thigh.

>tfw no takagi gf to experience middle school love with

I don't see how the degeneration of your culture means this guy isn't an obvious pedo.

imagine being so fucked up in the head to even think about kissing her armpits and navel tenderly

meant you

>little girl flirts with you in the store

Makes you think.

>not hiding your power level

I agree OP, disgusting.

That big toe looks wrong.

Then he is a terrible pedophile.

So drawing someone in a swimsuit is porn now? When something like THAT makes you think it must clearly be porn, the problem's not with whoever drew it. Your argument's no better than those old creeps that think women should be covered head to toe because it's "too enticing", trying to shift the blame for your erection on something other than your twisted mind.

You remind me of a certain GOP senator: "If everybody thought about gay sex as much as I have they'd know how disgusting it really is". You're a lolicon, and you're trying to make it not-your-fault.

Because they can. Being a lolicon is not a crime.

Also the series is aimed at boys Nishikata's age who are sexually attracted to girls like Takagi. She can't be sexless for it to be effective.

And as far as swimsuits go, two-piece suits for smaller children that can't clothe themselves properly yet is a fucking godsend. Probably quarters the time it takes to get them changed. The kids like it too - it's just like mommy and the big girls wear.

And kids *will* show off and ask if they're cute. There's nothing sexual about it, they just like being praised, and very few humans are so utterly retarded as to not notice the value of being visually attractive.

Takagi-san is a teenager, and she's moved on from wanting her parents to tell her she looks adorable to wanting the male she wants to spend her life with to tell her he finds her attractive. She's not stupid, she's got millions of years of evolution behind her. It's normal, and pretending it isn't is just fucked up in the head.

Target audience is a damn good point.
When I was 12, you know what 14 year old girls in bikinis were?
*HOT OLDER WOMEN*

>blah blah blah
He's clearly a pedo, he literally only draws little girls half of which have bedroom eyes.

>sigh
you need to go back

So what you're saying is little girls can consent?

why dont you relax close your eyes and tell me about your relationship with your mother

And OP once again single-handily proving why everyone thinks he's a pedophile.

It's not about the swimsuit, it's about the sexualization.

>doesn't try to hide it
how is that a bad thing to begin with?

You blind? I bet you deny Yoshikazu Hamada and Yoshikazu Hamada are pedos as well.

>this thread

what are we doing here, what are we trying to accmplish by pretending the author that draws didn't intent to titillate with I could understand if this was some social media site where you are trying to save face but we are in Sup Forums

If this is sexual to you, maybe you are the pedo.

>He hasn’t come to terms with his pedophilia yet
Children are sexy, get over it.

I require more evidence to, ehm... prosecute the sick bastard that drew those outrageous pictures OP.

Right, this is Sup Forums. Here lolicon doesn't equal pedo. Now get out of here, pedo.

It's clearly intended be somewhat sexual.
Just look at his art user.

Nobody's saying it's not meant to be sexy. Trying to determine a person's sexuality by what they draw is retarded, is the thing. That's like saying you like cocks if you draw a picture of a good-looking man, or that you're into gender-bending if you draw what you think a male character would look like if they were female.

>attracted to little girls
>b-but I'm not a pedo

I see what you're doing OP and I appreciate it. the author of Takagi-san is an idol to us all. look at this unoppressed lolicon in his new manga. the girl on the right is hardly wearing anything at all.

Is this translated?